Archive for the ‘Fifth Amendment’ Category

VERIFY: No, the Fifth Amendment can’t be used to opt-out of the census – KENS5.com

A viral video claims that one can use the Fifth Amendment to get out of completing the census. This is false.

Is a viral video claiming that the Fifth Amendment can be used to get out of doing the Census legit?

No. The Fifth Amendment protects people from incriminating themselves. However, the information provided in a census form would not incriminate someone. For that reason, the Fifth Amendment doesn't apply, according to legal experts.

Peter J. Smith, The George Washington University Law School

A viral video, published in 2010, has popped up yet again as people fill out their 2020 census forms. In the video, the narrator claims that people can choose not to answer questions on the census, simply by writing Fifth Amendment instead.

"As you can see here," the narrator said. "I've actually written in Fifth Amendment as each answer."

The Verify team turned to legal expert Peter J. Smith, a law professor at The George Washington University, to get his response to this viral video.

"I think the answer is no," Smith said.

Smith pointed out that the Fifth Amendment protects people from self incriminating, something which doesn't relate to the Census questions.

"Writing Fifth Amendment isn't some sort of magic solution," he said. "That would avoid having to answer questions that the government calls mandatory."

Michael C. Cook Sr. from the Census Bureau agreed, adding that filling out the census is important because it can decide voting power and funding for the next decade.

"I'm talking about funding for schools," he said. "Funding for roads, funding for health care."

For more information on the census, visit here.

Follow this link:
VERIFY: No, the Fifth Amendment can't be used to opt-out of the census - KENS5.com

Ex-Disney executive Kevin Mayer quits TikTok after three months – Quartz

When he started on June 1 as the new CEO of TikTok, former Disney executive Kevin Mayer said he was thrilled to join the company and vowed to further lead the apps global expansion. Less than three months later, Mayer is out.

In a letter sent to employees explaining his resignation yesterday, Mayer said he chose to join TikTok because ByteDance, the Chinese parent of TikTok, is utterly unique and changing the global internet landscape, according to CNBC, which published the internal memo. Mayer was also the COO of ByteDance.

He continued: In recent weeks, as the political environment has sharply changed, I have done significant reflection on what the corporate structural changes will require, and what it means for the global role I signed up forI understand that the role that I signed up forincluding running TikTok globallywill look very different as a result of the US Administrations action to push for a sell off of the US business. Vanessa Pappas, general manager of TikTok in North America, will be the interim global head of the company.

In a statement, a TikTok spokesperson said the company appreciates that the political dynamics of the last few months have significantly changed what the scope of Mayers role would be going forward.

Indeed, Mayer faced an uphill battle as soon as he joined TikTok, which ostensibly hired him in a bid to distance itself from the companys Chinese roots as it faced rising scrutiny from US lawmakers and users. Among his first challenges were addressing concerns that the app was suppressing videos linked to police brutality protests in the US, and also that it censored content deemed unsuitable by the Chinese government. Amid the worsening US-China relationship, however, even Mayer probably couldnt have predicted that US president Donald Trump would take the drastic step of declaring TikTok a threat to national security, and sign an executive order banning unspecified transactions with ByteDance unless the app can find a US buyer for its American business. The order takes effect on Sep. 21.

The resignation of Mayer is a major setback for TikTok, which has become one of the focal points of the US-China relationship. Mayers departure will not only hurt TikToks efforts to prove that it is a global rather than Chinese company, but will also add uncertainty to the potential sale of the apps US business. Trump has given Nov. 12 as the new deadline for the app to find a US buyer or be shut down, over Washingtons concerns that users could be exposed to spying by Beijing, a claim that TikTok rejects.

TikTok has challenged the US government, and this week filed a lawsuit accusing the Trump administration of violating the fifth amendment by issuing the executive order banning the service in the US without obeying due process.

Read more here:
Ex-Disney executive Kevin Mayer quits TikTok after three months - Quartz

The ACLU filed a lawsuit over excessive force by federal agents in clashes at Portland protests – Insider – INSIDER

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit on Wednesday that alleges federal agents used excessive force and illegal detentions after they were deployed by President Donald Trump's administration to protect a federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon.

The plaintiffs in the suit include three military veterans and other protestors who asserted that the federal officers in Portland used overly aggressive tactics that denied demonstrators their freedom of speech and assembly.

Protests against police brutality took place for at least 90 days in Portland after the death of George Floyd on May 25. In July, federal law-enforcement agents were deployed in Portland to deal with the protests. Videos and images of the protests showed federal agents using military tactics and putting protestors into unmarked vans.

The lawsuit, which is the third filed by ACLU in Portland, alleges that federal law-enforcement agents "heavily armed and clad in military-type camouflage or dark uniforms," violated protesters' First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment rights with their use of excessive force and illegal detentions of protestors.

"Our clients are individuals and organizations that gathered peacefully in downtown Portland to support Black Lives Matter after the killing of George Floyd and so many others at the hands of the police," ACLU attorney Jeremy Sacks said in a statement on the suit to the Associated Press. "But they were met by violence from the federal police forces intent on squelching the protesters message and their Constitutional rights all in aid of the president's political agenda."

Several of the plaintiffs claimed that they incurred physical injuries from police actions, including getting hit by tear gas cans, pepper spray, rubber bullets, and other chemicals, the lawsuit said. One man alleged that he was snatched off the streets by unidentified federal agents while protesting.

"I still haven't fully come to terms with what it means that I was kidnapped by my government," Mark Pettibone, a 29-year-old demonstrator involved in the Portland protests, said in a statement reported by the AP. "People need to know what happened to me and the government needs to be held accountable so that what happened to me doesn't happen to someone else."

In the lawsuit, the ACLU also alleges that Chad Wolf, the acting director of the US Department of Homeland Security, did not have the authority to send more than 100 agents to Portland.

The Department of Homeland Security, Wolf, and President Trump were all reportedly named in the lawsuit. The DHS did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.

Follow this link:
The ACLU filed a lawsuit over excessive force by federal agents in clashes at Portland protests - Insider - INSIDER

Beachwood Councilwoman: I will not be a rubber stamp – Cleveland Jewish News

It is important that I give you my perspective on recent incidents involving our city of Beachwood Police Department, more specifically the release of the video dated June 27, 2019.

The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States proclaims that no one shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the same exact words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of all states. The standard of due process applies not only to criminal law, but has become an essential part of civil actions and even administrative proceedings regarding employee, student or membership disputes. However, with the advent of social media, this vital Constitutional right is being violated by both sides of the political spectrum.

Recently, here in the city of Beachwood, for the first time in our citys history, Mayor Martin S. Horwitz made the decision to release the unredacted meaning the raw version of the videotape of a police incident, despite the fact that the incident is still under investigation. While this may be the mayors prerogative for our city, I, as chairperson of the Ohio Casino Control Commission, similarly have oversight of a law enforcement agency whose officers are also routinely recorded, albeit mostly via private surveillance systems, rather than agency-issued dash or body cameras.

These recordings often prove instrumental in the prosecution of criminal, civil and administrative matters. Our agency has consistently found these recordings are one piece of evidence in a much larger investigative process. That is, without the full context of an investigation, a particular recording may unjustly prejudice one or more parties involved, including officers and civilians. Accordingly, I believe that releasing evidence before an investigation is complete poses a substantial risk to the fundamental fairness of the adjudication process, including potentially tainting any reviewing body, such as grand juries, petit juries and the public.

City council does not have authority over the administrative policies of the police department, including the use of body cams, hiring and firing, the release of footage, paid administrative leave, etc. The police department is unionized and functions as a department within the city of Beachwood. The mayor is also the safety director. Therefore, the chief of police reports directly to the mayor. This structure is common in many cities in Ohio. In order for council to encourage or influence policy, the process dictates that council should financially support the policy. Ultimately, there are layers council, mayor, the police department and an umbrella of laws, civil service rules and collective bargaining laws all in place so that no entity can interfere or insert themselves into areas that are not their responsibility.

For this reason, police reform and any desired structural changes are very challenging to pursue or alter in a short amount of time. This is not to say that there should not be a movement toward change, my point is that the existing structure makes change very hard and slow to occur.

The system is not nimble and malleable. The investigation of the June 27, 2019, incident is under criminal review with the Special Prosecutions Section of the Ohio Attorney Generals Office and there is no time limit on investigations. It is in our best interest to wait for a complete and thorough investigation. It is not best to rush an investigation. It is essential that we let it go the distance to cover all bases.

In spite of these inherent challenges, please remember that we all want fairness. Members of the law enforcement community are first and foremost citizens of this nation and deserve the same rights, such as due process, reserved for all Americans.

We are living in unprecedented times. As a result, everyone is operating in a new zone, and we see the results of this stress ranging in higher suicide rates, increased food and alcohol consumption, as well as the need for mental health counseling and financial distress assistance.

By this commentary, I am in no way endorsing the use of unreasonable force. I believe that most of the officers serving Beachwood do so with respect, pride and courage on behalf of the community. I am, however, unwilling to rush to justice without giving that officer or any other citizen of the community their rights as Americans, including the important right of due process.

I am here to serve the community at large, which includes both our citizens and our employees; I am not and will not serve as a rubber stamp for one faction or another.

June E. Taylor is chair of the Ohio Casino Control Commission having been appointed by former Gov. John Kasich in 2011, and reappointed by Gov. Mike DeWine in 2018. She served on the city of Beachwood charter review committee in 2016 and was appointed to the Beachwood City Council in January 2018. She was elected to serve on Beachwood City Council in November 2019. She is the first African-American to serve on Beachwood City Council. She and her family have resided in Beachwood for more than 20 years and are members of Anshe Chesed Fairmount Temple in Beachwood.

Read more from the original source:
Beachwood Councilwoman: I will not be a rubber stamp - Cleveland Jewish News

EHT man with gun on Atlantic City Boardwalk ordered held – breakingac.com

An Egg Harbor Township man arrested on the Atlantic City Boardwalk with a gun and drugs while on parole will be held pending trial.Curtis Drinks, 24, was just released from prison in March. Since then, he has been arrested twice, Assistant Prosecutor Aaron Witherspoon told the judge at a detention hearing Wednesday.Drinks who is listed as Curtis Drakes by the state Department of Corrections was released from prison March 30, records show.He was then one of eight people arrested by Atlantic City police in July on drug charges.The latest arrest happened Friday, after Drinks was allegedly seen rolling a marijuana cigarette on the Boardwalk around South Carolina Avenue.An officer then found a gun, ammunition and drugs in his backpack, according to the charges.Drinks was cooperative with police by telling them about the gun, defense attorney Yvonne Maher noted to the judge, adding that the gun was not loaded.But there was ammunition in a sock, Judge John Rauh said.In arguing for release, Maher said her client has lifelong ties to Atlantic City and, while he had a gun, there is no indication he would use it for violence.Was he going target shooting? Rauh asked. Is it safe to say the gun was to protect him or protect his (drugs)?Drinks tried to briefly address the court, saying that his father died of COVID-19 about a month and a half after he got out of prison. I understand Im probably going to prison, he began before Rauh stopped him, noting he has a Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself.Candidly, I dont think youre helping at this particular point, the judge told him.While Rauh said he doesnt think Drinks is a risk not to appear, he does believe the defendant is a danger to the community.He appears to be a gentleman, but he cant get out of his own way, Rauh said. I let him go again, theres going to be a gun and somebodys going to get shot.

Read the rest here:
EHT man with gun on Atlantic City Boardwalk ordered held - breakingac.com