Archive for the ‘European Union’ Category

The European Union First – New Vision – New Vision

By Javier Solana

The world needs the European Union now more than ever. Despite recent crises and the hard blow dealt by the Brexit vote, the EU may well be the worlds best line of defense against todays most serious threats: isolationism, protectionism, nationalism, and extremism in all forms, all of which are once again growing in Europe and beyond.

The key to enabling the EU to meet this potential to save itself and the world from catastrophe is for member states urgently to adopt a European Union first mantra.

Unlike the America first credo embraced by US President Donald Trump, such a mantra would not be an exercise in damaging unilateralism. On the contrary, it would compel member states governments to look beyond narrow national interest, defend openness and multilateralism, and confront head-on the exclusionary political forces that have lately been gaining ground.

It would drive member states to consolidate the EU, thereby enabling it to overcome the challenges it faces and help preserve the international order.

That order is neither an inessential accessory nor a post-war relic. It has supported global prosperity and stability for 70 years. We need it together with the multilateralism on which it is built to confront many of the economic, environmental, and strategic challenges we now face, challenges that cannot be addressed at the national level.

A cornerstone of the existing international order is the recognition that maintaining peace and human welfare requires an understanding of and respect for the needs and interests of others needs and interests that are no less legitimate than our own.

Multilateralism is not a product of unsustainable solidarity, as some like to claim; it is the result of an enlightened interpretation of ones own interests. With a constructive attitude, even a large number of disparate actors can reach agreements in which everyone wins by yielding a little; without it, prospects for sustained peace and widely shared prosperity become far bleaker.

If all countries put their own interests first, paying no heed to others, competition will quickly overwhelm common interests. If nobody is ever willing to yield, we will all lose.

If we depend solely on bilateral deals, the shared spaces and synergies that facilitate agreement on difficult but vital topics from climate change to security will narrow until they disappear.

This is why Trumps embrace of an American first mantra is so worrying. As the worlds leading power, the US sets the tone of cooperation and often provides the incentives for other countries to participate.

If the US maintains a unilateral and isolationist stance, other countries are almost certain to follow suit, endangering everyone including the US.

Recently, the Trump administration has begun to moderate some of its foreign-policy positions. In particular, Trump has finally agreed to honor the One China policy.

He also seems to have rectified his approach to Japan, after having raised doubts about his willingness to follow through on Americas security commitments.

These developments imply that the administration is beginning to recognize the need for a more constructive approach.

That recognition may arise partly out of an understanding of history. Experience has shown that the most effective way to prevent conflicts is through inclusion and cooperation. Exclusionary rhetoric plays into the hands of those who reduce identity to nativist definitions.

When such figures nationalists and populists have been left to guide policy in the past, the result has been large-scale conflict.

At a time when global power dynamics are in flux, as is true today, the risk of such an outcome is even greater. Today, an effort is being made to incorporate emerging powers particularly China more deeply into the existing structures of global governance.

Casting doubt on these structures, which have sustained stability over the last seven decades, would merely fuel more nationalism and competition, opening the way for volatility and conflict.

If the US cannot be counted on to support global stability, the EUs model and experience will become even more important. The EU is the embodiment of inclusion, cooperation, and democratic values.

Despite its flaws, the EU has proved time and again how differences can be resolved peacefully and constructively. Its member states are uniquely committed to multilateralism; indeed, we practice it daily.

The results speak for themselves. No one can doubt that the EU has been a guarantor of peace, democracy, modernity, and progress for all of its members.

Its community model which requires cooperation, negotiation, and compromise to reach any consequential decision amounts to a check on extremism, because no member country can push radical policies forward without other members pushing back.

This is not to say that EU countries face no risk of falling victim to simplistic populist rhetoric. On the contrary, the point is to highlight why EU member states must dedicate themselves to the continued construction of a stronger and deeper union.

For the sake of Europe and the world, it is time to put the EU first.

No one knows better than Europe the consequences of extremism and nationalism or how to overcome them. With an enlightened and supranational spirit, the EU has achieved a sustained peace that would have seemed impossible a century ago. It must not lose sight of that achievement. Instead, it must continue to advance the union, and show the world what multilateralism can do.

Writerwas EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, Secretary-General of NATO, and Foreign Minister of Spain. He is currently President of the ESADE Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics and Distinguished Fellow at the Brookings Institution.

Go here to read the rest:
The European Union First - New Vision - New Vision

European Union asks India to extend by 6 months trade pact with EU nations – Economic Times

NEW DELHI: The European Union today pressed India to extend by six months its bilateral investment pacts with several EU-member countries which are expiring soon, saying absence of the treaties could adversely impact trade ties and FTA talks.

A high-level European Parliament delegation, here to gauge India's views about the Trump administration and discuss various key issues concerning India-EU ties, also expressed concern over situation in Jammu and Kashmir and called for improvement in ties between India and Pakistan.

Chair of the EU delegation for relations with India Geoffrey Van Orden said EU wants New Delhi to renew the investment deals first to take forward the stalled FTA talks.

"It will be helpful if trade and investment pacts can be extended for six months. The issue has become a problem for the FTA talks," he told reporters.

India's existing trade and investment pacts with The Netherlands have come to an end in November while while similar pacts with several other EU countries will expire in the coming months.

Orden said expiry of the pacts will make it difficult for the European countries to go for fresh investments in India, adding the EU want India to first give the extension to the pacts and then move ahead with the FTA which is known as EU-India Broad-based Trade and Investment Agreement (BTIA).

On Kashmir, he said EU is always sensitive about issues relating to human rights violations, adding certain forces do not want India-Pakistan relations to improve.

He said there ware "serious problem" of Pakistan containing terrorists and that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had showed his resolve to improve ties with Islamabad.

Orden said the aim of the delegation is to understand India's views on the Trump administration, discuss issues relating to Pakistan and matters concerning India-EU ties.

The delegation is meeting Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, Commerce Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and Minister of State for External Affairs V K Singh during which the issues are likely to be flagged.

The BTIA talks have been stalled since May, 2013, when both sides failed to bridge substantial gaps on crucial issues, including data security status for IT sector.

Launched in June 2007, negotiations for the proposed agreement have witnessed many hurdles as both the sides have major differences on crucial issues.

In the EU-India Summit in Brussels, the two sides had failed to make any announcement on resumption of the negotiations as many bottlenecks still remain.

The two sides are yet to iron out issues related to tariff and movement of professionals but the EU has shown an inclination to restart talks.

Besides demanding significant duty cuts in automobiles, the EU wants tax reduction in wines, spirits and dairy products, and a strong intellectual property regime.

On the other hand, India is asking for granting 'data secure nation' status to it by the EU. The country is among nations not considered data secure by the EU.

The matter is crucial as it will have a bearing on Indian IT companies wanting market access.

Read more from the original source:
European Union asks India to extend by 6 months trade pact with EU nations - Economic Times

European Union has serious problems ahead and Greek debt is just one – The National

On March 25, leaders of the European Unions member states will convene in Rome to celebrate the treaties signed in that city 60 years ago which allowed Europe to progress on its path towards union, peace and success. "United we stand, divided we fall," Donald Tusk, the president of the European Council, said in a letter to the 27 leaders last month. In that very same letter, he highlighted three threats facing the EU.

The first one relates to the geopolitical situation in the world and around Europe. Mr Tusks letter mentioned an assertive China, Russias aggressive policy in Ukraine and its neighbours, terror and turmoil in the Middle East and Africa and the worrying declarations of the new American administration.

The second threat of which Mr Tusk spoke was an internal one, which is more important and probably at the core of the EUs challenging future: the rise in anti-EU, nationalist and xenophobic sentiment.

The third threat, which in my opinion is related to the second one, is a decline in political integration and compliance to populist arguments.

The third threat is in many ways the consequence of failed policies of European economic exclusion and fundamental economic challenges facing many EU member states. Look no farther than Europes south: Greece continues to be an economic corpse.

Notwithstanding Greeces own faults, which are many, the EU has in many ways inadequately responded to the Greek crisis. Greeces debt problem was not dealt with on time until it had become too big to handle. Then, when the situation was "too big to fail", the EUs wealthier countries chose to save their banks, which had lent money to Greece.

The crisis in Greece was defined by its international creditors as a liquidity crisis, whereas in reality the country suffered from perennial macroeconomic faults such as a bloated public sector, lack of competitiveness and governance.

There is no doubt that the Greeks are to be blamed for reaching the tip of the debt cliff, but the recipe provided to fix the debt problem was faulty and never tested before. And as Greece is facing an ever-increasing crisis with no end in sight, there is greater incongruity between the EU and the IMF, which are both responsible for offering economic and technical assistance to Greece.

It remains to be seen whether Donald Trump, the US president, will want the IMF to support the Greek bailout programme over the medium term. In 2012, he tweeted that, "Greece should get out of the euro and go back to their own currency they are just wasting their time."

There is little doubt that Mr Trump is not very fond of supranational organisations and believes that the EU has "tilted strongly and most favourably towards Germany", according to Ted Malloch, who had been tipped as Mr Trumps ambassador to the EU, although concerns about his credibility have since arisen.

There is a distinct difference of opinion between the IMF and Germany about the Greek debt crisis.

The IMF believes that there has to be significant debt relief agreement, and that is something that Germany is not prepared to support. The IMF believes that without relief of the countrys debt, which is now above 175 per cent of its GDP, any further austerity measures will force the economy into a steeper depression. The Greek economy receded in the three months to December. The incumbent government is under pressure to step up economic reforms, including another round of pension cuts and tax rises. If anyone has any knowledge of basic economics or business, they would immediately expect that higher taxes lead to fewer investments, loss of confidence and, more importantly, loss of domestic demand. It remains baffling to a lot of analysts how Greece will ever reignite its growth potential if more is demanded from its citizens in the form of taxes.

Some sort of compromise will have to be reached in the coming days or weeks to avoid a bigger crisis in Greece, for now. Germany is facing national elections this autumn, so a debt relief compromise that favours the position of the IMF and the Greek authorities might not be attainable. However, if there is no agreement by June the Greek authorities will find it very challenging to make bailout repayments of more than US$8 billion in July alone. It will have to call for elections, something the current incumbents would not favour as most probably they could lose out, as most polls are showing.

The anti-EU parties are getting stronger, especially in the Netherlands, which is having national elections soon. France and the Le Pen movement should not be underestimated. Currently its a hypothetical, but in the era of all that is unexpected happening, a Marine Le Pen presidency would almost certainly lead France out of the EU, which would inevitably lead to the end of the euro.

The EU has to reinvent itself fast, something its bureaucrats are not known for. If not, Europes politicians will have to lead, likewise a tall order. Greece is simply emblematic of the symptom, not the problem. Nationalist demagogues are gaining traction causing internal confusion. The currency union admittedly shouldnt have included some countries, Greece is one of them, and that needs to be addressed. A parallel currency might be one option that can allow less adept economies some flexibility on currency and interest rates.

The EUs expansion to include former Eastern Bloc countries was done for political expediency in the 1990s after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

That has its limitation today, although some have performed much better than Spain, Greece and Portugal, which had more than a decade of prior EU experience. The notion of open borders and global markets will have to be addressed as discord prevails.

The Greeks are not absolved from not being blamed for their economic disarray. The leaders of Europe will have to take some tough, rather quick, decisions this year and Greece is just one of them.

John Sfakianakis is the director of economic research at the Gulf Research Centre in Riyadh.

business@thenational.ae

Follow The Nationals Business section on Twitter

See the original post here:
European Union has serious problems ahead and Greek debt is just one - The National

European Union-funded housing project commences in Killinochchi, Mullativu and Batticaloa – ReliefWeb

2,455 families to benefit from the house building component of a Euro 14 million grant

COLOMBO, 18 February 2017 More than 215, 000 people will benefit from a Euro 14 million multi-faceted housing project, financed by the European Union (EU), and implemented by Habitat for Humanity and World Vision Lanka.

Speaking during the opening ceremony, Ambassador to Sri Lanka and the Maldives for the Delegation of the European Union (EU), HE Tung-La Margue said, "I am hopeful that this project will assist in providing returnee families with not just homes and livelihood alternatives but also the necessary support to rebuild a life and a future for themselves. The goal has always been to turn the cycle of impoverishment and reliance to that of self-sufficiency, and I am encouraged to see that we are moving in the right direction through this initiative".

The project, which bridges the gap between relief, rehabilitation and development, aims to build 2,315 houses and repair 140 homes in 31 divisions across Batticaloa, Kilinochchi and Mullaitivu by early 2020. It utilises alternative materials and techniques to reduce constructions costs, while ensuring decent housing, and to encourage the use and production of locally manufactured earth blocks and construction materials.

"The project is aptly entitled Homes not Houses. Indeed we wish to see thriving communities that are self-sufficient, stable and strong, once our building work is done and we are long gone. Thanks to the focus of this funding from the European Union the project aims to boost the local economy by investing in earth-based technologies which are cost-effective and sustainable, said Dr. Dinesh Kanagaratnam, National Director of Habitat for Humanity Sri Lanka.

The project activities include:

Access to permanent housing including houses built with innovative materials (compressed stabilized earth blocks and earth concrete blocks).

Appropriate incremental building through microcredit to expand a home or create a place of business.

Flanking measures relating to general livelihood support for families and communities such as vocational training in construction, training in appropriate building materials and methods, and forming and strengthening small and medium enterprises.

Training families in financial literacy including savings plans, microfinance and basics of business. Improved access to appropriate microfinance and management of debt.

A more holistic approach of strengthening community-based organizations, supporting disaster risk reduction, peace building and gender equity.

Commenting, on this endeavor, National Director of World Vision Lanka, Dhanan Senathirajah, said We are proud to be associated with this project. One of the main strengths of World Vision Lanka is its community engagement and livelihood development expertise. I believe our interventions in this sphere will be key to transform houses into happy and stable homes.

Contacts:

Melissa Jayasuriya

Habitat for Humanity Sri Lanka

melissa@hfhsl.org

+94 77 296 0352

Michele Soh

Habitat for Humanity, Asia-Pacific

msoh@habitat.org

+65 9233 1544

Notes to Editors

To schedule interviews, or for more information, please contact Melissa Jayasuriya, Corporate Relations & Resource Development Manager, Habitat for Humanity Sri Lanka, melissa@hfhsl.org, +94 77 334 0971.

About Habitat for Humanity

Driven by the vision that everyone needs a decent place to live, Habitat for Humanity began in 1976 as a grassroots effort. The housing organization has since grown to become a leading global nonprofit working in more than 70 countries. Families and individuals in need of a hand up partner with Habitat for Humanity to build or improve a place they can call home. Through financial support, volunteering or adding a voice to support affordable housing, everyone can help families achieve the strength, stability and self-reliance they need to build better lives for themselves. Through shelter, we empower. To learn more, visit habitat.org.

Since 1995, Habitat for Humanity Sri Lanka has assisted more than 23,000 families by building and improving homes and by providing training and access to resources to help families improve their shelter conditions. To learn more about Habitat for Humanity Sri Lankas work in communities across Sri Lanka, to donate or to volunteer, please visit http://www.hfhsl.org or follow http://www.facebook.com/hfhsl

About World Vision Lanka

World Vision is a Christian, relief, development and advocacy organization dedicated to working with children, families and communities to overcome poverty and injustice. The organisation serves all people, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender and has been in Sri Lanka since 1977. The organization has 45 programmes spread across 19 Districts in the country.

Go here to read the rest:
European Union-funded housing project commences in Killinochchi, Mullativu and Batticaloa - ReliefWeb

Brexit: European Union citizens in United Kingdom could face legal limbo – Firstpost

London: The European Union (EU) fears millions of its nationals living in the UK will be left stranded in a legal no mans land after the country leaves the bloc because of the weaknesses of the British immigration system, according to a leaked document.

A file photo of a protester opposing Britain's exit from the European Union. AP

Members of the European Parliament (MEP) and senior European diplomats fear that chaos will ensue as the Home Office does not have the information or systems in place to select who can stay, once the UK restricts access to nationals from the other 27 EU member states, The Guardian reported.

It is widely assumed that, at an early stage of article 50, the official process of exiting the EU negotiations, Britain and the bloc will agree a cut-off date after which foreigners who have settled in the country will not have an automatic right to remain.

But the leaked document on Saturday, drawn up by MEPs on the European parliament's employment committee to aid the EU's Brexit negotiations, warned: "The UK has no population register. In practice it would be difficult to determine which EU27 citizens were residing legally in the UK before the Brexit would have taken effect.

"If all 3.3 million EU citizens were to initiate procedures aimed at proving the exercise of treaty rights', the administrative system would be overburdened."

Former British prime minister Tony Blair's government was forced to drop plans for a national identity card and population register in 2007 because of concerns over the security of citizens' data.

The Cabinet Office advises that EU nationals do not need to register for any documentation in order to enjoy free movement rights and responsibilities in the UK, reports the Guardian.

The government does not track EU nationals as they enter and leave the country. The databases of the Department for Work and Pensions, Revenue and Customs and the Home Office do not share information.

EU nationals who have lived in the UK for five years can gain automatic permanent residency status, although there have been numerous cases of employers asking for their foreign employees to acquire permanent residency cards in order to guarantee their jobs.

There has been almost a 50 percent increase in the number of EU citizens applying for permanent residency documentation since the vote on 23 June.

EU nationals say that to obtain permanent residency cards they have to complete an 85-page form requiring huge files of documentation.

The European parliament is also due to debate the rights of EU nationals in both the UK and on the continent on 1 March.

Read more from the original source:
Brexit: European Union citizens in United Kingdom could face legal limbo - Firstpost