Mediaboss Marketing

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -

The Florida Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously rejected a Republican political consultant's efforts to keep his redistricting records private, promising to give the public its first glimpse of documents that helped lead to the state's congressional districts being thrown out this summer.

While different justices signed onto two separate opinions about the case, both found that Pat Bainter and his consulting firm, Data Targeting, Inc., waited too long to claim that releasing some of the documents would violate his First Amendment rights.

The documents were requested by voting-rights organizations challenging the state's congressional districts.

Writing for five members of the court, Justice Barbara Pariente used unusually harsh language to paint Bainter's efforts as part of a months-long stalling tactic as the battle over the congressional map played out in a Leon County court.

"We simply do not countenance and will not tolerate actions during litigation that are not forthright and that are designed to delay and obfuscate the discovery process," Pariente wrote.

In the opinion, the court ruled that Bainter tried for months to keep the documents shielded without saying that releasing them would violate his First Amendment rights. Bainter only made that claim after a Leon County judge held Bainter and the company in contempt, Pariente wrote.

"By responding to the deposition questions and acknowledging discussions with other political consultants without ever revealing the true nature of those communications or asserting a First Amendment privilege, in conjunction with the failure to timely assert this qualified privilege after the deposition testimony and months of additional hearings, we conclude that Bainter waived his ability to later claim that the documents revealing these communications were privileged on that basis," Pariente wrote.

Joining Pariente in the opinion were Chief Justice Jorge Labarga and Justices R. Fred Lewis, Peggy Quince and James E.C. Perry. In a separate opinion, Justices Ricky Polston and Charles Canady supported the outcome. It was a rare, unified decision from a court that has often splintered on redistricting opinions.

The voting-rights groups, which include the League of Women Voters of Florida, argued that the Republican-dominated Legislature drew congressional districts that violated the anti-gerrymandering "Fair Districts" constitutional requirements, approved by voters in 2010.

View original post here:
Take a look at the

Book Talk with Professor Tamara Piety
Tamara Piety, Phyllis Hurley Frey Professor of Law at The University of Tulsa College of Law, gives a public Book Talk on her recent book, Brandishing the First Amendment: Commercial Expression...

By: TUCollegeofLaw

Read more:
Book Talk with Professor Tamara Piety - Video

Zick: Twitter and foreign policy
W M professor of law Timothy Zick, author of "The Cosmopolitan First Amendment," discusses establishment of in-country social networks as a prong of U.S. foreign policy.

By: College of William Mary

See the rest here:
Zick: Twitter and foreign policy - Video

James Foley needed to show people what war looked like.

It was his calling to travel to some of the most dangerous places in the world, camera in tow, so people back home could see the danger, the conflict, the hatred that boiled over daily. ... Subscribe or log in to read more

James Foley needed to show people what war looked like.

It was his calling to travel to some of the most dangerous places in the world, camera in tow, so people back home could see the danger, the conflict, the hatred that boiled over daily.

More than any adrenaline rush, he was drawn to these regions out of his compassion for the poor, the disadvantaged and the innocent in war-torn regions, his parents said.

The more Jim saw, the more he was drawn to it, his mother, Diane Foley, said.

Last night, James Foley was honored with the Nackey S. Loeb First Amendment Award, one of the highest honors for New Hampshire journalists.

Were very honored. I think Jim would have been, his mother said. Jim believed very passionately for freedom of the press. We are very proud of the work he was doing. It is vital to a democracy.

Foley was kidnapped Nov. 22, 2012, in Syria and killed 21 months later, Aug. 19, by Islamic State forces.

His murder was broadcast for the world to see and began to galvanize U.S. efforts to stop terrorists known as ISIS.

Read more:
James Foley posthumously receives First Amendment Award

Follow CBSMIAMI.COM:Facebook|Twitter

TALLAHASSEE (CBSMiami/NSF) The Florida Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously rejected a Republican political consultants efforts to keep his redistricting records private, promising to give the public its first glimpse of documents that helped lead to the states congressional districts being thrown out this summer.

While different justices signed onto two separate opinions about the case, both found that Pat Bainter and his consulting firm, Data Targeting, Inc., waited too long to claim that releasing some of the documents would violate his First Amendment rights.

The documents were requested by voting-rights organizations challenging the states congressional districts.

Writing for five members of the court, Justice Barbara Pariente used unusually harsh language to paint Bainters efforts as part of a months-long stalling tactic as the battle over the congressional map played out in a Leon County court.

We simply do not countenance and will not tolerate actions during litigation that are not forthright and that are designed to delay and obfuscate the discovery process, Pariente wrote.

In the opinion, the court ruled that Bainter tried for months to keep the documents shielded without saying that releasing them would violate his First Amendment rights. Bainter only made that claim after a Leon County judge held Bainter and the company in contempt, Pariente wrote.

By responding to the deposition questions and acknowledging discussions with other political consultants without ever revealing the true nature of those communications or asserting a First Amendment privilege, in conjunction with the failure to timely assert this qualified privilege after the deposition testimony and months of additional hearings, we conclude that Bainter waived his ability to later claim that the documents revealing these communications were privileged on that basis, Pariente wrote.

Joining Pariente in the opinion were Chief Justice Jorge Labarga and Justices R. Fred Lewis, Peggy Quince and James E.C. Perry. In a separate opinion, Justices Ricky Polston and Charles Canady supported the outcome. It was a rare, unified decision from a court that has often splintered on redistricting opinions.

The voting-rights groups, which include the League of Women Voters of Florida, argued that the Republican-dominated Legislature drew congressional districts that violated the anti-gerrymandering Fair Districts constitutional requirements, approved by voters in 2010.

Go here to read the rest:
Supreme Court: Release Redistricting Documents