Archive for the ‘First Amendment’ Category

First Amendment Issue or Safety Issue – The Branding Iron

Photo by Ashley Dewey

In the first amendment, freedom of religion is in the top spot. But during this pandemic things have changed. The National Government has come and declared everyone should be social distancing and people should stay six feet away from people to stop the spread of the coronavirus, but for churchgoers, staying six feet apart is easier said than done.

In Tennessee, a pastor was calling for the governor to consider church essential.

It is disturbing to me how grocery stores, gas stations, drug stores, day care centers, etc. can be designated as essential businesses, yet churches and religious institutions are not part of the list of essential businesses, Bishop Alvin E. Miller wrote to Fox 17 in Nashville. How can churches and religious institutions not be classified as essential when our nation is fighting one of its greatest enemies since its existence?

On the other hand, there were protests in California and in Cincinnati, where people were driving by the services honking their horns and begging the churchgoers to stay because they are spreading the virus.

Here in Laramie, churches are doing their best to accommodate the regulations but also giving people their church services.

Harvest Church continues to minister in an online presence, phone calls, text and emails. We just had our first ever drive in church service for Easter and I believe people were blessed, said senior Pastor Bobby Calderon. I have encouraged and continue to encourage leaders to reach out to those they have relationship with in the church and make sure people are good and their needs are met. Mens ministry are continuing to meet via Webex Meet.

Pastor Calderon does express, though, that people can be safe and also be part of the church.

The church should continue to be disciples.Disciples are disciplined followers of Jesus. We need to continue/start to do the things God has called us to do.Pray, fast, believe and trust in God. Pray for our country and the world and hurting people.We need to pray Psalm 91, a psalm of protection over our lives. We need to pray Psalm 139:23-24 over ourselves too which is Search me O God and know my heart; Try me, and know my anxieties; And see if there is any wicked way in me, And lead me in the way everlasting. On Sundays, I would encourage people to get dressed and ready for church, gather their family and tune in online with expectancy in their hearts that God will move on their behalf.

Visit link:
First Amendment Issue or Safety Issue - The Branding Iron

The Right to Protest During the Pandemic – Blogging Censorship

Dissent and protest are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution, which guarantees freedoms of speech, assembly, and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. These rights are fundamental to our democracy. They cannot be sacrificed even, and perhaps particularly, in times of public emergency.

On April 14, 2020, the police department in Raleigh, North Carolina, tweeted, Protesting is a non-essential activity, as an explanation for breaking up a protest. As organizations dedicated to protecting civil liberties and the First Amendment, the undersigned groups are deeply disturbed by this statement and other remarks and actions by public officials suggesting that peaceful protest can be outlawed during a national crisis. The ongoing Covid-19 pandemic cannot be used to justify the suspension of First Amendment rights. People must be free to express disagreement with government decisions, even when it involves criticism of essential public health measures.

Upholding First Amendment rights need not be at odds with the governments authority and obligation to protect public health and safety. The emergency decrees that call for social distancing, wearing of face covers or masks, and limits on the size of public assemblies can regulate the manner in which protests occur. However, regulations should be narrowly tailored to what is necessary to protect public health and cannot be so broad that they ban protest completely or so poorly drafted that they restrict peaceful demonstrations.

Most protesters have been exercising their constitutional rights without threatening the health of their fellow citizens: wearing masks and standing six-feet apart outside hospitals and other places of business to protest inadequate safety precautions; participating in car demonstrations in Arizona, California and Michigan, and launching digital campaigns.

Public officials in Ohio and Michigan have included explicit protections for First Amendment rights in their emergency decrees. Some states have also acknowledged information-gathering and reporting as essential services.

We urge all public officials to recognize their obligation to defend First Amendment rights while they protect public safety. These rights are critically important during uncertain times like these.

Co-signed:

National Coalition Against CensorshipAmerican Booksellers for Free ExpressionAmericans for Prosperity FoundationAssociation of American PublishersThe Authors GuildThe Buckeye InstituteCaesar Rodney InstituteThe Center for Media and DemocracyCivil Liberties Defense CenterCoalition for Policy ReformThe DKT Liberty ProjectDefending Rights & DissentFirst Amendment Lawyers AssociationFirstAmendment.comFree PressFree Speech CoalitionFreedom ForumFreedom Foundation of MinnesotaFreedom to Read FoundationIdaho Freedom FoundationInstitute for Free SpeechKurt Vonnegut Museum and LibraryMackinac Center for Public PolicyMississippi Center for Public PolicyPEN AmericaPEN America Childrens and Young Adult Books CommitteeRestore The Fourth, Inc.United for MissouriWoodhull Freedom FoundationDavid A. Schulz, Media Freedom & Information Access Clinic at Yale Law School *institution listed for identification purposes only

Here is the original post:
The Right to Protest During the Pandemic - Blogging Censorship

A Teenager Posted About Her COVID-19 Infection on Instagram. A Deputy Threatened To Arrest Her If She Didn’t Delete It. – Reason

A family in Oxford, Wisconsin, is suing the local sheriff's department after a patrol sergeant threatened to arrest a teenage girl for disorderly conduct for posting on Instagram about being infected with COVID-19.

Amyiah Cohoon, 16, is a student at Westfield Area High School in Westfield, Wisconsin. According to this lawsuit, she and schoolmates went to Disney World and Universal Studios in Florida for a spring break trip in early March, right as the coronavirus was beginning to spread and businesses began to shut down. She and her classmates canceled the trip early and returned home.

Once home, Cohoon began developing symptoms associated with COVID-19. She sought medical assistance, but at the time they were unable to test her to see if she was infected. She was diagnosed with an upper respiratory infection with "symptoms consistent with COVID-19," according to the lawsuit.

Cohoon went home and posted on Instagram letting people know that she had COVID-19 and was in self-quarantine. Her condition worsened and she was brought to the hospital for treatment. She posted again about the experience on Instagram. Finally, they were able to test her, but the test came back negative. According to the lawsuit, doctors told her it was likely the missed the window for testing positive, but she probably did have COVID-19, despite the test results. (False negative results have been an ongoing issue in accurately diagnosing infections.)

After she returned home from this visit, she posted again on Instagram and included a picture of herself at the hospital wearing an oxygen mask.

The very next day, Patrol Sergeant Cameron Klump from Marquette County Sheriff's Department showed up on the family's doorstep. He was there under orders from Sheriff Joseph Konrath to demand that Amyiah and her father, Richard Cohoon, remove Amyiah's Instagram posts. If they refused, Klump said the family faced charges for disorderly conduct and Klump told them he would "start taking people to jail," according to the suit.

Konrath's justification was that there had been no confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the county. He found out about the Instagram post from Amyiah's high school. The Cohoon family had contacted the school to let them know about Amyiah's infection, but nobody ever contacted them back to get more information. It appears that instead the school contacted the police. Under the threat of arrest, Cohoon complied and deleted the allegedly illegal Instagram post.

That evening the family would discover that a school administrator sent out an alert to families accusing Cohoon of making it up and assuring families that any information of infection was just a rumor. "Let me assure you there is NO truth to this," the message read. "This was a foolish means to get attention and the source of the rumor has been addressed. This rumor had caught the attention of our Public Health Department and she was involved in putting a stop to this nonsense."

The family then connected with the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, and the Institute sent a letter to Konrath warning him that he had violated Cohoon's First Amendment rights and demanded both an apology and the promise that there would be no further threats of criminal charges against the family for Amyiah's post.

Konrath refused, and now the Wisconsin Institute of Law and Liberty is suing Konrath and Klump in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin for violating Cohoon's First and 14th Amendment rights. Her Instagram posts are protected speech, the Institute argues, and there was nothing about her posts that violated the county's disorderly conduct law, and even if they did, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has held that disorderly conduct statutes in the state cannot be applied to speech protected by the First Amendment.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty is asking the court to rule that Cohoon's posts were protected speech and order that the sheriff's department may not threaten or cite Cohoon or her family for these posts, plus paying "nominal damages."

The sheriff's department is not backing down or even acknowledging an overreaction. According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, their position remains that the one negative test means that she did not have COVID-19, which simply isn't how it works. The Sentinel reports:

Sam Hall, an attorney for the sheriff, said the teenager "caused distress and panic" among other parents by claiming she had contracted the coronavirus despite getting a negative test result.

"This case is nothing more than a 2020 version of screaming fire in a crowded theater," he said, referring to speech that is not protected by the First Amendment.

That the sheriff's lawyer is misusing the much-maligned "fire in a crowded theater" argument from Schenck v. United States is a huge tell that these guys don't have a leg to stand on. It's a bad argument, a bad precedent (it was about censoring anti-war activism), and the Supreme Court has subsequently weakened that decision and broadened our free speech protections.

And even if that ruling remained relevant, Amyiah Cohoon was not engaging in the equivalent of "shouting fire in a crowded theater." Because of the significant number of false negative test results, it's appropriate for health staff to treat her as though she likely has COVID-19 based on her symptoms. It's also appropriate for the Cohoon family to attempt to warn families of the students who went with her to Florida that they might have been exposed, too.

It's the school officials and the police who behaved irresponsibly, not Amyiah or her family.

Read the complaint here.

Read the rest here:
A Teenager Posted About Her COVID-19 Infection on Instagram. A Deputy Threatened To Arrest Her If She Didn't Delete It. - Reason

Where is America’s backbone? | Letters To The Editor – Cumberland Times-News

Perhaps some additional information will lead readers to a more realistic conclusion than that presented by Carolyn Weigle (See: Dont put others in harms way, April 15 Times-News).

The directives by all officials are totally illegal, as they take away our First Amendment right to assemble and our 14th Amendment right to due process we shall not be deprived of our life, liberty or property without due process.

So, the several million Christians who did not defy those illegal directives, were surrendering to the authority even though they should have defiled it.

Our walk away from theLord is resulting in our suffering and this pandemic is quite clearly stated in the Bible, in Luke 21:11. (and other places in the Bible). The Bible is theword of God and also a history book.

Simple looking back in history will prove that. A pandemic is a contagious disease which is worldwide and often fatal. You or I will not avoid it whether we stay at home or work or hide under the bed. It touches the just and the unjust. Not all even know they had it.

Looking back on the history of the U.S. Constitution, never, has any government official attempted to take away our First Amendment right to assemble or our 14th Amendment rightthat says life, liberty and property shall not be taken without due process of law.

Yesteryear, any attempt would have resulted in an immediate revolution. Today, we have had all of our rights provided by the Constitution taken without a bit of question.

We have surrendered our freedom. Now, looking back on history of the world, never has any country been shut down due to a pandemic, although millions died. Thousands of people will die now, with or without the shutdown. Lifting the totally unconstitutional shutdown will not stop you or me from the virus.

Many doctors are showing the cause of death as the virus, when actually many are dying from heart, cancer or other causes. They lie because the hospital gets a higher payment if it shows coronavirus. You gain profit from lying. Does that scare you, that our country isOK with lying and fraud?

When we distance from the Lord, we pay the consequences. The additional problem is our acceptance of an illegal directive.

What happened to our bravery, our fortitude, our American way? Our once great country was not built on fear. What happened? It happened because we are complacent, willing to surrender to total control of government without a touch of due process. We are now slaves and no one even protests.

Christians are willing to give up church attendance so easily. Where is the backbone of America?

We have told ourLord that we do not need him. He is responding by lifting his hand and blessing from us.

Only if we, as a country, will humble ourselves, pray, seek his face, and turn from our wicked ways, will he hear from heaven and heal our land.

The decision is yours America. Change or continue to submit to oppression without even a protest.

If you disagree, email me: tedoyle@iceweb.net.

Thomas E. Doyle

Oakland

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

Read the rest here:
Where is America's backbone? | Letters To The Editor - Cumberland Times-News

Lawmakers say Walz order is a violation of The First Amendment – KWLM (Willmar Radio)

(Willmar MN-) One area lawmaker says he thinks Governor Tim Walz' Stay at Home order violates the First Amendment by closing churches. Minnesota Christians were forced to celebrate Easter Sunday at home, watching services on the internet or listening on the radio instead of attending at their places of worship. On Legislative Review Saturday, Representative Tim Miller of Prinsburg said the governor's Stay at Home order which caused churches to close their doors is a violation of the separation of church and state...

...Representative Dean Urdahl of Grove City said he's been told people attending drive-up church services from their cars have been threatened...

...Urdahl says the governor's decrees are directives, but they need to be made into law by statute in order to be enforceable. Urdahl says the current government reaction to Covid 19 has had unintended consequences, and there needs to be flexibility.

See the article here:
Lawmakers say Walz order is a violation of The First Amendment - KWLM (Willmar Radio)