Archive for the ‘Erdogan’ Category

Erdogan: The Sultan Of An Illusionary Ottoman Empire – Center for Research on Globalization

This is the fourth and last in a series of articles based in part on eyewitness accounts about the rapidly deteriorating socio-political conditions in Turkey and what the future may hold for the country. The first, second and third articles are available here: First, Second, Third.

In many conversations and encounters I had over the years with former Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, he emphatically echoed his boss President Erdogans grandiose vision that by 2023 (the 100th anniversary of the Turkish Republic), Turkey will become as powerful and influential as the Ottoman Empire was during its heyday. Under the best of circumstances, Turkey cannot realize Erdogans far-fetched dream. Had he stayed the course, however, with his socio-political and judiciary reforms and economic developments, as he had during his first nine years in power, Turkey could have become a major player on the global stage and a regional powerhouse.

Sadly, Erdogan abandoned much of the impressive democratic reforms he championed, and embarked upon a systematic Islamization of the country while dismantling the pillars of democracy. He amassed unprecedented powers and transformed Turkey from a democratic to an autocratic country, ensuring that he has the last word on all matters of state.

In retrospect, it appears that Erdogan had never committed himself to a democratic form of government. The reforms he undertook during his first nine years in power were largely induced by the European Unions requirements from any country seeking membership, which he exploited as a means by which to propel himself toward his ultimate goal. A quote attributed to him in 1999 describes precisely what his real intentions were from the day he rose to power. Democracy he said, is like a bus, when you arrive at your destination, you step off.

His role model is Mustafa Kemal Atatrk (meaning Father of the Turks), who founded the Turkish Republic in 1923. Both share similar personal attributes as they sought to lead the nation with an iron fist while disregarding any separation of power. However, Atatrk was determined to establish a Westernized secular democratic state while Erdogan went in the opposite direction.

Erdogan steadily moved to create a theocracy where Islamic tradition and values reign supreme while assuming Atatrks image, which is revered by most Turks. Erdogan presents himself as one who leads with determination and purpose, generating power from his popular support, ultimately seeking to replace Atatrk; with the new amendments to the constitution, he will be endowed with powers even greater than Atatrk ever held.

With his growing popularity and most impressive economic growth, Erdogan successfully created the status of a strong and resolute leaderthe father of a new Turkish Republicand artfully penetrated the consciousness of the Turkish public while using Islam as the undisputed pathway that will lead Turkey to greatness. He is determined to preside at the 100th anniversary of the Turkish Republic over a powerful nation among the top ten largest global economies and that extends its influence East and West, akin to the prodigious influence that the Ottoman Empire enjoyed.

To realize his grand vision, Erdogan took several measures to consolidate his absolute power.

First, clearing the way: Erdogan embarked on the complete marginalization or elimination of anyone, in and outside the ruling AK Party, that challenged his authority or advanced new ideas for solving the countrys problems. Those who did not support his policies and dared to question his judgment were not spared. He resorted to conspiracy theories, accusing his political opponents of being enemies of the state aiming to topple his government, in order to continue unopposed to realize his vision for the country, analogous to the influence and outreach of the Ottoman Empire. He even fired his long-time friend and confidant Davutoglu because Davutoglu differed from him in connection with the Kurdish problem, and especially because of Davutoglus reluctance to support the constitutional amendments that will grant the president sweeping and unprecedented powers.

Second, the need for a culprit: Erdogan needed a scapegoat to blame for any of his shortcomings, and found the Gulen movement to be the perfect culprit that would provide him with the cover to overshadow the massive corruption that has swept his government. This also provided him with the justification to crack down on many social, political, and institutional entities, silencing the media, controlling the judiciary, and subordinating the military.

The aftermath of the attempted military coup in July 2016 gave him the ammunition to conduct a society-wide witch-hunt, providing him with the excuse to purge tens of thousands of people from academia, civil society, judiciary, military, and internal security. This has allowed him to assume total control of all departments in the government and private sector. He described his purge as a necessary evil to cleanse the public of the cancer that has gripped the country. In so doing, he ensured that the political system revolves around the presidency, leaving him completely unchallenged to pursue his imperial dream to resurrect the stature of the Ottoman Empire as the country prepares to vote in the constitutional referendum onApril 16.

Third, the creation of Ottoman symbolism: To project his grandiose vision, Erdogan needed to instill Ottoman images into the public consciousness, including the building of a 1,100-room White Palace as his residence at a prohibitive cost to taxpayers. His most recent project was the amlica Mosque, the now-largest mosque in Istanbul, standing on the eponymous hill that overlooks the entire city.

Recently, Erdogan started the construction of another mosque in Taksim Squareonce the site of the fiercest protests against Erdogan in his careerwith all the style of the Ottoman era. Erdogan has even instructed that the national anthem be played on modified drums and brass instruments to make the music sound as if it were being played by bands of the Ottoman period. His purpose is to indoctrinate the public in a subliminal way to his perspective of the glorious Ottoman period.

Fourth, foreign policy assertiveness: Under Erdogan, Turkey has become increasingly assertive and forceful in the region. In Cyprus, he is determined to strike a deal largely on his terms. In Iraq, he placed Turkish troops over the objections of the Iraqi government to maintain his ruthless war against the Kurds. In Syria, he allowed thousands of foreign fighters, including many who have joined ISIS, to cross the border to strengthen the anti-Assad fight, while fighting the Syrian Kurds to prevent them from establishing their own autonomous rule, fearing that the Turkish Kurds would also demand autonomous rule of their own.

Erdogan further promoted the policy of zero problem with neighbors, and although presently Turkey has problems with just about every neighbor (and its prospective EU membership has completely diminished), he continues to claim that Turkey enjoys good relations internationally. Erdogan still uses Turkeys membership in NATO as a sign of greatness; the fact that Turkey has the second-largest number of ground troops in NATO reinforces his illusion that Ankara enjoys unrivaled military prowess in the region and commands the respect and attention of the international community that the Ottoman Empire was accorded.

Fifth, promoting Islam as a powerful tool: Erdogan is also using Sunni Islam to promote the country as a republic with Islamic ideals supported by a loyal state apparatus. He portrays himself as the leader of the Sunni world that would restore the Ottoman era of influence while cementing his authoritarian rule in the form of a neo-Sultan. To be sure, Erdogan is vigorously promoting with the support of his party Islamic nationalism systematically and meticulously. Mustafa Akyol, a Turkish analyst of politics and culture and author of the new book The Islamic Jesus says that political propaganda is in your face every day, every single moment. If you turn on TV, if you open newspapers

Former Prime Minister Davutoglu said in 2015 that Turkey will re-found the Ottoman state. Although Davutoglu was fired, helike most Turkish officialsdepicts the government as the rightful heir of the Ottoman legacy. To that end, Erdogan uses Islam as the unifying theme that would propel Turkey to the greatness that the Ottoman Empire enjoyed. In fact, Turkish religious leaders have always thought of themselves as the standard-bearer of Islamic civilization, and though this failed with the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, to them it must now be corrected. As they would have it, Turks once again should lead the ummah [Islamic community] as the new Ottomans.

Sadly, Erdogan, who is still seen as a hero by nearly half of the Turkish population, is leading the country on a treacherous path. Turkey and its people have the resources, creativity, and institutions to make Turkey a significant power. Erdogan, who demonstrated an uncanny ability to harness his countrys natural and human resources, could have made Turkey such a power on the global stage. Indeed, he would have been the Atatrk of the new era had he simply continued with his historic reforms while protecting the rights of every individual and creating a real model of Islamic democracy.

The collapse of the Ottoman Empire was largely precipitated, among other things, by its internal political decadence, the arbitrary exercising of power, and gross violations of human rights that dramatically eroded the foundation on which the empire was built.

In whichever form Erdogan wants to resurrect the Ottoman Empire, he will fail because no country can survive, let alone become great, as long as the government walks on the backs of the people and stifles their freedom to act, speak, and dream.

There is where the greatness of any nation rests and enduresthe Ottoman Empire never provided a model worthy of such emulation.

More:
Erdogan: The Sultan Of An Illusionary Ottoman Empire - Center for Research on Globalization

Mr. Erdogan’s Jaw-Dropping Hypocrisy – New York Times


New York Times
Mr. Erdogan's Jaw-Dropping Hypocrisy
New York Times
Turkey's president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has gall. He has jailed tens of thousands of people, shuttered more than 150 media companies and called a referendum in April to enlarge his powers. Yet when local authorities in Germany, for security reasons, ...
From reformer to tyrant: The strategy behind Erdogan's 'Nazi' accusationsDeutsche Welle
Erdogan spokesman agrees there are deep-seated differences between Germany and TurkeyThe Star Online
Merkel to Erdogan: Nazi Comparisons Must StopHaaretz
Al-Monitor -Express.co.uk
all 262 news articles »

Read the original here:
Mr. Erdogan's Jaw-Dropping Hypocrisy - New York Times

Geert Wilders labels Turkey’s President Erdogan a ‘dictator’ as he steps back in front of the cameras – The Independent

Geert Wildershas appearedback in front of the camerasas he tries to regain lost ground just a week before the Netherlands heads to the polls.

During a protest outside the Turkish Embassy, he branded Turkish President RecepTayyip Erdogan an "Islamist" and a "dictator".

A few dozen protestors turned out on a rainy day in the Hague to support Wilders. The leader of the Freedom Party (PVV) unfurled a banner saying Stay away. This is our country in Turkish and Dutch.

Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs Mevlut Cavusoglu was planning to campaign in the Netherlands to encourage Dutch-Turkish dual nationals to vote in an April referendum to expand MrErdogan's powers.

Wilders seized on the opportunity after his lead in the polls, which he has held for months, evaporated.

In the name of freedom, we need to say: Stay away, you are not welcome, this is our country, the far-right leader told journalists. Lobbying for a dictator is not allowed on Dutch soil. We wouldnt allow it either for ministers from North Korea or Saudi Arabia and also not for that other dictatorial regime Turkey".

The appearance comes after a surprise visit to the town of Volendam on Friday. After initially suspending his campaign over a security scare, Wilders declared late last week that he would go out and meet supporters again.

Yet he is still abstaining from almost all political debates and in-depth interviews with the Dutch press. Last Sunday, eight Dutch party leaders debated with each other live on television. Wilders was absent.

Following the debate, Prime Minster Mark Ruttes Liberal VVD party managed to surpass Wilders in the polls. Peilingwijzers poll of polls now predicts VVD will win 16.4 per centof the vote, with Wilders' partyset to win 14.6 per cent.

The conservative Christian Democrats (CDA) are also winning over PVV voters after the party tacked to the right. Leader Sybrand Buma announced over the weekend that he wants pupils to learn the national anthem the Wilhelmus at school and that they should stand up while singing it. The CDA is now predicted to capture 12.1 per cent of votes.

Hanne van Zon, a retired IT worker, was one of the few supporters to brave the rain. The 69-year-old carried an umbrella covered in a Dutch flag and came out to support Wilders because she is worried about Islam. I hope people who all agree on Facebook actually get off their sofa and vote on 15 March that will definitely give him a lot of extra votes, she said.

Ms Van Zon isnt sure she believes Wilders is losing voters saying she was sceptical of the news media. If I see he is falling in the polls, I think, is that really true?

Yet it was the media that turned this small protest into a campaign event. Reporters outnumbered the few dozen Wilders supporters, several of whom belong to the extreme anti-Islam Pegida movement.

The PPVs one page party platform calls for the closing of all mosques and the banning of the Quran.

With only one week to go until voters head to the polls, the field remains extremely divided. There are 28 parties running and 11 parties are set to capture at least fourseats in the 150-seat parliament. Almost all political parties have excluded the possibility of ruling with Wilders PVV. That will make forming a governing coalition tricky.

The Dutch election is seen as a bellwether for elections in France and Germany later his year. Both countries also have populist anti-immigration politicians who are looking to shake up European politics.

See original here:
Geert Wilders labels Turkey's President Erdogan a 'dictator' as he steps back in front of the cameras - The Independent

As Erdogan consolidates power in Turkey, the Kurdish opposition … – Los Angeles Times

She is facing a potential sentence of 83 years in prison. The crime, some would say, is belonging to the political opposition that is under siege by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Figen Yuksekdag, co-chair of the countrys leading pro-Kurdish political party, is among the most prominent targets of a massive legal assault on Turkeys Kurdish opposition in the run-up to a vote on a constitutional amendment that could grant Erdogan sweeping powers.

The government has already stripped her of her seat in parliament for allegedly supporting the outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). She stands accused in scores of other terrorism-related cases as does her co-leader of the Peoples Democratic Party (HDP), Selahattin Demirtas, who has been sentenced to five months in prison for insulting the Turkish nation.

Among Yuksekdags alleged crimes: delivering a speech in 2015 that lent support to Kurdish militias battling Islamic State in Syria, and attending the funeral of a suspected leftist militant in 2012.

Using emergency powers in place since last July, Turkey has jailed 13 HDP lawmakers and more than 5,000 of the partys workers over alleged terror links. In the Kurdish southeast, where the HDP enjoys an electoral majority, more than 80 locally elected district governments have been replaced by federally appointed caretakers, their former heads imprisoned.

In addition, dozens of news outlets have been shuttered, scores of journalists arrested, and art exhibits and cultural festivals have been banned for allegedly supporting the PKK.

The crackdown has gutted what was once touted as a political bloc that could help end the PKKs four-decades-long insurgency, which has claimed 40,000 lives.

The government is totally turning everything upside down, said Ahmet Yildiz, an author of several books on Turkeys Kurdish political movement and a researcher at the Istanbul-based Al Sharq Forum. Some [of those accused] have affiliations with the PKK, but not all of them . It all depends on how you define terror, and the government is using a political definition of terror.

Up to 20% of Turkey is ethnically Kurdish, but the minority has long been subject to restrictions on cultural expression, stoking tensions that gave birth to a leftist separatist insurgency by the PKK in 1984, led by the now imprisoned leader Abdullah Ocalan.

Erdogan's government enacted significant reforms, and the PKK agreed to a cease-fire in 2013. But the truce unraveled in 2015 after Turkey refused to militarily intervene in Syria on behalf of Kurdish militias who saw Ocalan as a figurehead and sought to carve out a separate state.

Erdogan views the Kurdish militias in Syria to be extensions of the PKK, which both Turkey and the United States consider a terrorist organization. In her 2015 speech, Yuksekdag said that while the government believed her party was leaning on a terrorist organization, she saw no harm in supporting the militias, which have been the most effective foes of Islamic State in Syria.

She has defended her attendance at the 2012 funeral as an attempt to acknowledge the grief of mothers in her constituency. Her supporters have pointed to a 2009 speech in which Erdogan ignited hope of a political solution to the PKK insurgency by speaking of the pain of mothers who lose their children. Mothers have no ideology. Mothers have no politics, they are not rightists or leftists, he said.

At the time he made those remarks, Erdogan had enlisted Kurdish opposition figures as mediators with the PKK's head, Ocalan.

One such mediator was Ahmet Turk, a veteran Kurdish politician currently with the Democratic Regions Party who has lived through nearly three decades of what amounts to a revolving door between parliament and prison. He now doubts Erdogan ever sincerely wanted peace.

Not Erdogan, not any of the governments internalized the Kurds identity problems, or their requests for education in their mother tongue, said Turk, currently deposed from his job as mayor of Mardin and facing terror charges for alleged involvement in a regional Kurdish confederation inspired by Ocalan.

The accusations, Turk said, are aimed at trying to make the Kurdish political movement fail. They are political decisions . The government is nitpicking, they have no solid evidence.

The case against Turk is centered on wiretapped phone recordings and a secret witness, the same kind of evidence used against Kurdish leaders under previous military-dominated governments that have banned five pro-Kurdish parties in the nations history over alleged ties to terrorism.

Even Kurds who have usually been allies of Erdogans Islamist movement find themselves in the snare.

One of Erdogans most regularly touted political achievements is the lifting of a ban on women wearing headscarves. Huda Kaya, an HDP lawmaker who once faced the death penalty for protesting the ban, now finds herself being accused of terrorism for a speech that sought to bring attention to alleged abuses by the military in the southeastern district of Diyarbakir.

When reports emerged of civilians dying as a result of a months-long curfew imposed as the military battled PKK militants, Kaya traveled to the area and gave a speech saying, We are witnesses to the massacres here. We know very well who killed whom.

Prosecutors are seeking to jail Kaya for up to 25 years for the statement, which they say glamorized the PKKs narrative.

There were dead bodies in the streets, left alone to rot because of a curfew, Kaya said. Neither in humanity nor in Islam is there any place for that kind of barbarity. I only went there to call for peace, and now I face accusations of being a terrorist.

Farooq is a special correspondent.

ALSO

Turkeys bleak media scene: Arrests, closures and closed trials

Fearful immigrants in U.S. make perilous winter crossing to seek protection in Canada

See original here:
As Erdogan consolidates power in Turkey, the Kurdish opposition ... - Los Angeles Times

Netanyahu, Erdogan, And German Foreign Minister Gabriel In Moscow For Talks – RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty

Russia will be a center for diplomacy on March 9, hosting the leaders of Israel and Turkey as well as Germany's foreign minister.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said he intends to use his visit with Russian President Vladimir Putin to "express Israel's strong opposition to the presence of Iranian forces, and those of its proxies" on Israel's northern border with Lebanon and Syria.

"This is a very important meeting for the security of Israel," it said. Victory over the terrorism of Daesh cannot lead to an upsurge in terrorism by Iran and its proxies," it said, using another name for the extremist group Islamic State (IS). "We will not exchange terrorism for terrorism."

Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov is expected to meet with his German counterpart, Sigmar Gabriel, to discuss issues including the conflict in Ukraine. Gabriel and Putin might also meet later in the day.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is also expected to arrive in Moscow on March 9 but will not meet with Putin until March 10, the Kremlin said.

They are expected to discuss the conflict in Syria, as well as the construction of the Turkish Stream gas pipeline and the Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant, it said.

Originally posted here:
Netanyahu, Erdogan, And German Foreign Minister Gabriel In Moscow For Talks - RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty