Archive for the ‘European Union’ Category

Europe wants its own satellite megaconstellation to compete with … – Space.com

A group of Europe's major space and telecommunications players will bid for a proposed satellite constellation that could compete with SpaceX's Starlink system.

Companies including Airbus Defense and Space, Eutelsat, SES, and Thales Alenia Space announced that they have formed a partnership to respond to the European Commission's call for assistance in creating a future European satellite constellation.

Announced in late 2022, the Infrastructure for Resilience, Interconnectivity, and Security by Satellite (IRIS) constellation will provide the European Union with internet connectivity from low-Earth orbit, a service similar to that offered by the ever-growing constellation of Starlink satellites operated by SpaceX.

Ars Technica reported (opens in new tab) this week that current EU estimates put the cost of Iris at around $6.6 billion USD (6 billion Euro). The EU hopes the proposed constellation could be operational by 2027.

Related: Starlink satellite train: How to see and track it in the night sky

The European Union (EU) will provide $2.64 billion USD (2.4 billion Euros) to the project with additional funding set to come from the European Space Agency and private investment.

"IRIS establishes space as a vector of our European autonomy, a vector of connectivity and a vector of resilience," Commissioner for Internal Market of the European Union Thierry Breton wrote in a statement last Nov. (opens in new tab) "It heightens Europe's role as a true space power. With a clear ambition and sense of direction."

The partnership also includes communications giants Deutsche Telekom, Hispasat, OHB, Orange, Hisdesat and Telespazio, who have said that the proposed megaconstellation will encourage startups in the European space sector to join the coalition. This meets the wishes of Breton, who has expressed his desire to broaden the European commercial space sector, hoping start-ups will build 30% of the Iris infrastructure.

Named after the figure from Greek mythology said to be the messenger of the gods to humans, the Iris satellite constellation will provide connectivity for the whole of Europe, including areas currently not supplied by broadband Internet. In addition to this, Breton said in his Nov. 2022 statement that IRIS will also provide connectivity to the whole of Africa, using the satellites' North-South orbits.

The system will integrate with Europe's existing satellite constellations including Galileo, the region's global satellite navigation system consisting of 24 spacecraft at Medium Earth Orbit (MEO), and the twin Earth observation satellites Sentinel-1A and Sentinel-1B that comprise the Copernicus system. Breton said that the aim of this coordination between what he describes as Europe's "three pillars" in space is to reduce the risk of space congestion.

But, Iris has a long way to go before it catches up with Starlink.

SpaceX launched the first two prototype satellites of its satellite constellation, Microsat-2a and Microsat-2b, aboard a Falcon 9 rocket in February 2018. According to astrophysicist and satellite tracker Jonathan McDowell, the megaconstellation currently boasts over 4,300 spacecraft (opens in new tab), most of which are operational.

SpaceX has plans to eventually send as many as 12,000 satellites to low Earth orbit as part of the Starlink megaconstellation which currently supplies internet to 53 countries, with the company estimating in 2018 this would cost around $10 billion USD (9 billion Euro). This population of satellites could eventually swell to 42,000 units, however; SpaceX has applied for approval for another 30,000.

The Starlink system has been controversial since its inception with astronomers, in particular, fearing that its size and scale could interfere with observations of the stars and other celestial bodies made from Earth. Spaceflight safety experts now consider Starlink as the number one risk of collision hazards in Earth's orbit.

Other scientists fear that as disused Starlink satellites, which have a lifetime of around five years, are deorbited metal burning up in the atmosphere could cause unpredictable changes in Earth's climate.

See more here:
Europe wants its own satellite megaconstellation to compete with ... - Space.com

The EU’s endless appeasement of the mullahs of Iran – JNS.org

(May 7, 2023 / Gatestone Institute) In spite of the Iranian regimes increasing involvement in the war against Ukraine, the European Union appears more than happy to continue appeasing Irans ruling mullahs, which should officially be considered an accomplice to war crimes committed by Russia.

While the mullahs have been busy supporting Russia against Ukraine, the European Union has also been busy increasing its trade with Iran. According to the latest report by The Financial Tribune:

Iran and the European Unions 27 member states traded 5.23 billion [$5.86 billion] worth of goods in 2022, registering a 7.95% rise compared with the year before.

New data released by Eurostat show Germany was the top trading partner of Iran in the EU region during the period, as the two countries exchanged 1.86 billion [$2.1 billion] worth of goods, 8.56% more than in 2021.

Italy came next with 713.17 million [$800 million] worth of trade with Iran to register a 13.32% rise. The Netherlands with 445.57 million [$5 million] (down 7.61%) and Spain with 378.46 million [$424.3 million] (up 12.67%) were Irans other major European trade partners.

Subscribe to The JNS Daily Syndicateby email and never missour top stories

Croatia registered the highest growth of 48.84% in trade with Iran during the period under review and was followed by Bulgaria with 44.13%.

What is crushing is that the European Union is cognizant of the fact that some of its technology exports to Iran can be used for dual purposes: military and civilian. As The Jerusalem Post reported:

Germany exported 1.2 billion [$1.35 billion] worth of goods to Iran from January to the end of October in 2022. Germany exported 275 million [$309.3 million] worth of machines and engineering technology to Iran in 2021. Germanys non-transparent export regulations do not permit disclosure of the nature of the goods and material sold to Iransome of which has been used for dual-use purposes (military and civilian aims) over the decades.

The beneficiaries of the European Unions increased trade with Iran are most likely the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The European Unions trade with Iran, which helps increase the Iranian regimes revenue, is doubtless making it easier for the theocratic establishment to provide weapons to Russia as well. Iran also reportedly sent troops to Crimea to assist Russia in its attacks on Ukraines infrastructure and civilian population, and to increase the effectiveness of the suicide drones the Islamic Republic supplied to Russia.

The Iranian regime has, in fact, set up a specific route across the Caspian Sea in order to supply large quantities of munitions to Russia. An April 25 report by The Wall Street Journal stated:

Russian ships are ferrying large quantities of Iranian artillery shells and other ammunition across the Caspian Sea to resupply troops fighting in Ukraine, Middle East officials said, posing a growing challenge for the U.S. and its allies as they try to disrupt cooperation between Moscow and Tehran.

Over the past six months, cargo ships have carried more than 300,000 artillery shells and a million rounds of ammunition from Iran to Russia.

The Iranian regime, probably because it knows that the European Union will not take any action, is ratcheting up its engagement and weapons exports to Russia. Sky News also reported on this issue in March, writing:

Iran has secretly supplied large quantities of bullets, rockets and mortar shells to Russia for the war in Ukraine and plans to send more, a security source has told Sky News.

The source claimed that two Russian-flagged cargo ships departed an Iranian port in January bound for Russia via the Caspian Sea, carrying approximately 100 million bullets and around 300,000 shells.

Ammunition for rocket launchers, mortars and machine guns was allegedly included in the shipments.

The source said Moscow paid for the ammunition in cash.

The Iranian regime is simultaneously profiting from its trade with the European Union and from its weapons sales to Russia, thereby empowering Russian President Vladimir Putin to escalate his war against Ukraine.

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a business strategist and adviser, Harvard-educated scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has authored several books on Islam and US Foreign Policy. He can be reached at Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu.

Originally published by the Gatestone Institute.

Read the original post:
The EU's endless appeasement of the mullahs of Iran - JNS.org

EU mulls partial exit from energy treaty over climate concerns – Reuters

BRUSSELS, May 3 (Reuters) - The European Union is considering a proposal to quit an international energy treaty that has become mired in climate change concerns, but leave an option for individual countries to stay in an updated version of the accord, a document showed.

The 1998 Energy Charter Treaty lets energy companies sue governments over policies that damage their investments, a system initially designed to support investments in the sector.

But in recent years it has been used to challenge climate policies that require fossil fuel projects to shut - raising concerns that the treaty is undermining efforts to address global warming.

The European Commission has said a coordinated EU exit from the treaty appeared "unavoidable", after member countries including France, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain individually announced plans to quit.

However, a handful of countries, including Cyprus, Hungary and Slovakia, have signalled they may prefer to stay in an updated version of the accord - leaving Brussels searching for a way forward that would appease all of its members.

A new proposal, which EU country diplomats will discuss this week, said the 27-country EU should agree to jointly leave the treaty, but at the same time, let some individual EU countries stay in a modernised version of the treaty.

This would provide EU countries and lawmakers in favour of leaving with "reassurances that there will be an early and swift withdrawal of the EU," said the proposal, seen by Reuters.

It could also unblock a planned upgrade of the treaty - which aimed to address some of the climate concerns, but has met a mixed reception from EU countries and criticism from campaigners - and then let some EU countries remain in the modernised treaty, the document said.

A decision by the treaty's roughly 50 signatories to approve a the upgrade has been on hold while EU countries debate their next move.

In its current state, the unreformed treaty has a "sunset clause" that would protect existing fossil fuel investments in Europe for 20 years even after the EU quit.

The EU says that undermines its climate change targets. The reformed version would let the EU shorten that protection, but it would still be 10 years.

The proposal was drafted by Sweden, which holds the EU's rotating presidency and chairs negotiations among EU countries. If it wins countries' support, Brussels would draft legal texts to proceed with the EU exit.

Reporting by Kate Abnett; editing by Jan Strupczewski

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

More:
EU mulls partial exit from energy treaty over climate concerns - Reuters

Can the European Union Tackle Afghanistan’s Crises? – The Diplomat

Advertisement

After the U.S.-led coalition, in which the EU was a significant partner, withdrew from Afghanistan in 2021, the country entered another political vacuum. The currently fragile state of affairs in Afghanistan is likely to drive the country to another crisis, which will have negative consequences for the region and beyond. Having played a significant role over the last two decades in Afghanistan, the EU has the capability to take a proactive diplomatic and political stance in managing the impending preventable socioeconomic and politico-security crises.

The 2016 EU Global Strategy (EUGS), titled Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe, outlined key priority areas, including the EUs role in conflict settlement, peacebuilding, and crisis management. The EUGS emphasizes that preventing conflicts is more efficient and effective than engaging with crises after they break out. This accurately characterizes the current political stalemate in Afghanistan.

The Taliban regime lacks internal legitimacy due to the absence of elections, and external recognition from the international community. A regime that lacks the general publics confidence is deemed unsustainable. This is when the EU must take proactive and constructive diplomatic measures to prevent potential crises.

An isolated Afghanistan could inadvertently become a haven for transnational terrorist groups, leading to a rise in poppy cultivation and widespread human rights violations, while also limiting freedom of expression and freedom of media. At the recent G-7 foreign ministers meeting in Japan, criticism was expressed regarding the Talibans strict restrictions on the Afghan population and reports of human rights violations throughout the country. However, the conservative Taliban group has not only failed to accommodate the public demands of the Afghan people and political movements but also intensified its coercive forces to rule through fear and exclusion. The use of coercion, intimidation, and oppression to silence dissenting voices not only fails, but also leads to increased public unrest.

Get briefed on the story of the week, and developing stories to watch across the Asia-Pacific.

The Talibans recent policies include a ban on girls secondary education and preventing women from working for U.N. organizations in Afghanistan. Similar policies fuel public outrage against their regime. The U.N. office in Afghanistan has been prompted to issue a warning of their potential departure from the country, unless the prohibition of female U.N. workers in Afghanistan is reversed.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

All neighboring states of Afghanistan, except Afghanistan itself, have been included in the EUs Global Europe-Programing for medium- and long-term international cooperation. The absence of a legitimate government has resulted in the countrys disconnection from regional and transnational forums, events, and initiatives, leading to further isolation, political instability, economic disruption, and a deepening humanitarian crisis with limited access to healthcare, food, water, and education for the public.

What Can the EU Do?

The fragile political security in Afghanistan is unlikely to be sustainable. The resurgence of armed resistance and sporadic attacks by the self-proclaimed Islamic State of Khorasan (ISKP) are likely to deteriorate the security situation, culminating in internal conflicts.

To prevent impending security threats to the region and beyond, the EU should act earlier and pursue its EUGSs integrated approach to conflicts and crises. The EU has the capability to pursue a multidimensional approach and use existing instruments that are helpful in managing potential crises and conflicts. The situation is still in the early stage of armed resistance, but political violence persists.

The EU must pursue a multi-phased approach to the current and potential crises and conflicts. The withdrawal of the international community, of which the EU was a significant actor, left Afghanistan in a crisis. The theocratic Taliban movement is ruling the country, and other strata of society, including youth, women, and minority ethnic and religious communities, are marginalized. The persistence of such policies is likely to deepen the crisis and create a backlash. The EU should seek diplomatic ways in the earlier phases to prevent, resolve, and stabilize the political-security situation before a larger crisis erupts.

An effective and sustainable solution to the current and potential crises could be pursuing a multilateral approach aimed at engaging all Afghan political parties, ensuring the representation of women and ethnic and religious communities. Achieving this is possible by enabling concerted international and regional efforts to pave the way for a representative and inclusive government. Elite-driven peace and governance efforts have fallen short of bearing fruit in the past. To ensure sustainable peace and responsible governance, Afghan citizens engagement in initiatives from the top-down and bottom-up levels is imperative. This confers a sense of belonging to people and minimizes the risk of conflict.

The EU has the capability to streamline initiatives similar to the Global Europe thematic programs focused on peace, stability, and conflict prevention. These programs serve multiple purposes, including providing support to local stakeholders, community leaders, civil society activists, and women representatives to help build their capacity for conflict prevention. Additionally, they act as points of connectivity to engage in the ground. Moreover, these initiatives can serve as early warning mechanisms to address threats and crises.

Reports suggest potential security threats stemming from Afghanistan. In addition to existing missions in the region, the EU has the capability to deploy a non-military Civilian Common Security and Defense Policy (CSDP) Compact, which can serve dual purposes: tackling emerging threats and addressing potential crises in the context of the changed security circumstances in Afghanistan. The presence of a Civilian CSDP Compact could serve as a rapid reaction to address these threats. Additionally, such missions could also assist humanitarian organizations operating in the region and Afghanistan, aimed at delivering life-saving and relief assistance to Afghan citizens in need.

The Way Forward

It is worth stating that regional problems require regional solutions, but the region is characterized by certain regional rivalries, particularly India and Pakistans historical hostilities, Tajikistans stance against the Taliban, the lack of a unified stance vis--vis the regime in Afghanistan, whether for engagement or confrontation, and other regional issues. It is imperative to seek constructive and diplomatic solutions to ongoing and impending crises. This requires a multifaceted approach involving various local, regional, and transnational stakeholders.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Local stakeholders, including political parties, opposition groups, women and youth representatives, civil society groups, representatives of ethnic and religious communities, and individuals can be brought together through dialogue to initiate and promote concerted efforts. Starting with dialogue is a significant step toward building efforts between and among stakeholders and parties. The EU has both political and economic leverage, and incentives for parties and stakeholders to use in building concerted efforts.

Through the use of existing political instruments and influence, the EU can facilitate the establishment of a regional consensus. This, in turn, can help facilitate the process of building intra-Afghan negotiations aimed at achieving a political setup that includes representation of all strata of society.

The present Taliban administration falls short of effectively representing the wider aspirations of the Afghan population and lacks mechanisms to be accountable to citizens. The persistence of such uncertainty prolongs the chaotic political deadlock.

To end the ongoing political stalemate, it is necessary to establish a responsive, accountable, and inclusive government that represents the desires and aspirations of all Afghan people. The EU has the capability to play a constructive role in supporting initiatives for a constructive solution that would lead to an inclusive, democratic, and representative political set-up in Afghanistan.

Read the rest here:
Can the European Union Tackle Afghanistan's Crises? - The Diplomat

Israel razes EU-funded Palestinian school near Bethlehem – The Times of Israel

Israeli authorities on Sunday demolished a building that housed a European Union-funded Palestinian school near Bethlehem, prompting protests by the Palestinian Authority and European Union.

Israeli Civil Administration engineers razed the structure, which Palestinians constructed in 2017 without a permit in the Herodium national park in the West Bank.

The demolition followed a District Court ruling from March, in which the structure was defined as a safety hazard at risk of imminent collapse.

Regavim, a nonprofit organization that says it is dedicated to the protection of Israels national lands and resources, and has conducted a five-year legal fight to bring about the demolition of the building, said in a statement that it was one of 100 illegal schools throughout Area C of the West Bank that are used cynically to cement the Palestinian hold on open areas.

Get The Times of Israel's Daily Editionby email and never miss our top stories

The email address is invalid or missingPlease try again.The email address is invalid or missingPlease try again.

Area C makes up some 60 percent of the West Bank and is fully under Israeli security and administrative control. Israel rarely approves Palestinian construction in Area C, with the overwhelming majority of requests being denied. This has resulted in rampant illegal building, which is in turn often demolished by Israel.

On social networks, the Office of the EU Representative in the West Bank and Gaza Strip protested the demolition near the village of Jubbet Ad Dhib, which the EU said it had funded.

A still shot from footage taken by Israeli NGO Regavim showing a school in Area C bearing an EU flag. (Photo credit: Regavim)

Shocked by the news about the demolition of the EU-funded Jab Zeeb school by the Israeli authorities. Over 60 Palestinian children will be affected by this, an EU spokesperson wrote in a statement posted on Facebook.

Demolition is illegal under international law, and childrens right to education must be respected. Israel must stop all demolition and evacuation operations that will only further the suffering of the Palestinian population and escalate an already tense environment, the statement read.

The Palestinian Education Ministry called the demolition a heinous crime, adding: These practices fall within the framework of the occupying regimes ongoing crimes against the Palestinian educational sector, targeting students, teachers and educational institutions in complete disregard of international conventions and principles.

Shlomo Neeman, head of the Yesha Council umbrella organization representing local authorities in West Bank settlements, said in a statement: We welcome the enforcement but regret the absurd reality in which the court, through a petition of civil society organizations, needs to instruct the state and its enforcement mechanisms to fulfill their duties. This is a tiny part of our unwavering struggle for our national lands. Much work remains to be done.

The rest is here:
Israel razes EU-funded Palestinian school near Bethlehem - The Times of Israel