Archive for the ‘European Union’ Category

Fasset to expand crypto operations in European Union – Trade Arabia

Fasset, a global digital asset gateway, has announced its entrance into the European Union (EU) after it secured a cryptocurrency authorisation. With the authorisation, Fasset will strengthen its global operations to serve the growing digital asset sector in the EU market and beyond.

Fasset previously secured three separate full authorisations from the Labuan Financial Services Authority and as part of the companys long-term growth strategy, this latest milestone will allow Fasset to bring its frictionless digital asset services to more retail and institutional investors across the world as it strengthens its presence globally.

Celebrating the achievement, Mohammad Raafi Hossain, Fasset Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, and former Advisor to the UAE Prime Ministers Office said: The digital asset sector has become an undeniable force in todays financial and technological landscape. The EU is a hotbed for crypto activity, with a number of member states leading the charge in both innovation and implementation.

With this licence, Fasset can continue on its mission of enabling greater access to crypto assets, bringing investors a step closer to the future of finance. The EU will serve as a cornerstone as we look to connect the remittance corridor between the West and the East.

EU global leader

The EU continues to be a global leader in digital asset adoption with Central, Northern and Western Europe outpacing all other regions to be the biggest cryptocurrency economy in the world. Representing a quarter of global cryptocurrency activity worth over $1 trillion, the EU is already an established hub for digital assets and a thriving market for growth and innovation in emerging technologies, playing an influential role in steering the future of finance.

Launched in 2019, Fasset is a multi-country digital asset gateway that aims to connect the next billion to buy, sell, send and store digital assets such as cryptocurrency and real-world asset tokens. Bringing easy, free, and frictionless access to digital assets, Fasset is providing people in frontier markets with the knowledge and the tools to build a better future.

A leader in asset tokenisation, Fasset built the worlds first comprehensive ecosystem dedicated to merging digital asset innovations with the real economy.

Previously partnering with Middle East fintech company Infinios (formerly known as NEC Payments), Fasset successfully completed the first Proof-of-Concept tokenisation of a Tesla charging unit in a move to accelerate progression of the electric vehicle (EV) industry in pursuit of creating a more sustainable future.-- TradeArabia News Service

View post:
Fasset to expand crypto operations in European Union - Trade Arabia

Ports of the European Union ban Russian vessels – FreshPlaza.com

The European Commission has announced a ban on Russian vessels and Russian-operated ships from accessing EU ports. The Commission did indicate there will be certain exemptions that will cover essentials, such as agricultural and food products, humanitarian aid as well as energy.

The Commission added it will propose a ban on Russian and Belarusian road transport operators. "This ban will drastically limit the options for the Russian industry to obtain key goods," said a spokesperson. The ban on Russian and Russian-operated vessels from EU ports is one of the six pillars of the fifth package of sanctions against Russia due to Putin's invasion of Ukraine.

"The four packages of sanctions have hit hard and limited the Kremlin's political and economic options. We are seeing tangible results. But clearly, in view of events, we need to increase our pressure further. Today, we are proposing to take our sanctions a step further. We will make them broader and sharper, so that they cut even deeper in the Russian economy," said president of the European Commission, von der Leyen.

The fifth package of EC sanctions also includes an import ban on coal from Russia worth 4 billion (US$4.3 billion) per year, a full transaction ban on four key Russian banks, further targeted export bans and specific new import bans worth 5.5 billion (US$5.9 billion).

"We are working on additional sanctions, including on oil imports, and we are reflecting on some of the ideas presented by the Member States, such as taxes or specific payment channels such as an escrow account," noted von der Leyen.

Source: container-news.com

Read the rest here:
Ports of the European Union ban Russian vessels - FreshPlaza.com

The European Union Will Allow Loaned Artworks to Return to Russian Museums, But Two Paintings From a Paris Show Will Remain in France – artnet News

France announced that two paintings featured in a recent hit exhibitionof a famed Russian art collection at Pariss Fondation Louis Vuitton will remain there until there is a change in the circumstances surrounding Russias invasion of Ukraine.

The two paintings are among some 200 masterpieces from the exhibition The Morozov Collection: Icons of Modern Art, which drew more than 1.2 million visitors by its close on April 3, having been extended from February 22. The bulk of the works on loan were set to return to museums in Russia.

France had resisted calls to seize the works to punish Russian President Vladimir Putin, who helped facilitate the show, and on April 8 the European Union (E.U.) issued a notice that cultural goods which are on loan in the context of formal cultural cooperation with Russia should be exempted from sanctions. But the French Ministry of Culture said on Saturday that two of the paintings will stay in France.

One of the works is a self-portrait by Pyotr Konchalovskythat is reportedly owned by the Russian oligarch and avid art collectorPetr Aven, who has been sanctioned by the E.U. and the U.K. over his alleged close ties with Putin, following Russias invasion of Ukraine. Aven has subsequently stepped down as a trustee of the Royal Academy. Tate has also severed ties with the billionaire, who was a member of Tates International Council and European Collection Circle of donors. The work will remain on French soil so long as its ownerremains targeted by an asset freeze, the ministry said in a statement cited by France 24 and Agence France-Presse. The ministry later confirmed the statement with Artnet News.

Head of LVMH luxury group Bernard Arnault (right) and French President Emmanuel Macron visit the opening of The Morozov Collection: Icons of Modern Art at Fondation Louis Vuitton in Paris, on September 21, 2021. Photo: Yoan Valet/AFP via Getty Images.

Another work is said to be Valentin Serovs painting of Margarita Morozova, which belongs to the Dnipro Fine Arts Museum in Ukraine. The ministry said that the move to keep the painting was at the request of the Ukrainian authorities, and it will remain in France until the situation changes and the work can be returned safely.

A third painting from this collection, which is held by a private foundation, may stay, but the ministry said that it is still assessing the situation. The work in question, according to AFPs report, is said to belong to the Magma foundation, which has links to Viatcheslav Kantor, another U.K. sanction target.

Fondation Louis Vuitton declined to comment.

Artworks belonging to Russian oligarchs have been a focus since they were slapped with sanctions following the countrys ongoing aggression in Ukraine. Many of the sanctioned billionaires have had their assets seized or frozen, and they have also stepped down from some of the top Western cultural institutions that they used to serve as patrons or donors.

Aven, for example, recently told the Financial Timesthat he had been in talks to donate his art collection to an institution in the U.K., but now feared he would struggle to pay his bills.

Installation view of The Morozov Collection: Icons of Modern Art, at the Fondation Louis Vuitton, Paris. Fondation Louis Vuitton/Marc Domage.

Works belonging to Russian museums, especially those have been loaned to institutions abroad, have faced varying treatments. South Korea has declined Russias request for an earlier return of 75 Modern Russian artworks on show in Seoul until April 17. Masterpieces from Russian museums that had been on loan to museums and galleries in Italy and Japan were seized in transit by Finnish authorities, citing the E.U. sanctions. On Friday, Finland said it would release them to Russia, in accordance with the E.U.s updated rule for cultural goods.

The Morozov collection was assembled by Mikhail (18701903) and Ivan Morozov (18711921), brothers from a textile-magnate family who acquired more than 250 works by top Impressionist and Modern masters in the West and Russia, ranging from Matisse, Monet, andCzanne to Picasso and Van Gogh. Mikhail died at the age of 33, while Ivan carried on building the collection.Their holdings were nationalized in 1918, nearly a year after the Russian Revolution began.Ivan Morozov was forced to flee and died in exile.

Read more here:
The European Union Will Allow Loaned Artworks to Return to Russian Museums, But Two Paintings From a Paris Show Will Remain in France - artnet News

Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure policies in the EU – ENISA

Vulnerability disclosure has become the focus of attention of cybersecurity experts engaged in strengthening the cybersecurity resilience of the European Union. The valid source of concern comes from the cybersecurity threats looming behind vulnerabilities, as demonstrated by the impact of the Log4Shell vulnerability.

Security researchers and ethical hackers constantly scrutinise ICT systems - both open source and commercial closed source software - to find weaknesses, misconfigurations, software vulnerabilities, etc. A wide range of issues are thus revealed: weak passwords, fundamental cryptographic flaws or deeply nested software bugs.

Identifying vulnerabilities is therefore essential if we want to prevent attackers from exploiting them. It is important to consider that attackers can always develop malware specially designed to exploit vulnerabilities disclosed to the public. Besides the identification itself, vendors can also be reluctant to acknowledge vulnerabilities as their reputation might be damaged as a consequence.

What is CVD?

Coordinated vulnerability disclosure (CVD) is a process by which vulnerabilities finders work together and share information with the relevant stakeholders such as vendors and ICT infrastructure owners.

CVD ensures that software vulnerabilities get disclosed to the public once the vendor has been able to develop a fix, a patch, or has found a different solution.

What are national CVD policies?

National CVD policies are national frameworks of rules and agreements designed to ensure:

What is the situation in the EU?

The report published today maps the national CVD policies in place across the EU, compares the different approaches and, highlights good practices.

The analysis allows a wide disparity to be observed among Member States in relation to their level of CVD policy achievement. At the time the data used in the report was collected, only four Member States had already implemented such a CVD policy, while another four of them were about to do so. The remaining Member States are split into two groups: those currently discussing how to move forward and those who have not yet reached that stage.

What are ENISAs recommendations to promote CVD?

The main recommendations from the analysis of nineteen EU Member States include:

Apart from the above, additional recommendations are issued in relation to the economic and polical challenges and also address operational and crisis management activities.

Next steps

The Commissions proposal for the revision of the Network and Information Security Directive or NIS2 proposal, provides for EU countries to implement a national CVD policy. ENISA will be supporting the EU Member States with the implementation of this provision and will be developing a guideline to help EU Member States establish their national CVD policies.

In addition, ENISA will need to develop and maintain an EU Vulnerability database (EUVDB). The work will complement the already existing international vulnerability databases. ENISA will start discussing the implementation of the database with the European Commission and the EU Member States after the adoption of the NIS2 proposal.

Background material

The report builds upon previous work performed by ENISA in the field of vulnerabilities. ENISA issued a report on good practices on vulnerability disclosure in 2016, and the economic impact of vulnerabilites was explored in detail in 2018. In addition, the limitations and opportunities of the vulnerability ecosystem were analysed in the ENISA 2018/2019 State of Vulnerabilities report.

Further information

Vulnerability Disclosure in the EU An overview of National Vulnerability Disclosure Policies in the EU ENISA report

State of Vulnerabilities 2018/2019 - Analysis of Events in the life of Vulnerabilities

Economics of Vulnerability Disclosure

Good Practice Guide on Vulnerability Disclosure. From challenges to recommendations

Contact

Stay updated - subscribe to RSS feeds of both ENISA news items & press releases!

News items:

http://www.enisa.europa.eu/media/news-items/news-wires/RSS

PRs:

http://www.enisa.europa.eu/media/press-releases/press-releases/RSS

Here is the original post:
Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure policies in the EU - ENISA

Annual report on payments made under the Healthcare (EEA and Switzerland Arrangements) Act 2019 – GOV.UK

First annual report on payments made under the Healthcare (European Economic Area and Switzerland arrangements) Act 2019 for the period 31 December 2020 to 31 March 2021.

The Healthcare European Economic Area and Switzerland Arrangements Act 2019 (HEEASAA) provides the Secretary of State with a legal framework to implement comprehensive reciprocal healthcare agreements with countries in the EEA and with Switzerland following the UKs departure from the European Union.

Under Section 6 of the 2019 act, the Secretary of State has a duty to lay an annual report before Parliament providing details of payments made under the powers conferred by or under the act. The report must be laid before Parliament as soon as practicable after the end of each financial year.

This first annual report covers the period between the end of the EU exit transition period on 31 December 2020 and the end of the financial year on 31 March 2021. Future reports will cover payments made under the 2019 act for subsequent financial years.

For this first report, very limited expenditure took place under the 2019 act due to the lag in receiving claims from member states. All EEA expenditure for the financial year 2020 to 2021 including that incurred under EU law (Regulation 883/04) as well as payments under the 2019 act are covered in the departmental annual report and accounts, published on 31 January 2022.

Reciprocal healthcare agreements with other countries strengthen international healthcare cooperation. They support UK residents to access necessary and emergency healthcare when they travel abroad and can facilitate cooperation on planned treatment and other areas of healthcare policy. They support tourism and short-term business travel and can particularly benefit those with long-term health conditions. The most frequently used element of reciprocal healthcare for UK residents, and the most familiar, is the access to necessary healthcare in other countries.

Following the UKs departure from the European Union, the UK government reached an agreement with the EU to ensure that UK residents will continue to benefit from reciprocal healthcare arrangements when in the EU.

Under the powers in the 2019 act, the government implemented separation agreements with the EU, Switzerland, and the EEA EFTA states (Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein), namely the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement [footnote 1], the UK-Switzerland Citizens Rights Agreement [footnote 2] and the UK-EEA EFTA Separation Agreement [footnote 3]. These agreements ensured there was no cliff-edge for citizens rights, including reciprocal healthcare rights, when the UK departed from the EU by protecting those with residence rights.

The government subsequently agreed further comprehensive arrangements with the EU and Switzerland, which have been implemented using HEEASAA powers. These provide reciprocal healthcare coverage to those travelling to the EU and Switzerland. These agreements (The Social Security Coordination Protocol to the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement [footnote 4] and the UK-Switzerland Convention on Social Security Coordination [footnote 5], respectively) mean continued healthcare support for UK residents when they travel or move to the EU or Switzerland.

Finally, the UK negotiated a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in 2020 with Ireland on reciprocal healthcare, which is also implemented under the powers under the 2019 act. This MOU was negotiated with partners in Ireland to ensure continuity of most elements of reciprocal healthcare in the event of no negotiated outcome with the European Union on a future relationship. It specifically recognises the unique relationship of the UK with Ireland and broader common travel area arrangements. Following the agreement of the EU arrangements, the UK and Ireland have agreed that the provisions in the trade and cooperation agreement will apply for reciprocal healthcare, but with some enhanced elements to support further cooperation.

The UK is currently negotiating a further agreement with the EEA EFTA states of Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Once negotiated, this agreement will also be implemented under the powers under the 2019 act. UK nationals can use their passports to access necessary healthcare in Norway in the meantime.

In summary, the UK has successfully negotiated and implemented 6 agreements under the powers conferred under HEEASAA with countries and blocs in Europe. In the future, it is expected that further agreements will be reached with countries in Europe and outside of Europe. The government has brought forward provisions in the Health and Care Bill to enable the government to implement comprehensive healthcare agreements with countries outside of the EEA and Switzerland.

Where the UK or an EU member state is responsible for the healthcare of an individual, they will be entitled to reciprocal healthcare cover.This includes certain categories of cross-border workers and state pensioners who retire to the EU.

In summary, the agreements in place during the report period cover:

the healthcare costs of UK-insured state pensioners and their dependants living in the EEA and Switzerland around 201,000 [footnote 6] in total. These are known as S1 arrangements

individuals exporting benefits to the EEA and Switzerland (and their dependants) whose healthcare is funded via the S1 form around 7,200 [footnote 7] in total

around 42,000 [footnote 8] workers from the UK who are on a temporary posting in the EU and access healthcare using their EHIC and GHIC [footnote 9]. There are also around 2,100 [footnote 10] S1 certificates issued to workers or their dependants to access healthcare in the EEA and Switzerland, although there may be overlap between these 2 groups

The cost of necessary healthcare (EHIC and GHIC) of UK-insureds of approximately 67 million visits to member states each year once travelling patterns return to their long-term trend [footnote 11]. UK nationals can also use their passports to access necessary healthcare in Norway

We also fund around 1,300 to 1,500 UK residents per year to travel overseas to receive planned treatment in member states (such as, for procedures unavailable in the UK within a medically justifiable timescale or returning home to give birth) [footnote 12]. These are known as S2 provisions

Prior to EU exit, the UK was obliged to reimburse healthcare costs for which we were liable under Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and in accordance with procedures set out in Regulation (EC) No 987/2009. Treatment in the EEA and Switzerland incurred since 31 December 2020, for which the UK is liable, is now mainly reimbursable under the 2019 act.

For the reporting period of this report, the UK has been responsible for funding those covered by the separation agreements and the social security coordination protocol to the UK-EU trade and cooperation agreement [footnote 13] (including the MOU with Ireland). The UK-Switzerland social security convention came into force in November 2021 and therefore no payments have been made under this agreement during this reporting period.

Different reimbursement mechanisms are in place for the different reciprocal healthcare provisions and vary by member states. Table 1 below outlines the specific detail for each member state.

For necessary healthcare, our reciprocal healthcare arrangements enable the UK to charge EEA and Swiss states based on the actual costs for the use of NHS services or to agree an alternative form of charging, such as cost-waiver agreements (where each country underwrites the healthcare costs of the services used by people of the other state) or formula agreements (where a model is agreed between the UK and a member state based on factors such as travel numbers).

The UK has formula agreements in place to estimate the value of NHS services used in the UK by temporary visitors from Spain, France, Portugal, Belgium, Sweden and Ireland, and the UK has opted to enter into cost waiver agreements with some of the smaller member states, such as Norway and Malta, where the total flow of people between the UK and these states is broadly similar in both directions.

The UK pays the actual costs for all those receiving planned treatment (S2).

Pensioner healthcare (S1) is charged at an average cost in Cyprus, Portugal, Spain, Ireland and Sweden, and actual cost (or through the waiver) for all other member states and Switzerland. Workers eligible for an S1 are all charged at actual cost.

Table 1: EEA Switzerland reciprocal healthcare payment arrangements

In terms of the payments, all EEA healthcare payments (including those under the 2019 act) are made in arrears, usually between 1 to 3 years after the event.

If, for example, a UK national were to injure themselves on a holiday in Germany, they would present their GHIC at the German hospital and receive the necessary treatment. The hospital would then raise an invoice for the treatment with their liaison body. In the case of the UK, this liaison body is the NHS Business Services Authority (NHS BSA). The German liaison body would then submit a claim for the cost of that treatment to the UK based on receipts of the invoice from the hospital. Once the UK is satisfied that the claim is accurate and valid, the UK would release the payment to Germany. This process takes at least one year.

Routine payments for treatments covered under the 2019 act are therefore unlikely to begin until early 2022, one year after the agreement came into force.

For the reasons outlined above, the only payments made under the HEEASAA legislation for the period between 11pm on 31 December 2020 and 31 March 2021 were for discretionary planned treatment care. These payments are made outside of the regular payments process and are therefore paid in a shorter time frame. Expenditure is outlined in Table 2 below.

Payments for discretionary planned treatment are made to support the healthcare needs of British residents when they are abroad in circumstances which fall outside of a reciprocal healthcare agreement. They are most likely to be used when the refusal to fund healthcare treatment would result in unjustifiably harsh consequences for the individual.

Table 2: Payments made by the UK government under HEEASAA for financial year

Alongside payments under HEEASAA, EEA payments have also been made for reciprocal healthcare claims from member states, which took place whilst the UK was still a member of the EU, during the 2020 to 2021 financial year. These payments do not fall under the 2019 act and are outlined in the DHSC annual report and accounts: 2020 to 2021

Visit link:
Annual report on payments made under the Healthcare (EEA and Switzerland Arrangements) Act 2019 - GOV.UK