Archive for the ‘George Zimmerman’ Category

Reinventing the Sound of Protest – The Nation

Irreversible Entanglements. (Photo by Bob Sweeney)

On November 20, 2014, Brooklyn resident Akai Gurley was getting his hair braided in his seventh-floor apartment in an East New York housing project. He was there with a friend, Melissa Butler; later that night, they decided to leave the building for a while. They waited for the elevator, but it was brokenas was often the case in the Louis Pink Housesso they decided to take the stairs. On the floor above, two members of the New York Police Department, Officers Peter Liang and Shaun Landau, were patrolling the stairwells and hallways to catch and question loiterers. But it was dark, and according to reports, Landau had to shine his flashlight to see anything at all. Liang, a rookie, also took out his flashlight, but he drew his service gun as well and walked down the dark stairwell armed. Thats when Butler heard a shot and saw a flash of light. Gurley was right behind her; Liangs bulletreportedly fired by accidenthit his sternum. After several attempts to revive him through CPR, Gurley was rushed to Brookdale Hospital and pronounced dead. He was 28.Ad Policy

It was an all too familiar story for black people in the United States: Gurley was unarmed and innocent but still fell victim to police brutality. His death came months after the highly publicized killings of Mike Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, and Eric Garner in Staten Island, New York, and it was only two years removed from the death of Trayvon Martin in Florida. Martins death, and the subsequent acquittal of his killer, George Zimmerman, sparked the rise of Black Lives Matter and waves of protests and activism across the country. Irreversible Entanglements, an experimental free jazz collective whose members reside in Philadelphia, New York City, and Washington, DC, was born out of those incidents and the demonstrations that followed.

Poet/vocalist Camae Ayewa (who releases solo work as Moor Mother), saxophonist Keir Neuringer, and bassist Luke Stewart performed together in 2015 at the Musicians Against Police Brutality rally in New York, which was organized after Gurleys killing. After the performance, the trio added trumpeter Aquiles Navarro and drummer Tcheser Holmes, both of whom also performed at the event. Then the quintet converged on a Brooklyn recording studio soon after and played together for the first time. The result was Irreversible Entanglements, an aggressive blast of screeching horns, volcanic drum fills, and surging bass, tied together by Ayewas scathing indictments of the police, American politics, capitalism, and racism. The album they recorded, released in 2017, was very much of the moment: Black people were angry, and rightfully so. For too long, theyd seen their peers murdered by law enforcement without justice, while living in a country that cashes in on black culture but doesnt pay any respect to black people. The band harnessed that rage into four songs, each one brimming with barbed lyrics. Sometimes you can get lost in the rhythm of oppression, Ayewa declares on Chicago to Texas, the albums combustible opener. The way they beat it into you, carve trees in your back, choke you out, fetishize your flesh.

The backing arrangement was equally urgent, a colossal blend of jazz evoking Afrocentric stalwarts like Sonny Sharrock, Brother Ah, and the New York Art Quartet. Theres a palpable weight to the music of Irreversible Entanglements; their sound hits with an earth-shattering force. That can cut both ways: Thanks to musicians like Robert Glasper and Kamasi Washington, who blend jazz with more marketable genres like hip-hop and R&B, jazz is once again considered a viable genre in the mainstream marketplace. But for a sonically ambitious band like Irreversible Entanglements, you either love the music or dont like it at all. It takes a patient ear to absorb the bands work; their songs are sprawling (sometimes clocking in at over 20 minutes long), mixing various subgenres of jazz along the way. The results are always compelling. We take the ugliest parts of the world and make them beautiful, Stewart told The Fader in February. Yet theyre able to do it without tapping into clichs. Through their frank critiques of political violence and organized religion, the band achieves something deeper and more emotional. Theirs is an artful blend of raw lyrical emotion and exquisite musicianship.

The bands new album, Who Sent You?, is just as serious, though its more introspective than confrontational. Theyre still urging actionfor us to give a shit, as Ayewa deadpans on the opening track, The Code Noir/Aminabut the tone is more reflective. Thats mostly due to the instrumentals: Where their debut album seethed, this one meditates, trading in the racket for restraint. On Who Sent YouRitual, Ayewa revisits the incident that brought the band together in the first place. Oh, you must be here to fix the elevator, she quips to an imagined Officer Liang, her voice dripping with contempt. Good policeman from the other side of town, you must be here to fix the lights in the stairwell.

The music behind her sounds like an alarm: All blaring brass wails, frenetic drums, and undulating bass, its the most unrestrained track on Who Sent You? and the one most aligned with Irreversible Entanglements three years ago. Eventually, the song eases into something more spiritual, like an old gospel hymn. Where the previous album was tethered to police brutality and the rise of Black Lives Matter, this one takes a step back to assess how we got here in the first place. Ayewa speaks of freedom as a tangible commodity, as something we can attain simply by staying the course. On Irreversible Entanglements, it was a thing to be taken forcefully; on Who Sent You?, its something we can enjoy through working together. As she says on No Ms: No longer will we allow them to divide and conquer, divide and oppress, define our humanity.

On an album of thick arrangements and sometimes opaque lyricism, No Ms and Blues Ideology are the clearest paths into the record and the most accessible tracks in the bands brief catalog. The former settles into a high-spirited groove that offers a mix of Latin and New Orleansstyle jazz, while the latter channels 1970s Nigerian Afrobeat. But if there was a notion that Blues Ideology would be an easy dance melody, Ayewas words quickly dispel that. The pope must be drunk, she asserts, manufacturing God in his own image. Blunt-force lyrics like these make Irreversible Entanglements one of the most fearless bands Ive listened to in recent memory; over the course of a single song, theyll compel you to rebuke the powers that be. At what point do we stand up? Ayewa asks on The Code Noir/Amina. At the breaking point? At the point of no return? At what point.

See original here:
Reinventing the Sound of Protest - The Nation

Black Lives Matter Founders Grace Cover of Time Magazine’s "100 Women of The Year" Issue – madison365.com

Activist Alicia Garza posted Black people. I love you. I love us. Our lives matter after George Zimmerman was acquitted of fatally shooting Trayvon Martin in July 2013. Soon after, Garzas friend Patrisse Cullors added the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter, which went viral, and a movement was born.

The co-founders of that movement Garza, Cullors and Opal Tometi were recently honored in a special double issue of TIME magazines 100 Women of the Year featuring 100 covers of women who defined a century. The issue was released to coincide with the celebration of International Womens Day this past weekend.

While critics called Garza, Cullors and Tometi terrorists and threats to America, the activists continued urging the public to pay attention to the spate of fatal shootings of unarmed black men and women that followed Martins, shutting down highways, blocking bridges and staging die-in demonstrations, TIME staff writer Melissa Chan wrote. We will continue to fight like hell, Cullors wrote on the groups website, because we deserve more.'

The list also includes people like Michelle Obama, Oprah Winfrey, Aretha Franklin, Chien-Shiung Wu, Beyonc, Serena Williams, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Marsha P. Johnson, and Toni Morrison.

More:
Black Lives Matter Founders Grace Cover of Time Magazine's "100 Women of The Year" Issue - madison365.com

Black Lives Matter Founders Grace Cover of Time 100 Women of The Year Issue – The Root

Black Lives Matter founders Patrisse Cullors, Alicia Garza and Opal Tometi grace the cover of Time 100 Women commemorating the year 2013, when the hasthtag #BlackLivesMatter went viral. Photo: TIME

Today is International Womens Day and to commemorate the occasion, TIME magazine has released a special double issue featuring 100 covers of women who defined a century, choosing one woman per year from 1920 through 2019.

The founders of the Black Lives Matter movement are on the list, which include political heavyweights, celebrity notables, dignitaries and trailblazers such as Michelle Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Oprah Winfrey, Aretha Franklin, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Chien-Shiung Wu, Beyonc, Serena Williams, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Marsha P. Johnson, Toni Morrison, and Billie Holliday.

Patrisse Cullors, Alicia Garza and Opal Tometi represent the year 2013, for when the hasthtag #BlackLivesMatter went viral following the acquittal of George Zimmerman for the heinous killing of unarmed Florida teenager Trayvon Martin.

While critics called Garza, Cullors and Tometi terrorists and threats to America, the activists continued urging the public to pay attention to the spate of fatal shootings of unarmed black men and women that followed Martins, shutting down highways, blocking bridges and staging die-in demonstrations, staff writer Melissa Chan wrote in her essay celebrating the trio.

The cover art was illustrated by New York-based artist and writer Molly Crabapple, whose art is in the permanent collections of the Museum of Modern Art.

The beautiful image is now available for sale.

Each of the 100 Women of the Year (see complete list below) is recognized with a Time magazine cover.

The legendary periodical commissioned 49 original portraits, with more than half created by women, including Mickalene Thomas, Shana Wilson, Bisa Butler on Wangari Maathai, and more.

Conceived with award-winning filmmaker Alma Harel, the 100 Women of the Year were selected by the magazines editorsial staff, in collaboration with Harel, and a committee of influential women across different fields, including journalist Soledad OBrien, producer Lena Waithe, actress MJ Rodriguez, writer Elaine Welteroth, actress Zazie Beetz and the Times former editor-in-chief Nancy Gibbs.

The women profiled here enlarged their world and explored new ones, broke free of convention and constraint, welcomed into community the lost and left behind, Gibbs wrote in her essay. They were the different drummers, to whose beat a century marched without always even knowing it. So this special project is an act of discovery, and rediscovery, of the possibilities that come when we look and listen differently to the world these women made.

THE 100 WOMEN OF THE YEAR:

1920 The Suffragists

1921 Emmy Noether

1922 Xiang Jingyu

1923 Bessie Smith

1924 Coco Chanel

1925 Margaret Sanger

1926 Aimee Semple McPherson

1927 Queen Soraya Tarzi

1928 Anna May Wong

1929 Virginia Woolf

1930 Martha Graham

1931 Maria Montessori

1932 Babe Didrikson

1933 Frances Perkins

1934 Mary McLeod Bethune

1935 Amelia Earhart

1936 Wallis Simpson

1937 Soong Mei-ling

1938 Frida Kahlo

1939 Billie Holiday

1940 Dorothea Lange

1941 Jane Fawcett and the Codebreakers

1942 The Resisters

1943 Virginia Hall

1944 Recy Taylor

1945 Chien-Shiung Wu

1946 Eva Pern

1947 Amrit Kaur

1948 Eleanor Roosevelt

1949 Simone de Beauvoir

1950 Margaret Chase Smith

1951 Lucille Ball

1952 Queen Elizabeth II

1953 Rosalind Franklin

1954 Marilyn Monroe

1955 The Bus Riders

1956 Golda Meir

1957 Irna Phillips

1958 China Machado

1959 Grace Hopper

1960 The Mirabal Sisters

1961 Rita Moreno

1962 Jacqueline Kennedy

1963 Rachel Carson

1964 Barbara Gittings

1965 Dolores Huerta

1966 Stephanie Kwolek

1967 Zenzile Miriam Makeba

1968 Aretha Franklin

1969 Marsha P. Johnson

1970 Gloria Steinem

1971 Angela Davis

1972 Patsy Takemoto Mink

1973 Jane Roe

1974 Lindy Boggs

1975 American Women

1976 Indira Gandhi

1977 Judith Heumann

1978 Lesley Brown

1979 Tu Youyou

1980 Anna Walentynowicz

1981 Nawal El Saadawi

1982 Margaret Thatcher

1983 Franoise Barr-Sinoussi

1984 bell hooks

1985 Wilma Mankiller

1986 Corazon Aquino

1987 Diana, Princess of Wales

1988 Florence Griffith Joyner

1989 Madonna

1990 Aung San Suu Kyi

1991 Anita Hill

1992 Sinead OConnor

1993 Toni Morrison

1994 Joycelyn Elders

1995 Sadako Ogata

1996 Ruth Bader Ginsburg

1997 Ellen DeGeneres

1998 J.K. Rowling

1999 Madeleine Albright

2000 Sandra Day OConnor

2001 Wangari Maathai

2002 The Whistleblowers

2003 Serena Williams

2004 Oprah Winfrey

2005 Melinda Gates

2006 Ellen Johnson Sirleaf

2007 Lilly Ledbetter

View original post here:
Black Lives Matter Founders Grace Cover of Time 100 Women of The Year Issue - The Root

Intersectionality: What it means, how to use it, and why to care in 2020 – Toronto Star

In the summer of 2013, after George Zimmerman was acquitted for the death of Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Florida, the Black Lives Matter movement took to the streets across the U.S. and Canada. Since then, one term floated up through the chants and out into everyday language: intersectional feminism.

So, what is it?

The word was originally used as a way to explain the specific oppression of Black women.

Consider that race bias and gender bias are two separate issues; however, both can often be at play, creating even more oppressive circumstances. Intersectionality is the framework to describe the phenomenon of being impacted and oppressed by multiple sources, but only treated for one.

Blackness is the gauge of oppression, and being a woman is an identifier of oppression on the gender continuum. Black women will always remain low on the hierarchy of nonsense that is society said Adora Nwofor, a Calgary activist, comedian and organizer of the Calgary Womens March.

Today the term has been used to include all racialized women. Its a framework to understand the complex and overlapping layers of inequities that face them such as gender, race, physical ability, ethnicity, sexual orientation, nationality and socio-economic status.

To fourth-wave feminists, its foundational. It has brought society into a sharper focus. Its a constant process of learning and unlearning.

If you are a feminist, you should value intersectional feminism above all else. In order to be equal we need to raise up the most vulnerable and those in the most harm, said Nwofor.

Where did the term come from?

The term was coined in 1989 by an American civil rights advocate Kimberl Crenshaw. She used it the term in reference to the 1976 court case Emma DeGraffenreid vs. General Motors, which involved a collective of Black women who set out to prove that they werent getting better jobs due to systemic racism. The court dismissed the womens claims. The court argued that women were getting better jobs and Black workers were also getting better jobs. The court then asserted that Black women were unable to combine their race and gender claims into one.

Crenshaw unpacked the case and determined that the law had no real way to think about what happens when two identities intersect and what happens at the intersection of identity, said Janovicek.

Intersectionality was a lived reality for decades before it became the term we hear today.

It was something that pulled together about 30 years of black feminist thought, said Nancy Janovicek, a University of Calgary history professor.

In her work Crenshaw explains intersectionality in terms of a traffic intersection. When an accident occurs, it can be caused by cars coming from one direction, or all directions. When Black women face discrimination it isnt just one factor, it can come from all directions.

How should it be used?

Should you use the term if youre not a racialized woman? Well that depends on who you ask and how you use it.

Ive seen white men co-opt that term. That takes it out of the very important politics of oppression, said Janovicek. The history of Black womens activism is often erased in the way that people are using the term now.

Janovicek describes herself as a feminist who is influenced by intersectional feminism, but said that it can be acceptable to call yourself an intersectional feminist only if you use it while acknowledging your own privilege while expressing the values of intersectionality.

But some activists feel that the term should be solely reserved for Black women.

It is specific to Black women. But I have always wanted to include everybody in our struggle for our humanity. We invite people to talk about feminism with humility, said Nwofor.

Get more of the Star in your inbox

Never miss the latest news from the Star. Sign up for our newsletters to get today's top stories, your favourite columnists and lots more in your email inbox.

According to Paulette Senior, CEO of the Canadian Womens Foundation, the term needs to be broader than an identity. It needs to be a way of life. Senior said that there should be a trickle-down effect from the top with intersectional feminism touching all spheres including workplaces, government, and communities.

It needs to be a healing of past wounds, especially around Truth and Reconciliation in Canada, and once it is, Im optimistic we will see true equality, said Senior.

Where can I learn more?

Crenshaw is still an active speaker and currently has a podcast on the topic called Intersectionality Matters. She also breaks down her theory into very interesting bite-sized morsels in a much-hyped TED talk.

Her book On Intersectionality contains many of her key essays including the piece that describes the pivotal court case against General Motors.

See the original post:
Intersectionality: What it means, how to use it, and why to care in 2020 - Toronto Star

Matt Gaetz allowed to mock coronavirus with gas mask in congress, after black lawmaker ‘forcibly removed’ for wearing hoodie – indy100

Democratic congressman Bobby Rush has called out the double standards of the House of Representativesafter Republican Matt Gaetz was allowed to wear a gas mask in congress, making light of the coronavirus epidemic, while Rushwas "forcibly removed" for wearing a hoodie to raise awareness of racial profiling of black men.

In 2012, Illinois representative Rush wore a hoodie on the house floor. Rush, who is African American, was trying to raise awareness of racial profiling following the shooting of unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin. At the time, the incident was widely reported, with some estimates suggesting it received more press than the presidential election.

George Zimmerman, who shot Martin, would go on to be acquitted of murderin 2013, sparking the #BlackLivesMatter movement.

It's an issue which lawmakers had systematically failed to address, and Rush's acknowledgement of that fact was important both in its symbolism and visibility but the establishment disagreed.

Rush was removed based on a rule which doesn't allow members of congress to wear hats, but a hoodie is clearly not a hat. Neither is a gas mask, obviously, but both cover parts of the head and face, so it's hard to understand how logically one could be allowed over the other.

Trump supporting Matt Gaetz presumablythought it would be amusing to come into congress wearing a full gas mask as some sort of joke relating to coronavirus, which has killed 14 Americans.

He claimed that members of congress were the most likely to become infected with coronavirus, because "we fly through the dirtiest airports" and "touch everyone we meet".

This is clearly false. For starters, people in China, which has reported around 80 per cent of the 102,000 cases we've seen thus far, are clearly more at risk than anyone in America. When it comes to risk of death, the main contributing factor is pre-existing conditions.

It's worth noting that in the US 44 million people don't have health insurance, while a further 38 million have "inadequate" insurance. The cost of testing for coronavirus can reach$3,270, more than 3.5 times the average weekly income in America ($865), according to 2017 figures.

The coronavirus outbreak has led to the spread of misinformation (including by President Trump himself), leading to arguably unwarranted panic. However, as cases rise in America, there is clearly reason for concern.

In one fell swoopGaetz managed to feed in to the hysteria while also mocking a situation which has led to thousands of deaths. Pretty shocking behaviour for an elected official entrusted with representing the interests of the American people.

View post:
Matt Gaetz allowed to mock coronavirus with gas mask in congress, after black lawmaker 'forcibly removed' for wearing hoodie - indy100