Mediaboss Marketing

During a heated exchange on Thursday, Fox News Tucker Carlson of Tucker Carlson Tonight calledco-president of the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) Dan Barkera bully who runs a highly aggressive interest group, after Barkers group shut down a before-school Bible study group for first- and second-graders.

The Altruria Bible Club met at Altruria Elementary School in Bartlett, Tennessee, before classes in the morning, with dozens of students attending the meetings, according to WMC-TV. The groupsent a letter tothe schooland told them to investigate the club to see to it that teachers or staff were not taking part in it, citing the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment.

The school shut down the club, causing outrage among parents. The FFRF said ina statement to WATN-TV in Memphis that this development is a victory not only for reason and the law but for the inviolable right of a captive audience of first- and second-grade students to be free from indoctrination in a public school setting.

Carlson and Barker exchanged opinions over the matter of the club being shut down. Carlson asked Barker if he felt good about shutting down a Bible study for children.Barker told Carlson that his group did feel good about it, and that the school did the right thing by shutting down the illegal Bible club.

Well, you bullied them into it, Carlson said. Bullied them into canceling a club for first graders.

Carlson then asked Barker what the Constitutional problem was with what the club was doing, stating that school district employeeshave their right to free speech. Barker disagreed, saying that the teachers are the government.

Theres a difference between free speech and governmentspeech, he said. When those teachers are at the school, they are the government.

There are families who wish to protect their children from the depravity and the violence thats in the Bible, Barker said.

Carlson and Barker arguedover First Amendment rights. Barker refuted Carlsons statement that teachers do not give up their First Amendment rights just because they are teachers.

You dont forfeit your First Amendment rights, or any of your Constitutional rights, just because you work for the government. You know that, Carlson said.

Yes, you do, Barker replied.

Carlson finished the segment by calling Barker a zealot who flexes his muscles because children reading the Bible bugs him, and said Barkers pride in shutting down the Bible study group weird.

The Supreme Court ruled that schools are required to allow religious groups to meet after hours on campus, if they allow similarly situated non-religious groups to do soin a 6-3 decision in the The Good News Club v. Milford Central Schools case in 2001. The Milford School in upstate New York claimed that allowing the private Christian group for children, The Good News Club, to hold meetings on school grounds after school was the equivalent of religious worship.

The Good News club claimed that the school was discriminating against the club due to their religious beliefs, while allowing other groups to teach their definition of morality, such as the Boy Scouts of America, and the 4-H club. The Supreme Court found that the school allowing other groups to meet on school grounds, but not the Good News Club, was indeed discrimination on the basis of religion, and made their ruling allowing religious groups tomeet on school grounds after hours.

When Milford denied the Good News Club access to the schools limited public forum on the ground that the club was religious in nature, it discriminated against the club because of its religious viewpoint in violation of the free-speech clause of the First Amendment, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the majority.

Visit link:
Watch: Tucker Carlson verbally pummels atheist activist with the ... - TheBlaze.com

Huffington Posts senior culture writer, Zeba Blay, blasted Vice President Mike Pence on Monday for perverting the idea of free speech itself during his recent commencement address at the University of Notre Dame. However, her own editors had to correct her faulty understanding of the First Amendment.

The original version of Blays piece apparently contained an argument that the Bill of Rights doesnt protect hate speech. The websites editors later added a correction at the end of post: An earlier version of this story indicated that the First Amendment never protects hate speech. It does.

Even with the correction from her editors, Blay still attempted to defend the speech codes, safe spaces, tone policing, [and] administration-sanctioned political correctness that the Vice President singled out for criticism during his commencement address.

The Huffington Post writer underlined that Pences pristine ideal of free speech' is too often used to dismiss legitimate criticism of language and policies that harm marginalized communities. She cited how figures like Milo Yiannopoulos, Ann Coulter, and Bill Maher have invoked the free speech argument when theyve been called out, criticized, or boycotted for their rhetoric.

Blay continued by dubiously claiming that none of them, however, have actually had their speech curtailed, and set up a straw man.

They have never been thrown in jail for things like inciting racist and sexist abuse against comedian Leslie Jones, or complaining about Jews in America, or suggesting Muslims are inherently violent. Indeed, it wasnt until Yiannopoulos started speaking positively about pedophilia that he actually faced any tangible repercussions.

Of course, individuals right to free speech can be restricted without being thrown in jail. Coulters planned speech at the publicly-funded University of California, Berkeley was cancelled because activists threatened to disrupt the event. The left-wing ACLU criticized the institution for this move, and outlined that the hecklers veto of Coulters Berkeley speech is a loss for the 1st Amendment. We must protect speech on campus, even when hateful.

The Huffington Post culture writer later emphasized that contrary to popular belief, free speech, in the context of the Constitution, actually does have limits. The First Amendment does not protect speech that incites violence, fraud, or child pornography, or certain forms of obscenity. It puts limits and restrictions on slander, and intellectual property.

Blay also asserted that safe spaces do not suppress anything they level the playing field in a landscape where so many of those who bemoan political correctness do so at the expense of already marginalized communities.

Near the end of her piece, the author lambasted appeals to free speech as ultimately just a rhetorical ploy to normalize ideas that oppress others. And complaining when those who are oppressed call out these ideas, as is their right, is another petty ploy.

Blays column isnt the first time that this sort of interpretation of the First Amendment has appeared in media circles. Back in May 2015, CNNs Chris Cuomo, who has a law degree, made an identical argument on Twitter: hate speech is excluded from protection. dont (sic) just say you love the constitutionread it.

Conservatives on the social media outlet sparred with Cuomo over his assertion. The CNN anchor even got some flak from the left, as Salon took him to task for his gaffe about the First Amendment.

[image via screengrab]

This is an opinion piece. The views expressed in this article are those of just the author.

Link:
Huffington Post Apparently Doesn't Understand How The First Amendment Works - Mediaite

Protesters against Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Washington on May 16, 2017.(Photo: Shawn Thew, epa)

The contrast between despotism and liberty wason stark display last week in the nation's capital, when bodyguards of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan set upon protesters exercising free-speech rights in front of the Turkish ambassador's residence.

Video capturedimagesof the Turkish strongman emerging from a car to watch his beefy sentinels pummel and kick dissidents until the violence was quelled by baton-wieldingD.C. police. Eleven people were injured, including a police officer.

The May 16 melee, largely overshadowed by last week's bombshell newsinvolving President Trumpand the Russians, was behavior that might have passed for state-sanctioned oppression in Ankara. But this took place along Washington's Embassy Row,and demonstrators acted with the First Amendment's blessing to peaceably assemble.

Imagine the outcry if Israeli protesters gatheringoutside the King David Hotel in Jerusalem during President Trump's visit this week hadbeensuddenly attacked by members of the U.S. Secret Service.Nor was this the first time Erdogan's security team fought with demonstrators in downtown Washington. A clash broke out in front of the Brookings Institutionlast year.

Suchbrutality is sadly what Americans have come to expect from a leader who once held promise as a much needed reformer for a leadingdemocracy in the Islamic world, only to turn increasing autocratic. Last year, Erdogan barely won areferendum, marred by allegations of fraud,that substantially increased the powers of his presidency. After a coup attempt in July, he launched a widespread purge, jailing thousands of opponents, journalists and educators.

OPPOSING VIEW:

Turkish ambassador: Protesters posed a threat

When the United States and other Western nations called for restraint, Erdogan dismissed them. That's why it was so galling to see his imperiousness on display in the U.S. capital. One video of the event last week showsa henchman leaning inside Erdogan's car,as if seeking direction. The man thenturns and signals another, who plunges into the demonstrators with his fists swinging. Some protesters also threw punches.

Two Erdogan guards were detained by policebut later released;all have since left the country. An investigation continues, but diplomatic immunity would make it toughto bring Erdogan's guards to justice.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson called the Turkish conduct "outrageous," and his department issued a condemnation, summoning Turkey's ambassador to the U.S., Serdar Kl, for a dressing down. Days later, theTurkish Foreign Ministry in Ankara playing tit for tat similarly called in the U.S. ambassador to complain of how police treated those guards.

But the White House has remainedsilent on the violence that occurred shortly after Trump heaped praised on Erdogan during a meeting between the pair.Increasingly and disturbingly, the presidenthas been drawn to strongmen who trample onhuman rights, among them Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, PhilippinePresident Eduardo Duterte and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Doesn't Trump care about Erdogan's thugs beating up protesters just blocks from the White House? The president has, after all, sworn to protect and defend the Constitution and its First Amendment.

Instead, it's left to others like Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.,to exorcise the bitter taste this episode has left. "That's not America," McCain said.No, it is not.

USA TODAY's editorial opinions are decided by itsEditorial Board, separate from the news staff. Most editorials are coupled with an opposing view a unique USA TODAY feature.

To read more editorials, go to theOpinion front pageor sign up for thedaily Opinion email newsletter.To respond to this editorial, submit a comment toletters@usatoday.com.

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2rW6bHM

Read the original:
Turkey henchmen kick First Amendment - USA TODAY

It's impossible to view Montana Republican Greg Gianforte's assault on journalist Ben Jacobs in isolation. As many outlets are now pointing out, the number of threatening incidents this month alone is startling. The AP writes:

The editor of Alaskas largest newspaper said a state senator slapped one of his reporters when the reporter sought the lawmakers opinion on a recently published article.

A Washington-based reporter from CQ Roll Call said he was pinned against the wall by security guards and forced to leave the Federal Communications Commission headquarters after he tried to question an FCC commissioner after a news conference.

A West Virginia journalist was arrested after yelling questions about the opioid epidemic at U.S. Health Secretary Tom Price.

We've all watched Donald Trump stoke this fire among his base for monthscasting reporters as the enemy of the American people and news outlets as "evil" and hellbent on treating him unfairly.

On the campaign trail, Trump's ire had a trickle-down effect.

At one rally, a man was photographed in a shirt that read, Rope. Tree. Journalist. Some Assembly Required.

It should be little wonder now that $100,000 worth of donations poured into Gianforte's coffers as news of his attack and unrepentant statement following it spread across the country.

Read more here:
Trump's attack on First Amendment press freedoms puts reporters at the tip of the spear - Daily Kos

Buck's Racks and Ribs was cited by the Greenville County Sheriff's Office Wednesday.(Photo: Provided)

A Greenville restaurant that has opened in the location of a former strip clubhas filed a lawsuitagainst the county and the Sheriff's Office, alleging thebusiness's rights to freedom of expression are being violated, according to court documents.

In a suit filed on May 23, Greenville Bistro and Frontage Road Associates, operator and lesseeof BucksRacks & Ribs, nameGreenville County and Sheriff Will Lewis and allegethe county violated an agreement reached by prior business, Platinum Plus, in 2002 and again in 2015, after owners, Elephant, Inc., filed a suit against the county.

The parties say in the suit that entertainment provided by Greenville Bistro constitutes free expression protected by the First Amendment.

The suit statesthat while the restaurant on 805 Frontage Road,hasno affiliation to Elephant, Inc.,itdoespractice a "similar business" as the former occupant,and that the county treats the business as a sexual adult establishment. The county is attempting to prevent, "any form of entertainment or expression at the property" by issuing citations and violation notices, according to the suit.

No employee of the current establishment"appears in a state of nudity,engages in any specified sexual activities, or displays any specified anatomical areas, according to the plaintiffs.

On Wednesday, the restaurant received three citations from Greenville County deputies after deputies performing a compliance check witnessed someone exposing an unlawfulamount of flesh, said Sgt. Ryan Flood, Sheriff's Officespokesman.

It was the second time this year, the restauranthas beenissued citations by the Sheriff's Office.

The plaintiffs are seekinga jury trial and repaymentof attorney fees.

Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey, LLC in Greenville,representing the plaintiffscould not be reached for comment. Luke Charles Lirot, out ofClearwater, Florida, is also listed as a co-counsel for the plaintiffs.

More: Once a strip club, now a restaurant

Related: Greenville County paid law firm $79K for Platinum Plus litigation

More: Platinum Plus Greenville ordered to close again

Read or Share this story: http://www.greenvilleonline.com/story/news/crime/2017/05/25/owners-bucks-racks-ribs-file-1st-amendment-suit-against-county-sheriffs-office/345573001/

See more here:
Owners of Bucks Racks & Ribs file 1st Amendment suit against County, Sheriff's Office - Greenville News