Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Harris Faulkner: Hillary Clinton Created the MAGA Movement – Barrett Sports Media

Fox News star Tucker Carlson took aim at several political commentators during a recent sit-down interview with University of Chicago journalism student Daniel Schmidt.

Carlson appeared on SchmidtsPiece of Schmidtpodcast. Carlson also shared some thoughts on why he hates college and why he thinks his detractors hate him.

The Fox News host told Schmidt that hes against college and even tried to convince all four of his children not to attend. Carlson said there are abundant objective data that shows that college is not a good choice for a lot of people.

I was just an abashed loser in college. I was just drunk every day and it took me years to recover from it, Carlson said. I should never have gone to college, my parents didnt go, my brother didnt really go. In my family there was a premium on reading and college was not considered an impressive option.

Schmidt told Carlson a story about the time the university brought in Dispatch Senior Editor David French, Dispatch Editor-in-Chief Jonah Goldberg, and political commentator Bill Kristol to engage with members of his class for a lecture and subsequent Q&A session.

As soon as I brought up your name, he (French) looked at me and cut me off instantly and said Tucker Carlson is a white nationalist, and just like filibustered for 10 minutes straight, he added.

Schmidt asked Carlson why people like French, Kristol, and Goldberg despise him.

I know all of those people from my previous life, Carlson said. I never had any problem with them. I know them well enough to know the limits of their intellect. I do think imposter syndrome plays a role here as well.

Carlson went on to mention other names of people he detests but said some of them are smarter than him.

Andrew Sullivan, who I detest as a person, I think hes a genuinely bad person but hes really smart.

Carlson told Schmidt his best advice that he can give is to find beauty in life, marry young and have children, and read lots of books.

Read the original:
Harris Faulkner: Hillary Clinton Created the MAGA Movement - Barrett Sports Media

Navarro urges Trump to skip planned DC speech: I had to fight Brother Larry Kudlow on daily basis – The Hill

Former Trump White House trade adviser Peter Navarro urged former President Trump not to deliver his keynote speech at the America First Policy Institute (AFPI), criticizing members of the think tanks staff and alleging they were working on a Trumpism without Trump coup.

Trump is set to deliver remarks on Tuesday at an AFPI summit, returning to Washington for the first time in a year and a half amid speculation he will run for president again in 2024.

But Navarro said Trump should put off the speech despite the need to create a stable of policy experts.

Yes, it is important for President Trump to have a well-credentialed stable of policy experts capable of both building a 2024 platform and finding solid MAGA talent to populate a new Trump Administration. But the AFPI Trojan Horsewhose leadership is now bragging about how it will staff Trumps shadow cabinetis decidedly not that, Navarro wrote in an op-ed on conservative website American Greatness.

Navarro slammed members of the AFPI, including former Energy Secretary Rick Perry, former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz and former economic adviser Larry Kudlow.

As I document in Taking Back Trumps America, I had to fight Brother Larry on an almost daily basis, not just on trade policy but also in my efforts to advance Trumps two most simple rules: buy American, hire American. And Kudlow worked hand-in-hand with several members of Trumps Council of Economic Advisors (CEA), who now constitute the free trade core of AFPIs economic experts, he claimed in his op-ed.

Navarro also called those associated with the AFPI griftersand claimed that their broader agenda might be to hijack the political attractiveness of Trumpism but replace Trump with an AFPI-anointed RINO [Republican in name only].

Marc Lotter, chief communications officer for the AFPI, slammed Navarro in an email to The Hill and noted Navarros previous support for 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

It is unfortunate to see Mr. Navarro, a former Hillary Clinton supporter, turning into the DC swamp creature he once abhorred. AFPI is lead by nine former cabinet level officials and nearly 20 senior White House officials from Trumps White House, Lotter said.

As it relates to the other comments, AFPI is currently hosting a two-day summit laying out a detailed policy agenda for the future. The fact President Trump is closing this event shows his support for AFPIs work to continue the policies that put America First! he added.

View original post here:
Navarro urges Trump to skip planned DC speech: I had to fight Brother Larry Kudlow on daily basis - The Hill

Hillary Clinton Is Best Bet for Democrats in 2024, Political Analyst Says – Newsweek

Pollster and consultant Douglas Schoen said Hillary Clinton should run for president again in 2024 and she would be one of the best options for the Democratic party right now.

In an opinion piece for The Hill, published on July 3, Schoen dismissed current President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' chances due to their waning popularity.

Schoen also noted that he and former New York City Council President Andrew Stein wrote an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journalin January of this year emphasizing why Clinton would be a good candidate.

"Our reasoning was that President Biden's low approval rating, doubt about his capacity to run again, Vice President Harris' unpopularity, and the absence of another strong Democrat to lead the ticket have created a leadership vacuum within the party that only Clinton as an experienced and politically savvy 'change candidate' can fill," Schoen said in the article.

President Joe Biden's popularity has continued to stumble with his approval rating sitting just around 40 percent as the November midterms approach.

The cost of living crisis and the conflict in Ukraine are among some of the key issues that GOP opponents will hope to seize on as the more conservative branches of the party gather influence nationally.

Biden's critics regularly cite the president's popularity in their attacks, with analysis showing he has a lower approval rating than Trump had at the same point in his presidency.

Schoen also added the recent Supreme Court ruling to overturn Roe v. Wade could prove to increase the case for Clinton's candidacy due to her dedication to women's rights.

"Regardless of one's own political affiliation or opinion of Clinton, the country knows her as an experienced politician and a champion of women's rights," he said.

"From her declaration at the United Nations in 1995 that 'women's rights are human rights' to being the first woman nominated as a major party's candidate for President in 2016, she offers the exact type of leadership that the Democratic Party desperately needs."

Schoen described the current Democrats as a "slowly sinking ship" and said the party needed to prepare for a blowout loss in November.

He also highlighted that recent polling has indicated that Democrats have little confidence Biden could push the party forward in the 2024 election.

"Only 36 percent of Democrats believe that Biden gives them the best chance to win the presidency in 2024," he wrote while quoting a Maris National Poll conducted in November 2021.

Despite Schoen's endorsement, Clinton has previously dismissed the idea she would be running for president again in 2024.

In March, Clinton was asked whether she would have a rematch with former President Donald Trump for the top office role and laughed off the suggestion.

"No, no, but I am certainly going to be active in supporting women running for office and other candidates who I think should be re-elected or electedboth women and men," she said on MSNBC'S Morning Joe on March 8.

Newsweek has reached out to Clinton for comment.

Read the original:
Hillary Clinton Is Best Bet for Democrats in 2024, Political Analyst Says - Newsweek

‘It changed everything’: Comey and ’16 outcome – MSNBC

Tuesday, July 5, shall forever be known as the anniversary of former FBI Director James Comeys foray into politics.

Six years ago today, Comey held an infamous press conference at the height of the 2016 presidential election, in which he announced that although Hillary Clinton hadnt committed any crimes in using a private email server as secretary of state, shed still done things Comey personally thought were extremely careless.

In hindsight, I think its clear July 5 was also a foundational moment for Trumps perversion of the Justice Department.

Comeys announcement may well have helped tank Clintons campaign. (Hes kinda, sorta, not-really apologized for his language at the press conference, and a late-stage announcement that he was investigating new Clinton emails). But I argue the political impact goes even deeper than 2016. In hindsight, I think its clear July 5 was also a foundational moment for Trumps perversion of the Justice Department. Comey showed Trump the value of a DOJ willing to launch or close investigations based on pretext and politics.

In fact, Trump was so impressed with how Comeys Clinton investigation worked in his favor that he reportedly asked Comey to end an investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn, and to meddle in the investigation into Trump, as well.

Comey didnt go along with his boss, but by then Trump was so hooked on the drug that is fascism he merely fired Comey with hopes of replacing him with a more loyal stooge.

After Comey was fired, Trump embarked on a scorched earth campaign to establish a more servile DOJ. He pressured then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to fire Comeys second-in-command, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, for his role in the Russia probe. Then, Trump pressured Sessions himself to resign. Trump briefly named the masculine toilet" guy (a.k.a. Matthew Whitaker) acting attorney general before appointing Bill Barr, the ultimate Trump sycophant, as his new AG.

Short of literally waging an insurrection, Barr did pretty much everything Trump wanted as attorney general, from targeting his political critics to surprise, surprise opening pretextual investigations to varnish Trumps image.

During his four years in office, Trump cycled through a series of DOJ officials whom he used and discarded. But you never forget the first time. And Comey showed him why.

Ja'han Jones is The ReidOut Blog writer. He's a futurist and multimedia producer focused on culture and politics. His previous projects include "Black Hair Defined" and the "Black Obituary Project."

Here is the original post:
'It changed everything': Comey and '16 outcome - MSNBC

What if Trump had used the Big Lie in 2016, if hed lost that election? John Blumenthal – cleveland.com

LOS ANGELES -- Weeks prior to the 2016 presidential election, candidate Donald Trump began to toss some new red meat to his carnivorous supporters -- the possibility of a rigged election. His poll numbers pointed to a defeat, possibly a resounding one. Democrats, myself included, were not especially worried about the outcome.

As Nov. 8 approached, Trumps warnings about a fixed election grew more frequent and more vehement, jacking up the belligerence of the MAGA crowd beyond the usual racist anti-immigration frenzy and customary Hillary Clinton-bashing.

At the time, many of my fellow Democratic friends and I believed that Trump was a harmless blowhard who enjoyed the adulation of raucous rally crowds and hoped for no more than a resurrection of his failed TV career. Many pundits held similar opinions.

Blowhard, yes. Harmless, no.

To many observers, this rigged-election business seemed a lame, pre-emptive attempt at cushioning the blow when Trump lost by an embarrassingly wide margin. Many of us believed that Trump might even be relieved by a loss, sparing him from a job for which he had no experience or qualifications. He was just interested in polishing his brand, we told ourselves, and he certainly did not want any nosy congressional investigations of his murky financial empire. After all, he had refused to reveal his tax returns, so there was reason for curiosity.

Clearly, we were being nave. Granted, this was before candidate Trump had had the power to actually do anything other than make promises about a wall and rant about rapists and murderers invading America from the southern border, but his rabid followers -- of which, surprisingly, there were millions -- were no less moved by his descriptions of what he intended to do as president. His rallies were packed and no less unruly and inflammatory than they are today. Suddenly, the possibility of a stolen election became an effective propaganda ploy. Hillary was a criminal, Trump told his troops, and her election would be a travesty. (Remember Lock her up!?)

If he had lost in 2016, how far would Trumps hard-core loyalists have gone to see him installed as president?

In swing states like Pennsylvania, Hillary lost by just over 44,000 votes; in Wisconsin, it was a deficit of approximately 23,000 votes; in Michigan, a mere 11,000. Had she won those swing states and a few others by narrow margins, resulting in her election, would Donald Trump have cried foul even after recounts in each swing state showed no substantial cases of fraud? No doubt his followers would have been enraged -- but how enraged? Enraged enough to take action?

John Blumenthal

Would Trumps hard-core devotees have been angry enough to go to great lengths to steal the election away from Hillary Clinton?

Would the Big Lie have been born as early as 2016?

At the time, congressional power lay solidly with Republicans in both Houses Paul Ryan was House Speaker; Mitch McConnell was Senate Majority Leader; congressional committees were chaired by Republicans. By then, McConnell had already proven himself to be primarily interested in power after all, he had vocalized his goal to make Barack Obama a one-term president and later denied our 44th president his constitutional right to appoint a Supreme Court Justice.

And the prospect of a Hillary Clinton presidency was anathema to a great many Republicans.

Would some swing-state election officials have disqualified Democratic ballots? Would legislators have overturned their states votes? Would the House of Representatives have refused to certify some Clinton electors? In other words, would we be where we are now six years ago, in the midst of a Big Lie movement and its accompanying existential threats to democracy?

A stretch of the imagination? Probably, but certainly no more surreal than the shocking facts about Jan. 6 that are now being exposed before our very eyes.

An award-winning novelist and former magazine editor who co-authored the movie, Blue Streak, John Blumenthals work has appeared in The Los Angeles Times,The Chicago Sun-Times,Playboy, Publishers Weekly, Salonand Huffington Post. This was written for The Plain Dealer and cleveland.com.

Have something to say about this topic?

* Send a letter to the editor, which will be considered for print publication.

* Email general questions about our editorial board or comments or corrections on this opinion column to Elizabeth Sullivan, director of opinion, at esullivan@cleveland.com.

Read this article:
What if Trump had used the Big Lie in 2016, if hed lost that election? John Blumenthal - cleveland.com