Mediaboss Marketing

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals on Sunday overturned a lower court ruling staying the execution of Daniel Lewis Lee. The execution, scheduled for Monday in Indiana, would be the first federal execution in 17 years.

"The plaintiffs' APA claim lacks any arguable legal basis and is therefore frivolous," the court said in its Sunday ruling.

Lee, 47, is a former white supremacist who in 1996 robbed and murdered a family of three, including their 8-year-old daughter. The family of Lee's victims filed a petition to delay the execution because they wanted to attend, but feared traveling to Indiana during the coronavirus pandemic. A judge on Friday had granted the petition, but Sunday's ruling overturned the stay.

The family said they will appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.

"The federal government has put this family in the untenable position of choosing between their right to witness Danny Lee's execution and their own health and safety," Baker Kurrus, an attorney representing the family, said in a statement.

"Because the government has scheduled the execution in the midst of a raging pandemic, these three women would have to put their lives at risk to travel cross-country at this time," Kurrus added. "They will now appeal the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision to the U.S. Supreme Court in an effort to seek reversal. My clients hope the Supreme Court and the federal government will respect their right to be present at the execution and delay it until travel is safe enough to make that possible."

The Justice Department argued the family's health concerns "do not outweigh the public interest in finally carrying out the lawfully imposed sentence in this case."

However, in a court filing Sunday, Justice Department officials revealed a staff member involved in preparing for the execution at FCI Terre Haute had tested positive for the coronavirus. The department said the staff member left work immediately and is self-isolating.

The DOJ said the positive test would not delay the execution further, claiming that the staff member didn't enter the execution chamber or come into contact with the team sent to the prison to carry out the execution or "with any members of the Crisis Support Team, who are involved in victim witness transportation and logistics."

Earlene Peterson, 81, is the mother of Nancy Mueller and the grandmother Sarah Powell, two of Lee's victims. Peterson, along with her surviving daughter and granddaughter, filed the initial petition to stay Lee's execution. Peterson, a supporter of President Trump, has been a vocal advocate against the execution of her daughter's killer and has even asked Mr. Trump to commute Lee's sentence to life without parole.

"Yes, Daniel Lee damaged my life, but I can't believe taking his life is going to change any of that," Peterson said in avideo statementin September. "I can't see how executing Daniel Lee will honor my daughter in any way. In fact, it kinda, like, dirties her name because she wouldn't want it and I don't want it. That's not the way it should be."

The federal judge who oversaw Lee's trial and the lead prosecutor on the case have both also expressed concern over Lee's sentence. In 2014, they wrote separately to then-Attorney General Eric Holder, pointing out the disparity between Lee's sentence and that of his co-defendant, Chevie Kehoe.

Kehoe was the mastermind behind the crime, and evidence at their joint trial showed he was the one who murdered 8-year-old Sarah Powell after Lee had refused to do so. Kehoe was not sentenced to death, something advocates attribute to Kehoe appearing more "clean-cut" at trial compared to Lee, who lost an eye in a fight and has SS bolts and a triskelion tattooed on his neck.

Attorney General William Barr announced the resumption of federal execution last July, following a 16-year-long hiatus. Three other men besides Lee are scheduled to be executed by lethal injection this summer. Two of those executions are also planned for next week.

According to theDeath Penalty Information Center, there are 62 federal prisoners currently awaiting execution on death row.

See the rest here:
7th Circuit court overturns stay of execution for Daniel Lewis Lee, paving the way for first federal execution in 17 years - CBS News

Flipping Wisconsin back into the blue column in the Electoral College is goal No. 1 for state Democrats in 2020. Wisconsin has already attracted tens of millions of dollars in spending and sits atop Trump and Joe Bidens target lists, with the campaigns and outside groups combining to spend or reserve over $35 million on TV and radio ads there from March through the general election, according to Advertising Analytics.

But state Democrats are also focused on building enough state legislative power to affect redistricting in 2021, with Republicans just three seats away from veto-proof majorities in both chambers.

Recent public polling in the state from both the Marquette Law School and Siena College/The New York Times showed Biden with a 9- to 11-point lead over Trump.

I think we have an outstanding chance and Im convinced that Joe Biden will win. But we just cannot let down our guard, Evers said. We have good momentum in the state, he said, citing his own election in 2018 and Democrats blowout win in a 2020 state Supreme Court election.

Party officials said that Wisconsin Democrats have about $12 million in cash on hand between their state and federal accounts.

Wisconsin Republicans control both the state Senate and state Assembly, and Democrats are campaigning in the 2020 state elections to Save the Veto for Evers after repeated and bitter clashes over the last few years. The Democratic governor and the Republican statehouse have butted heads on everything from holding the states scandal-plagued primary in the midst of a pandemic to the legislatures ability to dismiss Evers cabinet members without his blessing.

The battle for the statehouse is also important for both parties, with the next legislature in charge of drawing the states congressional and legislative lines for the next ten years.

If we lose that three-person margin, theyll draw their maps, likely draw them even worse than they are now, Evers said. One of the first bills I get in the next session will be those new maps, and Ill veto them, and theyll override that veto.

Evers recently rolled out applications for a commission to draw the states maps. Evers is promoting the commissions mandate as being public and nonpartisan, but the legislature is under no obligation to consider the maps that the commission ultimately draws.

Wisconsin is a top target for both parties in the redistricting battle, and Wisconsinites are well represented among national Republicans redistricting-focused efforts this cycle. Former House Speaker Paul Ryan is advising the Republican State Leadership Committee, and former Republican National Committee chair and White House chief of staff Reince Priebus is on its board of directors. Former Gov. Scott Walker is helping to lead the National Republican Redistricting Trust.

Democrats have also launched an aggressive campaign focused on the map lines, spearheaded nationally by the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, a group helmed by former Attorney General Eric Holder, and the Democratic Legislative Committee.

Democrats got crushed by Republicans during the post-2010 map-drawing cycle, both in Wisconsin and across the country, after Republicans outmaneuvered and outstrategized Democrats with its REDMAP program, which focused on key state legislative races.

Im a former educator, right? Evers said. You learn from your mistakes, and that was a huge one. We learned from that experience, [and] we also learned how important it is for a party itself to focus its efforts.

See more here:
Wisconsin Democratic Party raises $10M as battle for the state heats up - POLITICO

President Trump on Friday commuted the sentence of Roger J. Stone Jr., a longtime friend and former campaign adviser who had openly expressed loyalty to him throughout a congressional investigation into ties between Mr. Trumps 2016 campaign and Russia.

The simple fact is that if the special counsel had not been pursuing an absolutely baseless investigation, Mr. Stone would not be facing time in prison, the White House said in a statement on Friday evening.

Mr. Stone had been days away from reporting to a federal prison to serve a 40-month sentence for seven felonies, including lying to federal investigators, tampering with a witness and impeding a congressional inquiry. He had aggressively lobbied for clemency, both in the courts and on social media.

The commutation, which was immediately criticized by Democrats, adds Mr. Stone to a list of beneficiaries of Mr. Trumps clemency in cases that resonate with him personally or with people who have a direct line to him through friends or family over thousands of other cases awaiting his review.

According to the Justice Department, Mr. Trump has commuted the sentences of 10 people, not including Mr. Stone, but he has received 7,786 petitions for commutation. This puts him far behind his most recent predecessor, President Barack Obama, who commuted the sentences of 1,715 people, but closer to President George W. Bush, who commuted the sentences of 11 people.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution gives presidents unlimited authority to grant pardons, which excuse or forgive a federal crime. A commutation, by contrast, makes a punishment milder without wiping out the underlying conviction in Mr. Stones case, the White House did not argue that he was innocent. Both are forms of presidential clemency.

Here are some of the pardons and commutations issued by Mr. Trump:

Pardon: Aug. 25, 2017

Joe Arpaio, an anti-immigration crusader who enjoyed calling himself Americas toughest sheriff, was the first pardon of Mr. Trumps presidency.

Once one of the most popular and divisive figures in Arizona, Mr. Arpaio was elected sheriff of Maricopa County five times before he was ultimately charged with criminal contempt for defying a court order to stop detaining people solely on the suspicion that they were undocumented immigrants.

In a move that drew outrage from Democrats and immigration advocates, Mr. Trump, who has staked much of his political capital around zero-tolerance immigration policies, pardoned Mr. Arpaio less than a month after he was found guilty.

Pardon: May 15, 2019

Conrad M. Black, a former press baron and friend of Mr. Trumps, was granted a full pardon 12 years after his sentencing for fraud and obstruction of justice.

Mr. Black, who once owned The Chicago Sun-Times, The Jerusalem Post and The Daily Telegraph of London, among other newspapers, was convicted of fraud in 2007 with three other former executives of Hollinger International. They had been accused of skimming millions of dollars from the media company.

Mr. Black, who was released from prison in 2012, is the author of several pro-Trump opinion articles as well as a flattering book, Donald J. Trump: A President Like No Other.

COMMUTATION: Feb. 18, 2020

Former Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich of Illinois was sentenced in 2011 to 14 years in prison for trying to sell or trade to the highest bidder the Senate seat that Mr. Obama vacated after he was elected president. Mr. Blagojevichs expletive-filled remarks about his role in choosing a new senator Im just not giving it up for nothing were caught on government recordings of his phone calls and became punchlines on late-night television.

Pardon: May 31, 2018

Dinesh DSouza received a presidential pardon after pleading guilty to making illegal campaign contributions in 2014. Mr. DSouza, a filmmaker and author whose subjects often dabble in conspiracy theories, had long blamed his conviction on his political opposition to Mr. Obama.

What happened here is Obama and his team Eric Holder, Preet Bharara in New York these guys decided to make an example of me, and I think that the reason for this was Obamas anger over my movie that I made about him, Mr. DSouza said on Fox and Friends, one of Mr. Trumps favorite shows.

His reasoning seemed to strike a nerve with the president: In issuing his pardon, Mr. Trump said that Mr. DSouza had been treated very unfairly by our government, echoing a claim the commentator has often made himself.

Edward J. DeBartolo Jr., a former owner of the San Francisco 49ers, pleaded guilty in 1998 to concealing an extortion plot. Mr. DeBartolo was prosecuted after he gave Edwin W. Edwards, the influential former governor of Louisiana, $400,000 to secure a riverboat gambling license for his gambling consortium.

The 49ers won five Super Bowl championships in a 14-year span while Mr. DeBartolo was serving as the teams principal owner. Although Mr. DeBartolo avoided prison, he was fined $1 million and was suspended for a year by the N.F.L.

commutation: June 6, 2018

Alice Marie Johnson was serving life in a federal prison for a nonviolent drug conviction before her case was brought to Mr. Trumps attention by the reality television star Kim Kardashian West.

The presidents decision to commute her sentence freed Ms. Johnson, who had been locked up in Alabama since 1996 on charges related to cocaine distribution and money laundering.

Since her release, the Trump campaign has used her as the face of its outreach to Black voters: In February, Ms. Johnson was featured in the campaigns Super Bowl ad, which was viewed by about 102 million people during the game.

Ive been such a source of pride for him, Ms. Johnson said at the time. Who doesnt want to show something theyre proud of during an election year? Thats what all the candidates do. For him to highlight me, it makes me know hes not only proud, hes super proud.

Pardon: May 24, 2018

Jack Johnson, the first Black heavyweight boxing champion, was tarnished by a racially tainted criminal conviction in 1913 for transporting a white woman across state lines. It haunted him even well after his death in 1946.

Politicians and celebrities alike tried for years to secure a pardon, but in the end, Mr. Trump was swayed by a friendly phone call from Rambo.

Sylvester Stallone called me with the story of heavyweight boxing champion Jack Johnson, Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter just weeks before announcing his decision. His trials and tribulations were great, his life complex and controversial. Others have looked at this over the years, most thought it would be done, but yes, I am considering a Full Pardon!

Ten years ago, Bernard B. Kerik, a former New York City police commissioner, was sentenced to four years in prison after pleading guilty to eight felony charges, including tax fraud and lying to White House officials. Around the time of his sentencing, federal prosecutors denounced Mr. Kerik as a corrupt official who sought to trade his authority for lavish benefits.

Mr. Trump said he heard from more than a dozen people about pardoning Mr. Kerik, including Rudolph W. Giuliani, the former New York mayor and Mr. Trumps personal lawyer. Mr. Keriks rise to prominence dates to the 1993 campaign for mayor in New York City, when he served as Mr. Giulianis bodyguard and chauffeur. After the pardon was announced, Mr. Kerik expressed his gratitude to Mr. Trump on Twitter. With the exception of the birth of my children, he wrote, today is one of the greatest days in my life.

Pardon: April 13, 2018

I. Lewis Libby Jr. was Vice President Dick Cheneys top adviser before Mr. Libby was convicted in 2007 of four felony counts, including perjury and obstruction of justice, in connection with the disclosure of the identity of a C.I.A. officer, Valerie Plame.

Mr. Libby had maintained his innocence for years, and his portrayal as a victim of an unfair prosecution ultimately found favor with Mr. Trump.

I dont know Mr. Libby, Mr. Trump said in a statement, but for years I have heard that he has been treated unfairly. Hopefully, this full pardon will help rectify a very sad portion of his life.

Pardon: Nov. 15, 2019

Mr. Trumps decision to clear three members of the armed services who had been accused or convicted of war crimes signaled that the president intended to use his power as the ultimate arbiter of military justice.

He ordered full pardons of Clint Lorance, a former Army lieutenant who was serving a 19-year sentence for the murder of two civilians, and Maj. Mathew L. Golsteyn, an Army Special Forces officer who was facing murder charges for killing an unarmed Afghan he believed was a Taliban bomb maker.

The president also reversed the demotion of Chief Petty Officer Edward Gallagher, a Navy SEAL who had been acquitted of murder charges but convicted of a lesser offense in a high-profile war crimes case.

All three had been championed by prominent conservatives who had portrayed them as war heroes unfairly prosecuted for actions taken in the heat and confusion of battle.

Michael R. Milken was the billionaire junk bond king and a well-known financier on Wall Street in the 1980s. In 1990, he pleaded guilty to securities fraud and conspiracy charges and was sentenced to 10 years in prison, though his sentence was later reduced to two. He also agreed to pay $600 million in fines and penalties. After his release, Mr. Milken created the Milken Institute, a nonpartisan think tank.

Mr. Milken did not have a pardon or commutation application pending at the Justice Departments pardons office, meaning that the president made that decision entirely without official department input. Among those arguing for Mr. Milken to be pardoned were Mr. Giuliani, who as the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York prosecuted Mr. Milken.

Pardon: Feb. 18, 2020

David H. Safavian, the top federal procurement official under President George W. Bush, was sentenced in 2009 to a year in prison for covering up his ties to Jack Abramoff, the disgraced lobbyist whose corruption became a symbol of the excesses of Washington influence peddling. Mr. Safavian was convicted of obstruction of justice and making false statements.

Having served time in prison and completed the process of rejoining society with a felony conviction, Mr. Safavian is uniquely positioned to identify problems with the criminal justice system and work to fix them, the White House said in the statement announcing his pardon.

Pardon: Feb. 18, 2020

Angela Stanton an author, television personality and motivational speaker served six months of home confinement in 2007 for her role in a stolen-vehicle ring. Her book Life of a Real Housewife explores her difficult upbringing and her encounters with reality TV stars.

Before her pardon, she gave interviews in which she declared her support for Mr. Trump. In announcing her pardon, the White House credited her with working tirelessly to improve re-entry outcomes for people returning to their communities upon release from prison.

Go here to see the original:
Trump Adds Roger Stone to His List of Pardons and Commutations - The New York Times

For Theresa Greenfield, the Democratic candidate trying to unseat GOP Sen. Joni Ernst in a state President Trump won by nine points in 2016, the medias focus over the past few months on the countrys violent racial unrest and demands to defund the police is at best a distraction from her down-to-earth Midwest farm kid with farm kid values campaign messaging.

With just four months left before voters go to the polls, the soft-spoken middle-aged mom and former commercial real estate broker has been focused on wooing swing rural and suburban women and older voters, with an emphasis on a traditional Democratic platform of preserving Social Security and other social safety nets. And Greenfield has a powerful personal backstory.

Her husband, Rob, a lineman at the local power company, was killed in a workplace accident years ago, and she depended on Social Security to get by as a single parent before getting a degree and becoming the president of her Des Moines-based real estate firm.

Greenfields campaign has been slowly gaining traction in recent months as President Trumps poll numbers have sputtered in key battleground states, dragging down Ernst and other Republican candidates across the country. In mid-June, a Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll showed Greenfield edging Ernst by three percentage points, within the margin of error but still ahead. In late June, Trump held just a one-point lead in the state over Joe Biden.

To maintain momentum, Greenfield is trying to avoid being defined by the Democratic Partys leftward lurch and its embrace of expansive programs like Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, as well as the Black Lives Matter campaign to defund the police. But carving out a more nuanced position hasnt been easy. Seeing a potential vulnerability, Ernst in early June called on Greenfield to denounce the growing calls to defund or abolish our police officers.

For the first few weeks, Greenfield remained quiet on the police-funding issue. Meanwhile Biden, the Democratic nominee for president, has taken GOP fire for changing his tune on the movement over the last few weeks. At first Biden said he didnt support protesters demands to defund the police but said reforms are needed and backed a plan to condition federal aid to local police departments adhering to certain standards of behavior.

This week, during an interview with the left-wing outlet Now This, Biden said the police are over-militarized and become the enemy when they go into neighborhoods in armored, military-style Humvees. He also clarified in the same interview that he would absolutely be willing to direct police funds elsewhere to mental health care, affordable housing and other Democratic priorities.

Greenfields campaign spokesman on Thursday told RealClearPolitics she doesnt view it as an either/or funding choice.

Instead of defunding the police, Theresa believes we need real reform with more transparency and body cameras, more civilian oversight and Department of Justice reviews, and better racial bias and de-escalation training and standards, along with other long-term investments to address racial disparities in policing, housing, health care and education, Sam Newton, her spokesman, told RealClearPolitics in a statement.

Meanwhile, Ernst has tried to highlight her law-and-order differences with Greenfield by sponsoring a bill to deny federal funds to local leaders who allow autonomous zones such as the one protesters dubbed the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, or CHAZ, in Seattle to operate. Ernsts Ending Taxpayer Funding of Anarchy Act would block federal funds from flowing to anarchist jurisdictions areas which city and local officials allow to operate independently without immediate access to police, fire, or emergency services.

The Seattle mayor said the CHAZ was like a block party, and then weve had shootings there people have been killed and an alleged rape, Ernst told RealClearPolitics in an interview. When local officials arent allowing law enforcement, EMS, and fire services into certain areas of the city, thats an abdication of their constitutional obligations to protect their citizens.

Im pretty fired up about it I think its absolutely ridiculous, she added.

President Trump at his Fourth of July culture war speech at Mount Rushmore and elsewhere has pledged to be a law-and-order president and uphold the nations heritage. The presidents Twitter profile features a photo of him posing with a group of policemen in front of Air Force One.

Vice President Mike Pence continued the theme Thursday by headlining a back the blue campaign rally at a lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police in Philadelphia. Pence argued that Biden would cut funding for police if elected in November. He slammed the Minneapolis City Council for defunding its police department and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio for his cuts to law enforcement.

I want you to hear this directly from me, he said. Under this president, and this administration, were not going to defund the police. Not now, not ever.

The Trump campaign has been running an ad depicting Black Lives Matter protesters as dangerous anarchists, planning to unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities and chaos in our streets. It depicted Joe Biden as kneeling to the left, and predicted he would fail to stand up to the radical leftists fighting to defund and abolish the police.

Democrats and several media outlets have labeled Trumps ads purposefully misleading and say the presidents campaign is distorting Bidens position on cutting police funding. They are pushing back hard because they believe Trumps law-and-order messaging could be very powerful in the months leading up to November, especially among suburban women and independents.

Even though polls show Trump and several GOP Senate incumbents are running behind in key states and races, Democratic strategists are worried that the national defund-the-police movement and the national cancel culture push is an overreach that could hurt them in swing and red-leaning states this fall.

A new Pew Research Center national poll, conducted June 16-22 and released this week, found that 73 percent of respondents thought local police funding should stay about the same or be increased, while 42 percent of African Americans and 21 percent of whites favored cutting it.

Still, the poll uncovered some shifting feelings on police that opinions of law enforcement officials are less favorable today than they were in a similar poll Pew conducted four years ago. Some 58 percent said they believe the police do a good to excellent job of protecting the public from crime, slightly down from the 62 percent who answered that way in Pews 2016 survey. Additionally, two-thirds (66 percent) of those polled rejected the notion of qualified immunity, that individual officers should be shielded from lawsuits unless they commit clear violations of the law.

Greenfield is hardly alone in trying to side-step the defund-the-police movement while advocating more realistic responses to concerns about police brutality and racial inequality. The strong majority opposition to the defunding movement is forcing the two Senate Democrats in the toughest re-election contests to openly denounce it.

I do not support defunding the police, said Sen. Gary Peters, a Michigan Democrat facing off against GOP combat veteran John James, when first asked about his position on the issue in early June. The police departments are out there protecting citizens, and the overwhelming majority of law enforcement and police are protecting citizens.

Sen. Doug Jones, an Alabama Democrat considered the most vulnerable Democrat this cycle, said, I dont think thats a good idea. Defunding and disbanding is not something I would ever, ever support.

With the issue hardly fading away in recent weeks, as Black Lives Matter protests continue coast-to-coast, in early July Peters hosted an online forum on racial justice and was joined by the Michigan NAACP and former U.S. attorney general Eric Holder.Peters said police reform is part of a long list of issues needed to address racial inequalities and incidents of police brutality.

While stopping short of cutting funds to law enforcement, he said more accountability is needed for officers and police departments, including a way to keep track of officers with bad records so they cant simply move and join another department.

Peters also blasted Senate Republicans for failing to get a police reform bill passed in late June, although Peters had joined Senate Democrats in blocking discussion of the measure, sponsored by Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, the only black Republican in the Senate.

John James, a West Point graduate and African American business owner who is challenging Peters, labeled Peters stance a PR stunt.

Gary Peters doesnt speak for black people. We speak for ourselves, the Republican candidate told a Michigan news outlet.

James is attracting national GOP donors, outraising Peters for the fourth straight fundraising quarter while edging closer to him in the polls. A CNBC/Change Research survey, released July 1, found Peters ahead by 7 points, 49 percent to 42 percemt. Its James second attempt to topple a sitting Democratic senator. James fell six points short of defeating Sen. Debbie Stabenow in 2018.

Several other Democratic challengers in close swing-state Senate contests also have rejected the defund-the-police movement while supporting nuanced reforms.

This is not the approach we need, Mark Kelly, a former NASA astronaut challenging GOP Sen. Martha McSally in Arizona, said in mid-June.

We have some deep systemic issues here with racism in the country, and weve got to demand accountability, said Kelly, the son of two police officers. There needs to be a justice system that doesnt discriminate against anyone because of their race, but I do not agree that we should defund the police.

Kelly listed the adoption of body cameras for all police, along with the need for more transparency and independent oversight, as well as employing de-escalation techniques.

Theres a lot that can be done here. It should have been done decades ago, Kelly said.

Cal Cunningham, the Democratic challenger leading North Carolina GOP Sen. Thom Tillis by 10 points in a recent CNBC poll, in mid-June said, Twenty-first century policing reform will require increased investment in law enforcement, not defunding it.

Days earlier, Tillis tweeted that defunding law enforcement is irresponsible, would make our communities less safe and is void of common sense.

Anyone afraid of saying that is simply unfit to lead, he concluded.

This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics.

Susan Crabtree is RealClearPolitics' White House/national political correspondent.

Here is the original post:
Rioters' 'Defund The Police' Push Puts Democrat Candidates On Defense - The Federalist

Putting a measure on the ballot means getting petition signatures, but in a time of pandemic, at least one group will be trying a direct mail campaign instead.

People Not Politicians is calling on thousands of Oregonian voters via mail to sign a petition for an independent commission to take over electoral redistricting in the state, and if enough people sign the measure would be on the November ballot.

The coalition is asking for signatures by mail because social distancing restrictions make traditional face-to-face petition work unrealistic.

What the Measure Would Do

Called Initiative Petition 57, this proposal seeks to transfer Oregons redrawing process for legislative and congressional lines from the hands of the state legislature, and move authority to a new 12-member commission. The idea is to put an end to partisan gerrymandering, which occurs because legislators can have conflicts of interest during the process and can essentially choose their voters, instead of voters choosing them.

The initiative letter contains a return envelope and is being sent to multiple voters within 500,000 addresses, meaning it is reaching about one million Oregonians. It needs 149,360 valid signatures by July 2 to qualify for the November ballot.

The 2011 update was the first time in a century that lawmakers did not defer the duty of redrawing to the partisan secretary of state, which also can create potential bias issues.

Both Support and Opposition are Bipartisan

Former President Barack Obama as well as former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder are national supporters of the initiative. Locally, supporters include NAACP branches of Oregon, the conservative Taxpayer Association of Oregon, public interest nonprofit OSPIRG, the American Association of University Women of Oregon, and Oregons Progressive Party. A chief petitioner of the initiative is Norman Turrill, a retired Portland software engineer and former president of the nonpartisan League of Women Voters of Oregon. Those in favor are hoping that the initiative will help end gerrymandering and subsequently give voters more power to hold elected representatives responsible, by, according to Turrill, potentially decreasing the number of districts where incumbents can easily win re-election.

The opposed include executive director for nonprofit Our Oregon, Becca Uherbelau and executive director of Planned Parenthood Advocates of Oregon, Emily McLain. The two have filed a lawsuit with hopes of stopping the redistricting commission initiative from going any further. Uherbelau and McLain are arguing that the initiative violates the Oregon Constitution, specifically a procedural requirement that requires initiatives to only amend one provision of the constitution at a time. They claim that the initiative would both switch redistricting from the state legislature to the commission as well as restrict Oregonians rights to free speech excluding elected officials, lobbyists, and other political insiders from serving on the commission.

Uherbelau and McLain are also concerned that the initiative could prevent young voters and newly naturalized citizens from serving, and since it requires applicants to have voted in at least two of the last three elections, could leave out many more Oregonians as well.

Heres Where the Campaign Money is Coming From

As of right now, People Not Politicians, spearheaded by civic and good government groups, has accrued $316,000 in funding: $61,000 from in-kind donations from nonpartisan democracy reform organization Common Cause, $40,000 from The Standard insurance company, $37,000 from the League of Women Voters, and $35,000 from Oregon Business and Industry.

By Cara Nixon

View original post here:
Redistricting Campaign Hopes Signatures by Mail Will Put Their Measure on the Ballot - The Corvallis Advocate