Archive for the ‘European Union’ Category

India Plans to Expand Honey Exports to the European Union, Southeast Asia – Krishi Jagran

Honey Production

The Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) has been coordinating with producers and state governments to guarantee a reliable supply network of honey for export purposes to Europeand other nations.

MAngamuthu, Chairman of APEDA statedthat"We are working closely with state governments, producers, and other participants in the supply chain to increase exports to other countries and regions such as the European Union,UnitedKingdom,and South-East Asia".

He also stated that India is renegotiating the duty structure levied by several nations to increase honey exports.

In 2020-21, India exported 59,999tonnes ofnatural honey valuedat716 crores($96.77 million), with the United States accounting for 44,881 tones (74.8 percent). Other popular regions includeBangladesh,Saudi Arabia, UAE,and Canada.

AlthoughIndia's honey exports began in 1996-97, the country was ranked ninth in worldwide trade in 2020, with 7.36 lakh tons (lt) exported, according to APEDA. India is also ranked seventh in the world in terms of honey production. China, Turkey, Canada, Argentina, Iran, and the United States are significant honey producers, accounting for half oftheglobal production, which is estimated to be 17.21ltin 2019.

Angamuthustated that APEDA has assisted honey producers in reaching export markets, in addition to providing government help through various programs, quality certification, as well aslab testing.

On a priority basis, the export promotion agency is now also addressing concerns such as rising freight prices, restricted availability of containers during peak honey export season, higher nuclear magnetic resonance test expenses, and insufficient export incentives, he stressed.

Honey export hasenormous potential as a result of its popularity as an efficient immune booster and a healthy substitute to sugar, according to APEDA. Consumption has increased significantly, especially after theCovidoutbreak.

See the rest here:
India Plans to Expand Honey Exports to the European Union, Southeast Asia - Krishi Jagran

VDL scrambles to win over French after alarming poll ‘Without France, EU not as advanced’ – Daily Express

European Commission PresidentUrsula von der Leyen has heaped praise on France amid growing concerns in Brussels that French voters are increasingly turned off by the idea of a greater European federation. Ms Von der Leyen has talked up the importance of France within the EU after apoll by Ifop-EuropaNova, commissioned byLe Journal du Dimanche, released on December 25, saw the majority of those asked called for an end to the bloc.

Ms von der Leyen told France Inter: "It is a good thing and it is important that the French presidency has chosen to display the colors of Europe.

"We were very excited to see the European flag displayed on the great monuments.

"And I know that France is very proud of its long history and its flag which symbolizes it, and without France, it must be said, the European Union would never be advanced as it is today.

"Me, I find France and Europe, it goes very very well together."

JUST INGas price fury spills into Asia: Police hurl grenades after rare riots erupt in Kazakhstan

"I welcome the French presidency," she added.

"The stakes are numerous.

"We must move forward on our proposals, in particular on the fight against climate change, the digital transition and the fight against the pandemic."

Out of 1,022French people asked, 40 percent - which was the majority - called for the EU to be replaced with a Europe of nations with great focus on French sovereignty.

It comes as France takes up the revolving position of the EU presidency.

France24's Douglas Herbertbelieves the EU presidency will allow President Emmanuel Macron to project the image that France is punching above its weight diplomatically.

Mr Herbert told France 24: "Coming at this particular time his presidency and rotating presidency for six months, it's manna from heaven for Emmanuel Macron, a candidate who ran as a staunch europhile in 2017.

"And he is eager to do anything really where he has an opportunity to put both France front and centre on that European stage and to basically have a showcase in which he can put forward all the views that he has been become known for as president that is a proponent of a more powerful and a more sovereign Europe on the world stage.

DON'T MISS:Brexit Live: Massive boost as UK gets tough on fishing[LIVE BLOG]Sky News' Beth Rigby warns Biden to snub Brexit Britain[VIDEO]Brussels plots major power grab as companies targeted[INSIGHT]

"He believes that 2022 as we heard is going to be a turning point for Europe.

"And look, let's you know, we have to be honest with ourselves Europe has been in many cases disarray, a lot of different policies, and there have been centrifugal forces if you will, pulling away at the seams pulling Europe apart at times."

He continued: "Emmanuel Macron has been trying and it's been sort of the centrepiece of his presidency has been trying to bring Europe back together to sort of find its centre of gravity."

Mr Herbert added: "He obviously is not going to get all of that done, but look France always whether it's Macron or another president love to be sort of seen or give the impression of being a country that is front and centre on the diplomatic stage."

Read this article:
VDL scrambles to win over French after alarming poll 'Without France, EU not as advanced' - Daily Express

Timeline: The European Union and migration in 2021 – Al Jazeera English

Shipwrecks, fences and internal disagreements marked the European Unions efforts this year to stave off new arrivals of refugees while trying to forge a humane migration policy consistent with international law.

Al Jazeera takes a look at some of 2021s significant developments on the issue.

March 20 The migration or interior ministers of Greece, Cyprus, Malta, Italy and Spain meet in Athens. They call for a strengthening of external borders and for a European mechanism to return migrants and refugees to their countries of origin.

March 29-30 European Home Affairs Commissioner Ylva Johansson visits the Reception and Identification Centres on Samos and Lesbos for the first time. She announces the approval of 155 million euros ($175m) to build new camps on Lesbos and Chios, in addition to the 121 million euros ($137m) approved in 2020 for new camps to be built on Samos, Leros and Kos, and 22 million euros ($25m) to expand the reception centre at Fylakio, near the Turkish border.

April 22 A shipwreck off the Libyan coast claims the lives of 130 people. The search and rescue ship Ocean Viking finds dozens of bodies in the water.

April 24 Greece shuts down the Kara Tepe refugee camp on Lesbos, herding its hundreds of residents into a tent city at Mavrovounio. Following the burning of Moria camp in September 2020, Mavrovounio is the only large-scale refugee facility on the island. A new camp is to replace it in 2022.

May 11 Greece proposes authorising Frontex the EUs collective border and coastguard agency to operate outside EU waters to better prevent the flow of migrants towards Europe. In the context of the Mediterranean, this could imply patrolling international waters, but in the Aegean, it would almost certainly mean patrolling Turkish territorial waters.

May 18 Thousands of migrants and refugees from African countries try to swim to the Spanish enclave of Ceuta from Morocco, threatening to overwhelm security forces. Video recordings show authorities throwing people back into the sea, but the European Commission remains silent about the incident. Dozens of migrants and refugees also try to enter the Spanish enclave of Melilla.

May 24 Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis receives Frontex chief Fabrice Leggeri in Athens, offering much-needed political support in the midst of a European Parliamentary effort to remove the Frenchman from his post over allegedly turning a blind eye to illegal pushbacks at EU borders.

May 26 Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko threatens to allow migrants and drugs to pour into neighbouring countries. By September, the number of Iraqi refugees crossing into Lithuania from Belarus was reported to be 4,100 by September 55 times the previous years flows.

June 7 A Greek ministerial decision enters into force deeming Turkey a safe third country for Afghans, Syrians, Somalis, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. These nationalities represent 67 percent of asylum seekers in Greece. They are now rarely processed for asylum. Instead, they are asked if there is any reason why they should not apply next door in Turkey.

June 29 The European Asylum Support Office welcomes an agreement to reestablish the body as a fully-fledged European Union Agency for Asylum, with more autonomy and funding. It will ultimately be tasked with redistributing asylum applications across the EU according to member states economic and social capacity to absorb them. A quota system first proposed in 2015 was rejected by a core of anti-immigration states.

July 11 Authorities in Havana, Cuba suppress a large demonstration sparked by food shortages. In the weeks that follow, police go door-to-door, arresting participants who had been filmed. The crackdown leads to a covert exodus of possibly thousands of Cubans to Moscow, Minsk, Istanbul and Belgrade, from where they make their way into EU member states to seek asylum.

July 15 The European Parliament issues a report saying Frontex was witness to pushbacks it did not prevent. The report does not find direct Frontex involvement in pushbacks. Members of the European Parliament or MEPs had called on Frontex chief Fabrice Leggeri to resign over pushbacks in December 2020.

July 19 Police on Lesbos hold a press conference to announce they were indicting 10 individuals across four non-governmental organisations or NGOs for alleged espionage and trafficking activity. The NGOs in question are all active in search and rescue operations and have accused the Hellenic Coast Guard of conducting abandonments at sea.

July 21 Greece and Germany issue a joint declaration in Berlin, calling for fair distribution of asylum applicants among member states.

July 25 Possibly the worst single tragedy of the year takes place offshore Libya, with 150 people reportedly drowning in a shipwreck. Filippo Grandi, the head of the UNs refugee agency, urges countries to assume their responsibilities in rescuing those in distress.

July Greeces government rounds up thousands of homeless refugees and moves them into camps across the mainland.

August 15 The Taliban enters Kabul as then-President Ashraf Ghani flees, sealing their control over almost the entire country after a three-and-a-half-month campaign. Panicked residents rush to Kabul airport to flee Afghanistan, leading to an international campaign to covertly rescue as many as possible. Greece receives 819 Afghan evacuees by the end of November.

August 19 Forty-five people, including children, drown north of Libya when the engine on their boat explodes.

August 25 Greece submits to parliament a bill expanding police authority to order deportations, tightening the appeals process and shortening voluntary departure windows.

September 20 The Samos Closed Controlled Access Centre begins to receive the refugee population from the town of Vathy.

September 22 Greece receives its first Afghan evacuees since the fall of Kabul seven female members of parliament and their families.

September 28-29 Some 300 African migrants and refugees attempt to enter Ceuta, after false rumours that border security was relaxed.

October 1 The Greek migration ministry takes over the management of cash aid to refugees, but payments are subsequently delayed causing hunger and difficulty of movement.

October Lithuania continues work on a 500 kilometre-long (311 miles) fence along its border with Belarus. By then, refugees have been pouring over Belaruss borders with Latvia and Poland as well. The EU accuses Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko of attempting to destabilise neighbouring countries.

October 31 The Hellenic Coast Guard rescues 380 refugees in a stricken ship south of Crete, in the largest refugee haul of the year. Sattelite-navigation system or GPS information supplied by NGOs suggests the authorities tried to send it back to Turkey before bringing passengers onshore in Kos.

November 12 A refugee-filled boat sinks off the Libyan coast. Forty-six people are rescued and 30 bodies retrieved, but as many as 74 others are feared drowned.

November 24 Twenty-seven refugees drown in the English Channel as they try to cross from France to Britain, in what was billed as the worst such tragedy in northern European waters.

November 27 The Leros and Kos Closed Controlled Access Centres are inaugurated.

November The European Commission shuts down flights bringing refugees to Belarus, and persuades Iraq to repatriate some of its nationals.

December 1 The European Commission puts forward a set of temporary asylum procedures on the borders of Latvia, Lithuania and Poland with Belarus, which allow them to extend asylum registration and to apply simplified and quicker national procedures to deport those whose asylum applications are rejected.

December 20 Albania and North Macedonia are added to the Greek migration ministrys official list of safe third countries.

December 23-25 Three sailing boats overfilled with refugees capsizes in relatively mild weather in three different parts of the Aegean, leading to at least 31 deaths and dozens of people missing. It is the worst Aegean death toll since October 2015, when a boat sank off the coast of Lesbos.

Continued here:
Timeline: The European Union and migration in 2021 - Al Jazeera English

EU drafts plan to label gas and nuclear investments as green – Reuters

Steam rises from cooling towers of the Electricite de France (EDF) nuclear power plant in Belleville-sur-Loire, France October 12, 2021. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier

Register

Jan 1 (Reuters) - The European Union has drawn up plans to label some natural gas and nuclear energy projects as "green" investments after a year-long battle between governments over which investments are truly climate-friendly.

The European Commission is expected to propose rules in January deciding whether gas and nuclear projects will be included in the EU "sustainable finance taxonomy".

This is a list of economic activities and the environmental criteria they must meet to be labelled as green investments.

Register

By restricting the "green" label to truly climate-friendly projects, the system aims to make those investments more attractive to private capital, and stop "greenwashing", where companies or investors overstate their eco-friendly credentials.

Brussels has also made moves to apply the system to some EU funding, meaning the rules could decide which projects are eligible for certain public finance.

A draft of the Commission's proposal, seen by Reuters, would label nuclear power plant investments as green if the project has a plan, funds and a site to safely dispose of radioactive waste. To be deemed green, new nuclear plants must receive construction permits before 2045.

Investments in natural gas power plants would also be deemed green if they produce emissions below 270g of CO2 equivalent per kilowatt hour (kWh), replace a more polluting fossil fuel plant, receive a construction permit by Dec. 31 2030 and plan to switch to low-carbon gases by the end of 2035.

Gas and nuclear power generation would be labelled green on the grounds that they are "transitional" activities - defined as those that are not fully sustainable, but which have emissions below industry average and do not lock in polluting assets.

"Taking account of scientific advice and current technological progress as well as varying transition challenges across member states, the Commission considers there is a role for natural gas and nuclear as a means to facilitate the transition towards a predominantly renewable-based future," the European Commission said in a statement.

To help states with varying energy backgrounds to transition, "under certain conditions, solutions can make sense that do not look exactly 'green' at first glance," a Commission source told Reuters, adding that gas and nuclear investments would face "strict conditions".

EU countries and a panel of experts will scrutinise the draft proposal, which could change before it is due to be published later in January. Once published, it could be vetoed by a majority of EU countries or the European Parliament.

The policy has been mired in lobbying from governments for more than a year and EU countries disagree on which fuels are truly sustainable.

Natural gas emits roughly half the CO2 emissions of coal when burned in power plants, but gas infrastructure is also associated with leaks of methane, a potent planet-warming gas.

The EU's advisers had recommended that gas plants not be labelled as green investments unless they met a lower 100g CO2e/kWh emissions limit, based on the deep emissions cuts scientists say are needed to avoid disastrous climate change.

Nuclear power produces very low CO2 emissions but the Commission sought expert advice this year on whether the fuel should be deemed green given the potential environmental impact of radioactive waste disposal.

Some environmental campaigners and Green EU lawmakers criticised the leaked proposal on gas and nuclear.

"By including them... the Commission risks jeopardising the credibility of the EU's role as a leading marketplace for sustainable finance," Greens president Philippe Lamberts said.

Austria opposes nuclear power, alongside countries including Germany and Luxembourg. EU states including the Czech Republic, Finland and France, which gets around 70% of its power from the fuel, see nuclear as crucial to phasing out CO2-emitting coal fuel power.

Register

Reporting by Kate Abnett; Additional reporting by Sabine Siebold; Editing by Frances Kerry and Louise Heavens

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read more here:
EU drafts plan to label gas and nuclear investments as green - Reuters

"Economic coercionnew EU jargon for lobbying by third countries: Can the European Commissions proposed regulation to prevent foreign government…

On December 8, 2021, the European Commission adopted its proposal for a regulation to deter and counteract economic coercion measures by non-EU countries, such as Russia and China. The Commission committed to make a legislative proposal by the end of 2021 at the latest in a joint declaration by the Council, European Parliament and Commission in February 2021 highlighting the gap in the EUs international trade protection instrument armory.

It appears be an attempt to use the EUs exclusive legislative powers under the Common Commercial Policy (Article 207(2) TFEU) to allow the European Commission to adopt a new range of sanctions against foreign countries, companies and individuals beyond the current sanction regime, which only applies where consistent with international law. By assigning the tool to the realm of trade policy instead of foreign policy, the regulation may be passed by a qualified majority of governments, circumventing the usual unanimity requirement that frequently hampers the EUs foreign policy.

The mechanism is designed to target actions by third countries intended to coerce the EU or a member state to take or withdraw specific policy measuresin other words, state-sponsored efforts that exploit economic links, such as trade and investmentto push for political change in a national government or across the whole EU. However, coercion from private companies and individuals will also be penalized if the conduct is part of an subversive campaign led by a state actor.

The coercive measures that might trigger application of this instrument are not linked to the form of the measures but to the level of their intent to coerce the EU or a member state. The result is a very broad potential scope for coercive measures covered by the proposal.

While the 12 categories of Union Response measures listed in Annex I will require implementation by the member states, the Commission alone has the power to open an investigation of its own initiative and to adopt response measures. These could include:

The EUs countermeasures can target individuals, companies and/or third countries.

The instruments main objective is not to impose punitive measures; rather, it aims toward deterrence in order to preserve the EU and the member states legitimate right to make policy choices and decisions and prevent serious interference in the sovereignty of the EU or its member states. This objective suggests that sanctions will be used as a last resort, after all forms of international engagement have been exhausted.

Any member state, company or entity can bring a complaint to the Commission, which will then investigate the situation and gather the necessary evidence to see if the dispute amounts to economic coercion or relates to measures that fall under the WTOs jurisdiction.

If the Commission establishes that economic coercion has been used, it will proceed by engaging directly with the relevant country and begin negotiations to find a solution. However, if ultimately, such mediation fails and the coercion persists, the Commission can recommend countermeasures, which are then first debated before they can be approved by the member states. In certain urgent situations, the Commission is entitled to act alone to adopt temporarily measures, subject to subsequent scrutiny by the European Parliament and Council.

Once approved, all 27 member states will have to enforce the sanctions against the third country, even if they are not direct victims of the coercion campaign. Unity and solidarity remain key to uphold our values and interests, according to Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis, who is responsible for EU trade policy.

The European Parliament and the Council have undertaken to consider the proposal in a timely manner. It has thus far received strong support in feedback in response to the Commissions previous consultations. A new consultation has been opened for the next two months, until February 14, 2022, providing stakeholders and citizens an opportunity to submit additional feedback, which the Commission will report to the Council and Parliament.

In addition, the proposal now needs to be discussed and agreed by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. It will be considered under the Ordinary Legislative Procedure, whereby the Parliament and Council will internally develop their positions before negotiating with each other in Trilogue discussions with the assistance of the Commission.

France and Germany appear to support the proposal alongside other member states expressing their concern about the growing trend of increasing economic coercion.

However, other countries like Sweden and the Czech Republic, the Nordics, and Ireland have expressed their unease with the far-reaching scope of the instrument, and the potential that it will lead to more protectionism. They emphasized that sanctions should remain exceptional, comply with international law and that their harmful effects on the blocs overall economy should be kept to a minimum. In a joint statement, Sweden and the Czech Republic stated that it would be extremely difficult (especially in a short time) to quantify economic and political damage and find appropriate countermeasures.

The main fear is that the economic coercion proposal would escalate trade disputes, by becoming a trade irritant instead of an effective deterrent against giants like Russia, China and the US. An EU countermeasure could trigger a chain of retaliation measures under the WTO Agreement, which can target completely different sectors. Such escalation is exactly what worries some countries within the EU as well as the blocs like-minded trading partners. It remains to be seen, therefore, if EU capitals will succeed in diluting the instrument.

Additional questions have been raised by economic actors operating in the EU regarding the consequences of potential measures countering coercive third-country actions. For example, the instrument does not provide (so far) for an opportunity to claim compensation for damage suffered by economic operators arising from the EU reactive measures and other actions under the instrument.

More:
"Economic coercionnew EU jargon for lobbying by third countries: Can the European Commissions proposed regulation to prevent foreign government...