Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Did Giuliani have inside info on Hillary Clinton probe in 2016? DOJ watchdog inconclusive – USA TODAY

AP explains: DOJ's IG report on Clinton emails

The Dept. of Justice's watchdog faults former FBI Director James Comey for breaking with protocol in his handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation, but it says his decisions before the 2016 elections were not driven by political bias.

AP

WASHINGTON As part of a broad leak investigation related to the FBI's Hillary Clinton email inquiry, the Justice Department's inspector general could not determine whether Rudy Giuliani had access to inside information prior to the dramatic decision to re-open the Clinton probe in the closing days of the 2016 election.

Just two days before Congress was notified that the investigation into Clinton's handling ofclassified information was resuming, Giluiani, then adviser to Donald Trump, suggested that a "surprise or two" was coming in the final days of the campaign. The comments raisedquestions about whether Giuliani had been tipped to the decision.

In subsequent interviews with investigators, Giuliani and four unidentified agents denied any contact, according to the inspector general's review. The review included an examination of telephone records provided by the FBI, which showed that the four agents had contact with general numbers associated with Giuliani's law firm and two former businesses.

"The telephone numbers attributed by the FBI to Giuliani were not, therefore, specific to Giuliani," the inspector general concluded. "Accordingly, the purported investigative leads provided by the FBI based on alleged FBI employee contacts with Giuliani were inaccurate."

Giuliani, when interviewed by Justice investigators, said the Oct. 28, 2016 decision by then-FBI Director James Comey was "a shock to me."

"I had no fore-knowledge," Giuliani said, according to the report.

"Giuliani also said he had not been in contact with any active FBI agents in October 2016, and stated that he had only spoken with former agents who did not have any direct or indirect knowledge of FBI investigations in October 2016," the report said.

Giuliani characterized his conversations with former agents as "gossip."

Clinton reads her emails displayed at art exhibit

Hillary Clinton visited an art exhibition in Venice, Italy where 62,000 pages of her emails were displayed.

USA TODAY

Link:
Did Giuliani have inside info on Hillary Clinton probe in 2016? DOJ watchdog inconclusive - USA TODAY

How Rudy Giuliani Went From 9/11s Hallowed Mayor to 2021s Haunted Ghoul – Vanity Fair

And so, yes: Of course Rudy Giuliani is important.

But lets go back for a moment to that September morning when, in our vulnerability and fear, we clung to Rudy. The memory of that embrace, from which we have been trying to extricate ourselves ever since, may have faded, but the need that inspired it is still intact. Its funny that you call it a Cuomo-like moment, Andrew Kirtzman, Giulianis biographer, said to me on Zoom, because I thought Cuomo was having a Giuliani-like moment. What Kirtzman found especially comparable about the two situations is how quickly people forget the circumstances behind the rise of these heroic figures. Those circumstances are an atmosphere of totalizing fear combined with a leadership void. Enter a flawed but vigorous leader, seemingly all facts and no bullshita man born, as his friend Peter Powers said of Giuliani, without a fear gene.

Kirtzman had been with Giuliani on 9/11. A young reporter at NY1, he was awakened by his mother, who told him to turn on the television. He called his newsroom, who instructed him to find the mayor. He went downtown in a cab. The driver, as soon as they entered the deserted streets surrounding the World Trade Center, slammed the brakes and threw him out. A frantic woman got in, urging Kirtzman to go back uptown with her. A cop yelled at him to get off the street. Kirtzman waved a press pass and held his ground. Im looking for Giuliani, he said. Oh, Giuliani, the cop replied. Hes over there. The mayor, covered in dust and ash, was emerging from a building on Barclay Street where he had taken cover after the first tower fell. On seeing Kirtzman, he said, Come on, Andrew, lets go! They began to walk up Church Street on what is now Giulianis iconic march north. As they walked, the second tower fell behind them. An implosion of rubble and debris. Everyone ran for cover.

Talk about a terrifying moment, Kirtzman said, helping me to re-enter the unbelievable experience of that day, its magnitude, the emotions it inspired. Zeroing in on what he saw as the source of the mayors appeal, Kirtzman said, He was the only one who was not absolutely immobilized by fear. Afterward Giuliani held a press conference where, when asked how many would die, he gave that unspeakably moving reply: The number of casualties will be more than any of us can bear, ultimately.

Kirtzman is at work on a second Giuliani biography (to be published next year by Simon & Schuster), and its not hard to see why: His subjecta child of New Yorks white ethnic enclaves, with all their tribal hatreds and a cult of loyalty as fierce as that found in the honor-and-shame societies of Afghanistans frontier regionswas fascinating even as a young man. Born to a family of Italian immigrants, he grew upfirst in Brooklyn, later in Garden Cityin a world where crime and law enforcement were two sides of the same coin. He had four uncles in uniform; a fifth was a fireman. His father, Harold, was a petty criminal who, in 1934, at age 24, had been convicted of robbing a milkman at gunpoint in a Manhattan building. Later, Harold worked as a bartender at Uncle Leos loan-sharking operation. When people couldnt pay up, Harold was the guy who showed up with a baseball bat. Much of this information, including a cousin who was a junkie and another who died as a cop in the line of duty, came to light through the tremendous work of Wayne Barrett, Giulianis late biographer. These were dichotomies typical of second-generation immigrant families in the city, and it is hard to be sure how much Giuliani himself knew of the equal measures of light and shade contained within him. Certainly now, as law enforcement wraps its arms around himas this story went to press, a New York Court suspended Giulianis law license, having determined that he made false and misleading statements in an attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 electionthere is a special poignancy to Harold imploring the young Rudy to steer clear of a life of crime. He would say over and over, Giuliani told Time in 2001, You cant take anything thats not yours. You cant steal. Never lie, never steal. As a child and even as a young adult, I thought, What does he keep doing this for? Im not going to steal anything.

Rudy is the EPITOME of what has happened to our PUBLIC LIFE, says Joe Klein. And ITS SCARY.

The young Rudy, brimming with admiration for John F. Kennedy, was an RFK Democrat. When Hillary Clinton was still a supporter of Barry Goldwater, Giuliani was praising President Lyndon Johnsons War on Poverty and describing the writings of a member of the John Birch Society as the disgusting neurotic fantasy of a mind warped by fear and bigotry. He voted for George McGovern in 1972 but, three years later, was appointed Gerald Fords associate deputy attorney general. In 1981, under Ronald Reagan, he became the youngest associate attorney general ever. He only became a Republican, his mother, Helen, said of him, as Giulianis registration changed from Democrat to Independent to Republican, after he began to get all these jobs from them. As associate attorney general, he had a shameful record of demonizing Haitians fleeing the murderous regime of Jean-Claude Baby Doc Duvalier. By 1983, he was the youngest man ever to lead the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York (only men had led it then). He kept his lynx-eyed gaze fastened on Italian organized crime as well as white-collar crime, prosecuting the likes of Michael Milken and Ivan Boesky. His youthful love of opera made him relish the more theatrical aspects of his job. He memorably perp walked Richard Wigton across the trading floor of his company in handcuffs. You dont stop violent crime by being a good fairy, Ed Hayes, who served as the model for the Tommy Killian character in Tom Wolfes The Bonfire of the Vanities, told me. Hayes, who had also grown up hard in an Irish equivalent of Giulianis Italian neighborhood, fought the mayor on behalf of a firefighters widow after 9/11 and came away with a favorable impression. He was a good mayor, Hayes said. I dont give a shit what anyone says. But recently he had run into Giuliani at Scottos, an Italian restaurant in Midtown, and was shocked by what he saw. I remember looking at him, and he didnt look the same. I said to myself, What the fuck is going on here? This is one of the great heroes in the history of New York City.

Giuliani, who almost became a priest until he discovered he had a libido, had an uncompromising sense of right and wrong that served him well as a prosecutor. After two storied terms as mayor, he launched a 2008 presidential campaign that ran into the sands. Then he disappeared into the private sector, where he made gobs of money. (My husband, in fact, was an associate at the esteemed Houston law firm of Bracewell & Giuliani, after the latter name had fallen away.) So far, so standard. We should stop here to stress that, though more colorful than most, these are the lineaments of a perfectly routine career in public life. Had Giuliani at this point vanished into the mahogany woodwork of boardrooms, Kirtzman would have had no greater task ahead of him than detailing messy divorces, the odd shady deal, a late-in-life love affair with scotch, and the diminishing returns that accrue to those who try to extract every drop of financial and political gain from a global celebrity they had only a partial hand in creating.

But now, as Giuliani comes full circle, via the Trump bypass, to be the subject of a criminal investigation led by the very same office he once led, he becomes a study of almost Dostoyevskian proportions. In him, we see some of our most ancient impulses, of power and ethics, fear and greed, dramatized. To be clearin May, Time revealed Giuliani worked with an accused Russian agent in a plot against the 2020 U.S. electionthis is a prosecutor who has come to be a danger to his personal liberty, as well as that of this country. Even if we set aside the scenes of self-abasementnow butt dialing reporters, now possibly emitting COVID-infected fecal aerosols into a crowded Michigan courtroomthis is territory unlike any other in modern times. It is incumbent upon us to try to understand how the arc of this once-impressive individual came to intersect so calamitously with this moment that were living through in America. Because as much as there is nothing mysterious (and certainly nothing tragic) in Trumps trajectory, even the most partisan observers I spoke to could not help but feel a degree of pain, sadness, and frank bewilderment at the question of what happened to Giuliani. Its inexplicable to me, said one. Frontal lobe dementia, said another. A guy with an expiration date, suggested a former associate. Ravitch said, A lot of people think he became a heavy drinker and thats why hes behaving the way he is. A close aide demurred: Its a sadder, more complicated story. Theres something wrong, theres something off. He got nothing out of this relationship. He threw away his reputation for free.

I take great issue, said someone who worked closely with Giuliani in the 1990s (lets call him Jeff), with the people who say that this is just a continuation of who he was. Thats not true. This is the tragic collapse of a great public man.

Jeff remembers someone with a steel trap of a mind who could hold briefings of three to four hours without notes, a big reader, a man capable of compassion. Jeff attended one of a series of town halls Giuliani held around the city during his first term in Canarsie, in southern Brooklyn, real Rudy country. There, an older man struggled to get his point across. Shouts of learn English and stop wasting our time rose around the packed school auditorium. Rudy shut that down right away, Jeff said, recalling the mayors words: Let me tell you something: This gentleman is an immigrant trying to ask his mayor a question. My grandfather came here. He didnt speak any English. He had a hell of a tough time. If somebody had taken the time to listen, life would perhaps have been easier for him. Im a busy guy. As busy as you may be, Im busier than you are. If I have the time to spend a few extra minutes listening to this guy finishing his thought, you do too. Giulianis reaction changed the tenor of that room. Applause ensued. Jeff was eager for me to see that, when it came to the old Rudy, there were as many stories of this kind as of the other. There was none of that Trumpian nonsense, Jeff said, adding that he found the present condition of the ex-mayor heartbreaking.

Giuliani had far more trouble being sympathetic to people from other backgrounds, especially New Yorks Black population, which in his day amounted to more than a quarter of the city. His experience with race has a certain metaphorical power too, when one considers that in America the encounter with the other so often begins at the color line. That is when we see people unlike ourselves, and when our ability to see in the experience of another a shade of our ownempathy, in a wordis truly tested. In the case of Giuliani, his racial attitudes were more than casually held prejudices, no mere extension of his upbringing but an actual vendetta, originating in his 1989 electoral loss to the citys first Black mayor, David Dinkins.

When HILLARY CLINTON was still a supporter of BARRY GOLDWATER, Giuliani was praising President Johnsons WAR ON POVERTY.

He couldnt believe he had lost to Dinkins, said Bill Bratton, who served as police commissioner under Giuliani. Bratton, who had been in the room when President Barack Obama mocked Trump at the White House Correspondents Dinner in 2011an event many believe led Trump to truly set his sights on the presidency with an aim to undo Obamas legacydescribed that moment to me as the mirror image of the rage that the defeat to Dinkins produced in Giuliani. The future mayor had until then actively courted the Black vote, speaking with emotion of homeless shelters and crack babies. But Giulianis concern lasted only as long as he was allowed to play the benefactor. Confronted with losing to a Black man, his goodwill disappeared. At Giulianis party at the Roosevelt Hotel, Barrett evokes a scene that would return to haunt us: The ballroom was filled with frustrated supporters hed closed the campaign invokingwhite, male, and mad. It was also filled with ugly untruths about how Blacks had stolen the election at polls in Harlem and Bed-Stuy, where the dead had supposedly voted by the thousands.

Not only did Giuliani lack the historical imagination or the generosity of spirit needed to see the significance of New York electing its first Black mayor, what is especially revealing (given what he would later become) is that even when he had beaten Dinkins in 1993, on the issue of law and order, he could not let his animosity go. He really prevented us, Bratton said, still frustrated after all these years, from having a free hand to reach out to the Black community. The animus ran so deep that Giuliani, as mayor, didnt once attend the US Open, because that event had come to be associated with Dinkinss mayoralty. This also meant that when the truly hideous incidents of police violence occurred under Giulianithe 1997 rape of Abner Louima in a precinct bathroom by cops with the handle of a cleaning implement; Amadou Diallo, shot at 41 times in 1999 by plainclothes police officers; Patrick Dorismond, killed in 2000 by undercover officers attempting to buy drugs that Dorismond wasnt sellingthe mayor had no one in Black leadership to speak to. Nor did he seem to want to. Instead he released Dorismonds juvenile delinquency record to show that he was no altar boy. In fact he was, at the very same Catholic school that Giuliani had attended. Not surprisingly, a month after Dorismonds funeral Giulianis approval rating fell to 37 percent, with only 6 percent of Black voters approving of the job he was doing.

See original here:
How Rudy Giuliani Went From 9/11s Hallowed Mayor to 2021s Haunted Ghoul - Vanity Fair

Democratic Insider and a Republican Backed by Trump Win Ohio House Races – The New York Times

The race was not as much emblematic of a liberal-moderate divide among Democrats as it was a clash between an insider who rose fast in local party circles and an agitator who thrived on alienating party leaders by questioning their commitment to liberal ideals. Both candidates were solidly liberal in their views on a range of issues, including legalizing marijuana and making college more affordable or free in some cases.

Outside political groups from different corners of the Democratic coalition invested heavily in the race. Backing Ms. Turner were left-wing environmental interests supporting the Green New Deal; the political group founded by Senator Bernie Sanders that she once ran, Our Revolution; and two progressive groups, the Working Families Party and Justice Democrats.

Supporting Ms. Brown were more institutional players and politicians like the political committee of the Congressional Black Caucus; several senior members of the caucus; Representative James E. Clyburn of South Carolina, the Democratic House whip; Hillary Clinton; Jewish Democrats; Cleveland-area Black churches; and, unofficially, Marcia Fudge, who vacated the seat this year to become Mr. Bidens secretary of housing and urban development and consented to have her mother appear in an ad endorsing Ms. Brown because she had to remain neutral as a government official.

Democratic leaders in Washington and groups that are often at odds with the progressive left were worried that a victory by Ms. Turner, who led by double digits in early polls and initially raised more money than Ms. Brown, could presage a new round of intraparty hostilities for Democrats.

And the establishment hit back hard to a degree it had not in previous battles when candidates with the support of the partys activist left, like Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Jamaal Bowman of New York, took out veteran politicians with little pushback.

This time, while Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and other stars of the left campaigned in Ohio for Ms. Turner, prominent members of the Congressional Black Caucus like Mr. Clyburn visited the district and implored people to vote for Ms. Brown as someone who was respectful and willing to work with other Democrats an implicit criticism of Ms. Turners more confrontational style. Many criticized her openly, like Representative Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, who referred to Ms. Turner as a single solitary know-it-all.

Advertising attacking Ms. Turners professionalism and character was ubiquitous in the district during the final days of the campaign. One ad from the centrist group Third Way compared Ms. Turners political style and tone to Mr. Trumps, and replayed an on-camera moment she has struggled to live down throughout the campaign in which she made a crude analogy to the choice between Mr. Biden, whom she did not support, and Mr. Trump.

The rest is here:
Democratic Insider and a Republican Backed by Trump Win Ohio House Races - The New York Times

New 2020 voter data: How Biden won, how Trump kept the race close, and what it tells us about the future – Brookings Institution

As we saw in 2016 and again in 2020, traditional survey research is finding it harder than it once was to assess presidential elections accurately. Pre-election polls systemically misjudge who is likely to vote, and exit polls conducted as voters leave the voting booths get it wrong as well.

Now, using a massive sample of validated voters whose participation has been independently verified, the Pew Research Center has published a detailed analysis of the 2020 presidential election. It helps us understand how Joe Biden was able to accomplish what Hillary Clinton did notand why President Trump came closer to getting reelected than the pre-election surveys had predicted.

How Joe Biden won

Five main factors account for Bidens success.

How Trump kept it close

Despite (or perhaps because of) non-stop controversy about his policies and personal conduct, President Trump managed to raise his share of the popular vote from 46% in 2016 to 47% in 2020. His core coalition held together, and he made a few new friends.

Longer-term prospects

With electoral mobilization at a peak for supporters of both political parties, turnout surged to its highest level in a century. The Democratic vote total increased by 15.4 million over 2016; the Republican total, by 11.2 million. In future elections, much will depend on whether mobilization is symmetrical, as it was in 2020, or asymmetrical, as it is when one party is enthusiastic while the other is discouraged or complacent.

This said, Republicans are facing a structural dilemma. For the most part, their coalition depends on groupsnotably whites and voters without college degreeswhose share of the electorate is declining. Moreover, as elderly Americans, who now tend to be supportive of Republican candidates, leave the electorate, they will be replaced by younger cohorts whose views of the Republican Party are far less favorable. Among voters under age 30, Joe Biden enjoyed a margin of 24 points over Donald Trump, and political scientists have found the voting patterns formed in this cohort tend to persist.

There are potential countervailing forces, however. If the Democratic Party is regarded as going beyond what the center of the electorate expects and wants, Democrats gains among suburban voters and moderate Republicans could evaporate. And if Democrats continue to misread the sentiments of Hispanics, who now constitute the countrys largest non-white group, their shift toward Republicans could continue. There is evidence that among Hispanics as well as whites, a distinctive working-class consciousness is more powerful than ethnic identity.

As my colleague Elaine Kamarck has observed, Hispanics could turn out to be the Italians of the 21st centuryfamily-oriented, hardworking, culturally conservative. If they follow the normal intergenerational immigrant trajectory rather than the distinctive African American path, the multi-ethnic coalition on which Democrats are depending for their partys future could lose an essential component.

Despite these possibilities, Republicans have made scant progress at the presidential level over the past two decades, during which they gained a popular vote majority only once. In the four most recent elections, their share of the popular vote has varied in a narrow range from a high of 47.2% in 2012 to a low of 45.7% in 2008. Despite labelling Mitt Romney a loser, Donald Trump failed to match Romneys share of the popular vote in either 2016 or 2020. Trumps gains in some portions of the electorate have been counterbalanced by losses in others. If Republicans cannot move from their current politics of coalition replacement to a new politics of coalition expansion, their prospects of becoming the countrys governing majority are not brightunless Democrats badly overplay their hand.

More here:
New 2020 voter data: How Biden won, how Trump kept the race close, and what it tells us about the future - Brookings Institution

The United States has yet to fully abolish slavery – The Boston Globe

In her 1996 book, It Takes a Village, Hillary Clinton writes about what she called an unusual aspect of being the First Lady of Arkansas. Living in the governors mansion, Clinton and her husband were served by unpaid prisoners. When we moved in, I was told that using prison labor at the governors mansion was a longstanding tradition, which kept down costs, she wrote, adding that the prisoners were Black men in their 30s serving long sentences.

What was unusual to Clinton, however, was not that the fact that she was being served by unpaid Black men who had no freedom; it was that having prisoners in her home made her uncomfortable at least initially. I had defended several clients in criminal cases, but visiting them in jail or sitting next to them in court was not the same as encountering a convicted murderer in the kitchen every morning, she wrote. I was apprehensive.

Clintons nonchalant recounting of the unpaid labor in the governors mansion with no apparent concern over what is part of Americas legacy of slavery is reflective of just how much slavery, and unpaid Black labor in particular, has shaped American culture. And thats not only because the United States was built on slavery, but also because slavery was actually never fully abolished. Though the 13th Amendment, which outlawed the widespread practice of slavery, passed over 150 years ago, the US Constitution, to this very day, allows for certain American citizens to be subject to involuntary servitude.

The normalization of seeing Black people in nonpaid labor, in servitude as needing to be punished, as being suspicious of having done something is part of a legacy that dates back to the 17th century in our country, Michele Goodwin, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine, said in an interview. These are the messages that Americans had to tell themselves to justify a child being sold at a corner block.

The constitutionality of modern day slavery lies in an exception in the 13th Amendment, which reads, Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. That means that while Americans have a constitutional right to not be enslaved, that right is unequivocally stripped away from them if they are ever imprisoned.

After the 13th Amendment was passed, Southern lawmakers went back and created laws that would be targeted at Black people, Goodwin said. These were part of the Black Codes, a series of laws that criminalized behaviors that white lawmakers associated with Black people, who were subsequently arrested for things as simple as loitering. The result was the continued enslavement of Black Americans at the hands of the state.

That practice continues in some forms today. Prisoners, who are disproportionately Black and brown, work at government facilities, like state houses or governors mansions, for little to no pay, despite this kind of work not being a part of their sentence. The reason its been so normalized is because of the Black and brown faces associated with it, Goodwin said. While at least four states allow for unpaid labor, other states pay prisoners wages as low as a dime an hour. California, for example, employs prisoners for janitorial work or to make things like license plates for anywhere between 8 and 95 cents an hour, and pays firefighting prisoners a measly dollar per hour. Massachusetts pays its prisoners as little as 14 cents an hour, and withholds half of their paychecks until after they are released.

Some argue that prison labor allows incarcerated people to gain valuable skills and job training while serving their sentence. But the reality is that getting a job out of prison is still incredibly difficult. Even up until a new bill passed just last year, prisoners who worked as firefighters in California, for example, were seldom employed by the state after finishing their sentence. (This is not to mention the fact that work without pay should be inexcusable, whatever the circumstance.)

That the United States has the worlds largest incarcerated population and allows for underpaid or unpaid prison labor even, technically, if its involuntary should be a major concern for lawmakers. As it stands, prison labor, a multibillion-dollar industry that gives corporations and state governments access to cheap labor, only serves as an incentive to fuel mass incarceration.

Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Representative Nikema Williams of Georgia have introduced an abolition amendment, which would finally scrap the exception clause in the 13th Amendment. It should go without saying that Congress should pass this bill, but its easy to see conservative lawmakers standing in its way. That said, Republicans often point to the first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, as an example of how it was their party that led America away from slavery. If they actually believe they are still the party of Lincoln, then they should join Democrats and finally abolish all forms of slavery in the United States. That is, of course, unless their obsession with Confederate flags and monuments is about more than Southern heritage and pride.

Abdallah Fayyad can be reached at abdallah.fayyad@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @abdallah_fayyad.

Read more here:
The United States has yet to fully abolish slavery - The Boston Globe