Mediaboss Marketing

A biker from Wisconsin who worked as a confidential informant for the FBI in its investigation of an alleged extremist plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has reached a plea deal on a gun charge that will give him two years of probation instead of a maximum term of up to 10 years in prison, according to a new filing in federal court.

Stephen Robeson, 57, of Oxford, Wisconsin, helped the government infiltrate militant extremists and went with them to surveil Whitmers lakeside vacation home. He was not charged during the October 2020 takedown of the alleged plotters but was instead indicted this spring for possessing a .50-caliber sniper rifle, which he was forbidden from touching because he has multiple felony convictions.

In response to his indictment, Robeson admitted to having the gun, but his lawyer said he had also had something else: permission, as a confidential informant, to engage in illegal conduct. Robesons lawyer, Joseph A. Bugni, did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.

Court filings show that at least a dozen informants known in FBI lingo as "confidential human sources" played some role in the Michigan case, which resulted in criminal charges against 14 people in state and federal courts, including multiple members of a militant group called the Wolverine Watchmen.

But documents and interviews suggest that few informants played a more critical role than Stephen Robeson, a burly member of the Three Percenter militant group known to associates as Robey.

Robeson helped organize a series of meetings in several states where prosecutors claim the defendants first developed plans to kidnap Whitmer from her vacation home and either abandon her on a boat floating on Lake Michigan or take her to Michigan to be tried for treason. He was in frequent contact with a number of the defendants in the case and attended a nighttime surveillance of Whitmers vacation home in September of 2020, during which several men, including an undercover FBI agent, discussed blowing up a bridge to slow the police response to the kidnapping.

The federal trial in the kidnapping case, which is one of the most prominent domestic terrorism prosecutions in a generation, is set to start next month, although defendants in that case last week requested a 90-day delay. Several have indicated that they intend to mount an entrapment defense, arguing that there was no true conspiracy and that informants including Robeson induced them to say and do incriminating things.

Some defendants have indicated theyd seek testimony from Robeson at trial, saying that his criminal history and the nature of his cooperation might strengthen the argument that they were set up. But Robesons ability and willingness to testify in court without invoking his Fifth Amendment right to avoid incriminating himself have been in doubt because of the gun charge hanging over his head.

A second confidential informant, identified in court papers as Dan, also played a significant role in building the case, recording hours of audio and video of the day-to-day activities of the Wolverine Watchmen and other defendants. He testified for a full day in a state hearing in March.

One defendant, Ty Garbin, pleaded guilty and last month was sentenced to 75 months in prison for his role in the alleged plot. A federal prosecutor said at Garbin's sentencing that he expected him to be a star witness for the government at trial.

In a letter to the court on Wednesday, Robesons lawyer informed the judge that both sides have come to an agreement. A signed copy has not yet been filed, because his client had contracted COVID-19, so the agreement was sent via mail.

Robeson had been set to go to trial in Wisconsin on Oct. 12, the same day the Michigan case is currently scheduled to begin.

Excerpt from:
A Key Informant In The Michigan Kidnapping Case Has Struck A Plea Deal - BuzzFeed News

SALISBURY The prosecution on Thursday continued to build its case against Dedric Michelle Mason in an abbreviated trial day.

Mason, 45, is facing charges for second-degree murder following the deadly shooting at Fishzilla Arcade in April of 2018. The incident resulted in the death of James Christopher Davis, known by his friends and family as Milkbone, or Milk. Davis was fatally shot by Mason during a scuffle at the adult gaming establishment.

The trial got underway Tuesday afternoon once a 12-person jury and four alternates were selected. The prosecution is led by Assistant District Attorneys Barrett Poppler and Jennifer Greene while the defense is led by Ryan Stowe and Todd Paris.

The prosecution has argued the shooting was murder, but the defense has framed the shooting as an act of self defense and asserts that Mason was trying to stop Davis from injuring her friend, Andrea Dillard, who was also involved in the fight.

The trial continued on Wednesday, when the prosecution showed jurors video footage of the shooting and introduced several witnesses who were in Fishzilla when it occurred. On Thursday, the prosecution introduced three more witnesses and showed the jury the handgun used to kill Davis.

The first witness brought to the stand was Burlee Tobias Kersey. Currently incarcerated for drug trafficking, Kersey was transported to the Rowan County Courthouse from prison and took the stand in handcuffs. Kersey was at Fishzilla on the night of the shooting and was playing at the same table as Davis and his longtime girlfriend, Cheviss Bennett, minutes before Davis was shot.

Kersey was questioned by Greene, who had difficulty eliciting any answers. Kersey cited the Fifth Amendment, which protects people from self incrimination, several times. When he responded to Greenes inquiries, Kersey admitted knowing little about the incident, saying he had his back turned and it was none of his business. When asked by Greene whether he felt anyones life was in danger during the incident, Kersey said he did not know.

The defense did not ask Kersey any questions.

The trial continued with the prosecution calling on Joshua Clawson, who was also in Fishzilla during the shooting. Clawson testified he was there to talk with Curtis Quick, an employee of Fishzilla who testified Wednesday.

Clawson echoed Quicks account of the incident, saying the altercation started after Mason and Dillard walked into Fishzilla and sat down at the gaming table where Davis, Bennett and Kersey were playing.

When the argument continued to the front of the arcade, Clawson said he saw Mason throw Davis phone further back in the room. With video footage of the incident playing for the jury, Clawson pointed out the moment he ducked to avoid what he said was Davis phone flying through the air.

Clawson painted Davis as the victim of an attack from Mason and Dillard, who Clawson said cornered Davis and pushed him. Clawson said Davis pushed back, but added that it was in self defense. When asked by the prosecution if he believed anyones life was in danger before the shooting, Clawson said he did not.

In his cross examination of Clawson, Paris pressed Clawson on whether he was absolutely sure he saw Mason throw Davis phone. Clawson responded that he was. Paris also asked Clawson whether he saw Davis strike or choke Mason or Dillard near the counter. Clawson said he did not.

Clawson, who said he has 20/20 vision, testified Davis was flat on his back on the floor when Mason fired her handgun. That contradicts the story put forth by defense attorneys, who say Davis was on top of Dillard choking her when Mason shot him. In a video shown several times in court, it appears Davis was on top of Dillard at least momentarily.

When Clawson left the stand, the prosecution called Salisbury Police Detective Meredith Walker to testify. Walker responded to the Fishzilla shooting and was responsible for documenting the crime scene. Walker also transported Mason to the police department immediately after the shooting.

Walker testified that Mason smelled faintly of alcohol as they rode to the police department and that Mason admitted to having consumed one to one and a half Mikes Hard Lemonades that night. Walker said she did not observe any slurred speech or slowed movements.

Once they arrived at the department, Walker photographed Masons face from two separate angles. The photographs were shown to the jury and showed no evidence of injuries. Walker said she told Mason to come back to the police department if bruising appeared in the days following the incident.

During Walkers testimony, the prosecution introduced a handgun Mason used to shoot Davis into evidence. The courts bailiff carried the box containing the gun around the courtroom gallery and showed it to each individual juror.

When Paris cross-examined Walker, he asked her if her injury photography training taught her that bruising can take longer to show up on people who are Black. Walker confirmed that was indeed the case.

The trial was abruptly recessed before 3 p.m. on Thursday after Paris told Judge Hamilton he was feeling nauseated and requested the rest of the day off. Stowe offered to finish the day as Masons only acting attorney, but Mason told Hamilton she would rather have both Stowe and Paris present at all times.

Paris said he expected to feel better Friday morning. If the trial does resume as planned, the prosecution is poised to call a medical examiner from Raleigh as its next witness. The prosecution will likely rest its case on Friday. Then, the defense will call its first witness.

See the rest here:
Prosecution in Fishzilla murder case introduces more witness accounts, handgun used in shooting - Salisbury Post - Salisbury Post

Josh Duggars defense team is embroiled in yet another back-and-forth with prosecutors over the evidence in his ongoing child pornography case.

In a motion filed on Sept. 10, Duggar, 33, asks the court to suppress photographs that were taken of his hands in jail after he was arrested on charges of receiving and possessing child sex abuse material in April. (He later pleaded not guilty and was released pending his Nov. 30 trial.)

The motion claims that the taking of the photos, which show a scar on one of Duggars hands, were a violation of his Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights and says that law enforcement officials should have obtained a warrant before taking them.

What is particularly egregious about [Homeland Securitys] conduct in this capacity is that Duggars body parts were manipulated and he was required to pose for the photographs, the motion states. By any measure, this constitutes a search and an intrusion on [his] personal rightsall without his counsel presentin violation of his Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment rights.

Lawyers for Duggar did not immediately respond to PEOPLEs request for comment.

josh duggar

Danny Johnston/AP/Shutterstock Josh Duggar

RELATED: Duggars Splinter amid Joshs Legal Drama: Family Isnt as Close as They Once Were, Says Source

In their response, filed the same day, the prosecution writes that the defendant is incorrect on all counts regarding the alleged rights violations and asks the court to deny the motion.

The document claims that the scar on Duggars hand links him to images recovered from [his] electronic devices that were seized while law enforcement was previously carrying out a search warrant in the case.

It goes on to dispute each of the points in the defenses motion, noting that the photographs do not constitute an unreasonable or warrantless search of the defendant because his hands were in plain view and clearly visible.

Story continues

Prosecutors add that Duggar also voluntarily consented to having the photos taken.

The response also says that the display of a defendants physical characteristics, such as a photograph, do not fall under the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. As for the alleged Sixth Amendment violation Duggars right to counsel prosecutors say that that right only applies to critical stages of criminal proceedings, under which taking photographs does not fall.

josh duggar

Kris Connor/Getty Josh Duggar

RELATED: Josh Duggar Child Porn Case Is Straight-Forward, Prosecution Says amid Dispute Over Evidence

A court hearing is set for Oct. 4 to settle the matter brought up in the defenses motion, which is the latest of many filed by Duggars team regarding evidence in the case.

In August, his attorneys argued that his case should be dismissed because of technicalities over who was running the Department of Homeland Security at the time of their investigation. They also say investigators failed to preserve potentially exculpatory evidence.

And earlier that month, the prosecution accused the defense of embarking on a fishing expedition for evidence that does not exist or is irrelevant to the case. That was in response to a motion filed by the defense claiming the prosecution was refusing to turn over evidence.

Never miss a story sign up for PEOPLEs free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

Duggar, who prosecutors believe had more than 200 images of children on his computer, is no stranger to controversy. In 2015, a 2006 police report that surfaced indicated he was investigated for molesting five underage girls, including sisters Jill (Duggar) Dillard and Jessa (Duggar) Seewald. He said at the time that he was extremely sorry for the wrongdoing.

Amid his current legal woes, TLC canceled the Duggar familys reality series, Counting On. In their statement, the network said it feels it is important to give the Duggar family the opportunity to address their situation privately.

The show premiered on TLC in 2015 and served as a spinoff series to 19 Kids and Counting, which ran from 2008 to 2015. The spinoff was created amid the previous molestation controversy surrounding Duggar.

If you suspect child abuse, call the Childhelp National Child Abuse Hotline at 1-800-4-A-Child or 1-800-422-4453, or go to http://www.childhelp.org. All calls are toll-free and confidential. The hotline is available 24/7 in more than 170 languages.

If you or someone you know has been a victim of sexual abuse, text STRENGTH to the Crisis Text Line at 741-741 connected to a certified crisis counselor.

Continue reading here:
Prosecution and Defense Fight Over Photos of His Hands Learn Why - SGE - Sports Grind Entertainment

News Photo by Julie RiddleForensic interviewer Kellie Sefernick, left, answers questions from Alpena County Prosecutor Cynthia Muszynski while observed by Judge Roy Hayes in Alpenas 26th Circuit Court on Tuesday.

ALPENA Alleged eyewitness accounts and excused jurors marked the fifth day of testimony in the trial of former Alpena Public Schools teacher Heather Winfield on Tuesday.

Judge Roy Hayes limited the testimony of several expert witnesses and allowed one witness to plead the fifth as the prosecution sought to prove that Winfield sexually assaulted a one-time student when he was between 11 and 13 years old.

Winfield denies the charges. The News does not identify alleged survivors of sexual assault.

During Tuesdays testimony in Alpenas 26th Circuit Court, a string of witnesses said they observed sexually suggestive interactions between Winfield and the student.

A relative of the now-17-year-old alleged victim said the accuser in 2017 showed him a social media message including a photo of female genitalia. The message came from Winfields social media account, the witness said.

News Photo by Julie RiddleReflected in a courtroom mirror, attorneys debate proposed testimony by forensic interviewer Kellie Sefernick, seated in the witness stand, in Alpenas 26th Circuit Court on Tuesday.

A friend of the alleged victim said he overheard Winfield promising to perform oral sex on the accuser while the two boys were playing the video game Fortnite in 2016. Attempting to cast doubt on the testimony, defense attorney Matt Wojda noted that Fortnite was not released to the public until 2017, to which the friend replied that he had been playing a pre-release version.

Another friend said he caught Winfield and the alleged victim sitting on a bed, a pile of clothes at the foot of the bed. When the friend entered, Winfield hid her body with a sheet and the alleged victim, partially clothed, laughed, according to the witness.

Asked why, like others on the stand, he didnt tell police what he witnessed, the friend described a bro code that forbade him from revealing his friends secrets to adults.

Hayes asked jurors to leave so attorneys could discuss unrelated illegal activity by the friend. Hayes advised the friend of his right to invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination, which the friend did, declining to answer a question from the defense.

Hayes also excused the jury so attorneys could wrangle over proposed testimony from two experts.

Siding with the defense, Hayes forbade witness Kellie Sefernick from revealing what the alleged victim told her when she interviewed him at Alpenas Child Advocacy Center after he first claimed Winfield assaulted him.

Sefernicks testimony would help rebuild the youths credibility, attacked at length by the defense on Monday, Alpena County Prosecutor Cynthia Muszynski said.

Check out the interactive graphic below. Story continues below the graphic.

The defense said Muszynski could have done that herself when the alleged victim was still on the stand, arguing that statements by an expert would have too much weight with the jury.

The Michigan Court of Appeals agrees, said Hayes, citing recent jury decisions overturned by the higher court because expert witnesses influenced jurors unfairly.

Similar concerns caused Hayes to also limit the testimony of Dr. Maureen Mead, who examined the alleged victim in 2018 for physical signs of sexual assault.

Sexually assaulted children rarely show such signs, Mead testified.

The jury could not hear her diagnosis that the alleged victim had sustained sexual abuse by an adult authority figure, despite no physical indications, Hayes said.

Hayes issued a stern warning that the attorneys and witnesses not cross the lines drawn by Michigans higher courts.

Ill declare a mistrial if this goes haywire, Hayes said. We start over. Everyone understand that?

Tuesdays witnesses also included a teacher who worked with Winfield at Thunder Bay Junior High School, where Winfield first developed a close relationship with her accuser while he was a student in her 6th Grade classroom.

The teacher related once finding Winfield locked in a classroom with the student. She said Winfield neglected her work to talk to the boy via social media, received a sexually suggestive message from him, and repeatedly watched video clips of the boy dancing.

The trial, expected to last at least through Friday, continues today.

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

Recent actions by law enforcement agencies in Northeast Michigan. This has been only lightly edited.ALCONA ...

Continue reading here:
Expert testimony restricted in Winfield trial | News, Sports, Jobs - Alpena News

According to the Vermont Professional Responsibility Board, a nine-month suspension is the appropriate penalty for a lawyer who brandished a gun in response to COVID-19 safety measures.

Back in May, we told you about lawyer Carrie Legus, who was accused of getting angry over a homemade sign at Butchs Harvestore in Walden, Vermont, that promoted social distancing and safety. After allegedly shaking the sign, a store worker says Legus pulled out a gun. She allegedly told police she thought the sign at the store was a barricade behind which people were shooting at the road. According to police, she yelled that everyone on the road is the military and her ex-husband was behind all this.

As reported by ABA Journal, Leguss obstinance didnt end at the store. Her interactions with the disciplinary counsel also raised a few eyebrows:

She answered essentially every question by citing the Fifth Amendment or indicating that you have my response. Some testimony was disrespectful, the hearing board said. As an example, the board cited Legus response to one question: Are you asking me to do pushups?

She stopped the interview when her computers battery was running down. She refused an offer to go to another location where she could plug in her computer or to continue using cellphone audio.

Legus did not have a Fifth Amendment right to decline to be interviewed, the hearing board said.

In order to make a proper assertion of her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, the board said, Legus had to sit for an interview and, during the course of the interview, raise objections to specific questions.

Every instance in which Legus was nonresponsive to questions constituted a violation of an ethics rule requiring lawyers in disciplinary matters to respond to lawful demands for information, the hearing board said. The board had scheduled the interview after Legus evaded prior requests for an in-person or video hearing.

The board added that it didnt assign any relevance to Legus refusal to answer specific questions, however, because a court had not ruled on the validity of her Fifth Amendment assertions.

Legus failure to cooperate with interview requests violated her duty of cooperation with the disciplinary counsel, the hearing board said.

The decisions of the hearing board is appealable, though it is unclear at this time if Legus intends to do so. Shes been on interim suspension since May 2020.

Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email herwith any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Excerpt from:
Nine-Month Suspension In The Cards For Attorney Who Pulled A Gun Because She Was Mad About COVID Protocols - Above the Law