Mediaboss Marketing

Levent Kenez/Stockholm

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has assumed the authority to declare a mobilization and a state of war. The authority to declare a mobilization previously belonged to the Cabinet, while the decision to declare war was made by the parliament.

Turkey introduced an executive presidential system in 2018giving Erdogan sweeping powers and preventing parliament from conducting its oversight of the executive branch.

According to the new regulation published in the Official Gazetteunder President Erdogans signature, the Mobilization and State of War Regulation has replaced the former Mobilization and State of War Decree, effectively ending the practicesin placesince 1990. With the new regulation in effect, several older regulations havebeen annulled, including the 1980 Turkish Armed Forces logistical mobilization preparedness regulation, the 1991 Turkish Armed Forces personnel mobilization regulation and the 2010 Reserve Personnel deferment regulation. References to the repealed decree in existing legislation will now point to the new regulation.

The 52-page document defines the regulations purpose as enabling the swift and effective transition of all state power and resources from a state of peace to a state of mobilization or war.

Mobilization isdefined as the preparation, assembly, arrangement and utilization of all state power and resources, especially military power, to meet wartime needs. This process allows for the partial or complete restriction of citizens rights and freedoms by law. The Ministry of Defense describes mobilization as the state during which the country and the nation prepare for war.

Partial mobilization pertains to one or more regions of the country, requiring only a portion of the states power and resources. The new regulation underscores the presidents pivotal role in these preparations and activities during mobilization.

Some legal expertsnote that this change is a routine adjustment necessitated by Turkeys transition to a presidential system of governance following a 2017 referendum, which transferred powers previously held by the Cabinetto the president.

Former Turkish Navy commander Mehmet Dagc voiced his criticism of the recent change during an interview on X, where he emphasized that the shift of authority to declare a mobilization from the Cabinetto the presidency is concerning as it centralizes power in a single individual. Dac expressed his apprehensions, suggesting that the underlying motive behind the regulation appears to be safeguarding the regime against internal unrest and potentialuprisingsrather than primarily addressing external threats.

Meanwhile, legal expert Hatice Yldz expressed concerns that the new regulation could restrict certain fundamental rights and freedoms, noting the ambiguous language used. According to the regulation, even our private cars could be confiscated under the pretext of mobilizationwithin six hours, she said.

Yldz also highlighted another critical aspect of the regulation, that mobilization can now be declared not only against external enemies but alsoin response to internal uprisings or insurrections. Its not just about a state of war with an external enemy; it also includes the potential for internal uprisings or insurrections, she said. For instance, if this authority had existed during the Gezi Park protests in 2013, a mobilization decision could have been ordered. The president could claim, I see an uprising in the country, and I am making this decision. So who decides what constitutes an uprising or insurrection? It will be Erdogan himself.

Text of the new Mobilization and State of War Regulation:

The most striking provision in the new regulation is that individuals dismissed from state institutions through emergency decrees canbe called up as reserve personnel during periods of mobilization. Notably, following a controversial coup attempt on July 15, 2016, tens of thousands of people, primarily from the military and other state institutions, were expelled without court rulings on charges of membership in a terrorist organization. Ironically, these individuals may now be assigned duties during critical periods when reliable and trustworthy personnel are needed most.

Ruling party spokesperson mer elik said at a press conference on Wednesday, In light of changing war conditions and developments, it is necessary to update old decrees. elik explained that the former regulation, whichwas first draftedin the 1990s, has undergone six or seven changes. Since 2011, input has been gathered from all institutions. It was supposed tobe reviewed earlier, but the earthquake agenda took precedence. We decided what coordination for national security entails, and the regulation was published, he said.

Original post:
Erdogan grants himself the authority to declare war - Nordic Research and Monitoring Network

Turkeys President Recep Tayyip Erdogan speaks during a press conference with Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis (not seen) at the Presidential Palace in Ankara, on May 13. [Umit Bektas/Reuters]

Press conferences convened by heads of government, are usually carefully planned and choreographed occasions. Typically, prior to taking the podium, each leaders staff usually finesse their agreed-upon statements and decide whether to field questions from the gathered press pool. In a perfect world, this should not be a forum where surprises are sprung upon one leader by the other.

This was not the case at a meeting between Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on May 13. It is a well-established fact that Turkey and Greece disagree on many foreign policy issues, ranging from maritime border and airspace disputes, all the way to how to settle the Cyprus dispute. While these issues are difficult to resolve, summits between Greek and Turkish leaders have not been occasions where these differences act out. Leaders are usually cordial and respectful towards the other. A new issue where Turkey and Greece (and most of the Western Hemisphere for that matter!) hold opposing views is the Gaza war. While Greece supports Israels right to defend itself against Hamas an EU and US designated terrorist organization, responsible for the murder of over 1,200 Israeli civilians on October 7, 2023, Turkey sees things differently. Erdogan refers to the group as a group of mujahadeen resistance fighters, struggling to end Israels oppression of Palestinians.

While the two Aegean countries are unlikely to change their views on Hamas, admonishing a countrys leader for their countrys position, at a publicly televised press conference, is a gross violation of diplomatic protocol and tradition. Yet, this is exactly what Erdogan did. In addition to reiterating his support of Hamas, Erdogan lectured Mitsotakis, remarking that if one calls Hamas, [which] has lost 40,000 of its people, a terrorist organization, this would be a heartless approach. While this was certainly a shocking rebuke of his counterpart, Erdogans second outburst at the joint press conference shocked audiences. The Turkish leader openly admitted that more than 1,000 members of Hamas are under treatment in hospitals across Turkey. Mitsotakis managed to maintain a stoic disposition, simply stating, Lets agree to disagree. Meanwhile, reporters were busy soaking up the news that the president of a NATO country admitted on live television that it was providing medical care to Hamas fighters. The question that still lacks an answer is glaringly obvious: Given that Gaza is under the control of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), how did 1,000 terrorists manage to get medevacked to Turkey? Before this could be investigated further, an alleged Turkish official, told Reuters, on the condition of anonymity, that Erdogan misspoke, and it was not Hamas fighters who were receiving medical treatment, but Palestinians from Hamas-run Gaza. The official may be telling the truth, as Turkey and Egypt have been permitted to evacuate gravely ill and injured Gazans to hospitals in their countries. But then again, they may not, and Erdogan did not misspeak. Ankara has not issued any official correction of his remarks. In the event that the presidents remarks needed to be corrected, a press official would be quick to engage in a what he really meant to say type of clean-up effort, rather than rely on an anonymous official to contain the spread of a bombshell admission. More importantly, the officials comment to Reuters is not a correction. For one thing, its not an official statement. Furthermore, we have no way of knowing if the official is a government representative, authorized to speak on behalf of Erdogan, or whether the 1,000 people evacuated from Gaza to Turkey are actually civilians and not Hamas. Bottom line: If Erdogan wanted to be crystal-clear on the issue of whether his country is aiding and abetting members of a terrorist organization, he could unequivocally do so. The fact that he has not is suspicious.

Unless of course, it is in keeping with Turkeys wider ambition to be Hamas main patron on the world stage. Erdogan has not shied away from championing Hamas since the October 7 attacks. Since then, Turkey has steadily increased its hostile stance towards Israel, calling the war a genocide against Palestinians; an act, which, Erdogan stated, Hitler would have been jealous of. On May 2, 2024, Erdogan imposed a complete trade embargo on Israel, breaching numerous existing contractual trade obligations that are likely to be contested in court.

If Recep Tayyip Erdogan wanted to be crystal-clear on the issue of whether his country is aiding and abetting members of a terrorist organization, he could unequivocally do so

Most damning has been Ankaras granting of safe harbor and sanctuary to Hamas and its leadership. Senior leaders like (the late) Saleh al-Arouri and Ismail Haniyeh received Turkish passports, allowing them to travel freely internationally. Turkey is likely the biggest financial hub for the terrorist entity, allowing Hamas donors to use Turkeys financial system to facilitate the transfer of hundreds of millions of dollars to its Gaza base. On May 14, the London-based Times newspaper revealed the story of the IDF finding a document in the Gaza home of Hamza Abu Shanab, the chief of staff to Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza and the mastermind of Hamas October 7 attacks. The document reveals Hamas exploring the possibility of establishing a base in Turkey that could be used to launch terror attacks inside Israel. We do not know if any of these goals were ever realized, but between April 19-20, Erdogan hosted Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh in Istanbul, where among many other topics, they discussed the possibility of relocating Hamas external headquarters from Qatar to Turkey.

Finally, on May 15, Erdogan addressed his parliamentary group, this time going further than before, to accuse Israel having ambitions on taking Turkish territory, and that Hamas [was] the first line of defense against eventual military expansion by Israel into Anatolia. All this should serve as a harbinger of Erdogans real intentions to prioritize the mission of a terrorist entity above those of Turkeys existing obligations towards treaty allies. By refusing to designate Hamas as a terrorist entity, and instead nurture it, Erdogan undermines the security interests of NATO, the EU and the United States. It also makes it clear to them that Turkey does not share their values and threat perceptions. Just prior to October 7, Erdogan was exploring ways to normalize ties with Israel, even attempting to nail down a possible date that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could visit Ankara. Following the attacks in Israel, it took Erdogan no time to abandon what some already perceived to be an insincere initiative in the first place. Barely weeks had passed following October 7, when Erdogan called Irans president to coordinate peace efforts. By the end of January 2024, both Iran and Turkey were coordinating their condemnation efforts of Jerusalem.

Erdogans Turkey is the country for which the Biden administration and Congress approved the sale of new fighter jets and military equipment a deal thats worth $23 billion. The time for introspection and deliberation about Erdogans intentions has surely passed. What is the virtue and value in continuing to coddle a leader who undermines everything that we and our allies value? What more does Erdogan have to do to demonstrate that he is nurturing a country that is only an ally in name, and a growing adversary with each passing day?

Sinan Ciddi is a non-resident senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), where he contributes to FDDs Turkey Program and Center on Military and Political Power (CMPP). He is also an associate professor of Security Studies at the Command and Staff College-Marine Corps University and Georgetown Universitys School of Foreign Service.

Read the original here:
Erdogans Turkey: Champion of Hamas, and an adversary of the West - Kathimerini English Edition

ISTANBUL (Reuters) -Turkish fiscal policy will not add to inflationary pressure as the country begins to experience some disinflationary relief in the second half of the year, President Tayyip Erdogan said on Saturday.

Addressing the Foreign Economic Relations Board, Erdogan said annual inflation should peak in May before cooling, echoing the forecasts of the central bank and offering his latest endorsement of the economic programme.

"We will enter a disinflationary period in the second half of the year. We will not allow for inflationary pressures through fiscal policy," he said.

The economic programme mainly aims to lower inflation to single digits, Erdogan added. "We are aiming for a sustained drop in inflation, not temporary relief."

Annual consumer price inflation was near 70% in April and is expected to touch about 75% this month. The central bank has aggressively hiked interest rates to 50% since June last year, reversing a years-long easy-money policy under Erdogan.

Continued here:
Turkey's Erdogan says fiscal policy will not stoke inflation - Investing.com

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan renewed his resolve to draft a new constitution for the country, saying the one in force after the military coup of 1980 cannot sustain the new Trkiye.

It's not possible for the current constitution to sustain Trkiye anymore, Erdogan said following a cabinet meeting in Ankara on Monday.

Despite all the amendments introduced to the current constitution, we have not been able to eliminate the spirit of guardianship that the coup plotters have injected into it, he said.

The Turkish democracy should settle old scores with the tradition of coups by adopting a new and civil constitution, he added.

Erdogan also stressed that he does not want a new constitution for himself. Trkiye needs this. This is what our nation needs. Future generations deserve to be governed by a liberal constitution, he said.

After being re-elected to a new and final presidential term in May 2023, Erdogan pledged to introduce a new liberal civil constitution to replace the current one, which according to him, is a product of the (1980) coup.

His insistence raises concerns that the move will help him cement his power indefinitely by allowing him to run for president again in the 2028 elections.

On Tuesday, Erdogan welcomed a Turkish court sentence of ex-leader of the pro-Kurdish Peoples Democratic Party (HDP), Selahattin Demirtas, to 42 years in prison and HDP's former co-chair Figen Yuksekdag to 30 years and three months for their alleged involvement in the Kobani protests in 2014.

The protesters in Trkiyes mainly Kurdish southeast accused the Turkish army of standing by as ISIS militants besieged Kobani in plain view just across the Syrian border in October 2014. The protests led to the deaths of 37 people.

Speaking at the appointment ceremony of judges and public prosecutors, Erdogan said: Ten years after the insurrection attempt, we see that justice has been served, albeit late, and we are pleased with this.

He dismissed the sharp criticism of the judiciary for the overblown rulings in the case and called them politicized.

We know well, especially from our experience, the damage caused by political and ideological polarization in the judicial system. We won't let that happen again, he said.

The Kobani trial involved 24 convicted politicians among 108 defendants, who were sentenced to a combined 407 years and seven months in prison.

Read the original here:
Erdogan: Current Constitution Cannot Sustain the New Trkiye - Asharq Al-awsat - English

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

See the rest here:
No points from Erdogan. Turkey's leader claims Eurovision Song Contest is a threat to family values - Lufkin Daily News