Archive for the ‘European Union’ Category

European Union parliament condemns United Kingdom Brexit … – Firstpost

Brussels: The European Parliament's group on Brexit negotiations has made a damning assessment of British proposals on EU citizens' rights after the United Kingdom leaves the European Union, a further indication of how tough the two-year negotiations are expected to become.

Representational image. Reuters

In a letter Monday to EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier and seen by The Associated Press, the group said "the UK does not respect the principles of reciprocity, symmetry and non-discrimination." Furthermore, it said that under the UK proposals made on 26 June, EU citizens in Britain would be looking at "nothing less than relegation to second-class status."

Citizens' rights in each other's nations are considered the first issue that both sides must settle. Even though Barnier is leading the negotiations, the European Parliament still has a veto right on any deal.

Recently, Barnier had said that Britain cannot enjoy "frictionless" trade with EU partners after it leaves the union. He took a tough position on theBrexitnegotiations, warning there will be "negative" consequences no matter what.

He said the consequences would be even worse if the EU and Britain can't agree on departure terms, and there's no "reasonable justification" for failing to reach a deal. He insisted, however, that the EU isn't trying to punish Britain for voting to leave.

Read more:
European Union parliament condemns United Kingdom Brexit ... - Firstpost

European Union parliament threatens veto on Brexit over citizens’ rights – 13abc Action News

BRUSSELS (AP) - The European Parliament on Monday set itself on a collision course with Britain, making a damning assessment of British proposals on EU citizens' rights after the U.K. leaves the European Union.

The legislature indicated it would be using its power of veto on the negotiations if Britain did not become more lenient on the rights of EU citizens living in the country, a further indication of how tough the two-year negotiations are expected to become.

In a letter Monday to EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier, the group said EU citizens in Britain would be looking at "nothing less than relegation to second-class status," adding that the U.K. proposals made on June 26 do not "respect the principles of reciprocity, symmetry and non-discrimination."

Citizens' rights in each other's nations are considered the first issue that both sides must settle.

"It is clear we will not approve any deal which diminishes the rights of EU citizens in the U.K. or U.K. citizens in the EU," Guy Verhofstadt, the EU Parliament's chief Brexit official, told the AP.

Even though Barnier is leading the negotiations for the EU as a whole, the European Parliament still has a veto right on any deal. So Verhofstadt's words carry power and should boost the standing of Barnier when he meets with his British counterpart David Davis next week.

British Prime Minister Theresa May had first floated her ideas on protecting the rights of each other's citizens at an EU summit in late June. The U.K. proposal offers EU nationals who have lived in Britain for at least five years - as of an unspecified cut-off date - "settled status," with the right to live, work and access benefits. The estimated 3 million EU nationals in Britain would all have to apply individually for permission to stay, and it's unclear what the plan would mean for those who have been in the U.K. for a shorter time.

The other EU leaders were halfhearted at best about what May called a "generous" offer on protecting the rights of EU citizens.

After carefully studying the details, the EU Parliament's Brexit Steering Group was much more definitive and said too much of Britain's optimistic talk was just a smoke screen. It indicated it wouldn't be good enough for the legislature.

"The rights of EU citizens in the U.K. will be reduced to a level lower than third country nationals in the EU," the letter to Barnier said.

"The aspirational language used in relation to rights as important as the right to health or the recognition of diploma and professional qualifications does not provide the much-needed guarantees."

"Above all," the four-page letter brimming with scathing comments added, EU citizens in Britain would have "no life-long protection."

The EU parliament wants citizens from both sides to receive "fair treatment" and their rights "given full priority in the negotiations."

Alongside citizens' rights, the Brexit negotiators will first have to address the substantial bill that Britain will have to pay to quit the EU and the problems surrounding the border in Ireland.

The withdrawal process of Britain from the EU should be completed by March 2019, meaning negotiators only have up to the fall of 2018 to agree, not only on the disentanglement of the country but also on setting up a new relationship.

The EU has said once there is "sufficient" progress on such withdrawal issues as the rights of citizens, it could start talks simultaneously on a new relationship and a trade deal.

The difficulties already surrounding the first issue indicate that it could become a tough job.

Here is the original post:
European Union parliament threatens veto on Brexit over citizens' rights - 13abc Action News

International Dairy Foods Association: European Union, Japan trade agreement could be bad for US dairy industry – Fence Post

The free trade agreement announced last week between the European Union and Japan looks "ominous" for the U.S. dairy industry, a key official at the International Dairy Foods Association told The Hagstrom Report.

The deal includes reductions in Japanese tariffs on European cheeses and the acceptance of a system of geographical indicators, or GIs, that require only a cheese from a place of origin can bear that location's name.

"The EU-Japan bilateral agreement could be an ominous portent for U.S. dairy exports to Japan," said Beth Hughes, the IDFA director of international affairs, in an email.

"The Department of Agriculture projects that U.S. milk production will grow by 23 percent over the next 10 year," Hughes said. "Given that today we are exporting 15 percent of our total production, there needs to be increased export opportunities for approximately 80 billion pounds of milk over the next 10 years. Bilateral agreements, especially in the Asia-Pacific region, are critical if we are to attain our future export potential and continue to support American jobs. This agreement enhances the EU as a competitor to the U.S. for dairy exports to Japan now and in the future.

"The EU is currently negotiating a deal with Mexico on GIs, concluded one with Canada last year, and now they've struck one with Japan. We still need to see all the details but we are concerned about which common food names will be affected and how that will impact U.S. cheese exports to Japan."

Publications have also noted the threat to the U.S. dairy industry as well as other sectors, including meat and wine.

The U.S. dairy industry and other sectors were big backers of the Trans Pacific Partnership agreement, which President Donald Trump withdrew from.

Original post:
International Dairy Foods Association: European Union, Japan trade agreement could be bad for US dairy industry - Fence Post

The European Union will not die with the giants who built it – The New European

PUBLISHED: 17:45 10 July 2017 | UPDATED: 17:45 10 July 2017

Bonnie Greer

The coffin for late former chancellor Helmut Kohl at the European Parliament in Strasbourg.

DPA/PA Images

Email this article to a friend

To send a link to this page you must be logged in.

La construction europenne est fragilise par la prolifration bureaucratique et le scepticisme croissant qui en dcoule.

The European construction is weakened by bureaucratic proliferation and the growing scepticism that ensues, Emmanuel Macron announced at his gathering of legislators at Versailles.

Summoning what could only be described as the full De Gaulle, the pomp of the new president was called Pharaonic by Jean-Luc Mlenchon, who boycotted the Congrs. But Macrons statements about the EU were positively 21st century, as they seemed to have been illustrated by a reported incident at Strasbourg that very day.

The European Commission President, Jean-Claude Juncker, was furious at the tiny number of MEPs who had come to the chamber of the parliament to hear a speech by the Prime Minister of Malta. He called the body ridiculous and accused it of lacking respect for the smaller nations of the EU.

The president of the Parliament, Antonio Tajani, asked Juncker in Italian to back off. Tajani moved to French and instructed Juncker to mind his language and not to call the parliament ridiculous.

There are 751 MEPs. Only a reported 30 showed up for the speech, which was an account of Maltas six month presidency. Juncker, former prime minister of Luxembourg, pointed out that this absenteeism was typical and that if Angela Merkel or Macron had been there, all 751 MEPs would have been in attendance. There was reported anger, too, at the small number of attendees when the president of the Marshall Islands came to address the parliament after a journey that had to have been approximately 18 hours long. The reality of the bigger nations commanding respect, and the smaller nations having to struggle to get any at all is not particular to the EU but it reinforces the negative narrative of an organisation that many consider no longer fit for purpose.

For example: all MEPs are expected to attend whats called plenary sessions once a month in Strasbourg. They have to sign an official register to prove that theyve attended a plenary and in return receive 306 euros a day to cover expenses. There are accusations of MEPs signing in for half days and then going elsewhere the same accusation levelled at peers in the House Of Lords. Except that the EU is a conglomerate of sovereign nations, each with its own story, its own challenges.

Now with the sheer chaos of Brexit; the tragic and urgent reality of immigration from Africa which is bringing Italy and Greece to breaking point; the rise of right-wing populism; and the arrival of a charismatic dynamo from France in the person of its new president who may or may not be good news for the European project, it is a tricky time for the EU.

An intelligent question would be: what is the EU for now? What is its meaning?

The irony and poignancy of the deaths of Helmut Kohl and Simone Veil so close to one another remind us of something lost in the tumult of our time, a time most of us only know as having always been this way. How could we have known any other?

Only an expert can unravel the labyrinth of post-war German politics. A nation carved in two by its vanquishers determined to stop a momentum that had been driving forward, more or less, since the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, it was a miracle that Germany had any politics at all. And a miracle was what Germany was. It was aided by American money and a USA determined to win the Cold War against the Soviet Union. Millions of us were born and grew up under the reality of an East Germany and a West Germany. A broken nation that deserved to be broken. Needed to be broken for the peace of Europe itself.

At the height of the whole thing, there came The Wall, a monstrosity erected by the Soviet Union on which people literally died. The Berlin Wall became a metaphor for both the restrictions and oppression of the Soviet Union, and the blue jeans and rock and roll of the West. The West was America and Great Britain and the freedom to do what you wanted.

Kohl, who had joined the Hitler Youth in the last days of the Second World War took no part in this. He was a conservative and no saint, either. His last days were mired in political scandal; intrigue and shame. A famous German satirist once labelled him Don Kohleoni.

The left hated him and called him a pear because of his shape. They ridiculed him without mercy. But the Pear was also a political talent-spotter. Angela Merkel is his protge.

Outside of Germany he is now and will be remembered for German reunification and European integration. And the picture of him holding hands in solidarity with another wily political operator, Franois Mitterrand, during a ceremony, will endure. Kohl was buried with the flag of the EU draped on his coffin, a German who had come to embrace something much bigger than Germany.

Simone Veil, who died almost two weeks after Kohl, like him, embraced Europe. But unlike Kohl, Europe, in the reality of her native land and Germany itself, had tried to kill her. Veil, Jewish and born in Nice, was transported to Auschwitz. French Jews were rounded up and sent to their deaths with a zeal which even surprised Nazi officials, and is still a scar on the nation. Her brother and father disappeared in a truck heading for Lithuania, and her mother died of typhus in Belsen. You were murdered in Auschwitz but you passed away in Belsen, a survivor once said. In short, in Bergen Belsen people were left to rot. But this Nioise survived to return to speak at Auschwitz-Birkenau in 2005 for the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the camps.

Like Kohl, she was a passionate European. She became an MEP and eventually president of the Parliament. She also served on various committees. For her, bringing France and Germany together was an act not only of necessity, but of supreme intelligence. France, with its border with Germany, its long history of conflict and hatred, became, for Veil, a kind of workshop for her own rebirth.

The European Union can be said to have been, for her, at once a reality and a promise. She and Helmut Kohl must have had no illusions about it. But they were Europeans. They pushed against the boundaries of their own countries. They remade them as Idea. And Purpose.

I was told once that what I really didnt get about Brexit is that it is really English nationalism by another name. Maybe that explains why Brexit is still being driven though in the light of a flip/flop pound; the possibility of real trouble in Northern Ireland; the reality of investment banks looking away from the City of London and toward Frankfurt and Dublin; a Civil Service having to shore up its expertise to handle hundreds of new laws to replace European laws; inflation rising because of the fluctuating currency; science agreements in turmoil; workers not coming over to work in the fields. The list will get longer. And more complex.

Maybe Emmanuel Macron, born in the 1970s, can begin to bring some kind of understanding of the new reality facing this part of the world, especially in the face of the economic powerhouses of the USA and China, and in not very long: India. He demands reform. The EU needs it, and it is possible.

Everybodys buying Europe now, an American investor has said recently. Just when GB is selling it.

But first it was Helmut Kohl and Simone Veil who helped to make it.

Read more here:
The European Union will not die with the giants who built it - The New European

European Union hails liberation of Mosul, urges Iraqis to rebuild their country – Firstpost

Brussels: The European Union has hailed the defeat of the Islamic State group in Mosul as a "decisive step" in fighting terrorism but called on Iraqis to work together to improve their country.

Representational image. Reuters

Iraqi prime minister Haider al-Abadi earlier announced that pro-government forces had retaken the second city from Islamic State after a months-long battle that killed thousands of civilians and forced nearly a million people from their homes.

"The recovery of Mosul from the hands of (Islamic State) marks a decisive step in the campaign to eliminate terrorist control in parts of Iraq and to free its people," the EU foreign affairs chief Federica Mogherini and its aid commissioner Christos Stylianides said in a joint statement on Sunday.

But they urged Iraqis to pick up the pieces of their country, parts of which were easily overran by Islamic State three years ago.

"It is now essential that a process of return and the re-establishment of trust between communities begins, and that all Iraqis are able to start building a shared future," they said.

Islamic State still controls swathes of western Iraq including much of the desert Anbar province and rival forces, which largely cooperated against the jihadists in Mosul, are expected to compete for a share of the spoils.

Abadi himself has faced accusations of incompetence and corruption in his government, and followers of popular cleric Moqtada Sadr have staged large protests in Baghdad calling for electoral reform.

More:
European Union hails liberation of Mosul, urges Iraqis to rebuild their country - Firstpost