Mediaboss Marketing

With the news cycle centered on Russia and Republican health-care flops, Attorney General Jeff Sessionss swift and quiet assault on the Fifth Amendment has gone largely unnoticed. In a reversal of one of the few conservative legacies of the Obama administration, the Trump Justice Department plans to restore the ability of police to seize money and property from suspected criminals without due process. The Department of Justice formally announced on Wednesday that it will roll back heavy restrictions imposed on law enforcement by former Attorney General Eric Holder, and thereby encourage law enforcement to plunder private property and cash in order to . . . fund law enforcement.

The process of civil asset forfeiture, referred to in Sessionss order as federal adoptions, has long attracted criticism from proponents of civil liberties. The process allows police to seize property that they suspect may have been illegally obtained. It involves local government essentially stealing from citizens who have not yet been tried for or found guilty of a crime, and it seems to directly violate the due process guarantees within the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. In a few notable cases, such as that of small-business owner Lyndon McLellan from North Carolina and college student Charles Clarke, citizens have been robbed of hundreds of thousands of dollars without so much as being charged with a crime. The practice emerged during Prohibition and has exploded during the War on Drugs, evolving into a multibillion dollar industry for the police state.

House Republicans Justin Amash and Darrell Issa have rightly slammed Sessionss reinstatement of the practice. Amash derided the Justice Department order as unjust and unconstitutional, while Issa called once again on Congress to pass the Due Process Act, which he reintroduced in the House earlier this year.

But this is not enough. The party of small government and individual liberty must act as such and condemn the Justice Departments foray back into the murky, abusive, and authoritarian waters of asset forfeiture.

This is not your usual political mudfight. Indeed, before you cry Never Trump! consider, first, that the congressman who has most vocally denounced the practice, Darrell Issa, has been quite friendly with Trump. Moreover, opinions on this matter do not break down neatly along partisan lines. Before she was known as the eternally silenced, intersectional, resistance-princess-in-waiting, Kamala Harris was the relatively lackluster attorney general of California. And, despite selling herself as a progressive from Berkeley, Harris became famous for continually overlooking prosecutor misconduct and youve guessed it for becoming one of the countrys most aggressive proponents of civil asset forfeiture.

Harris was not merely doing her job. In 2011, she actively fought a California bill that would have curbed civil asset forfeiture. Four years later, she sponsored a bill to expand the abilities of prosecutors to seize assets of those charged with a crime prior to the commencement of criminal proceedings. That year, the state stole $50 million worth of private property and funds from California citizens.

To rebuke the Reagan legacy, Harris has billed herself as smart on crime rather than the Sessions-adopted tough on crime. In practice, their ideologies are reflective of the same, constitutionally hostile statism that conservatism must reject.

Thankfully, many conservatives do. Justice Clarence Thomas has excoriated the practice, describing it as policing for profit and calling into question its constitutionality. Indeed, as recently as last month, Thomas called upon the Court to reconsider whether their rulings on the matter are consistent, a concern that was reflected in Senator Mike Lees castigation of the DOJs order today. Rand Paul cited the Fifth Amendment in his condemnation of the order. Marco Rubio will likely also denounce the bill, as his historical opposition to civil asset forfeiture has been so strong that it led him to refrain from voting to confirm Loretta Lynch, who backed the practice, as attorney general. Senator Mike Crapo has also stood with Lee to call on the DOJ to reform it.

Alas, there seems to be a bipartisan momentum against reform. In four years, Donald Trump may very well face Harris in his quest for reelection. If so, Harris is bound to amplify the Democrats recent return to defending civil asset forfeiture, which began with the replacement of Eric Holder with Loretta Lynch, and has more recently continued with Harriss Senate colleague, Dianne Feinstein, floating legislation to bring even cryptocurrency back into the purview of forfeiture. Americans of all political persuasions deserve a good deal better than this.

READ MORE: Editorial: Jeff Sessions Should Drop His Expansion of Civil Asset Forfeiture Civil Asset Forfeiture: Where Due Process Goes to Die Justice Thomas Defends Victims of Policing for Profit

Tiana Lowe is an editorial intern at National Review.

Go here to see the original:
On Civil Asset Forfeiture, Jeff Sessions Is the New Kamala Harris - National Review

A federal appeals-court panel has overturned the convictions of two former Rabobank traders in the scandal over attempted manipulation of the London interbank offered rate, or Libor, saying the men's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination had been violated.

The three-judge panel of the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in New York dismissed the charges against Anthony Allen and Anthony Conti, both former Rabobank traders who were convicted on conspiracy and wire-fraud charges in November 2015.

In a unanimous 81-page ruling Thursday, Second Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes wrote that the two men's convictions were tainted because a witness against them had been aware of testimony authorities in the U.K. had forced them to provide. Essentially, that testimony was used against them, Judge Cabranes wrote, and it was "not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt."

The ruling is a blow to authorities' attempt to pursue the traders and bankers involved in the scandal over Libor, a key interest rate that international banks charge each other and a global benchmark underpinning the costs of hundreds of trillions of dollars of financial products.

More than a dozen major banks allegedly rigged Libor to benefit themselves and have paid billions of dollars in fines and settlements. At least nine people, including Messrs. Allen and Conti, have been convicted or pleaded guilty to Libor-related charges in the U.S. and the U.K. Rabobank agreed in 2013 to pay more than $1 billion in settlements to U.S., U.K. and Dutch authorities, including a $325 million settlement with the U.S. Justice Department.

Write to Michael Rapoport at Michael.Rapoport@wsj.com

View post:
Appeals court scraps Rabobank traders' convictions - MarketWatch

NEW YORK The head of an advanced-materials manufacturer said he met with President Trumps chief strategist, Steve Bannon, on Monday to persuade him that the United States should nationalize the countrys only mine of rare earth minerals, which are used in military applications.

The staff understood the urgency of the matter, Michael Silver,chief executive officer of closely held American Elements Corp., said in a phone interview after his White House meeting, which he said was also attended by presidential deputy assistant Sebastian Gorka and White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus.

Advertisement

The rare-earth mining operations in Mountain Pass, Calif., the last remaining assets of bankrupt Molycorp Inc., were bought in June by a group that drew objections from rival bidders, who said the winner has ties to the Chinese government.

The mine should be converted to a national laboratory dedicated to rebuilding Americas rare-earth mining industry so the world knows it is safe to build high-tech manufacturing plants in the US, Silver said.

Get Talking Points in your inbox:

An afternoon recap of the days most important business news, delivered weekdays.

The production of rare-earth minerals used in applications from hybrid electric cars to iPhones and military hardware such asnight-vision goggles and guided weapons is dominated by low-cost Chinese companies. Molycorp Minerals and its parent, Molycorp Inc., filed for bankruptcy in 2015 after prices for the minerals fell below the mines costs to produce them.

Silver said he was invited to brief the president on the issue on Tuesday. The White House didnt respond to requests for comment.

Silver said hes proposing the US government apply the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment and acquire Mountain Pass by eminent domain.

Advertisement

Any attempt to make the mine commercially viable would fail because no one can compete with China, which accounts for almost all the worlds rare-earth production, Silver said.

The perception is the only place in the world you can go for reasonably priced rare earth materials for your product is in China,he said. You have to change that perception.

Los Angeles-based American Elements manufactures metals and chemicals andhas a catalog of more than 15,000 products, according to its website. Silver said his company did business with Molycorp before its Mountain Pass became idle. Silverwas among the first Americans to set up a production and distribution supply chain from rare earth mines in Inner Mongolia and China to North America and Europe, according to documents on the company website.

The sale of Molycorps last remaining assets to one of two groups of creditors that had feuded over the facility was approved after complaints that the winning bidder, which is majority-owned by JHL Capital Group LLCand QVT Financial LP, had recruited an affiliate of Shenghe Resources Holding Co., which allegedly is tied to the Chinese government.

JHL Capital founder James Litinsky, who has been helping lead the effort to revive the mine, declined to comment.

See the original post:
Trump urged by CEO to nationalize the only US rare-earths mine ... - The Boston Globe

Robert Feder (blog)

Robservations: Ebert named to Chicago Literary Hall of Fame Robert Feder (blog) At Kelly's 2008 trial on charges of making child pornography (for which he was acquitted), DeRogatis risked imprisonment when he took the Fifth Amendment and refused to testify about his confidential sources. The former Sun-Times critic co-hosts Sound ...

See the original post:
Robservations: Ebert named to Chicago Literary Hall of Fame - Robert Feder (blog)

BLOOMINGTON A dispute over a coat led to a November shooting on Bloomingtons east side, prosecutors said Monday on the first day in the attempted-murder trial of Darvell Williams.

A six-man, six-woman jury was seated Monday before opening arguments and the states first witness, a woman who reluctantly testified against her former roommate.

Its a really simple case, Ghrist said. It will come down to common sense. The defendant took a 9 mm handgun and shot multiple times at Willie Love. Eight shell casings were found in the apartment the defendant was living in.

Williams is facing nine felony charges, including attempted murder in the Nov. 26 shooting that also damaged a mailbox in an apartment complex, a passing car and a window at Lowes Home Improvement at 2101 E. Empire St.

One of the charges, an aggravated unlawful use of a weapon into a vehicle, against Williams was dropped in court Monday.

Defense attorney Brian McEldowney asked the jurors to keep an open mind and to listen to all of the evidence before making a decision on Williams' guilt or innocence.

These are volatile charges and our natural reaction is to get angry, but please listen to all of the testimony before making a judgment, he said.

The state called Chiquan Felton to the stand, who attempted to avoid Ghrists questions.

I plead the Fifth, she said. I have nothing to say.

Ghrist reminded her that she was not facing charges, so there were no grounds to invoke the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination.

After excusing the jury, Judge Robert Freitag explained that she had to be truthful with her testimony.

You are here pursuant to a court order and if you are asked a question, you must answer truthfully, and if you refuse, you could be held in contempt of court and be held in county jail until you decide to answer, he said.

When the jury returned, Felton testified that she never saw Williams shoot at Love because her back was turned while she was trying to open the door to the apartment she shared with Williams.

I heard gunshots, but I never saw him shoot at him, she said. Where I come from, you run away from gunshots.

The trial is expected to conclude Tuesday or Wednesday. Testimony will resume at 9 a.m. Tuesday.

Follow Kevin Barlow on Twitter: @pg_barlow

See the original post here:
Prosecutor: Attempted murder began with feud over coat - Bloomington Pantagraph