Archive for the ‘First Amendment’ Category

First Amendment anniversary: What it says, why it’s a cornerstone of democracy – KETV Omaha

What's the deal with the First Amendment? This is the one that protects the freedoms of speech, religion, the press, assembly and petition. But how far does that protection actually go now? This is arguably the most important amendment in the bill of Rights. In fact, some states wouldn't ratify the Constitution until the framers promised something like this would be added. And this is what they came up with. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Now, essentially, this means that the government can't tell you what to believe or control what you say, and it gives every American the power to speak out. But let's dig a little deeper into the nuance. Freedom of religion is the separation of church and state, And while those words never actually show up in the document, the First Amendment stops the government from creating a state religion like with the Church of England. Obviously, Judeo Christian language is woven into the fabric of American history and even the money. But the Supreme Court is laid out specific guidelines for how to make sure our laws are constitutional and don't promote or put down any particular religion. It also means that everyone can believe in what they want. Thio, the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press essentially go hand in hand. Now, generally speaking, the government can't stop you or punish you for what you say or what you write, even if people find it offensive like hate speech or non verbal protests like flag burning. Remember, our country's founders had just broken from a king, so they wanted to make sure that we, the people, could expose a corrupt or tyrannical government. You could even talk some smack about government leaders for whatever reason. You want thio without the fear of being put in prison or worse. But not all speech is free. True threats and even fighting words are not protected by the Constitution. And while the government can't dictate what you say, it can restrict where and when. The press also can't just print whatever it wants to. Because of libel laws. You can successfully sue someone if you can prove that they printed something harmful and knew that it wasn't true. But one thing that's often misunderstood the First Amendment's protection of free speech Onley applies to the government. Ah, private company could kick you out or fire you for doing or saying something that violates its personal code of conduct. Our guys, I think they were good, and that's the deal with Sorry, My very excited and very loud friends do have a point there exercising their freedoms of assembly. In petition, they often get overlooked. But these two kind of support all the others, Whether it's an email threat, a march or lawsuit, they allow us to push the government to fix things that we think it's doing wrong, all in an effort to form a more perfect union. And that is the deal with the First AmendmentWhat's the deal with the First Amendment? This is the one that protects the freedoms of speech, religion, the press, assembly and petition. But how far does that protection actually go now? This is arguably the most important amendment in the bill of Rights. In fact, some states wouldn't ratify the Constitution until the framers promised something like this would be added. And this is what they came up with. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Now, essentially, this means that the government can't tell you what to believe or control what you say, and it gives every American the power to speak out. But let's dig a little deeper into the nuance. Freedom of religion is the separation of church and state, And while those words never actually show up in the document, the First Amendment stops the government from creating a state religion like with the Church of England. Obviously, Judeo Christian language is woven into the fabric of American history and even the money. But the Supreme Court is laid out specific guidelines for how to make sure our laws are constitutional and don't promote or put down any particular religion. It also means that everyone can believe in what they want. Thio, the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press essentially go hand in hand. Now, generally speaking, the government can't stop you or punish you for what you say or what you write, even if people find it offensive like hate speech or non verbal protests like flag burning. Remember, our country's founders had just broken from a king, so they wanted to make sure that we, the people, could expose a corrupt or tyrannical government. You could even talk some smack about government leaders for whatever reason. You want thio without the fear of being put in prison or worse. But not all speech is free. True threats and even fighting words are not protected by the Constitution. And while the government can't dictate what you say, it can restrict where and when. The press also can't just print whatever it wants to. Because of libel laws. You can successfully sue someone if you can prove that they printed something harmful and knew that it wasn't true. But one thing that's often misunderstood the First Amendment's protection of free speech Onley applies to the government. Ah, private company could kick you out or fire you for doing or saying something that violates its personal code of conduct. Our guys, I think they were good, and that's the deal with Sorry, My very excited and very loud friends do have a point there exercising their freedoms of assembly. In petition, they often get overlooked. But these two kind of support all the others, Whether it's an email threat, a march or lawsuit, they allow us to push the government to fix things that we think it's doing wrong, all in an effort to form a more perfect union. And that is the deal with the First Amendment

First Amendment anniversary: What it says, why it's a cornerstone of democracy

Updated: 4:57 PM CDT Sep 25, 2020

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."Friday marks 231 years since the passage of the First Amendment, protecting the freedoms of speech, religion, the press, to assemble peacefully and to petition the government. The day Sept. 25 is known as First Amendment Day. It was one of several amendments proposed by Congress on Sept. 25, 1789, and sent to the states to ratify. Those amendments together are known as the Bill of Rights. But the cornerstone of the Bill of Rights is the First Amendment. Centuries of U.S. history show the rights in action. Freedom of religion: When the colonists came to the New World, they were, in part, fleeing from religious persecution. This right, built into the Constitution, means that the U.S. can't declare a national religion. It can't persecute someone for their religious beliefs. Freedom of speech: This freedom is one of the more litigated in the First Amendment. The U.S. court system hears Freedom of Speech cases frequently. Here are some of the protections the court system has decided fall under freedom of speech: In West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, the court decided the right not to salute the flag was protected under the First AmendmentIn Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court ruled that students had the right to wear black armbands to school to protest a war under freedom of speechIn Cohen v. California, the court said using certain offensive words and phrases to convey political messages was protectedIn Texas v. Johnson and United States v. Eichman, the court decided burning the flag in protest of something was protected. Here are some things the court says are not protected by freedom of speech:In Schenck v. United States, the court ruled that inciting actions that would harm others (e.g., Shouting "fire" in a crowded theater) is not protected speech. In Bethel School District #43 v. Fraser, the Supreme Court ruled that the rights of students to make an obscene speech at a school-sponsored event was not covered.In Roth v. United States, the court ruled that making or distributing obscene materials was not protected by the freedom of speech. Freedom of the press: Simply put, freedom of the press is protection against government meddling in the media. It means that the government can't tell the media what they can and cannot report, nor can they prosecute the media for what they do or don't report. This freedom has also played out in the court system.In 1931, the case of Near v. Minnesota, helped define freedom of the press. A newspaper editor printed an article saying some local officials were associated with gangsters. The state obtained an injunction under a law that said the newspaper could be stopped from publishing malicious, scandalous or defamatory material. The Supreme Court ruled that Minnesota law restricted freedom of the press. In 1988, the court issued a landmark ruling in the case of Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier. This time, a high school newspaper was barred from publishing two articles the school's principal found inappropriate. The court ruled that schools have to be able to set high standards for speech disseminated under school supervision, saying the principal's actions did not violate the student's right to freedom of speech or freedom of press. Freedom to peaceably assemble: This protection gives people the right to protest peacefully, but the court has ruled that there are limits to this part of the first amendment. In Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, a case argued before the Supreme Court in 1969, the court ruled that requiring a permit to assemble on city streets was unconstitutional. But the decision also allowed cities to deny permits in publicly owned places if they have a compelling reason, like public safety, to do so. In other cases, courts have ruled that requiring permits for a planned peaceful protest are constitutional, but gatherings in response to breaking news are not required to have a permit. Cities are also allowed to regulate aspects of a protest, like the time or place.Freedom to petition the government: This right was included after the British government ignored the U.S. founders' list of grievances. The founders had previously petitioned their concerns about the British government and instead of addressing them, the government only made things worse for the U.S. So, when the founders were writing the constitution, they included both the right to assemble and petition in the initial draft of the first amendment. Freedoms of speech, religion and the press came later, but were included before the final draft was voted on in Congress. According to the Freedom Forum Institute, in 2020, petitioning is any nonviolent means of encouraging or showing dissent of government actions. This includes letter writing, lobbying, emailing, calling or even signing an online petition. The First Amendment - among our most important in the constitution - offers anyone in the United States protection, not just citizens.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Friday marks 231 years since the passage of the First Amendment, protecting the freedoms of speech, religion, the press, to assemble peacefully and to petition the government.

The day Sept. 25 is known as First Amendment Day.

It was one of several amendments proposed by Congress on Sept. 25, 1789, and sent to the states to ratify. Those amendments together are known as the Bill of Rights.

But the cornerstone of the Bill of Rights is the First Amendment. Centuries of U.S. history show the rights in action.

Freedom of religion: When the colonists came to the New World, they were, in part, fleeing from religious persecution. This right, built into the Constitution, means that the U.S. can't declare a national religion. It can't persecute someone for their religious beliefs.

Freedom of speech: This freedom is one of the more litigated in the First Amendment. The U.S. court system hears Freedom of Speech cases frequently. Here are some of the protections the court system has decided fall under freedom of speech:

Here are some things the court says are not protected by freedom of speech:

Freedom of the press: Simply put, freedom of the press is protection against government meddling in the media. It means that the government can't tell the media what they can and cannot report, nor can they prosecute the media for what they do or don't report. This freedom has also played out in the court system.

In 1931, the case of Near v. Minnesota, helped define freedom of the press. A newspaper editor printed an article saying some local officials were associated with gangsters. The state obtained an injunction under a law that said the newspaper could be stopped from publishing malicious, scandalous or defamatory material. The Supreme Court ruled that Minnesota law restricted freedom of the press.

In 1988, the court issued a landmark ruling in the case of Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier. This time, a high school newspaper was barred from publishing two articles the school's principal found inappropriate. The court ruled that schools have to be able to set high standards for speech disseminated under school supervision, saying the principal's actions did not violate the student's right to freedom of speech or freedom of press.

Freedom to peaceably assemble: This protection gives people the right to protest peacefully, but the court has ruled that there are limits to this part of the first amendment.

In Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, a case argued before the Supreme Court in 1969, the court ruled that requiring a permit to assemble on city streets was unconstitutional. But the decision also allowed cities to deny permits in publicly owned places if they have a compelling reason, like public safety, to do so. In other cases, courts have ruled that requiring permits for a planned peaceful protest are constitutional, but gatherings in response to breaking news are not required to have a permit. Cities are also allowed to regulate aspects of a protest, like the time or place.

Freedom to petition the government: This right was included after the British government ignored the U.S. founders' list of grievances. The founders had previously petitioned their concerns about the British government and instead of addressing them, the government only made things worse for the U.S. So, when the founders were writing the constitution, they included both the right to assemble and petition in the initial draft of the first amendment. Freedoms of speech, religion and the press came later, but were included before the final draft was voted on in Congress. According to the Freedom Forum Institute, in 2020, petitioning is any nonviolent means of encouraging or showing dissent of government actions. This includes letter writing, lobbying, emailing, calling or even signing an online petition.

The First Amendment - among our most important in the constitution - offers anyone in the United States protection, not just citizens.

Originally posted here:
First Amendment anniversary: What it says, why it's a cornerstone of democracy - KETV Omaha

Editorial: Honoring the First Amendment on its 231st anniversary – WXII12 Winston-Salem

Editorial: Honoring the First Amendment on its 231st anniversary

Updated: 7:12 PM EDT Sep 25, 2020

Hide TranscriptShow Transcript

PRESIDENT AND GENERAL MANAGER, MICHELLE. BYE. CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF OR ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR OF THE PRESS OR THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO PEACEABLY ASSEMBLE AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES. THAT IS THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION A RIGHT AND PRIVILEGE OF THIS COUNTRY. SEPTEMBER 25TH IS THE 230 FIRST ANNIVERSARY OF ITS PASSAGE TODAY. ITS GUARANTEES OF YOUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH YOUR ABILITY TO WORSHIP YOUR WAY AND THE OPPORTUNITY TO PEACEFULLY PROTEST AND PETITION OUR GOVERNMENT AND ITS LEADERS. ITS AS IMPORTANT AS EVER. ITS ALSO THE BEDROCK OF WHAT WE DO AT WXII 12 NEWS WEAR TODAY. EVERY DAY WE ARE PROUD TO BE LOCAL BROADCASTERS THE FIRST AMENDMENT PROPOSED BY CONGRESS ON SEPTEMBER 25TH. IT EMPOWERS US ALL AND IT EMPOWERS US AS JOURNALISTS BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD THE RIGHT TO DECIDE AND A WXII 12 NEWS. ITS OUR FIRST RESPONSIBILITY TO DELIVER THE FACTS HOLD THE POWERFUL ACCOUNTABLE BRING YOU THE STORY GIVE YOU A VOICE. ITS WHAT WE DO. ITS WHAT WE ARE WXII 12 NEWS WXII 12 WELCOMES RESPONSIBLE

Editorial: Honoring the First Amendment on its 231st anniversary

Updated: 7:12 PM EDT Sep 25, 2020

Friday marks the 231st anniversary of the passage of the First Amendment, protecting the freedom of speech, religion and the press. It's now honored as First Amendment Day.

Friday marks the 231st anniversary of the passage of the First Amendment, protecting the freedom of speech, religion and the press. It's now honored as First Amendment Day.

Read the original here:
Editorial: Honoring the First Amendment on its 231st anniversary - WXII12 Winston-Salem

Editorial: The First Amendment – KETV Omaha

Opinion

Editorial: The First Amendment

Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. The first amendment helps ensure these rights for all Americans.

Updated: 10:15 AM CDT Sep 25, 2020

Hide TranscriptShow Transcript

This is an editorial from KETV president and General Manager Shawn Oswald Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. The first amendment helps ensure these rights for all Americans. On its anniversary, we proudly celebrate the five freedoms the first amendment helps guarantee: religion; speech; the press; to peaceably assemble; and to petition the government. Now is the time to reflect on these freedoms and how they help move our great nation forward. (ROB) THE FIRST AMENDMENT... PROPOSED BY CONGRESS ON SEPTEMBER 25TH IT EMPOWERS US ALL (JULIE) AND IT EMPOWERS US AS JOURNALISTS BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD THE RIGHT TO DECIDE (ROB) AND AT KETV NewsWatch Seven... IT'S OUR FIRST RESPONSIBILITY TO DELIVER THE FACTS HOLD THE POWERFUL ACCOUNTABLE BRING YOU THE STORY GIVE YOU A VOICE (JULIE) IT'S WHAT WE DO (ROB) IT'S WHAT WE'LL ALWAYS DO (ROB & JULIE) WE ARE KETV NewsWatch Seven

Opinion

Editorial: The First Amendment

Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. The first amendment helps ensure these rights for all Americans.

Updated: 10:15 AM CDT Sep 25, 2020

Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. The First Amendment helps ensure these rights for all Americans.On its anniversary, we proudly celebrate the five freedoms the First Amendment helps guarantee: religion; speech; the press; to peaceably assemble; and to petition the government. Now is the time to reflect on these freedoms and how they help move our great nation forward.

Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. The First Amendment helps ensure these rights for all Americans.

On its anniversary, we proudly celebrate the five freedoms the First Amendment helps guarantee: religion; speech; the press; to peaceably assemble; and to petition the government.

Now is the time to reflect on these freedoms and how they help move our great nation forward.

Continued here:
Editorial: The First Amendment - KETV Omaha

First Amendment shines through during toughest of times | TheHill – The Hill

Two hundred and thirty-one years ago this week, Congress passed a collection of amendments to the U.S. Constitution, ten of which would become the Bill of Rights. Foremost in the Bill of Rights is the First Amendment, which allows Americans to worship how they please, speak their minds openly and have their voices heard by their government.

Our Founding Fathers, in their infinite wisdom, also included in the First Amendment the right to a free press. They understood that our democracy could not survive without the freedom to report the news without fear or favor. The times may have changed; that principle has not.

The work of our most-trusted sources of news our local radio and TV stations, broadcast network partners and community and national newspapers during the most important events of the past six months have shown how essential a free press is to keeping people informed. Yet, these historic times have also laid bare the existential threats facing journalism brought on by economic, cultural and political factors.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, media outlets have been providing a comprehensive picture of how the virus has affected us all. They have expanded newscasts and aired special reports, hosted virtual townhalls with public health experts and brought audiences into hospital rooms to show the devastating toll of coronavirus. Journalists have dug deep into medical research to shine a light on the short- and long-term effects of COVID-19. Some have documented their own struggles after contracting the virus, while others have volunteered in vaccine trials. And, as the pandemic continues impacting all aspects of everyday life, local media outlets have explored the financial, psychological and societal toll coronavirus has taken on our communities.

Yet, even as media outlets cover the pandemic, they have faced historic advertising losses as businesses large and small cut ad budgets to save expenses during these difficult times. As a result, broadcast stations and newspapers have seen the financial underpinnings of their investment in journalism drop out. Unfortunately, some have had to shutter for good. Others are struggling to survive and recover, even as they revamp operations to create safe, socially distant workplaces. We should be reminded that good journalism takes investment, and that amidst a pandemic this investment is more challenging and more important than ever.

Journalists are also playing a unique role during the ongoing protests and civil unrest stemming from issues of racial injustice. They provide a platform for protesters to voice their grievances and shine a light on the challenges facing our nation. They bear witness to interactions between police and demonstrators to hold local officials and citizens accountable. They provide images, words and context for those at home, helping them connect to, learn and understand what is happening in the world.

Alarmingly, journalists covering these demonstrations have been targets of violence and harassment. Journalists have been pepper sprayed, tear gassed, arrested and shot with projectiles, even after identifying themselves as members of the media. They have been assaulted, had equipment destroyed or stolen, and their headquarters vandalized. This is unacceptable. It is incumbent on law enforcement and protesters to respect journalists who are doing the difficult jobs we need them to do.

Millions of voters are also turning to newspapers and broadcast outlets to help make informed choices at the polls during federal, state and local elections in 2020. Since the founding of our nation, Americas free press has been entrusted with the awesome responsibility of educating voters, examining the issues, promoting civil debate and holding our public officials accountable. That is a tradition that is alive and well today.

From my time in elected office, including 12 years as a U.S. senator from Oregon, I understand the desire of politicians to push back when frustrated by unfavorable news coverage. Indeed, criticism of the press is warranted and something we should expect of all our democratic institutions. But we should all be mindful of the difference between an adversarial relationship between elected officials and the media that is a sign of a healthy democracy and overheated rhetoric that jeopardizes journalists ability to legally and safely report the news.

When our Founding Fathers passed the First Amendment, they likely could not envision a year as challenging as 2020. Still, by enshrining the right to a free press in the bedrock of our nation, they showed their faith that journalism was necessary to our democracys survival even in the toughest of times. That is worth celebrating.

Gordon Smith has been president and CEO of the National Association of Broadcasters since 2009. He is a former two-term Republican U.S. senator from Oregon.

Read more here:
First Amendment shines through during toughest of times | TheHill - The Hill

Lawyer: Horseheads church should be reopened, First Amendment rights have been violated – Hornell Evening Tribune

A lawyer representing Lighthouse Baptist Church in Horseheads, the source of a rapidly growing cluster of COVID-19 cases across New York, said Thursday the church is asking Chemung County to remove an order of closure, claiming its First Amendment rights have been violated.

In a statement, Buffalo attorneyJames Ostrowskisaid the church "is committed to cooperating with the County to reopen the Church in a manner consistent with the health of the community," but threatened a federal lawsuit if the county does not allow "free exercise of their religion."

About 300 people across New York have been diagnosed or identified as contacts potentially exposed to COVID-19 as a result of the cluster, according to the state health department. As of Monday, 75 confirmed cases in Chemung County and 15 cases in other counties are tied to the cluster.

Chemung County health officials originally traced a cluster of five positive cases to Lighthouse Baptist Church in early September.The number of confirmed cases quickly ballooned to at least 45 across multiple counties as officials learned several members of the Horseheads congregation attended a wedding in late August in Oneida County.

Lighthouse Baptist Church lawyer's statement

Ostrowski said the church voluntarily suspended services Sept. 6 after learning two members of its congregation tested positive and encouraged its members to be tested and quarantine.

He also claimed the church supplied a list of recent church attendees to county officials. Chemung County Executive Chris Moss has previously stated a list of members was received after the county filed a subpoena.

Ostrowski pointed to a "false media report" saying the church opposed proper medical treatment. The lawyer could not be reached for comment to clarify the claim Thursday.

Previously, county officials said the church was not cooperating with the contact tracing, and Mosssaid of church leaders, "They said, 'God will look out for them.' But they are coming in contact with elderly folks and children and the outbreak grows and grows."

Lighthouse Baptist Church has refused to comment publicly on the cluster in its church despite being contacted multiple times.

Ostrowski further denied the cluster's connection to thedeath of a 76-year-old Chemung County man, who county health officials have said was not a member of the churchbut came into contact with someone who is.

"The Church had received no definitive proof that this tragic death was related to any church activity," he said.

COVID-19 church closures across New York

The Lighthouse Baptist Church is not the first religious institution that has faced a temporary closure order amid the COVID-19 pandemic in New York.

In March, New York halted services atthe Young Israel synagogue in New Rochelle, Westchester County, after discovering the state's first COVID-19 cluster. The virus spread to hundreds of congregants after a man who unknowingly had COVID-19 attended a crowded funeral service and bat mitzvah.

In June, a federal judge struck down an order from Gov. Andrew Cuomo that capped capacity at religious services to 25% and 33% in Phase 2 and 3, respectively, of the state's reopening process.

Instead, U.S. District Judge Gary Sharp allowed religious institutions to have 50% capacity for indoor services, the same cap afforded to restaurants, noting the state's previous limits should have applied equally.

Ostroswki said "the County itself must comply with the law in this regard or risk federal court litigation."

USA Today Network reporter Jon Campbell contributed to this report. Follow Katie Sullivan Borrelli on Twitter @ByKatieBorrelli. Support our journalism and become a digital subscriber today. Click here for our special offers.

This article originally appeared on Elmira Star-Gazette: Lawyer: Horseheads church should be reopened, First Amendment rights have been violated

Read more:
Lawyer: Horseheads church should be reopened, First Amendment rights have been violated - Hornell Evening Tribune