Archive for the ‘European Union’ Category

EU hosts defence forum to rally its military industry behind Ukraine – Euronews

The defence industry forum was held in Brussels to discuss cooperation and increase ammunition production for Kyiv in response to Russia's ongoing aggression.

The European Union hosted a defence industry forum on Monday in a bid to find new ways to supply Kiyv with much-needed weapons and ammunition.

Some 140 firms from 25 countries attended the event in Brussels, which was meant to link Ukraine's defence industry with those of the EU.

Industry representatives met to discuss how Ukraine's industry capacity for defence production could be better matched with that of Europe.

They also discussed how Ukrainian firms could amp up production and meet the country's needs at home. This would minimise transportation costs and allow the tools to be produced where they are needed.

We produce in Europe, but we should be able to produce in [Ukrainian] territory, High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell said, in order to save costs, to reduce delivery times and be closer to [Ukrainian] needs.

Supplying Ukraine's forces has proven to be a difficult task for the country's allies. More than two years into Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Moscow has repeatedly targeted Kyiv's industrial capacities as one of its primary targets in a bid to weaken its resistance.

Our goal is to find extra funding for procuring from Ukrainian defence industry for Ukrainian armed forces, said Ukrainian Minister for Strategic Industries Oleksandr Kamyshin. Thats the fastest way we can help the frontline, he added.

The news follows a proposal for a European Defence Industrial Strategy. The strategy aims to preparedefence industrial readiness within the EU following the return of high-intensity conflict to the continent.

The plan also proposed 1.5 billion in funding to prepare the European defence industry, aiming to make the EU safer and benefit key allies, including NATO and Ukraine.

This is the first time the EU is hosting the forum. It was initially held in Ukraine in 2022, followed by the US the following year.

Read this article:
EU hosts defence forum to rally its military industry behind Ukraine - Euronews

EU in Tug-of-War for Georgia and Moldova – Center for European Policy Analysis

Ukraine is the priority for those who take the future of Europe and liberal democracy seriously, but there are two other battles that demand our attention.

Moldova and Georgia, the other European Union (EU) candidate countries that share a border with Russia, are currently caught in an onslaught of hybrid attacks aiming to undermine and ultimately destroy the blocs plans of enlargement to the East.

Bidzina Ivanishvili, the billionaire former prime minister and founder of the ruling Georgian Dream party, referred to the EU and US as a global party of war at a government-organized rally on April 29. It marked an extraordinarily open attack on the bloc from the man who effectively leads the ruling party and whose country was offered candidate status only in December.

The speech, to an audience of state employees many of whom were bussed to Tbilisi from the regions was straightforward in its commitment to the repression of opponents of Georgian Dreams resurrected law on so-called foreign influence (referred to by protesters as Russias law for its similarity to the Foreign Agents Law which Russia adopted in 2012 and increasingly used to stamp out dissent.)

It bodes ill not just for civil society organizations targeted for their independence and criticism of the ruling party, but also for Georgias integration into the EU and NATO.

Defeated by widespread public protests last year, the Russian law was brought back in April, half a year before general elections scheduled for October 20.

That the government was prepared to resurrect the law months before the European Commissions decision on whether to recommend the start of accession negotiations confirms[MG1] that joining Europe and aligning with its fundamental values, is no longer part of the ruling partys vision. The EU has made clear that the law is an affront to its values and would derail Georgian accession.

The government had committed to honoring the Georgian peoples support for closer integration with Europe, but the pledge has been watered down in statements from the party elite, including another former prime minister, Irakli Garibashvili, who said Georgia is not ready for more Europe.

The interventions came after more than two weeks of huge protests by civil society groups and other opponents of the proposed law, suppressed by water cannons, teargas, and police brutality.

The prospects for Georgias democracy and European integration will depend on the perseverance of the countrys highly energized and independent civil society, which is also the main target of government attempts at suppression under the new law.

Parliamentary opposition is relatively weak, and vocal non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and independent media are seen and treated as the ruling partys main competitors in the battle for influence over the population.

Get the Latest

Sign up to receive regular emails and stay informed about CEPA's work.

Their influence is intensely disliked, not just by the Georgian Dream government, but also by openly pro-Russian right-wing groups.

Georgia is not alone in facing growing efforts to block its closer alignment with the West. There are also attempts by Russian proxies to steer Moldova off its chosen path of EU integration.

The countrys pro-EU President Maia Sandu will be standing for re-election on October 20, making it a crucial year for the countrys relations with the West. Sandus approval ratings have been undermined by economic hardship and challenges to reforming her impoverished country, which has only just weaned itself off dependence on Russian energy.

By holding a referendum on EU membership alongside the presidential election, Sandu and her party hope to energize the pro-EU electorate to come to the ballot box (polls suggest a plurality of Moldovans will vote in favor.) It may help increase the chances of her re-election, or at least fix the country on a path to EU integration.

There will be no shortage of challenges in the run-up to the referendum, as the opening salvos from the Russian state propaganda machine have clearly indicated. The separatist leaders of Transnistria, a strip of Moldova under Russian military control, will also provide cause for concern, especially if the Moldovan government implements plans to reduce energy imports from the self-declared republic.

Georgia and Moldovas populations have made clear their support for joining Europe, and should one or both be dislodged from the path to integration, the Kremlin will score a major victory.

Ukraine is not the only place where the future of democratic Europe is at the crossroads, and the EU will need to do everything in its power to support democratic forces in both Georgia and Moldova, enabling their voices and those of the majority of the population to be decisive and to outweigh Russias lavishly funded dark campaigns to oppose them.

The outcome matters first and foremost for them, but also for a Europe struggling to safeguard its Eastern neighborhood as an area where the values of democracy and human rights prevail over dictatorship and imperialism.

Marija Golubeva is a Distinguished Fellow with the Democratic Resilience Program at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA). She was a Member of the Latvian Parliament (2018-2022) and was Minister of the Interior from 2021-2022. A public policy expert, she has worked for ICF, a consultancy company in Brussels, and as an independent consultant for European institutions in the Western Balkans and Central Asia.

Europes Edgeis CEPAs online journal covering critical topics on the foreign policy docket across Europe and North America. All opinions are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position or viewsof the institutions they representor the Center for European Policy Analysis.

See original here:
EU in Tug-of-War for Georgia and Moldova - Center for European Policy Analysis

Seven out of 10 Europeans believe their country takes in too many immigrants – EL PAS USA

Europeans view immigration with increasing suspicion. Seven out of 10 Europeans believe that their country takes in too many migrants, according to a survey carried out by BVA Xsight for ARTE Europe Weekly, a project led by the French-German TV channel ARTE GEIE and which EL PAS has participated in, as part of the countdown to the European elections in June.

The survey shows that 85% of respondents feel the European Union needs to take more action to combat irregular migration. And only 39% believe that Europe needs immigration today.

The countries where most people consider immigration a problem are Bulgaria (74% of respondents), the Czech Republic (73%), Hungary and Cyprus (68% in both cases). Paradoxically, in Italy, the European country where the largest number of immigrants entered irregularly last year (157,652), only 44% of respondents viewed it as a problem and only 14% saw it as the main problem. In Greece and Spain, the second and third countries with the most irregular arrivals in 2023, respectively, only 11% of respondents considered it the issue of most concern to them, below the European average of 17%. However, Greece is the country where the most people (90%) believe their country takes in too many migrants.

These are some of the conclusions from a survey carried out online between March 27 and April 9 in the 27 member states, where 22,726 people over 15 years of age were interviewed, with a representative sample from each country. In addition to El PAS, the media organizations Gazeta Wyborcza, Internazionale, Ir, Kathimerini, Le Soir and Telex collaborated in the survey.

Beyond the data on migration, health is the biggest concern for Europeans (41%), followed by the war in Ukraine (38%). The environment and inflation are tied in third place at 24%. Each country also presents some unique features when it comes to the order of priorities. In France, purchasing power is a top concern; in Poland people are particularly focused on security; the Irish are notably preoccupied with housing and Spaniards are very worried about unemployment.

This picture of Europeans concerns emerges one month before more than 400 million people from to the 27 countries of the European Union are called to vote in the elections to the European Parliament, which will be held between June 6 and 9. Voters will elect 705 MEPs in a chamber whose composition will be key to deciding issues such as pushing or stopping a policy of self-defense, and the promotion of measures for the green transition under threat by the far right, which is forecast to perform well at the polls.

On the economic front, 73% of those surveyed feel optimistic about their personal future, although 57% believe that the economic situation in the EU has worsened and 63% feel the same way about their own country.

Only a third of respondents believe that EU decisions have a positive impact on their lives. And there is only one country, Portugal, where the majority (51%) highlighted the positive influence of the EU on their lives. Portugal is followed by Spain, Luxembourg, Malta and Romania, all of them with 43% positive responses. At the opposite pole, France and the Czech Republic (21% in both cases) are where the smallest number of people believe that the EU affects their lives favorably, followed by Hungary (24%) and the Netherlands (26%).

In the population as a whole, only 9% admit to feeling more European than their own nationality. In several of the member states that joined the EU most recently, citizens recognize that, when they vote, they prioritize their national needs over European ones: Romania (82%), Bulgaria (81%), Greece and Latvia (79% in both cases). However, the majority of countries would like to see the common European policy strengthened, especially in defense (72%) and immigration (70%).

Pollsters believe the survey paints a portrait of a Europe divided between those who worry more about the end of the world security and the war between Russia and Ukraine and those who focus more on end of the month issues. The first group includes Estonia, Finland and Poland, who are closer to the Russian borders. The second group, more concerned about the loss of purchasing power, encompasses France, Belgium, Spain and Portugal.

The war that began with Russias full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022 might have served to reinforce the feeling of belonging to the EU. But it did not turn out that way. Only 14% of citizens say they feel more European now than before the invasion of Ukraine. And 15% of those surveyed consider themselves less European since the beginning of the conflict.

The survey shows that 62% of Europeans fear an imminent war with Russia, a fear that is felt most strongly in the countries geographically closest to the invading country, such as Poland, the Baltic States, Finland and Romania. Only 30% think that Europe has enough military resources to respond to a possible attack. Although 61% believe that the EU should strengthen its support for Ukraine, a similar majority (63%) believe that a ceasefire should be negotiated.

Fully 63% of Europeans are in favor of Ukraines accession to the EU. However, the countries most favorable to negotiations with Vladimir Putin (Hungary, Czech Republic, Austria, Bulgaria) are also the most reluctant to the admission of Ukrainians into the European club.

The environment occupies, along with the loss of purchasing power, the third place among the top concerns of Europeans. Last year was the warmest on Earth since records began in the 19th century. For 82% of respondents, this is an important problem. And for 43%, the fight against global warming is a priority, especially in southern Europe Malta, Italy, Portugal, Cyprus and Spain where droughts and heat waves are felt most keenly.

The measures that generate the most support to combat climate change are those decided by governments and the European Parliament, such as the reduction of pesticides (60%) or massive investment in public transportation (57%). However, decisions that involve changes in individual behavior, such as increasing taxes to reduce personal vehicle use, are well received in only 21% of cases.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAS USA Edition

More here:
Seven out of 10 Europeans believe their country takes in too many immigrants - EL PAS USA

EU Commission ends rule of law proceedings against Poland after six years – JURIST

The European Union Commission issued a statement Monday announcing they will end six years of rule of law proceedings brought against Poland. President of the Commission Ursula von der Leyen congratulated the Polish Prime Minister, Donald Tusk, in what she called a culmination of Polands diligent work and unwavering commitment to reform.

The Commission initiated proceedings under Article 7 of the European Union Treaty against Poland in 2017, which provides mechanisms to address violations of EU values by member states. The Article 7 procedure involves several stages, including an acknowledgment of the breaches within a state, recognition of the serious nature of the breach from all other governments and, finally, a vote on sanctions. The procedure was initiated against Poland in 2017,when it was under the Law and Justice (PiS) government. The PiS government had brought in a number of reforms, including restructuring of the courts, ending the mandate of sitting judges prematurely and favouring appointees that were friendly to the ruling party. This led to allegations that the PiS were acting in an unlawful manner, and the EU Commission argued that the moves compromised the separation of powers and entailed serious hindrances to the application of EU law.

Since his election in 2023, Tusk has promised to restore legal order and worked to improve relations with Brussels, including the creation of an action plan of nine proposed laws to reinstate judicial independence, as well as commitments to comply with rulings from the European Court of Justice. By February, the EU Commission had unblocked 137 billion that had previously been denied to Poland.

The Polish government welcomed the announcement, with Minister of Justice Adam Bodnar stating on X that Poland is [consequently] bringing back rule of law. We are determined and devoted to our common European [values].

President Von der Leyen said:

Today, marks a new chapter for Poland I congratulate Prime Minister Donald Tusk and his government on this important breakthrough. It is the result of their hard work and determined reform efforts. The ongoing restoration of the rule of law in Poland is great for the Polish people and for our Union as a whole. It is a testament to the resilience of the rule of law and democracy in Europe.

See the original post:
EU Commission ends rule of law proceedings against Poland after six years - JURIST

George Robertson: Why Russia fears the European Union – The New Statesman

George Robertson was at Natos Brussels headquarters when the second plane hit. By 9.30pm on 11 September 2001 he would become the first, and only, Nato secretary general to trigger Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which states an attack on one is an attack on all. But his first thought after watching 9/11 unfold was that the Nato headquarters lay beneath the flight path to Brussels Airport. All non-essential staff were sent home.

Then, his mind turned to the perpetrators. He first suspected US domestic terrorists; the Oklahoma bombing had happened six years before. You began to realise that if it was an external source, then this was huge, he said when we spoke in his Westminster office. America had been attacked for the first time since Pearl Harbor. Here, in many ways, the world had changed.

His staff drafted a statement while he phoned the US secretary of state, Colin Powell, and the national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, to discuss triggering Article 5. Robertson said they were initially sceptical about whether it would work. It was high-risk because if you do it and it fails it has the opposite effect.

At 3.30pm he put the plan to the Nato council. If somebody had said, No, we dont like the wording or we dont want to do it today, put it off till tomorrow, then it would have been pretty disastrous. But eventually, I persuaded everybody. We got it [finalised] by half past nine. Everybody in the morning thought it was their idea but that was fine.

Robertson entered parliament as a Labour MP at the 1978 Hamilton by-election. He became a stalwart of the partys right: Pro-American, pro-Europe, pro-mixed economy and willing to fight for it. Robertson remembers Tony Blair later saying he was New Labour before we even thought about it. He was appointed shadow Scottish secretary in 1993. His remark that Scottish devolution would kill the SNP stone dead has been ridiculed since: the party has been in government since 2007.

Select and enter your email address

Your email address

Im yet to be proved wrong, Robertson told me. The SNP is in dire trouble at the moment, largely because of their inability to use the instruments of devolution. And in many ways, I thought that is exactly what would happen I may well be proved right. He held the Scottish brief until the 1997 election, when he took charge of the Ministry of Defence. I had a staff of three and a half people; 24 hours later, I had 383,000 people, and a navy and an air force, he chuckled.

Robertson then joined Nato in 1999 as secretary general, leaving in 2003. He is still active in the party he joined the Labour Middle East Council in March and now champions causes such as Ukraine and Kosovo in the Lords, which explains his office decor. A painting on the walls shows long, slender poppies growing out of the soil, beneath which lies a bed of skulls. He was presented with it at a school in Kosovo, where he said Serbian paramilitaries had taken 16 children and burned them alive in a house during the 1998-99 Kosovo War. In 1999 Blair, alongside an initially reluctant Bill Clinton, led the Nato bombardment of Serbian forces to prevent such atrocities. Are Kosovar children named after Robertson, as they are after Blair? No, but I was still treated as a hero, he said.

He gestured to a photo on a nearby shelf. That was my second meeting with Putin, he said. The two men are sitting on ornate, pink and red armchairs. The Russian presidents chin is turned down, his eyes raised in a mischievous glance. Robertson stares straight at the camera with a grave expression. What was Putin like? Serious, but he had a sense of humour then. He doesnt seem to have it any more. Im one of a few people still alive who can tell funny stories about what Putin said. There was one occasion when I gave him an English-language book [as a gift]. It was an antiquarian book, Gossip in the Tsars Court. Putin told him: Thanks for the book. I practise my English by reading out loud so my dog is now a perfect English speaker.

Robertson was hopeful in the early 2000s that Putin might lead Russia away from Boris Yeltsins drunkard anarchy and towards a reliable friendship with the West. [Putin] said at one of the meetings: I want Russia to be a part of western Europe when are you going to invite Russia to join Nato? And why didnt Nato? We dont ask countries to join; they apply.

There was a bit of a window [for Russia to join the West], he admitted. But he wanted not equality around the Nato-Russia council table; he wanted it with the United States He started thinking that Russia needed to be admired and respected. And feared. So the opportunity was gone, but largely due to him.

When pressed about whether Nato and the West could have done more to welcome Russia into the international community, he said: Its difficult to do the counterfactual, and I dont know that [the then US vice-president Dick] Cheney and [US defence secretary Donald] Rumsfeld were terribly interested in getting closer to Russia. [George W] Bush was but I think by that time Putin was beginning to get a grandiose notion about [how] he wanted Russia to be seen.

Robertsons eyes turned towards a picture of him and Bush on his shelf. He remembers Bush as interesting he listened to you. Not every head of state, or head of government, listens his favourite question was: What do you mean by that?

Whereas Putin, he went on, was thin-skinned, so when Obama said that Russia was just another regional power [in 2014], that would cut through. But Robertson views the UK and USs failure to punish the Syrian president Bashar al-Assad for using chemical weapons in 2014 as the moment Putin realised he could act with impunity. [It was] the most extraordinary thing to take place: a prime minister recalls the House of Commons in order to get backing for a military action and gets defeated. And not only that, [he] then stays on, he said. In the Kremlin, that must have been a bright green light.

One theory, propounded by realists such as the academic John Mearsheimer, is that Nato expansion in eastern Europe was the reason that Putin invaded Ukraine. Robertson dismissed the idea. I met Putin nine times during my time at Nato. He never mentioned Nato enlargement once. What Robertson said next was interesting: Hes not bothered about Nato, or Nato enlargement. Hes bothered by the European Union. The whole Ukraine crisis started with the offer of an [EU] accession agreement to Ukraine [in 2014].

Putin fears countries on Russias border being fundamentally and permanently changed by EU accession. Every aspect [of society is affected] they woke up very late to it I dont think they ever fully understood the EU, Robertson said, adding the caveat that the EU was not at fault because accession was what Ukraine, as a sovereign nation, wanted.

Whatever the wars cause, isnt the challenge facing Ukraine insurmountable? 15 February 1989: 100,000 Soviet troops left Afghanistan, Robertson replied. No face-saving. No off-ramp. Still, that withdrawal came ten years after the Soviet Union invaded, in 1979.

Despite Robertsons knowledge of the Ukraine conflict, he does not believe we are on the brink of total war. People who go around saying the world is more dangerous than ever thats absurd. There are a lot of dangers in the future if Putin wins in Ukraine, but at the moment there is no actual danger to us.

In terms of a physical attack, Im probably the only person who ever will [trigger Article 5] because nobodys going to cross that line, he said. Nato is stronger than it ever was before. A billion people and a trillion dollars. Almost a billion people sleep easily in their beds at night because of Nato and Article 5.

[See also: John Healey: Britain has a lot to learn from Ukraines resilience]

Here is the original post:
George Robertson: Why Russia fears the European Union - The New Statesman