Archive for the ‘European Union’ Category

‘Brexit changed my view of Europe’ Angela Merkel reveals shock as EU divorce talks begin – Express.co.uk

The German Chancellor revealed her perspective of the EU changed after Britain voted to quit the bloc last June.

But, despite this, she said she was still determined to fight for even further European integration.

She cited the election of pro-EU Emmanuel Macron as French president as evidence that the bloc remains "strong".

Mrs Merkel said: "For many people, including myself, something changed when we saw the Britons want to leave.

"But we have realised in the past few months that Europe is more than just bureaucracy and economic regulation."

She claimed the "decades of peace" following the Second World War "would have been completely unthinkable without the European Union".

GETTY

1 of 16

GETTY

You don't have all this in many parts of the world

Angela Merkel

The 63-year-old has putGermany's role in the EU at the heart of her bid to win re-election in September.

Speaking at a press conference on Saturday, Mrs Merkel said many people have taken the EU for granted.

She said: "You don't have all this in many parts of the world. And that's why it is worth fighting for this Europe.

"That's why one of our election placards says: 'If Europe is stronger, then Germany will be stronger'. This is directly related."

GETTY

Recent opinion polls suggest the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) leader is on course to win a record fourth term.

A survey published by pollsters Emnid on Saturday put the centre-right CDU and its sister party, the Christian Social Union, on 38 per cent.

The Social Democrats (SDP) trailed on 25 per cent, while the Greens were on eight per cent.

The SDP has lost momentum in the polls after making gains initially following Martin Schulz's nomination as its candidate in January.

See the original post here:
'Brexit changed my view of Europe' Angela Merkel reveals shock as EU divorce talks begin - Express.co.uk

EU, Britain Begin Months of Divorce Proceedings – Voice of America

The European Union and Britain have begun the first substantive round of negotiations on their separation, with both sides saying it is time to proceed quickly.

Speaking to reporters Monday at the European Commission's Berlaymont headquarters, Britain's Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union David Davis said at the start of a four-day session on the divorce proceedings that it is incredibly important we now make good progress.''

EU chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, said that "We will now delve into the heart of the matter. We need to examine and compare our respective positions in order to make good progress."

Barnier and Davis declined further comment, but the EU envoy said they would brief the media Thursday. At a one-day session in June both sides agreed on a broad timetable for the talks.

The negotiations this week are expected to focus on the post-Brexit rights of citizens in each other's nations, the bill Britain has to pay to meet existing commitments, the border issue in Ireland and the pre-eminence of the EU's Court of Justice.

Original post:
EU, Britain Begin Months of Divorce Proceedings - Voice of America

Trump Administration to Sign Insurance Regulation Pact with … – Insurance Journal

The U.S. Treasury Department and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative said they will sign the bilateral agreement between the United States and the European Union regarding regulation of insurance and reinsurance.

In addition to signing the so-called covered agreement in the coming weeks, the Trump Administration said it also plans to issue a policy statement on implementation.

The Treasury statement called the pact, which was negotiated by the Obama Administration in talks that began in 2015, an important step in making U.S. companies more competitive in domestic and foreign markets and making regulations efficient, effective and appropriately tailored.

The Treasury statement also said the bilateral agreement benefits the U.S. economy and consumers by affirming Americas state-based system of insurance regulation, providing regulatory certainty, and increasing growth opportunities for U.S. insurers.

The agreement which was announced on January 13 in the final days of the Obama Administration addresses three areas of insurance oversight: reinsurance, group supervision and the exchange of insurance information between regulators.

The agreement is known as a covered agreement, which is an agreement between the U.S. and one or more foreign governments, authorities or regulatory entities, regarding prudential measures with respect to insurance or reinsurance.

U.S. Fact Sheet on Covered Agreement with European Union

According to the negotiators, U.S. and EU insurers operating in the other market will only be subject to oversight by the regulators in their home jurisdiction. For the United States, the agreement preserves the primacy of state regulation the U.S. of U.S. insurance groups while for the EU, it preserves the primacy of EU oversight of EU insurance groups.

The agreement calls for an end to collateral and local presence requirements for EU and U.S. reinsurers.

European reinsurers and regulators have wanted the U.S. to lift reinsurance collateral requirements on foreign reinsurers and treat them like U.S. reinsurers. European reinsurers and Lloyds of London syndicates complain they are disadvantaged compared to American competitors by the additional capital and collateral requirements of some states. They note that they must also now comply with new EU solvency [Solvency II) rules.

The limitations on worldwide group oversight outside of the home jurisdiction include limits on matters involving solvency and capital, reporting and governance. Supervisors however preserve the ability to request and obtain information about worldwide activities which could harm policyholders interests or financial stability in their territory.

The agreement encourages insurance supervisory authorities in the U.S. and the EU to continue to exchange supervisory information on insurers and reinsurers that operate in the U.S. and EU markets.

In January, the Treasury Department released a fact sheet on the agreement and said the final legal text of the agreement had been given to Congress as required by the Dodd-Frank Act.

The European Union approval process involves the Council and the European Parliament.

Michael McRaith, the former director of the Federal Insurance Office (FIO) within Treasury who left his post a week after the agreement was announced, has called negotiating a covered agreement with the European Union a critical step toward leveling the playing field for American insurers and reinsurers.

Several major insurance organizations including the American Insurance Association (AIA), the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) and the Reinsurance Association of America (RAA) welcomed the agreement in January, as did the International Underwriting Association, which represents wholesale re/insurance companies in the London market.

However, the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC) has not been as welcoming of a covered agreement. It has called the pact a proposed solution to an invented problem the question of European regulators deeming our regulatory system equivalent.

State insurance regulators have also expressed concern that a covered agreement could potentially undermine the U.S. system of state regulation of insurance. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has been critical of the agreement, warning that it might be used as a backdoor to force foreign regulations on U.S. companies.

Another state regulatory group, the National Conference of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL), which has also criticized the pact, is waiting to see what the Trump Administration policy statement on implementation says. NCOIL CEO Tom Considine, speaking at the Super Regional P/C Insurer Conference in Wisconsin on Monday, said he believes the policy statement will be an attempt to reconcile the agreement with support for state-based regulation but he questioned if this is possible. Considine, a former New Jersey banking and insurance commissioner, termed the agreement great for Wall Street and horrible for Main Street.

Read more here:
Trump Administration to Sign Insurance Regulation Pact with ... - Insurance Journal

‘Where’s the option to abolish you?’ EU mercilessly mocked after running emoji poll online – Express.co.uk

GETTY

The EUs social media team posted an interactive vote on Facebook so ordinary members of the public could deliver their verdict on Jean-Claude Junckers five proposals for the project going forward.

But the innovative post sparked anger and derision amongst some users who accused eurocrats of showing open bias by choosing a tearful face for the option to devolve more powers back to member states.

EU officials are trying find ways to engage with more young people after surveys showed worrying numbers across the continent now feel completely detached from Brussels.

But placing yourself in the hands of social media is always a high risk strategy, and it appeared to backfire today as many Facebook users took the opportunity to give the ailing project a kicking.

Mr Juncker has proposed five pathways for the future of the EU, which range from reverting back to a simple trading alliance right through to the creation of a full United States of Europe.

The chief eurocrat has already dismissed going back to economic ties as unworkable, and his officials echoed that sentiment by choosing a crying emoji to represent voting for that option.

A thumbs up was used to vote for the creation of a two speed Europe, a heart represented doing less but more efficiently, a laughing face meant carrying on as normal and a wow emoji championed the superstate option.

The comments below the post were split between those offering supportive remarks and others mocking the project, with several asking why dismantling the club was not an option.

Ryan Bailey asked: Why theres no option for dismantle the European Union? I don`t think Europe has a future.

Dillon Slowey echoed that thought, adding: Is there an option to abolish the EU?

Rickard Ankar said: I want your supranational union to die. Long live democracy, long live the nation state.

Others offered more nuanced criticism, suggesting that a perceived lack of democracy at the heart of the EU and the dominance of Germany and France were more pressing issues.

Sander de Regt wrote: I like the EU but I dont like it that I cannot choose the persons who think of new ideas.

Also I dont like how Germany and France plays like they are the boss. Everyone should be equal. Also this companies who are manipulating laws should be banned.

Christopher Talbot said: Personally, I would like to see the EU as more democratic, better run, less bureaucratic organisation.

And Saba Buadze mused: Doing more economical and less political things. Before European union were less political everything was great.

Some also suggested the poll itself was not fair, pointing out that eurocrats were clearly showing a preference for certain options through which emoji they had chosen to represent them.

Darran Gange wrote: Come on European Commission, you can't seriously suggest that this is a fair poll. Someone had to choose what the sad emoji would be.

REUTERS

1 of 8

Geert Wilders wants to 'de-Islamicise' the Netherlands, hopes clashes between Turkish-Dutch protesters and the police, along with Ankara's accusations of Dutch 'fascism', will help bolster his chances of finishing first

However, equal number in were people expressing optimism and encouragement about the future of the EU, with many saying they would like to see more cooperation in future.

Arnout Posthumus wrote: Doing more together is the perfect way. But we know that its rather impossible.

Michael Holz added: In my opinion it is a question of doing the 'right' things together on the European level. Common problems are tackled commonly.

Everything else stays in the competence of the member states. Personally, I think that the EU must adopt a federal structure.

And Rudy Maertens implored: Find a way to cancel Brexit... we are better together... and I know this post will get trolled, but I'm still hopeful there is a way.

Original post:
'Where's the option to abolish you?' EU mercilessly mocked after running emoji poll online - Express.co.uk

EU and Britain to present post-Brexit plan on WTO membership – Reuters

GENEVA (Reuters) - The European Union and Britain plan to put forward a joint proposal for reform of the terms of their World Trade Organization (WTO) membership in September or October, an EU source said on Monday, as London negotiates to leave the EU.

The two sides are also discussing sharing liabilities from trade disputes including WTO litigation over Airbus (AIR.PA) subsidies in a long-running case with the United States, the EU source said.

Currently we are in talks with the United Kingdom to come to a joint approach on the matter, on all the aspects of the divorce, with regard to the WTO. And I would think that, come the month of September/October, we will be able to come jointly to the rest of the (WTO) membership, the EU source said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The joint approach would address aspects of the EU's WTO membership terms, known as its WTO "schedules", that are not easily split between Britain and the other 27 EU members: agricultural tariff quotas, agricultural subsidies and commitments on services trade.

The plan is (that) we would explain together how we would see the disentanglement of the United Kingdom from the EU commitments and schedules, the source said.

The joint approach would also deal with Britain's wish to join the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement, which liberalises access to procurement markets between signatories. The EU is a member of the agreement but Britain is not.

Asked how important it was to finalize revision of the WTO terms of membership before the EU and Britain formally divorce, the source said: I have the impression that the United Kingdom believes that is important.

Britain's Brexit minister, David Davis, pledged to "get down to work" as he kicked off a first full round of negotiations in Brussels on Monday but, a year after Britons voted to leave the EU, their government seemed at war with itself over the divorce terms.

Britain also faces a multi-billion euro bill as it leaves the EU, to cover ongoing commitments.

One of those costs may be a provision to cover damages that could be awarded to the United States in the world's largest trade dispute, the 13-year-old battle over allegedly illegal subsidies to plane giants Airbus and Seattle-based Boeing (BA.N).

"I think that is also part of the discussion," the EU source said, without giving any details. "I'm not sure that will be clarified already. I think we're now working first and foremost on schedules."

Reporting by Tom Miles; writing by Stephanie Nebehay; Editing by Kevin Liffey

See the article here:
EU and Britain to present post-Brexit plan on WTO membership - Reuters