Mediaboss Marketing

When we went to Magneti Marelli software it was a big step down for us and the bike became very difficult to ride. Not only the traction control but also engine character, so everything was less in balance. Over the next years the Yamaha engineers had a lot of problems working with the Magneti Marelli ECU and I think this is still a problem!

Yamaha also struggled to adapt the M1 to the spec Michelins. And this was a bigger problem for bigger riders like Rossi, especially when the French company introduced its latest rear slick for his last two seasons in MotoGP, when his average score per race dropped to five points in 2020 and 2.5 in 2021.

The tyres softer construction deflected (squished) more to provide a fatter contact patch and therefore more grip, for faster race times. But, like all tyres, this one worked better for some than for others.

Me and Valentino often talk about this, Danilo Petrucci revealed recently. We were both quite good until the end of 2019, fighting for the podium, then from 2020 the rear tyre changed and we were fighting for 16th

You cannot be really aggressive with the new rear tyre because you put yourself in more difficulty. Now your riding style must not be about braking and acceleration, it must be about corner speed and momentum you mustnt put too much load on the tyre, which is difficult if you are heavier, like me or Valentino.

Of course, if a soft construction tyre is worse for bigger riders, it will most likely be better for smaller riders. Like Dani Pedrosa.

Rossi on the grid in his pre-race into-the-zone mode at Red Bull Ring in August

Petronas SRT

Its difficult for people who arent really passionate about MotoGP or dont know how a bike works to understand this, continued Petrucci. But for example, Dani really struggled to heat the rear tyre in 2017 and 2018, so he was complaining a lot and finally he quit racing at the end of 2018. But now the situation is the opposite. When Dani started using the softer-construction rear tyre in testing [from 2020] he was incredibly fast when KTM went testing at Red Bull Ring he was faster than all of us!

There are always winners and losers in every change of tyre design, even before spec tyres. For example, when Rossi won his first MotoGP title with Yamaha the success wasnt all him and the bike. Michelins new-for-2004 rear slick worked perfectly with the M1, while it cursed Hondas RC211V with chatter.

My weight is quite not fantastic for the Michelin, but this is the game Valentino Rossi

So just as Michelins new-for-2020 rear slick helped Pedrosa and others it was a disaster for Petrucci and Rossi, whose gradual decline became a precipitous descent.

The tyres have made a big change in the last years, said Rossi on the eve of his final race at Valencia. Ive always needed a hard [construction] rear tyre which gives good support. For this reason I was very strong with the Bridgestone rear and I started to suffer more with the Michelin rear, because the tyre is a lot softer.

But especially the last two years [2020 and 2021] Michelin made another step softer. You gained more grip but the tyre is very soft, so we needed to change another time the bike settings and my riding style.

Also, me and Danilo are the tallest and, although Im quite thin, my weight is quite high compared to the median of the grid and this is not fantastic for the Michelin tyre. But this is the game

Rossi was very nearly as fast as ever in 2021 but the others were faster

Petronas SRT

Its also difficult because I arrived at a certain age where it wasnt easy to once again change my riding style and the way I use the gas, so it wasnt easy.

A certain age, indeed

Rossi may have been the Peter Pan of MotoGP but Father Time waits for no one, not even Peter. Thats why the average age of British fighter pilots during the Battle of Britain was 20, because our reaction times degrade with time itself. If 40-year-old pilots were better than 20-year-olds at flying and fighting at 200mph you can be sure they wouldve been doing it instead.

Biochemistry also plays an important part in this degradation, because we are all slaves to the chemicals inside our bodies. For example, theres the enzyme monoamine oxidase which increases its activity in the brain with age, reducing our willingness to undertake risky activities.

Thus the writing was always on the wall for Rossi. Its not for nothing that he had his strongest seasons in MotoGP in 2002, 2003 and 2005, when he was a young man.

During his last season his competitiveness dropped off a cliff.

See the original post here:
Ciao Vale! But why the downfall? - Motor Sport

I quit my job at the start of 2020. Two months later, the U.S. went into lockdown and everyone glued themselves to their screens. So, like many avid gamers, I started streaming on Twitch. After deciding what to stream and when, and acquiring a webcam, I had to pick my broadcasting software. When youre starting out as a streamer, your budget, or lack thereof, is going to be a major factor. And to this day, I havent felt the need to move to a paid broadcasting platform because so much can be accomplished with free options.

After a casual Google search, I initially settled on XSplit. The setup process was fairly straightforward, which took a lot of the guesswork and scouring the net for guides out of the equation. XSplit is probably best known for allowing users to stream content to multiple platforms, like Twitch, Facebook Gaming, and YouTube. It also boasts the ability to tweak video settings for resolution up to 4k and frames per second well above the standard 60fps.

That said, XSplit requires you to either create an account or sign in with an existing social media account. And unless you pay for an XSplit subscription, youll only be able to stream to a single platform, and quality levels will be capped at 720p and 30fps.

Its also important to note that the features differ on each platform. For example, Twitch does not support 4k resolution in streams while YouTube, on the other hand, does. Also, while XSplit allows for higher framerate settings, Twitch, Facebook Gaming, and YouTube all recommend streaming at no higher than 60fps.

When I first started, I got set up on Twitch, then decided to maximize my potential audience by creating a Facebook page and streaming to both sites simultaneously, though not with XSplit, as streaming to multiple sources is a premium feature. Then I qualified for the Twitch Affiliate program.

Without getting too off-topic, Im going to remind everyone of the importance of reading contracts. One of the stipulations that many streamers miss in the Twitch Affiliate contract is that Twitch owns the exclusive rights to every one of their streams for 24 hours, which means that everything, including clips, cannot be uploaded or streamed on another platform. I promptly stopped dual-streaming to Facebook.

I had a lot of success using XSplit. Its a solid piece of software and has received numerous updates since I first tried it. But, in my search for the best combination of options and features from free software, I decided to move on to a different program: Open Broadcaster Software.

Aptly named, OBS is open source, which means that power users can code their own plugins and casual users can download and use them. This also means that bugs are usually caught and fixed quickly, and its usually the first program to get new updates.

The setup process for OBS is both simpler and more complicated than the setup for XSplit while the initial download and run installer work in its favor, OBS requires much more tweaking to ensure the best stream quality for your audience. The manual setup can take some serious time and research.

On top of that, OBS lacks a chat overlay and customizable themes out of the box. These stream theme overlays must be separately downloaded and manually installed, which isnt terribly difficult but takes more effort than other options.

But it isnt all bad. OBS has plenty of advantages, too. Unlike XSplits free version, OBS allows for livestreaming at 1080p and 60fps, taking full advantage of the recommended limits. Its also less resource-intensive, saving your CPU for more important things like your game. OBS also supports multi-platform streaming.

OBS was good to me, but I never felt like it clicked. The options available for making my stream look and feel the way I wanted just werent available. Instead, my strongest recommendation for a free broadcasting software goes to Streamlabs platform.

Streamlabs is a company built for livestreamers. Because OBS is open source, users have been able to build out their own versions on top of it, enabling streamers to choose from all kinds of premade tools, like chat monitoring bots and overlays. But thats not all Streamlabs does. It also has tools for building your community and editing your clips.

Streamlabs setup process is the easiest by far, taking advantage of Open Broadcaster Softwares plug-and-play approach. The key difference, however, lies in the built-in optimizer. Rather than having to manually select the best settings for your stream machine, the optimizer takes care of everything for you.

Where Streamlabs really shines, though, is in its customization options. Both OBS and Streamlabs have adjustable user interfaces. Simply click and drag the various informational boxes around the window to suit your needs. But Streamlabs makes personalizing the layout and design that your audience sees and interacts with much more convenient.

Streamlabs also has a bunch of free overlays available on its site. Instead of hunting for a stream overlay that matches your style and vibe, then downloading and going through the trouble of integrating it into OBS, you can simply install it directly with the click of a button. Remember to keep your hardware limits in mind, though, as every additional tool running on top of Streamlabs will take more power from your CPU.

How you set up the streaming experience and manage the backend can greatly impact your audiences first impressions, as well as make watching the stream more enjoyable. Animated backgrounds, chat management bots, and sound alerts create a more engaging experience. And it will take time to curate the perfect blend of immersive and meta features that make your stream unique.

Youll also want to be comfortable working with the settings and tweaking your streams visuals and sound effects. While Streamlabs is the clear winner of the big three free options, some companies that offer sponsorship deals will be partnered with another companys platform, like StreamElements OBS.

(While I was writing this article, controversy rose surrounding Streamlabs new premium service. Despite feeling conflicted about recommending Streamlabs, I still believe that their free broadcasting software is the best choice for streamers. Id encourage you to look further into the situation and weigh the options for yourself.)

Whether you are starting to stream as a hobby or hoping to turn it into your next career move, livestreaming requires some serious legwork. The best thing you can do is be informed of the pros and cons of each option, and choose the best fit for your streaming needs.

Read this article:
XSplit, OBS, or Streamlabs: Whats the best free streaming software - Polygon

Sometimes a Windows 10 system starts misbehaving to the point where repair is needed. This often takes the form of worsening performance or stability, and can originate from damage to, loss of, or corruption of Windows system files typically found in theC:Windowsfolder hierarchy. When that happens, users would be well advised to break out the following routine to help them set things back to rights.

I initially wrote this story in 2016, but as Windows 10 has evolved over time, some of the steps have changed a bit. Ive now updated it for the latest versions of Windows 10. That said, most of these approaches also work with Windows 7 and 8 (with slight variations), and the advice here applies almost identically to Windows 11, which Microsoft is gradually rolling out to Windows 10 users whose hardware can support the new OS via Windows Update from October 2021 into early 2022.

The idea is to first try the initial step in the sequence. If that doesnt fix whats broken, advance to the next step. Keep working through the steps in order until you reach the end, and you are bound to fix the vast majority of problems. (The only remaining step at that point would be to replace the system on which the software is running, and thats outside the scope of this story.)

The amount of time and effort required for each step goes up incrementally. Some steps involve additional work to restore the prior state of your PC more or less back to where it was prior to taking that step. Thus, the most important bit of advice I can dispense for those who must venture beyond Step 1 is this: Make a complete backup of your system to provide a source for files and information that might otherwise go missing. Ignore this advice at your own risk.

See original here:
How to repair Windows 10 (and 11) in 4 steps - Computerworld

Welcome toPaycheck to Paycheck, where workers with the same job across the U.S. share how much they earn, how they got to their salary and their best negotiating tips. Ready to join the salary transparency conversation?Apply to be a part of the series here.

In this installment, a 26-year-old shares how he makes $120,000 working as a software engineer in San Diego, California.Read how his salary stacks up to other software engineers around the U.S.

Nishant Parepalli, 26, is from India and moved to the U.S. in 2017 to earn a master's degree in telecommunications. Two years later, he started his career as an applications engineer in the Bay Area and earned $90,000.

He was happy with some of the buzzy perks so often glamorized in Silicon Valley free catered lunch, a fun office, equity in the company and a dazzling performance bonus. But it wasn't enough to keep him motivated, especially as the coronavirus pandemic meant on-campus perks were now out of reach. After a while, he felt bored at work and began taking coding courses in his spare time to switch into software engineering.

After he added those skills to his LinkedIn profile, a recruiter invited him to apply for a software engineering job with his current employer, a global electronics maker.

By the time he interviewed and got the job offer with the electronics maker, Parepalli felt like he was in a good place to negotiate salary. When he got HR's offer of $115,000 a year, the first thing he did was email a few of the people at the company who would be his future colleagues.

As he recalls, "these were people I had just interviewed with, who said if I had any questions I could reach out to them." He had questions about how much he should negotiate for and figured they'd have a good idea: "I asked them the average pay I could expect. That helped me come with a counter offer."

Parepalli also knew that his employer at the time was willing to give him a raise in order for him to stay. He wasn't interested in that, since he was leaving in pursuit of more interesting work, but brought that additional leverage to the negotiation table with HR.

"So I waited patiently on that, and the new employer responded with a better offer of $5,000 more," he says.

Parepalli joined the company in November 2020 at a base salary of $120,000 a year. He also got $10,000 to relocate from the Bay Area to San Diego, and he's eligible for a 10% performance bonus every year.

Parepalli is a firm believer in discussing pay with peers to understand his value in the job market. He also sees it as a way to understand what he could earn at the next stage of his career, which motivates him to continuously improve his skills and level up.

He often has informal discussions about pay, and personal finance in general, with his coworkers over coffee or at lunch. For example, he might seek out the advice from older colleagues on how to manage his money or invest. One coworker is planning to buy a house soon so they'll have open discussions about managing a mortgage on his salary, and how much he'll have to save with every paycheck.

Overall, he says his company "is really transparent about pay," which was "really shocking" at first: "I think they try to imbue this in every new hire. But it's a good thing."

Parepalli remembers that when HR made him the offer of $120,000, they said it was above the average for the geographic market and his years of experience. That matched up with what Parepalli heard from his other colleagues, as well as information he found online, so he felt good about accepting the offer.

With that said, he knows some of the most influential tech companies, including Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google, can pay $135,000 for a new grad in the Bay Area. According toa report from Hired, a marketplace for tech jobs, the average software engineer earned roughly $153,000 in 2020. Parepalli doesn't rule out moving back to the Bay Area for work, but he'd need for it to come with a significant pay bump.

At $120,000 a year in Southern California, Parepalli says he feels "comfortable" on his salary: "I'm able to pay my rent, pay for expenses and cover the basic necessities. But I also feel like I'm unable to significantly save or invest in my future."

The cost of living in California is definitely a factor, he says. His job demands a lot of his time, up to 10 hours a day and through nights and weekends, which means he doesn't have much extra time to dedicate to a side hustle or to set up passive income opportunities as he would like to.

And unlike the practice of many tech companies, his employer doesn't provide stock benefits, which he sees as a disadvantage.

All told, he's happy with his career move: "In terms of my last job, with bonuses and free catered lunch, I was essentially being paid $100,000 to do less interesting work. Now I'm paid $120,000 to do more interesting work."

Check out:

From $70,000 to $120,000: Heres how much 3 software engineers earn around the U.S.

This speech pathologist taught herself to codenow she earns $93,000 as a software engineer

This 26-year-old doubled his pay by switching to computer scienceand using a key negotiating trick

Sign up now: Get smarter about your money and career with our weekly newsletter

Read more:
This 26-year-old negotiated his $120,000 salary by finding out how much his coworkers makehere's how - CNBC

This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

Its not a new development in the tech world that bringing back formerly loved items from the past is cool once again, but that usually applies to old hardware like gaming consoles, smaller phones, and so forth. This time around though, its software thats attempting a comeback, from a bygone era. Winamp, the formerly hugely popular music player, has plans to relaunch in 2021 according to a report by Bleepingcomputer. Whats surprising about this announcement is the software hasnt been updated since 2013, and as we noted, people dont use media players like Winamp anymore.

First off, if youre under the age of 30 and are reading this, some explanation is required. You see, back in the 2000s, digital music wasnt really a thing yet, so we used to take our music CDs and extract the files into MP3 format. This conversion allowed us to reduce the file size immensely, and also transfer the files to a portable music player like the iPod, or for a handful of folks, a Zune player. The small file size also fueled the explosion of P2P file-sharing. Though we had our mobile music needs met, we also needed software to play music on our PCs, and for that a lot of people used Winamp, ourselves included. It offered a ton of cool skins, had a visualizer, and was just fast and free, two things we appreciate in every piece of software.

Installing Winamp in 2021 certainly brings back some good memories. (The fact that you wrote an explainer for this hurt me in my soul. -Ed).

The big question now is, since everyone uses streaming services like Spotify and Apple Music to listen to their tunes, what place does Winamp even have in todays market? According to the website, the software isnt just updated, its remastered, with the goal of becoming the one app you can use to connect to your favorite artists, which includes podcasters. Winamp will apparently not only be marketed to end users who just want to consume some content, but artists and creators as well who are unhappy with the arrangements provided by todays most popular streaming services. The site states, For artists and audio creators were all about giving you control over your content. Well help you to connect closely with your fans and earn a fairer income from doing what you love.

Judging by all this marketing copy, the company seems intent on leveraging its nostalgic connection to its 80 million users around the world, but whether it can do so in a world that has collectively moved on to an entirely new format for music consumption remains to be seen. That said, if you are curious about what the company has coming down the pike you can download the latest version from its website, to get a feel for it. We installed it and it looks exactly like we remembered it from so many years ago. The company is also asking people to sign up for itsupcoming Beta version, which will supposedly offer all the new features the company is currently teasing via its website.

Now Read:

Continued here:
Winamp Prepares to Relaunch: Can it Still Whip the Llama in 2021? - ExtremeTech