Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Data show South Dakota’s COVID infection rate nearly 4 times higher than West Virginia’s – The Capital Journal

A compilation of data by the Capital Journal shows that South Dakotas COVID-19 infection rate is nearly four times higher than West Virginias yet while West Virginias Republican governor imposed an indoor face covering mandate this week, South Dakotas fiercely resists such action.

President Donald Trump remains relatively popular in deep red South Dakota after winning the states three Electoral College votes by 30 points over Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016.

If there is anywhere Trump may be more popular than he is in South Dakota, however, it might be West Virginia. There in 2016, Trump defeated Clinton by an astounding 41 points.

Both states are well-known for country life, as places where gun ownership rates exceed the national average. While South Dakota has far more farmers than coal miners or factory workers and West Virginia is known for mountains rather than prairies the spirit of grit, hard work and independence permeates the culture of both states.

However, there now seems to be one key difference in the two states. On Monday, West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice issued the order masks to be worn while inside indoor public places amid the COVID battle.

On Thursday, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem reemphasized her position that there should be no mask mandate. Noem did so in responding to a question on Twitter: Should there be a national mask mandate?

No. People should have the freedom to wear masks if it makes them feel safe, but the science on masks is very mixed, Noem tweeted.

This followed last weeks declaration from Noem that there would be no social distancing during the Independence Day fireworks display at Mount Rushmore.

Raw Data

The data below are mined from the South Dakota Department of Health, the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources and the U.S. Census Bureau. The COVID numbers were effective as of Friday evening.

South Dakota:

Trumps 2016 victory spread over Clinton: 30 points

COVID tests administered 88,542

Confirmed COVID cases 7,401

Persons per square mile (population density) 10.7

Percentage of population under age 65 without health insurance 11.6%

West Virginia:

Trumps 2016 victory spread over Clinton: 41 points

COVID tests administered 199,383

Confirmed COVID cases 3,882

Persons per square mile (population density) 77.1

Percentage of population under age 65 without health insurance 7.9%

Conclusions

If the information provided by both states is correct, it means the following:

COVID-19 infection rate:

South Dakota 1 of every 120 residents has been infected.

West Virginia 1 of every 462 residents has been infected.

This means that South Dakotas COVID-19 infection rate is nearly four times higher than West Virginias.

This is somewhat offset by West Virginias population density being much higher than South Dakotas. In other words, because West Virginia has more people in a tighter area, their likelihood of contracting COVID-19 would be higher in comparison to those in South Dakota.

I know its an inconvenience, but its not going to be much of an inconvenience, Justice said upon announcing West Virginias mask requirement. If you dont decide to wear the face covering for yourself, if you dont decide to wear it for one of your loved ones or your friends, do it for the 95 West Virginians that have died, do it for the 95 people that weve lost.

Despite Noems independence, her own Department of Health maintains the following phase very clearly on its website: Everyone should wear a cloth face cover in public settings and when around people who dont live in your household, especially when other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain.

View post:
Data show South Dakota's COVID infection rate nearly 4 times higher than West Virginia's - The Capital Journal

Commentary: No, Trump isn’t going to drop out – The Daily World

By Rich Lowry

After hes repeatedly survived the unsurvivable, we are supposed to believe that President Donald Trump might quit the presidential race before it truly begins because of a spate of negative polling.

This is the latest chatter among (unnamed) Republicans, according to a widely circulated Fox News report and cable news talking heads.

Trump is a volatile figure and things could get weird if hes far behind in the final weeks. But the idea that he is going to fall on his sword because the conventional wisdom has turned sharply against his chances runs starkly counter to all Trumps predilections and past actions.

Good luck convincing him hes going to lose after he survived the Access Hollywood tape that had GOP officeholders deserting him in droves, and after he prevailed on an election night when many people closest to him thought he was sure to go down to defeat.

Theres nothing any political consultant, pollster or adviser can tell him about his dire political condition that he hasnt heard, and dismissed, before.

If the polling looks bad for him now, Hillary Clinton had sizable leads in 2016, too.

The assumption behind the Trump-might-drop chatter is that the president would want to avoid the psychological sting of a loss, but hes already signaled how hell handle a defeat by saying he was robbed.

The anonymous Republicans speculating about this scenario surely are wish-casting and assume some other any other GOP presidential candidate would be better for the partys chances. This, too, is doubtful.

How would the great drop-and-switch even work? The party would be implicitly conceding that the incumbent Republican president was such a disaster that he couldnt even run for a second term and then turn around and ask voters for four more years of yet another Republican president.

One of the points of this exercise would be to repudiate Trump, but how could the party plausibly do that after loyally and enthusiastically backing him for four years? Who would be a turn-the-page candidate? The natural successor would be Vice President Mike Pence, but hes obviously more associated with Trump than any other figure in the party besides the presidents direct relatives.

How about a Trump critic, say, Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse? But such a choice would be a whiplash-inducing change of direction for a party led the moment before by Trump.

The presidents base wouldnt go away even if Trump said he wasnt running again, and its feelings would have to be taken into account not to mention that Trump loyalists would make up a disproportionate share of Republican convention delegates, who would presumably make the choice of a new candidate.

At a time of great populist passion in the GOP, deciding on a presidential candidate without the direct say of any voters would be fraught with peril, to say the least and more likely to produce a civil war rather than comity.

Then, theres the question of Trump himself. Unless the Trump-stepping-aside scenario becomes even more implausible and involves him resigning the presidency and getting dropped off by Marine One at a monastery to begin a four-month silent retreat, hes not going to quietly abide some other Republican soaking up all the public attention that comes with being one of two people who will be the next president of the United States.

Perhaps former Vice President Joe Biden indeed has a durable 10-point lead, in which case theres nothing that the GOP can do to avoid a terrible drubbing. If Biden is that strong, some emergency replacement Republican candidate hastily chosen amid a political panic isnt going to win, either.

Its more likely, though, that the race will naturally tighten, and that Trump will be behind, but within range and have a punchers chance.

Regardless, theres no way he quits without even trying to win the ultimate vindication for any president, and the ultimate repudiation of his critics.

Rich Lowry has been the editor of National Review since 1997. Hes a Fox News political analyst and writes for Politico and Time. He is on Twitter @RichLowry.

Excerpt from:
Commentary: No, Trump isn't going to drop out - The Daily World

What Women Want – The Bulwark

One of the great mysteries of 2016 was why so many women voted for Donald Trump.

Despite being caught on a hot mic talking about grabbing women by the pu**y, nearly 20 sexual assault allegations, and well known accounts of treating his multiple wives horribly, Trump still received the votes of 44 percent of white college-educated women and 61 percent of non-college-educated white women.

Many observers were doubly confused because they had expected Hillary Clinton, as the first major party female nominee, to be especially strong with women. And she wasnt. Trump did poorly with African-American and Hispanic women, because he did poorly with all African-Americans and Hispanics. But he managed to actually win a narrow plurality among white women.

But that mystery has been easy to solve. Over the last three years I conducted dozens of focus groups with both college-educated and non-college-educated female Trump voters. And the answer given most commonly for why they voted for Donald Trump is I didnt vote for Donald Trump. I voted against Hillary Clinton.

In 2016, Democrats understood that Hillary Clinton was a deeply polarizing candidate. But even they didnt grasp the full magnitude of it. Right-leaning and Republican female voters had spent more than a decade hating both Clintons, and they didnt stop just because Hillarys opponent was an unrepentant misogynist.

In fact, Bill Clintons legacy of similarly disgusting behavior with womenand Hillary Clintons defense of her husbandhad the effect of blunting Trumps own execrable track record. These women voters decided that either way, thered be a guy with a long history of sexual malfeasance living in the White House.

Podcast July 10 2020

On today's Bulwark Podcast, Sarah Longwell, Jonathan V. Last, and Bill Kristol join Charlie Sykes to discuss women voter...

But after Trumps victory, something started happening almost immediately. Womeneven those who voted for Trump in 2016began shifting away from the president.

In the 2018 midterm elections that delivered Democrats 40 congressional seats and control of the House of Representatives, support for Republicans from both college-educated women and non-college-educated white women dropped by 5 points.

And the relationship has gotten worse.

A recent New York Times Upshot/Siena College Poll showed Trump trailing Joe Biden by 22 points with women. Thats 9 points bigger than the gender gap was in 2016.

And while much has been made of college-educated women in the suburbs ditching Trump, a recent ABC/Washington Post survey shows that Trumps support with white non-college-educated women has fallen by 11 points.

After nearly three years of conducting focus groups with women who held their nose and voted for Trump in 2016, this decline hasnt surprised me. He was holding on to many of those voters with a wing and a prayer and strong economy. When everything began to fall apart, these female Trump leaners went running for the exits.

From the beginning of his presidency these women gave Trump low marks for his tweeting and divisivenessbut they also gave him credit for the strong economy and relative prosperity of the last few years.

His perceived business acumen was one of the top reasons many of these women were willing to take a flyer on him in the first place. Never forget that for many Americans, their impressions of Trump were formed less by his presidential campaign than by his role on The Apprentice where he was, through the wonders of editing and reality TV storytelling, presented as a decisive, successful businessman.

In late 2019 and early 2020 with a roaring economy and a bunch of abstract foreign policy scandals consuming the media and the elites whom these voters generally despise and distrust, even Trump-voting-women who rated the presidents performance as very bad werent entirely sure what they would do in 2020. There was still a crowded field of Democratic candidatesmany of whom were living, breathing representations of the far-left caricature that Republicans paint of Democrats.

But by March of 2020, everything had changed.

First, Joe Biden blew out Bernie Sanders and the rest of the Democratic field.

In my focus groups, Biden had consistently outperformed all other Democrats among the female Trump voters who were souring on the president. In hypothetical head-to-head matchups, almost none of the women would take Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren over Trump, but a handful would typically (if not enthusiastically) pick Biden over Trump.

It cannot be overstated how much better of a candidate Joe Biden is for attracting disaffected Republican votersespecially womenthan any of the other Democrats who ran this cycle.

Then on March 11 the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus a global pandemic. Two days later, the United States declared a state of emergency.

No one in America will forget what happened next: Lockdowns; PPE shortages; 130,000 deaths; staggering unemployment.

And every night on television voters saw a president both unwilling and incapable of providing clear and coherent leadership.

Since March, I have conducted the focus groups virtually and watched Trumps position with women weaken in real time.

Interestingly, in the early days of the pandemic the women in the focus groups were frustrated with Trump, but didnt necessarily hold him responsible for everything that was happening. He hadnt done great, they said, but it was a tough situation for any president to handle.

It wasnt until the killing of George Floyd and the resulting protests that the bottom started to drop out.

Two weeks after Floyds death I ran a focus group with seven women from swing statesall of whom voted for Trump but currently rated him as doing a very bad job.

Only one was leaning toward voting for him again. Three were definitely going to vote for Biden. The other three were still making up their minds. But even these undecideds were unequivocal in their distaste for Trumps posture on race and his handling of the protests. They actively recoiled.

One of the Trump voters who had decided to vote for Biden said, The stakes are too high now. Its a matter of life and death.

Thats a pretty a good distillation of why Trump has been shedding support from women over the last few months. The multiple crises laid bare the fact that Donald Trump isnt the savvy businessman these women voted for. Instead, they see him as a divisive president whos in over his head.

And they see that his inability to successfully navigate this environment has real-world consequences for actual people.

Average voters werent moved by Trumps obstruction of justice in the Mueller investigation, or his quid-pro-quo with Ukraine, or his many personal scandals. But when people are unemployed, or dying, and the streets are on fire, they want a president who isnt winging it.

They want someone who knows how the world works and can make the government perform the kind of functions that only it can do. Like managing a coordinated national response to a pandemic. Or using the bully pulpit to bring the nation together during a moment of crisis.

Donald Trump and his campaign think they can stop the bleeding with women by leaning into the culture wars and highlighting looters, rioters, and vandals pulling down statues. But this is a fundamental misunderstanding of these voters. They dont see Trump as someone who can protect them from the chaosthey think hes the source of it.

Which isnt to say that the race couldnt turn around for one reason or another. I suppose that crazier things have happened in American politics. (Though I cant think of many off the top of my head.)

But the reality is that no modern president has done more to alienate female voters. His whole life Trump has treated women with disdain. And they are now poised to return the favor.

Read the original post:
What Women Want - The Bulwark

What Will Trumps Rally in New Hampshire Be Like? Its Anyones Guess – The New York Times

Three days before President Trumps latest rally, in a state that Hillary Clinton narrowly won in 2016, the only thing that seems clear is that the presidents team has no idea what to expect.

Mr. Trumps campaign is planning an event at an airport hangar in Portsmouth, N.H. But the states governor, Chris Sununu, a Republican, has said he will not be attending. It isnt clear how many other Republican elected officials will come. The number of attendees could be low, or it could be expansive. There could be lots of people drifting in from Vermont, Maine and Massachusetts.

Campaign officials believe they will be able to prevent the kind of ticket prank that helped turn Mr. Trumps rally last month in Tulsa, Okla., into a far smaller event than expected but they still cannot say for sure. And most significantly, there is the looming threat of the coronavirus spreading in a crowd where attendees will be in relatively close quarters, despite being mostly outdoors.

Its not what we need right now in terms of Covid, said Tom Rath, a Republican former New Hampshire attorney general. We have been very, very fortunate our number of deaths are quite small.

Mr. Sununu, in particular, is threading a needle in a year when he is up for re-election in a swing state, and has gotten praise for how he has handled the coronavirus crisis, Mr. Rath said.

In an interview with CNN on Tuesday night, Mr. Sununu said he might have a chance to see Mr. Trump during his swing through the state, but it would not be at the rally on Saturday.

Im not going to put myself in the middle of a crowd of thousands of people, if thats your question specifically, Mr. Sununu said.

The Trump campaign is attempting a reboot of the reboot that fizzled out just a few weeks ago the June 20 rally in Tulsa that the president and his team bragged had spurred nearly one million ticket requests. In the end, it drew only about 6,200 people to the 19,000-seat arena.

Since then, campaign officials and the White House have discussed ways to allow Mr. Trump to hit the stump the way he wants to at big rallies without endangering people. On Wednesday, a leading health official in Tulsa said that Mr. Trumps rally probably contributed to a drastic increase in coronavirus cases there.

Also on Wednesday, Max Miller, the head of the advance team at the White House, was announced as the deputy campaign manager for presidential operations. Mr. Trump asked Mr. Miller to assume the role after Brad Parscale, the campaign manager, suggested that Mr. Trump choose a person with whom he has a personal relationship to help oversee the rallies.

For now, the campaign is treating the Saturday evening rally as a potential prototype for future events. Some requests from the president have not yet come to pass, according to a person familiar with the planning, such as his interest in adorning his rally with statues of founding fathers. Preserving statues of historical figures, including from the Confederacy, has become a cause for the president in recent weeks.

And Trump campaign officials dismissed the impact of the teenage TikTok users who claimed responsibility for sabotaging the presidents rally in Tulsa last month. Those ticket requests were counted when Mr. Parscale hyped the rally online, officials said. But they weeded out those requests and still thought that they could fill an arena as well as a space reserved for an overflow crowd with the presidents supporters in a red state that he won by more than 36 points four years ago.

Still, contact information from ticket registration for the New Hampshire rally was being cross-referenced with data in previous lists of supporters, in an effort to better protect themselves from online tricksters.

The more visible problem with the Tulsa event, officials conceded, was that they grossly underestimated how frightened their own supporters would be to attend an indoor rally at all. It was not clear whether they would face the same problem for the event at an airfield in New Hampshire.

The campaign this time selected a mostly outdoor venue, and has been strongly encouraging attendees to wear face masks, all in the hopes of easing health concerns as officials try to stage large social gatherings amid the coronavirus pandemic. But officials say they are aware that they cannot force people out of their homes and into the venue and there was a chance that the rally crowd would be thinner than expected, again.

Mr. Parscale, chastened by last months experience, was not hyping any crowd numbers ahead of the weekend rally.

The difficulty in giving Mr. Trump the kind of adoring rallies that he seeks has been growing more and more apparent to White House officials and campaign advisers. The campaign last month canceled a planned rally in Mobile, Ala., where the president was expected to campaign for Tommy Tuberville in his Senate runoff on Tuesday against Jeff Sessions.

In the past, when Mr. Trump has held rallies in Mobile, he has had to move his event to the Ladd-Peebles Stadium, which seats 43,000 people, because of high demand. But officials say the days of filling stadiums with that kind of capacity were behind them, for now.

Tulsa was not the first time the Trump campaign had been flooded with bogus ticket sign-ups online. Officials say they comb through all of the sign-ups and look to see whether the person requesting a ticket is a registered Republican, or has any history of voting for a Republican candidate at all. If they dont, those requests are often discarded.

Registering for a rally means youve RSVPd with a cellphone number and we constantly weed out bogus numbers, Tim Murtaugh, a campaign spokesman, said in a statement. These phony ticket requests never factor into our thinking. What makes this lame attempt at hacking our events even more foolish is the fact that every rally is general admission entry is on a first-come-first-served basis and prior registration is not required.

View original post here:
What Will Trumps Rally in New Hampshire Be Like? Its Anyones Guess - The New York Times

From Weird Al’s polka to the mask-up medley, these ‘Hamilton’ parodies are keeping us satisfied – USA TODAY

Lin-Manuel Miranda tells USA TODAY's Brian Truitt what resonates with him now about "Hamilton," ahead of the musical's release to Disney+. USA TODAY

If you're like us and have had the "Hamilton" movie playing on repeat since it arrived on streaming July 3, you're probably wondering what comes next? What can I watch that will keep me satisfied?

The parodies of course.

The Broadway smash hit has spawned a variety of parodies that re-imagine the music, message or both. Here are some of our favorites:

Weird Al Yankovic's"The Hamilton Polka"

By July 4, comic singer Weird Al Yankovic was out with a new video for "The Hamilton Polka." The track was initially released in 2018 as part of Lin-Manuel Miranda's "Hamildrops" series.

Thehilarious video features actual scenes from the musical set to a polka medley, so it appears as if actors from the original cast, such as Daveed Diggs (Marquis de Lafayette and Thomas Jefferson) and Leslie Odom Jr. (Aaron Burr) are doing the singing.

"Huge thanks to Lin-Manuel, (director) Tommy Kail, and the rest of my Ham pals for creating the best thing ever," Yankovic wrote on YouTube. The clip had been watched almost 1 million times as of midday Friday and had more than 2,000 comments.

'Hamilton' for newbies: Does Lin-Manuel Miranda's Disney+ movie live up to the Broadway hype?

Miranda responded to Yankovic's video on Twitter, tweeting a GIF from "Lord of the Rings."

'Hamilton Act 1 but it's Muppets'

Even the Muppets are getting in on the action, with a clip of them performing the entire first act floating around on YouTube. Well, sort of.

It's actually the work of voice actor Ricky Downes III.

Kermit the Frog is Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr is Gonzo, Miss Piggy is Eliza Schuyler ... and, well, you get the idea.

'Hamilton Mask-up Parody Medley'

Another popular parody reworks lyrics from the show, turning it into a commentary on the current coronavirus pandemic. The video comes from the Holderness family of Raleigh, North Carolina, which regularly produces comedy videos for social media.

Father Penn Holderness, a former TV news anchor, stars in the clip, arguing with himself over whether COVID-19 is real.

"2020. Any city," he says. "Pardon me, do you have germs, sir? No, I don't. And that's my business, not yours, sir. I have my rights and have my freedom. To be sure, sir. But this corona is a sham. I'm getting nervous, sir."

The Hillary Rodham Clinton version

A classic clip originally from just before the 2016 presidential election features actors portraying Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. It resurfaced recently.

In addition to Trump and Clinton, actors also portray a number of other politicians, including Bernie Sanders and Tim Kaine.

"Hillary ... Rodham ... Clinton," the actress says. "I'm here to save us from armageddon. I just have to get past this piece of dung. Waste of space. Orange disgrace."

"Trump" gets in plenty of digs of his own, such as this one: "How does a moon-faced schemer ... wife of a cheater ... elected to the New York Senate ... then end up in the cabinet of her former nemesis ... the president she ran against? I like to speak in yuge run-on sentences."

Contributing: Brian Truitt, USA TODAY

Follow Gary Dinges on Twitter @gdinges

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/music/2020/07/10/hamilton-parodies-keep-us-satisfied-weird-al-mask-up-medley-muppets/5412904002/

Original post:
From Weird Al's polka to the mask-up medley, these 'Hamilton' parodies are keeping us satisfied - USA TODAY