Archive for the ‘European Union’ Category

Europe’s priority now is to keep the union of 27 together – The Guardian

A selection of German front pages feature images and stories on Theresa Mays Brexit speech. Photograph: Steffi Loos/Getty Images

Among the German public, last weeks speech by Theresa May has gone down largely unnoticed. Rather, headlines were dominated by the incoming presidency of Donald Trump and his interview with widely-read German tabloid Bild. After seven months, Germans have got over the referendum and the prospect of Britain being on its way out of the European Union.

Indeed, the wider German public has shown little interest in questions regarding the future of Europes relationship with the UK, let alone in the details and minutiae of the UKs legal withdrawal and future relationship with the EU. If anything, the Brexit vote has bolstered support for the EU. As one study conducted at the end of 2016 shows, Germans views on the EU have evolved positively over the course of the past year, in large part due to the results of the UK referendum.

While in March 2016, 61% of Germans polled suggested they would vote against exiting the European Union in a potential referendum, this number grew to almost 70% in August, suggesting that citizens feel a greater need for European solidarity and security in the face of a potential break-up. Trumps inauguration is likely to cement this sentiment; consider that one aspect of Trumps interview in Bild that aroused particular controversy was his suggestion that further exits from the European Union were not only likely but inevitable.

In Berlins political class, a similar sense of acceptance has developed. The result of the June 2016 referendum did not really come as a surprise to Berlin; what did create a strong sense of bafflement, however, was that Westminster had not adequately planned for this outcome. After the referendum, several government ministers expressed their dismay at what was seen as utterly careless behaviour by British politicians.

Europe is not something to play around with, the foreign minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, commented in front of Berlins ambassadorial corps last summer, a hardly veiled criticism of the Brexiters. In fact, the political chaos unleashed by the referendum only strengthened the view that forced to choose between retaining bountiful economic relations with Britain or keeping the EU in good shape, Berlin should choose the latter.

The priority of keeping the union of 27 together has been the consistent, dominant message in Berlin over the past months and Angela Merkel has invested a great deal of energy in shaping a unified European position on the Brexit process. As such, there is no desire for retaliation, but a rather sober and solemn assessment that the British withdrawal is merely another challenge to be added to Berlins overladen foreign policy agenda. More positively, the threat to European cohesion has brought Berlin and Paris closer together again and, at this stage, Berlin is much more worried about Frances future in the EU. A President Le Pen is a grave, existential threat to the EU, in a way Brexit never really could be.

The German government has resisted wooing by London lately, insistent that there would be no negotiations without Britain officially triggering article 50. Berlin has stood remarkably firm on this particular point over the past months, arguing that there could be no compromise on the four freedoms. Considering this backdrop, Theresa Mays speech last week was in fact welcomed in Berlin. The prime ministers announcement that Britain would pursue a complete, clean break from all EU structures (including the single market) and aim to negotiate a free-trade agreement with the EU has brought greater clarity to European negotiators and reduced the risk of British cherry-picking.

Having said that, German officials know from experience that what seems black and white from their point of view might in fact be different shades of grey on the other side of the Channel. In other words, Berlin also anticipates that in the upcoming negotiations, Mays currently clear-cut goals could very well give way to a more erratic approach; negotiating special rules for specific sectors, such as the financial industry, might still be on the table further down the road.

Berlin is prepared for the EU to enter a period of complex and demanding negotiations once article 50 has been triggered; considering last weeks speech, it has become abundantly clear that Britain will have to punch extremely hard in order to realise Mays vision of a global Britain.

Philip Hammonds recent interview in German newspaper Die Welt, in which he implied that the UK could effectively become a tax haven as a means of relief from the consequences of Brexit, was universally rebuked in Germany, illustrating the state of current discourse. At the same time, there is also a broad consensus that both the UK and German would suffer greatly in the tax dumping scenario outlined by Hammond.

Berlin never wanted Britain to leave the EU and in many ways this choice is now coming at the worst of times. Europe is confronted with major, concrete questions of prosperity and security, while at the same time there is a strong sense of realism in Berlin that only a few years ago would have perhaps resonated positively in London.

But nowadays, as the prime minister expressed in her speech, Britain thinks in terms of broad visions, while the German government sternly insists that this is no time for vision, or for waxing lyrical about an ever closer union, but rather a time for grit-and-grind dispassion and getting things done. The twisted irony, then, is that the UK is abandoning Europe at a time when Germany has perhaps come to cherish the beauty of shades of grey.

Yet the fact that Germany has repeatedly underlined Britains weak negotiating position should not be diagnosed as a symptom of overconfidence. The German government knows very well that keeping the European Union together will be a major struggle; a struggle that will become far more difficult once President Trump steps into the Oval Office on Monday morning.

Almut Mller is a senior policy fellow and director of the Berlin office of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR)

More here:
Europe's priority now is to keep the union of 27 together - The Guardian

‘NO MORE SUPERSTATE’ Dutch PM says ever-closer union ‘dead’ and urges free movement reform – Express.co.uk

In a highly-charged intervention Dutch PM Mark Rutte said the troubled bloc cannot go on as it is and accused eurocrats who still hope to morph the continent into one United States of Europe of accelerating its dismantling.

Instead he called for a new pragmatic settlement between member states and Brussels with more respect for national sovereignty, whilst also suggesting that some of the EUs most ideologically precious principles need rapidly overhauling.

EbS

But his proposals were met with a robust response from former European Parliament president Martin Schulz, who mounted a passionate defence of the biggest cultural achievement the continent has seen in centuries and said more Europe is needed to solve its problems.

The pair clashed in a frantic debate at the World Economic Forum in Davos earlier today, where they were part of a panel discussion how the European Union can survive the challenges posed by Brexit, Donald Trump, the migrant crisis and eurozone stagnation.

EbS

EbS

Mr Rutte, who is facing an election battle with populist leader Geert Wilders in March, insisted that committing to and even accelerating the idea of ever-closer union is the fastest way to dismantling the entire Brussels project.

He said that the world has changed since the days when German chancellor Helmut Kohl and French president Francois Mitterrand cooked up the process of pooling sovereignty to avoid a repeat of the Second World War.

And the Dutch leader hinted that Brussels will need to compromise on its cherished freedom of movement rules in light of the Brexit vote if it wants to stem a growing populist movement sweeping the continent.

He said: There has been a huge shift in thinking because this whole idea of an ever closer union is now really buried. Its gone.

What you now have is a Europe which has to be relevant and not the sort of project which has a momentum of its own.

This whole idea of an ever closer union is now really buried. Its gone.

Dutch PM Mark Rutte

Mr Rutte said it was absolutely fantastic that the EU Commission has significantly slashed the amount of needless legislation it pumps out in recent years, adding that the Brussels bloc will fail if leaders do not make it relevant to ordinary voters.

He said: We need to show to the people that Europe is adding and it is possible to control immigration, to create more jobs, to control our outer borders.

If we continue about talking that we are step by step moving towards some sort of European superstate, that is the fastest way to dismantling the European Union.

The fact that Mr Rutte deliberately separated the issues of migration and external border control suggests that he is planning to argue that internal movement of people within the EU also needs to be brought under control.

1 of 8

But he was firmly rebuked by Mr Schulz, who is returning to national politics in Germany after five years as EU Parliament president, who accused national governments of betraying the EU by trying to blame their own shortcomings on Brussels.

He raged: Mark said this idea of ever closer union, thats done now. Thats wrong. What is the message of Europe an ever less closer union of countries and citizens?

More than ever we need in the 21st century an ever closer union of citizens in the European Union.

What I expect from leaders in Europe, is that they dont say this is now over, an ever closer union - no, in the 21st century I expect from the leaders that they say more than ever we have to stick together.

If the leaders will not think that way then we are really at risk. If the heads of states of government - Angela Merkel, Mark Rutte, Francois Hollande - will not publicly say this this is our union based on that idea then the European Union has no chance for the future.

View post:
'NO MORE SUPERSTATE' Dutch PM says ever-closer union 'dead' and urges free movement reform - Express.co.uk

‘We can only pray!’ Former Italy PM admits European Union ‘he once dreamed of’ is DEAD – Express.co.uk

Mr Prodi, who had two spells in power, condemned the lack of leadership and strategy in Brussels and admitted the Europe he once dreamed of was dead.

His comments came in an interview with Italys Quotidiano newspaper in the same week Theresa May laid out her plans for a hard Brexit which would sever all existing ties with the EU including the single market and customs union.

The 77-year-old said: The EU has no strategies and there is no leader to follow.

GETTY

GETTY

The Europe I dreamed of is dead. Now we can only do one thing: pray

Romano Prodi

"The Europe I dreamed of is dead. But I hope the crisis will wake us up. Now we can only do one thing: pray.

Mr Prodi said did not have great hopes about the future of the European Union which he said was increasingly divided by national and political interests.

And he said Brexit had accelerated the process of detachment from Brussels.

GETTY

He told Quotidiano: I was disappointed by Brexit but not surprised. The new thing is the American encouragement to Brexit.

It is an unprecedented and inappropriate interference in my opinion. From a political point of view the fact that the future US President supports Brexit says a lot.

On the future of the EU, Mr Prodi called for "a single strategy".

GETTY

Getty

1 of 29

Countries that are in the European Union

He said: The real problem is that, once again, there will not be a common policy.

We would need a real leader who would put himself in other peoples shoes.

"Whoever leads a political coalition and a group of countries must consider the interests of all the members. I am talking about Angela Merkel."

Continued here:
'We can only pray!' Former Italy PM admits European Union 'he once dreamed of' is DEAD - Express.co.uk

Is this the end of TTIP? Trump REMOVES deal with European Union from White House website – Express.co.uk

Negotiations on the trade deal started in February 2014 but talks came to a standstill under Barack Obama.

During the election campaign Donald Trump said he would bin the beleaguered deal and it appears just hours into his presidency he has kept his promise.

TTIP is no longer featured on the White House website as the President wipes out Mr Obamas legacy.

WHAT IS TTIP?

REUTERS/ GETTY

All references to TTIP have been wiped from the White House website hours into Mr Trump's presidency

The move will be a blow to European Union chiefs who hoped to remove trade barriers between the bloc and Washington.

A number of TTIP talks had already been held in secret under the Obama administration but it appears the hours of diplomacy and negotiation may have gone to waste.

Mr Obama and Angela Merkel both pushed for the deal, with the German Chancellor saying the agreement was absolutely in Europes interests.

Mr Trump, a critic of multilateral trade deals, has also already announced plans to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership on his first day in office.

As well as deleting TTIP, references to Obamacare have also been scrapped alongside references to the LGBT movement and climate change.

In its place, the Trump administration is instead plugging its America First policies before the president even sets foot in the White House in his new role.

AMERICA FIRST DONALD TRUMP BECOMES 45th US PRESIDENT

GETTY

REUTERS

1 of 40

US President Donald Trump points to the stands as he walks with his wife Melania during the Inaugural Parade.

Mr Trump plans to rebuild the US military and said he will pursue a foreign policy based on American interests.

He has vowed to eradicate ISIS and Islamic terrorists and pledged to create 25 million American jobs.

The White House also announced the first details of some of the new administrations defence policies.

WHITE HOUSE

GETTY

In a statement, the White House said: We will also develop a state-of-the-art missile defence system to protect against missile-based attacks from states like Iran and North Korea.

President Trump also plans to take steps to safeguard national security secrets and systems under threat from cyber warfare.

This comes after the election campaign was mired in controversy over allegations Russia hacked the election and helped the billionaire Republican win.

Around 250,000 people were believed to have turned out in Washington to watch Donald Trump be inaugurated as President.

But one hour before Trump was sworn in as the 45th US President, chaos descended onto Washington's streets close to the inauguration ceremony, as protestors smashed windows, hurled rocks, bottles and set fire to limousines.

A Bank of America branch and a Starbucks were among other buildings some protestors armed with bats and long wooden poles targeted.

In a bid to enforce peace, outnumbered police officers chased the rioters with batons and threw flash bang grenades into crowds, creating a thick cloud of smoke over the city.

Vito Maggiore, a DC Fire Spokesman said law enforcers were injured in run-ins with protestors and reports confirmed two police officers had been hospitalised and 95 protestors were arrested.

Originally posted here:
Is this the end of TTIP? Trump REMOVES deal with European Union from White House website - Express.co.uk

National Grid warns of costs if Britain exits European Union energy market – ETEnergyworld.com

By Susanna Twidale

LONDON: Taking Britain out of Europe's energy market could stymie development of new power links designed to help avert a looming supply crunch and also drive up the cost of imported European electricity, National Grid has warned.

Prime Minister Theresa May signalled a so-called hard Brexit on Tuesday, which would involve leaving Europe's single market when Britain quits the European Union (EU).

May gave no indication of what this would mean for energy markets in her speech.

But any change could have implications for the development of Britain's electricity supplies, around 9 percent of which come from European imports.

Several more power links are planned over the next decade, which are intended to give Britain access to cheaper electricity abroad as the country faces a supply crunch by the early 2020s as old nuclear power plants and coal-fired power stations close.

National Grid said that each 1 gigawatt (GW) of new electricity interconnector capacity could reduce Britain's wholesale power prices by 1-2 percent, with 4-5 GW of capacity equating to a 1 billion pounds ($1.23 billion) saving.

"However, for interconnectors to be economically viable... they must be able to sell their capacity to traders and therefore require efficient and robust trading arrangements between the two countries," National Grid said in an evidence submission to the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee, which was published on Friday.

Britain currently has access to tariff-free electricity trading with Europe due to its participation in the so-called internal energy market (IEM), but National Grid said leaving this market would make cross-border trade more difficult.

"While alternative arrangements can be put in place that would allow trade to continue these are unlikely to be as effective or efficient," it said.

National Grid also warned the cost of delivering new projects could rise due to Britain leaving the European Union.

"Restrictions on trade and movement of labour could impact adversely on the cost of delivering new interconnector projects," it said.

National Grid was among a group of firms submitting evidence ahead of a BEIS Committee hearing on Brexit negotiation priorities for energy and climate policy, to be held on Jan. 25.

British utility Centrica also stressed the importance of Britain's access to Europe's energy markets.

"The IEM has improved the efficiency in trading power and gas across Europe, supported infrastructure investment and helped deliver security of supply for the UK," Centrica said. ($1 = 0.8143 pounds)

Read the original post:
National Grid warns of costs if Britain exits European Union energy market - ETEnergyworld.com