Mediaboss Marketing

David Davis has warned EU chiefs "the clock ticking" in Brexit negotiations in a bid to pushtalks towards discussions on a future trade deal.

The Brexit Secretary will publish five position papers further setting out Britain's negotiating strategy this week in an attempt to speed up the talks.

Brussels stated at the start of negotiations that discussionswould take place in two stages, with the first phase concentrating on the UKs withdrawal and the second on a new trade deal.

But Mr Davis is expected to approach EU chiefs and argue the talks should take place in parallel.

A key document is expected on the Government's favoured approaches to enforcing rights outside the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

Disagreement over the ECJ's role was a major sticking point during July's round of talks, with the UK aghast at Brussels' insistence that EU citizens' rights should be enforced by the court after Brexit.

Next week's paper will set out different possible approaches to end the "direct jurisdiction" of the ECJ but still enforce individuals' and businesses' rights after Brexit.

Big Ben should bong Britain out of EU, Brexit-backing MPs say

But first, a document on goods will emphasise the Government is seeking a deal to ensure the freest and most friction-less trade possible in goods and services.

At present, the EU's position is that only goods should be discussed in "phase one" of the negotiations, in which "sufficient progress" must be made before talks on a future trade deal can begin.

But Britain believes the goods and services sectors are impossible to separate and so wants to discuss them together.

Mr Davis said: "With the clock ticking, it wouldn't be in either of our interests to run aspects of the negotiations twice."

David Davis

Reuters

Michel Barnier

AP

Tim Barrow

AFP/Getty Images

Oliver Robbins

Sabine Weyand

Didier Seeuws

AFP/Getty Images

He went on: "This week we set out more detail of the future relationship we want with the European Union, putting forward imaginative and creative solutions to build a deep and special partnership with our closest neighbours and allies.

"In the coming days we will demonstrate our thinking even further, with five new papers - all part of our work to drive the talks forward, and make sure we can show beyond doubt that we have made sufficient progress on withdrawal issues by October so that we can move on to discuss our future relationship."

Another position paper on confidentiality will make clear the Government's intentions on ensuring official documents and information exchanged between the UK, EU and other member states remain protected after Brexit.

A document will also be published on civil judicial co-operation to reassure the domestic legal sector and with an eye on August's talks.

And a paper on data will seek to ensure that it continues to be passed between the UK and EU without disruption.

Writing in the Sunday Times, Mr Davis said some early discussion of the future trading relationship would help progress on the Irish border, a key issue in phase one of withdrawal talks.

"It is simply not possible to reach a near final agreement on the border issue until we've begun to talk about how our broader future customs arrangement will work," he said.

"Furthermore, if we get the comprehensive free trade agreement we're seeking as part of our future partnership, solutions in Northern Ireland are easier to deliver."

Meanwhile, Sir Paul Jenkins, who was the Government's most senior legal official for eight years until 2014, said Britain would have to replicate EU rules and submit to the ECJ "in all but name" if it wants to remove the need for hard borders.

Last week the Government published a paper setting out its wish for close customs arrangements with the EU and no hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

"If the UK is to be part of something close enough to a customs union or the single market to remove the need for hard borders, it will only work if the rules are identical to the EU's own internal rules," Sir Paul told the Observer.

"Not only must they be the same but there must be consistent policing of those rules. If Theresa May's red line means we cannot be tied to the ECJ, the Brexit treaty will need to provide a parallel policing system.

"That may be a new court but, in reality, any new court will have to follow what the ECJ says about the EU's own rules, otherwise the new system won't work. So, never mind Theresa May's foolish red line; we will have the ECJ in all but name."

Additional reporting by Press Association

Read more:
David Davis: Trade talks with European Union must begin with 'clock ticking' over Brexit - Evening Standard

European Commission chief Jean-Claude Juncker has said the continent cannot rely on American military support in the long run, reiterating his previous calls for establishing Europes own integrated military.

It becomes clear that we cannot rely on American defense support in the long run, Juncker told the Austrian Tiroler Tageszeitung newspaper.

Read more

Speaking about the current state of European affairs, he said Europe only became stronger and more inclined to stick together after the British voted to leave the EU in their landmark 2016 referendum.

The 27-member bloc, he said, is steadily recovering from the crises it has faced since 2015, including the mass influx of refugees and the surprise election of Donald Trump as US president.

The veteran politician has consistently suggested that Europe become less dependent on its transatlantic ally in terms of military support. In June, he argued the European Union should cease outsourcing defense matters.

The protection of Europe can no longer be outsourced. Even our biggest military powers and I could count them on one, maximum two cannot combat all the challenges and threats alone, he said at the Prague Defense and Security Conference.

Less than three percent of Europes troops are combat-ready and fit for deployment, he said, while alluding to the creation of European Defense Fund to conduct defense-related research.

Juncker said Washington now believes they are shouldering too much of the burden for their wealthy European allies, which in turn should make Europe more pro-active in defending their interests.

Calls for a greater European military integration have also been voiced by other senior officials. Hans-Peter Bartels, the German parliaments Commissioner for the Armed Forces, said in June there will be a European army in the end, destined to unite disorganized, technically fragmented and duplicate structures.

Read more

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has also championed the move to create a joint defense force on a number of occasions. "We should list the issue of security as a priority, and we should start setting up a common European army," he said last August at a meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the Polish, Czech and Slovak leaders in Warsaw.

Though the Treaty on European Union provides for substantial defense integration among member states, Europes own military structures remain embryonic.

There are several joint military formations operating under the auspices of the EU, including Eurocorps, formed by a Franco-German brigade, and a number of smaller battlegroups formed by specific countries across the continent.

The EU Military Staff (EUMS), which is attached to the office of the High Representative for Foreign Affairs, oversees external deployments but does not act as a fully-fledged military HQ.

In June this year, the Council of Europe moved to create the so-called Military Planning and Conduct Capability (MPCC) to strengthen the EUMS. The new body will assume responsibility at the strategic level for the operational planning and conduct of the EUs non-executive military missions, the council said.

Link:
Europe cannot rely on US support to defend itself EU Commission chief - RT

The Tory activist slammed the European Union for failing to enforce a successful security policy to tackle terrorism because of its open borders.

Speaking to BBC Any Questions, Ms. Perrins questioned the ability of EU member states to address the threat of terrorism while maintaining free movement.

She said: "For too long in Europe, the borders have been far too porous. And the politicians and the elite, especially in Brussels and in Germany, are not willing to admit it.

GETTY/BBC

"Intelligence is probably your most important weapon when you are using unsophisticated weapons. Of course, it's very hard to have intelligence if you don't know who is entering your country."

Ms Perrins was discussing Thursday's terror attack in Barcelona, Spain, that saw 13 people killed and more than 100 injured they strolled around the Las Ramblas district of the city.

The EU should reconsider its current border security policy in order to guarantee the safety of its citizens, she said.

She said: "If you are a country, if you are a nation, you have to have borders. They have to be protected otherwise you don't have a clue who's coming in and out of the country."

Since 2015 Germany has been targeted by terrorists five times, including a similar attack to the one in Barcelona.

In 2016, 12 people died and 56 other injured when a car sped through the crowd at a Christmas market in Berlin.

Terror groups have successfully targeted five EU countries since the start of 2017.

Haras Rafiq, the CEO of counter-terrorism organisation Quilliam, said he was not surprised about the attack in Barcelona because Spain has had issues with terrorism "for a while".

He said: "We know that Spain has been a hub for financing ISIS and plots, recently there were people in April arrested for financing the France and Belgium plots.

"Also we know that Spain is a hub through which people are sent out to join ISIS and to return back to Europe and just because Spain hasn't had an attack for a while, it doesn't mean that all these things have been bubbling underneath."

In 2004, 192 people died when 10 bombs exploded on commuter trains during rush hour in the Spanish capital of Madrid.

Read the original post:
'They won't admit it!' EU savaged for security failures in wake of Barcelona attack - Express.co.uk

Big Bens iconic chimes should bong Britain out of the European Union on the day of Brexit, Leave-backing Tory MPs have said.

Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg said the bongs would be symbolically uplifting for the country as a row continues to grow over plans to silence the Great Bell for four years.

Earlier this week, Parliament said it would review plans to silence Big Ben for maintenance work to be carried out, after Prime Minister Theresa May joined a backlash against the move.

But the bongs will still be halted after noon on Monday so the work on the Elizabeth Tower and the clock and bell it houses can begin.

Earlier this year, Downing Street said Britain would leave the EU "when Big Ben bongs midnight" on March 29, 2019, the deadline for the two-year Article 50 withdrawal process.

But Commons authorities could not confirm when the chimes would start up again, or whether Big Ben would bong on Brexit day.

Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg told the Daily Mail: "I think Big Ben ought to be kept striking as much as possible during the repairs as long as it doesn't deafen the work force.

It would be symbolically uplifting for it to sound out our departure from the EU as a literally ringing endorsement of democracy."

Party colleague Peter Bone said: "Big Ben should bong when we come out of the EU, absolutely.

Big Ben maintenance man slams plans to silence clock as 'nonsense'

"We are being liberated from the European Union superstate and Britain will again be a completely self-governing country. Where will the eyes of the world be? On Parliament and Big Ben. It would be very strange if at midnight on that day it does not chime out, very bizarre. It is the heart of our nation."

And fellow Tory Andrew Bridgen added: "It would be very fitting if Big Ben was to chime us out of the EU. We need to go out with a boom as we regain a sovereign parliament once again."

A Commons spokesman said: "On Monday, following the 12 noon chimes, Big Ben's bongs will temporarily cease.

"We cannot yet give a confirmed date for when chiming will resume, however the intent is to maintain striking for important events, such as Remembrance Sunday and New Year's Eve.

"The clock mechanism will continue to function for the immediate future, and we will aim to have at least one working clock face visible throughout the works.

"When Parliament returns, the House of Commons Commission will consider the length of time that the bells will fall silent.

"Of course, any discussion will focus on undertaking the work efficiently, protecting the health and safety of those involved, and seeking to ensure resumption of normal service as soon as is practicable given those requirements."

If the bell does not bong for four years, it would be the longest period Big Ben has been silenced in its 157-year history.

The 13.7-tonne Great Bell was last stopped for maintenance in 2007 and before that was halted for two years in 1983 for refurbishment, but has been stopped on a number of other occasions since it first sounded in 1859.

Parliamentary officials have insisted workers' hearing would be put at "serious risk" if the bell continued chiming. They warned that those using the 100-metre-high scaffolding around the tower could also be startled by the 118-decibel bongs.

And they have dismissed suggestions the chimes could be restored during the hours that work is not being carried out as the process takes about half a day to complete.

The 29 million renovation includes the installation of a lift and repairs to the clock's hands, mechanism and pendulum.

View original post here:
Big Ben should bong Britain out of European Union, Brexit-backing MPs say - Evening Standard

Thats all kinds of scary. If theres one place on Earth that would be the worst possible spot for a giant volcanic chain, its beneath West Antarctica. Turns out, its not a great situation to have a bunch of volcanoes underneath a huge ice sheet.

In a discovery announced earlier this week, a team of researchers discovered dozens of them across a 2,200-mile swath of the frozen continent. Antarctica, if youre listening, please stop scaring us.

The study that led to the discoverywas conceived of by an undergraduate student at the University of Edinburgh, Max Van Wyk de Vries. With a team of researchers, he used radar to look under the ice for evidence of cone-shaped mountains that had disturbed the ice around them. They found 91 previously unknown volcanoes. We were amazed, Robert Bingham, one of the studys authors, told the Guardian.

The worry is that, as in Iceland and Alaska, two regions of active volcanism that were ice-covered until relatively recently, a warming climate could help these Antarctic volcanoes spring to life soon. In a worst-case scenario, the melting ice could release pressure on the volcanoes and trigger eruptions, further destabilizing the ice sheet.

The big question is: how active are these volcanoes? That is something we need to determine as quickly as possible, Bingham said.

Read the original here:
The European Union is considering an electric car mandate. - Grist