Synopsis | The Great Deception: Can The European Union Survive?
THE SYNOPSIS OF YOUR FAVORITE BOOK =--- Where to buy this book? ISBN: 9780826480149 Book Synopsis of The Great Deception: Can the European Union Survive? by Christopher Booker ...
By: Heavy truck
Go here to read the rest:
Synopsis | The Great Deception: Can The European Union Survive? - Video
Synopsis | Romania And The European Union: From Marginalisation To Membership?
JUST A SUMMARY - THE SUMMARY YOUR FAVORITE BOOK =--- Where to buy this book? ISBN: 9780415373265 Book Review of Romania and the European Union: From Marginalisation to ...
By: Heavy truck
Read more from the original source:
Synopsis | Romania And The European Union: From Marginalisation To Membership? - Video
Synopsis | Turkey #39;s Accession To The European Union By Julia Gillard
JUST A SUMMARY - THE SUMMARY YOUR FAVORITE BOOK =--- Where to buy this book? ISBN: 9780739179819 Book Review of Turkey #39;s Accession to the European Union by Julia Gillard If...
By: Heavy truck
See the rest here:
Synopsis | Turkey's Accession To The European Union By Julia Gillard - Video
QMI Agency Feb 6, 2015
, Last Updated: 2:09 PM ET
The European Union on Friday announced plans to toughen its 2009 ban of commercial seal hunt products.
Last May, Canada lost its challenge of a World Trade Organization ruling that upheld the EU ban on the trade of seal skins, furs and other products. The EU banned those products because of animal welfare concerns.
But the WTO Appellate Body concluded exceptions for Inuit and other indigenous hunts, as well as for maritime resource management, had some discriminatory effects.
The new proposals try to remedy that by removing the exception for skins, furs and products that result from marine resource management while still recognizing the importance of seal population management hunts and increasing oversight of products brought in under the traditional Inuit hunt exceptions.
Canada and Norway have repeatedly challenged the EU ban, arguing the hunt is humane.
Humane Society International applauded the proposals as a victory for animal welfare.
The EU has to officially adopt the proposals by October to comply with WTO rules.
Read this article:
European Union seeks to toughen seal product ban
The recommendation isn't likely to please the European Union, which has argued that user takedown requests should be applied by Google globally.
Googe has the backing of its own advisory group in restricting takedown requests to Europe.
An advisory group set up by Google is backing the search engine's belief that so-called "right to be forgotten" requests should be restricted to Europe.
Google has been complying with a May ruling from the European Union that requires it to honor requests from users in Europe asking that search engines remove specific results that may no longer be relevant or may infringe upon that person's privacy. But Google has restricted the takedown requests to its European domains, such as Google.fr in France, and not to its global domain. That means people across the world, including those in Europe, can still access those disputed links via Google.com. The European Union believes those requests should be applied worldwide.
But a report released on Friday by Google's eight-member Advisory Council found that confining the requests just to the European Union follows the intent of the ruling. The members acknowledged that expanding the requests globally might ensure the "more absolute protection of a data subject's rights." But the group also cited two arguments against such a move.
First, users outside of Europe may need to search for information whose links have been removed across the European Union. In that case, the needs of citizens in other countries would come into conflict with any takedown requests applied globally. Second, users within Europe may need to access versions of Google's search engine beyond the ones available in their own countries. Though it would be technically possible to block European users from accessing a site such as Google.com, the council expressing concerns about the ramifications of implementing such a block.
"The Council supports effective measures to protect the rights of data subjects," the group said in its report. "Given concerns of proportionality and practical effectiveness, it concludes that removal from nationally directed versions of Google's search services within the EU is the appropriate means to implement the Ruling at this stage."
The recommendation from the council is just that -- a recommendation. It has no legal bearing on Google, which must decide on its own how to implement the EU's ruling in general and case by case.
The council does include Google insiders, such as Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt and the company's chief legal officer, David Drummond. But it mostly consists of third parties, including Wikipedia founder James Wales, Oxford University professor of philosophy Luciano Floridi and a former director of the Spanish Data Protection Agency, Jos-Luis Piar. Some of these people have been more in line with Google's interpretation of the overall ruling, while others have been more concerned about the privacy of the people submitting takedown requests.
Though the group as a whole sided with Google in limiting the removal of search results to Europe, not all members were on the same page, according to The New York Times.
The rest is here:
Google advisers: Limit 'right to be forgotten' to Europe