Mediaboss Marketing

WACO, TX - FEBRUARY 29: Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) speaks during a rally at the Waco Convention Center February 29, 2008 in Waco, Texas. With less than a week before the Texas and Ohio primaries, Clinton is campaigning throughout Texas. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Regarding the letter, Bidens, Hillary Clinton really need to be investigated (Feb. 11): The Republicans pathological need to investigate Hillary Clinton will go on ad infinitum.

The letter writer may recall that Republicans started to investigate Clinton in 1992 in connection with the Whitewater investigation, which found her innocent of any criminal wrongdoing. Then came 1993 and Travelgate, in which no criminal charges were filed. That year also found her embroiled in the Vince Foster investigation, in which Fosters death was ruled a suicide, but true Republicans still arent buying it.

The year 1996 also gave us Travelgate, in which Clinton was again exonerated. Some Republicans probably believe she had her fingerprints removed with acid so they couldnt be detected on the files. In 2012, the Benghazi investigations started and came to the conclusion that there was no intentional misconduct on her part. In 2015, the Republicans wanted the Clinton Foundation investigated, but nothing illegal was found. And from 2015 to 2019, the Clinton email investigation concluded there was no intentional mishandling of classified information.

The Republicans have wasted precious time and untold millions of dollars with their quixotic and twisted anti-Hillary crusades, but I fear its not over yet. President Donald Trump has probably convinced himself that "Evil Hillary" should be prosecuted for removing the do not remove labels from her bed pillows, followed by Fox News demanding that the Senate investigate her heinous and wanton disregard of the pillow laws. Pillowgate is sure to follow. She cannot go unpunished.

Read the original post:
Letter: GOP obsessed with investigating Hillary Clinton - STLtoday.com

Say so long to the West and live out your days in tropical splendour.

You got a retirement plan?

You ever worked out how the harvest years are going to play out?

You going to be the old man who sits in the front room of his rendered brick townhouse in the heart of suburbia, an unresponsive wife ignoring your pawing at night, every dream you ever had so crushed you pray for the local teen hoodlums to break in and end your suffering with an iron bar?

A common retirement among the gung-ho, of course, is to take your First World money into the tropics, where your dollars buys palaces and endless indulgence.

It aint such a bad idea if you can take the suffocating heat and the feeling youre just another in a long line of damn colonialists, spraying your cash, stomping over local culture, buggering the coolies etc.

Earlier today, I saw, and was rather taken by a beachfront site, with a development plan, onSimeulue Island, the next island up from Nias in North Sumatra.

The joint, which still has to be built, costs $US295,000, a number youll negotiate down by at least ten per cent, so lets call it $US270,000.

It comes with five bungalows, an open air restaurant, a couple of beachfront gazebos, a boat, a van, a couple of scooters and enough land, or so they say, to build four or five more bungalows.

The only downside is itll only be sold as a land-and-building contract only, and must be sold toa private owner or syndicate.

Which means, you cant run it as a commercial surf resort.

But who needs kooks and guests weeping about sunburn and the wind direction and too much and not enough swell when youre the master of your little piece of surf heaven, anyway?

Important a few lovers of various stripes from Medan, bring your friends from the west and away you go,

Buy here.

Read the original post:
Thumb your nose at Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Hillary Clinton and all other "surf hating" Presidential hopefuls! - BeachGrit

Democratic presidential candidate Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, discusses government spending, former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and says she plans to stay in the 2020 race.

Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard defended her decision to file a lawsuit against Hillary Clinton in January, insisting that it was not a political maneuver.

"It's important to understand that this is not just another political thing where one person said this, another person said that," Gabbard told FOX Business' Maria Bartiromo on Wednesday. "The accusation that Hillary Clinton made really devalues the essence of who I am."

In the lawsuit, Gabbard claimed the2016 Democratic nominee defamed her when she called her a "Russian asset" during an October podcast interview.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

"Clinton lied about her perceived rival Tulsi Gabbard," the lawsuit, filed in U.S. district court in New York, read. "She did so publicly, unambiguously, and with obvious malicious intent. Tulsi has been harmed by Clintons lies and American democracy has suffered as well."

During an October interview, Clinton suggestedthat an unnamed Democratic presidential candidate was "the favorite of the Russians."

"I'm not making any predictions, but I think they've got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate," Clinton said, speaking on a podcast withDavid Plouffe, a former adviser to President Obama.

TRUMP WEIGHS IN ON CLINTON-SANDERS FEUD: 'NOBODY LIKES HER. THAT'S WHY SHE LOST'

Although she never named Gabbard, a four-term congresswoman from Hawaii,there were just five women running for president at the time: Gabbard, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar and MarianneWilliamson.

"This is about my life, and the oath of loyalty and service, willingness to lay down one's life for this country," Gabbard said on Wednesday.

"I am not willing to standby to allow her or any of her powerful allies or partners to take such an action, which is why I filed this lawsuit," she added.

The Hawaii representative is the first female combat veteran to run for president. She served in the Army National Guard for 16 years and has made that service an integral part of her bid for president.

Gabbard's suit suggests that Clinton targeted her with a false accusation for "retribution" over her endorsement of Vermont Sen. BernieSanders, Clinton's rival in the Democratic primary, in 2016. (Sanderseventually endorsed Clinton for president in July 2016).

According to an aggregate of polls, Gabbard is currently in ninth nationally. She has not qualified for the Democratic debate in Las Vegas next week.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

See the article here:
Tulsi Gabbard defends decision to sue Hillary Clinton: 'This is not just another political thing' - Fox Business

Jane O'Meara Sanders said elite establishment figures from both political parties are afraid of her husband's policies promoting affordable health care and education, noting that the U.S. "already has socialism" -- but only for corporations.

Sanders, the wife of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, told Fox News Saturday the "powers-that-be" in America are placing a shallow focus on her husband's "Democratic socialist" label instead of what they're really attacking -- his campaign policies. Jane Sanders said "corporate socialism" has benefited billionaires like President Donald Trump and Michael Bloomberg, while hard-working U.S. taxpayers end up paying for their business subsidies and bailouts. She rejected Joe Biden's claims that Bernie Sanders can't win by citing her husband's back-to-back popular vote victories in Iowa and New Hampshire.

She called on the news media and the Democratic National Committee to talk honestly about the senator's campaign policies, and not focus on labels and Hillary Clinton "hypothetical" scenarios.

"There's clearly a pushed effort to find an alternative to your husband. What do you make of that?" asked Fox News anchor Neil Cavuto.

"I think it's pretty obvious, [Bernie Sanders is] running a campaign that is 'not me, us' that's about getting the working class a fair shake and being able to provide Medicare-for-all, affordable health care, affordable education and a Green New Deal. There are the powers-that-be and the status quo that don't want him to do those things," she said.

"They're using lots of other reasons why they don't support him, but the fact is it's the issues. And we are talking about transforming this country and not having the powers-that-be continue to be the-powers-that-be," Sanders told Cavuto. "Make it more government of the people and by the people."

Cavuto pressed the question and said a lot of DNC and media figures "respect your husband's consistency a great deal, but they think he's a sure loser" solely because of the "Democratic socialist" tag.

"Everyone is talking about the label - we have 'socialism' right now but it's not 'Democratic socialism,' it's called 'corporate socialism,'" Sanders replied.

Her husband has consistently accused the country's wealthiest individuals of running a rich-only form of socialism such as the 2008 taxpayer bailouts of Wall Street. New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, another self-described "Democratic socialist," had previously echoed similar sentiments to that of Jane Sanders' in asking "hypocritical" Republicans why they don't criticize Trump's massive farm bailout as "socialism."

"President Trump got $800 million for his real estate development company. That's corporate socialism paid for from the working class to the rich," said Sanders. "We see that all the time, subsidies to the fossil fuel industries. We think the priorities need to be shifted so that people get those subsidies and we have the ability to access higher education if you have the willingness and the ability to do so.

"We want people to be less stressed about having health care and being able to afford health care or at-home care for their elderly parents," she continued. "It's which side are you on and I think that's clear to everyone who knows him is that Bernie is honestly and consistently on the side of the working class."

She urged U.S. news media and DNC figures to help "get beyond the top-level 'Democratic socialism' fearmongering and instead focus on improving health care for average Americans.

Sanders brushed off an unsubstantiated Drudge Report claim Saturday that Bloomberg and Hillary Clinton may pair up as running mates, saying: "Mayor Bloomberg can choose whoever he wants for a running mate. But he's not going to get there." She similarly addressed Cavuto's question about Clinton's interview last month in which she claimed "nobody likes" Senator Sanders.

"I like him. And I think a lot of people like him. I'm not here to talk about Hillary Clinton," she replied succinctly.

"I tend to not worry and waste time on hypotheticals. I think what we need to do is win and win well in all the races. The problem is by starting with 25 people, and eleven in Iowa and New Hampshire, the problem with having so many people ... but the field is winnowing."

Sanders acknowledged it is a "concern" the DNC might try to give the nomination to an establishment figure. But she hopes the party will "give the nomination to the person who has the plurality and that it will be fair."

Read more from the original source:
Jane Sanders: Bernie Campaign Will Remove 'Powers-That-Be' From Government - Newsweek

One of the most surprising things about Bill and Hillary Clinton is that they were broke and in debt when they left the White House in 2001. But whats even more interesting is that the former First Couple managed to turn the financial situation around and became multimillionaires in just a decade.

The Monica Lewinsky scandal left them broke

I left the White House $16 million in debt, former president Bill Clinton told NBCs Craig Melvin during an interview which tackled the Monica Lewinsky scandal, CNBC reported. Clinton was millions of dollars in the red due to the legal fees.

Apparently, Bill Clintons salary cant keep up with his mounting legal fees. The presidential salary of $200,000 had been overwhelmed by defense attorneys fees for scandal investigations, the impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton and action to suspend his Arkansas law license, NPR reported.

Clintons quick financial rise

But Bill and Hillary Clinton quickly bounced back financially. Three years after they became dead broke, they were able to pay off all of their debts by 2004. When Hillary ran for the presidency against Trump, Forbes estimated her net worth at that time to be $45 million.

The Clintons were able to quickly reverse their financial situation via multimillion-dollar book deals and paid speeches. The couple reportedly earned more than $153.7 million in paid speeches from 2001 to 2015.

Book deals were also a major source of earnings for the Clintons. For her book Living History, Hillary Clinton reportedly got an $8 million advance while Bill Clinton got a $10 million advance for his book My Life.

The Clintons net worth

Hillary Clintons net worth is estimated to be over $45 million, according to Express. Meanwhile, Bill Clintons estimated net worth is almost twice that of his spouse at $80 million. Combined, that means that the couple has around $125 million.

Their daughter, Chelsea Clinton, is likewise a millionaire with a net worth of about $15 million. Fresh out of graduate school at Oxford University, she is now employed with McKinsey & Co earning $120,000.

Visit link:
Bill and Hillary Clinton net worth: How the former First Couple got out of debt and became multimillionaires - EconoTimes