Mitt Romney Defends Hillary Clinton
Mitt Romney came to Hillary Clinton #39;s defense Sunday amid Republican efforts to resurrect the Monica Lewinsky scandal ahead of a possible Clinton presidentia...
By: HuffPost Live
Read more:
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer in March 2012.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
(CNN) -- Newly uncovered documents from a confidante of Hillary Clinton are making headlines about the former first lady. But they also reveal new details about legacy moments in her husband's presidency that were frustrating and distracting to the White House.
It seemed as if Bill Clinton had too many choices in his first chance to name a Supreme Court justice and not enough for his second.
The deliberations went down to the wire, and when Stephen Breyer's name came up each time, he was not the person the President, in his heart, preferred.
"At this point BC [Clinton] also said he did not want to name Breyer," wrote Diane Blair in May 1994 just two days before he was ultimately selected. "Didn't want to give a big deal to Massachusetts."
That's where Breyer, then 55, was serving. Apparently naming someone from that reliably liberal state would not pay political dividends.
Blair was a close family friend who took copious notes of conversations she had with both Clintons throughout most of their White House years that ended in 2001.
Notes from that conversation with Clinton are part of papers Blair, then a University of Arkansas professor, left the school after her death in 2000.
CNN has uncovered one inside look at how Breyer was ultimately chosen, and it mirrors the tricky, often delicate game of politics nearly every White House must navigate.
Read the original post:
Then-first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton watches then-President Clinton pause as he thanks those...
There's a debate going on about Hillary Clinton's past. If she runs for president in 2016, should Republicans reach back to the scandals of her years as First Lady? Or should they focus on more recent times, especially her tenure as Secretary of State, to build a case against her?
The GOP doesn't have to choose. Of course Clinton's recent experiences are relevant to a presidential run. But so are her actions in the 90s, the 80s and even the 70s. It's not ancient history; it reveals something about who Clinton was and still is. And re-examining her past is entirely consistent with practices in recent campaigns.
In the 2012 presidential race, for example, many in the press were very interested in business deals Mitt Romney made in the 1980s. In the 2004 race, many journalists were even more interested in what George W. Bush did with the Texas Air National Guard in 1968, as well as what John Kerry did in Vietnam that same year. And in 2000, a lot of journalists invested a lot of time trying to find proof that Bush had used cocaine three decades earlier.
So by the standards set in coverage of other candidates, Clinton's past is not too far past.
That's especially true because there will be millions of young voters in 2016 who know little about the Clinton White House. Americans who had not even been born when Bill Clinton first took the oath of office in 1993 will be eligible to vote two years from now. They need to know that Hillary Clinton has been more than Secretary of State.
Those voters need to know, for starters, that Mrs. Clinton once displayed incredible investment skills. In 1978 and 1979, when her husband was attorney general and then governor of Arkansas, she enlisted the help of a well-connected crony to invest $1,000 in the highly volatile and risky cattle futures market. Several months later, she walked away with $100,000 -- a 10,000-percent profit. Cynics thought the well-connected crony who executed the trades might have paid her the profits from good trades and absorbed the losses from bad ones, but Mrs. Clinton insisted that she developed her investing acumen by reading the Wall Street Journal.
New voters also need to learn about Mrs. Clinton's checkered history as a lawyer and the game of hide-and-seek she played with federal prosecutors who subpoenaed her old billing records as part of the Whitewater investigation. After two years of defying subpoenas and not producing the records, she suddenly claimed that they had been in a closet in the White House residence all along.
New voters also need to learn about Mrs. Clinton's purge of the White House travel office, which was done to steer business to another Clinton crony. There's no doubt she directed the 1993 firings of long-time White House employees although she testified under oath that she did not. Years later, prosecutors concluded that "Mrs. Clinton's sworn testimony is factually inaccurate."
Finally, there is the Lewinsky scandal, which Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., has somewhat clumsily brought into the political discussion. In 1998 and 1999, Mrs. Clinton essentially played two roles, that of wronged wife and that of strategist and spokeswoman in a concerted White House attack-the-prosecutor misdirection campaign.
Read more:
Why Hillary Clinton's past is fair game in presidential race
Hillary Clinton tells women to have a thick skin
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton launched a new project called "No Ceilings" with her daughter, Chelsea, and Melinda Gates. During a talk at New Yor...
By: CBS This Morning
Read more:
We #39;re All On Their Enemies List
The Clinton #39;s have a history of high crimes corruption and out right treason. Alex discusses how seeing Hillary Clinton in the news everywhere is a reminder ...
By: TheAlexJonesChannel
More: