Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Hillary Clinton: Kavanaugh shows time for civility with GOP …

Hillary Clinton warns Americans to fend off the Trump Administrations assault on our democracy in a scathing essay published by The Atlantic. Veuer's Chandra Lanier has the story. Buzz60

WASHINGTON Hillary Clinton says the time for civility is over.

After the bitter and partisan fight over the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the former secretary of State and 2016 Democratic presidential candidate declared that President Donald Trump has undermined the integrity of the nation's highest court and that it's time for Democrats to be "tougher" with their opponents, in an interview with CNN published Tuesday

"You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about," Clinton told CNN's Christiane Amanpour. "That's why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that's when civility can start again."

Clinton said that Senate Republicans under Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., "demeaned the confirmation process" and "insulted and attacked" Christine Blasey Ford who testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about a sexual assault she alleges Kavanaugh committed in1982 along with other "women who were speaking out."

Clinton compared the handling of Kavanaugh's confirmation to "Republican operatives shutting down the voting in 2000," the "swift-boating of John Kerry," attacks on former Arizona Sen. John McCain in the 2000Republican primary and "what they did to me for 25 years."

"When you're dealing with an ideological party that is driven by the lust for power, that is funded by corporate interests who want a governmentthat does its bidding, you can be civil but you can't overcome what they intend to do unless you win elections," she told Amanpour.

Clinton compared Kavanaugh's swearing-in ceremony at the White House on Monday to a "political rally" that "further undermined the image and integrity of the court."

She told Amanpour the effect on the court "troubles" and "saddens" her "because our judicial system has been viewed as one of the main pillars of our constitutional government."

"But the President's been true to form," Clinton added. "He has insulted, attacked, demeaned women throughout the campaign really for many years leading up to the campaign. And he's continued to do that inside the White House."

After the Kavanaugh confirmation, Clinton said her husband, former President Bill Clinton, told her that "Democrats have to be tougher."

"Bill had to be incredibly strong first to get elected, then to get re-elected and to survive," she said. "And it was not easy by any means, obviously."

More: Bill and Hillary Clinton set to begin 6-month speaking tour

More: Hillary Clinton laughs at Kavanaugh's claim of 'political hit' to get 'revenge' for her

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/10/09/hillary-clinton-cnn-interview/1578636002/

Read this article:
Hillary Clinton: Kavanaugh shows time for civility with GOP ...

Hillary Clinton’s security clearance revoked by her own …

The Senate Judiciary Committee confirmed Friday that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's security clearance has been revoked by her own request. The move comes more than a year after Judiciary Committee chairmanChuck Grassley requested the department to investigate if Clinton still had security clearance.

According to the letter released by Grassley, the State Department said that Clinton's clearance was revoked on Aug. 30. Five of Clinton's aides, who she had asked be designated as researchers, had their security clearances revoked on Sept. 20.

During Clinton's run for president, lawmakers and investigators looked into her andher staff's security clearance as part of the investigation into her use of a private email server.

Retiring senior officials usually retain a basic level of security clearance, but the Trump administration has been "exploring" the possibility of revoking security clearances of several intelligence officials who have criticized the president.

Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in July that the White House is evaluating on a "case by case basis" the clearances of several of President Obama's intelligence officials, including former FBI director James Comey and former National Security Adviser Susan Rice.

In August, President Trump ordered former CIA Director John Brennan, one of those officials, bestripped of his security clearance.

The CIA "holds" former directors' security clearance and renews it every five years for the rest of their lives. But that requires former CIA directors to behave like current CIA employees if they want to keep their clearance, which means avoiding travel to certain countries and generally living in a manner above reproach.

Other former government employees can keep their security clearances if they move to a private sector job where they work with classified information, such as at a defense contractor. The company would then apply to the government for someone to keep or receive a security clearance. The security officers at the different agencies then grant or rule if someone can keep their clearances.

Hundreds if not thousands of private companies apply for their employees to receive security clearances. In an interview with Bloomberg earlier this year, the CEO of Lockheed Martinsaid that 60,000 of her employeeshave a security clearance of some kind.

2018 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Visit link:
Hillary Clinton's security clearance revoked by her own ...

Hillary Clinton | New York Post

Hillary Clinton had her security clearance revoked at her own request, it was revealed on Friday. Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released a letter that said the former secretary...

The sentiment came from the President of the United States, but reflects a common feeling among conservatives and Republicans. He and they are ever more certain that one of the...

With much of the Democratic Party going nuts, former first lady Michelle Obama is sticking by her when they go low, we go high advice. Thank you, maam. Her husbands...

From the right: Eric Holder Immolates His Morals He was once the nations highest law-enforcement official, but former Attorney General (and likely presidential candidate) Eric Holder now is proposing that...

Sen. Heidi Heitkamp perfectly summed up Hillary Clintons insistence that Democrats cant be civil to Republicans until they regain control of Congress. Quoth the North Dakota Democrat: Thats ridiculous. Actually,...

Two events from the last two days stand out. The first came Monday night with President Trumps forceful yet compassionate speech at the swearing in of Brett Kavanaugh to the...

President Trumps MAGA fans still want to lock her up! but Hillary Clinton with Bubba in tow has other plans: a speaking tour that debuts in Vegas weeks after...

And so our fiery national nightmare is over. For now. But only a Pollyanna would think peace is about to break out across the bloody political and cultural battlefields. We...

"Roseanne" star Laurie Metcalf and John Lithgow of "The Crown" are poised to star as Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton in a new Broadway play.

Aguilera has performed at various Clinton events and even hosted a campaign fundraiser at her Beverly Hills home in 2015.

Link:
Hillary Clinton | New York Post

Hillary Clinton: Throw Civility Out The Window Until …

Twice-failed presidential candidate and former first lady Hillary Clinton told CNNs Christine Amanpour Tuesday that civility can start again when Democrats take back control of the House and Senate. Until then, she argued, all bets are off when dealing with Republicans.

"You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about," she claimed. "That's why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that's when civility can start again. But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength."

Clinton cited her own treatment at the hands of Republicans, claiming she was targeted by lies and they were driven by a lust for power.

"I remember what they did to me for 25 years -- the falsehoods, the lies, which unfortunately people believe because the Republicans have put a lot of time, money, and effort in promoting them," she said. "So when you're dealing with an ideological party that is driven by the lust for power, that is funded by corporate interests who want a government that does its bidding, it's -- you can be civil, but you can't overcome what they intend to do unless you win elections."

Clinton made similar comments about civility in an interview with The Guardianin June when she was asked about the Trump administrations policy of separating immigrant children from their parents at the border. President Trump later ended the policy in an executive order.

Oh, give me abreak, she responded regarding a question about if the left was becoming uncivil in their rebukes of the policy.

What is more uncivil and cruel than taking children away? She asked. It should be met with resolve and strength.

And if some of that comes across as a little uncivil, well, childrens lives are at stake; their futures are at stake, she concluded.

During the controversy over the child separation policy, leftist protestors disrupted Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsens dinner over the policy at the time and White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked to leave a restaurant in Lexington, Virginia because she worked for Trump.

Clintons remarks may add fuel to the increasingly extreme tactics being adopted by leftist protesters, most recently in the confirmation battle over Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) was recently chased out of a restaurant by protestors over his support of Kavanaugh.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), a key vote who went to great lengths to explain the rationale behind her support of Kavanaugh, faced ugly threats over her decision, including some who are calling for her to be publicly harassed for the rest of her life over her vote.

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) defended leftist tactics of harassment and intimidation in regards to the Kavanaugh fight on CNN Sunday.

She blamed white supremacists,sayingthat "this is what happens."

Continued here:
Hillary Clinton: Throw Civility Out The Window Until ...

Memo to President Trump: Prosecute Hillary Clinton or Perish

Years ago, I agreed to represent a client who wanted to bring a lawsuit against a particular department of the federal government.

Since the opposing counsel would be the U.S. Department of Justice, and with my being new to that game, I enlisted as co-counsel an accomplished federal litigator with extensive experience in dealing with the DOJ.

At one of our first meetings, I asked him, What do you think are our odds of beating the DOJ? I will never forget his response.

With a silent smile, he slowly nodded, looked down and scribbled something on a sheet of paper before handing it to me.

The text of his properly signed and dated memorandum to me contained only two words:

Youre f--ked.

Now, nearly 20 years later, that is the exact memo or warning I want to send to President Trump.

That is unless he demonstrates soon a willingness to exercise his constitutionally delegated powers to terminate and remove the partisan factions within his Department of Justice that are either failing to use, or are intentionally misusing, their authority to unlawfully destroy his Presidency.

If he does not, I believe the abbreviated ineloquence of my former colleagues memo could likely convey an accurate forecast of his fate.

The DOJ is an institution vested with formidable resources, including its authority over the FBI.

It is also often the beneficiary of a thinly veiled, yet presumed, allegiance with most of the federal courts in which its attorneys operate.

As a result, and given enough time, in most cases, the DOJ is empowered via favorable rulings and otherwise to access, manipulate and maneuver the federal laws, rules, regulations and procedures not to mention witness testimony in whatever ways it may deem necessary to ultimately bring most of those it targets to heel perhaps, even including a President.

Unconstrained, those with such potentially unlimited power could easily go rogue and morph into a government unto to themselves.

Theoretically, however, that should not be possible. The Constitution empowers the people to elect a President to whom they give their proxy to keep it in check.

Yet, today we are witnessing this chain of authority being turned on its head and a President who seems on the surface, anyway to be doing little with the powers of his office to put it right.

In the course of Sessions apparent hibernation subsequent to his recusal, a good portion of his responsibility as a member of the Presidents Cabinet to run the DOJ appears to have been handed off to his unlawfully conflicted Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, who, in turn, has unlawfully delegated unfettered authority to an unlawfully conflicted Special Counsel, Robert Mueller, to prosecute any crime he sees fit and who, in turn, has unlawfully abused that unfettered authority to unlawfully establish what is an unlawfully conflicted not to mention unconstitutional shadow Department of Justice.

Distilled to its essence it is a creation of the corruptcontrolled by the corrupt to protect the corrupt by empowering the corrupt to achieve but one corrupt purpose:

To stalk all allies, friends, relatives and associates of this nations duly elected President in the hope of removing that President from office before his Administration is able to fully discover, expose and prosecute the many felonies the corrupt have committed.

Moreover, this criminal cartel has apparently blessed its members with an impenetrable umbrella of immunity. Notwithstanding the alleged crimes many are known to have committed, think: Brennan, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, etc. not one of them has yet even been indicted, much less prosecuted, for any of them even for those crimes having nothing to do with any supposed collusion think: Hillary, Huma, Rice, Power, etc.

Alarmingly, in the course of the last two years, only a few have lost their jobs, while the rest remain completely untouched.

By contrast, however, among the Presidents allies and supporters who have been investigated, subpoenaed, deposed and otherwise harassed by this shadow DOJ in the course of that same time period, Flynn, Manafort and Cohen have already been indicted, prosecuted and either tried and convicted or coerced to enter guilty pleas.

At first blush, this lop-sided enforcement of our nations laws obviously suggests we are living with a government that has replaced the rule of law with a two-tiered justice system. But beyond that, it begs an alarmingly important question:

Exactly whose government has done this?

And to answer that question begs yet another:

Is it possible that the criminal cartel directing this skewed operation has been allowed to wrongfully assume greater control over the DOJ than the President?

In the beginning, the President was understandably lets say, disoriented, as were many of us by the national fog created by the medias unending advancement of what may now be thought of kindly as the delusion of collusion.

Since then, however, we have all been informed of facts that tell us that this false narrative was a production staged by none other than corrupt officials within the DOJ and FBI working with other corrupt operatives elsewhere, and all under the brilliant direction of none other than the very candidate who the President defeated at the polls Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And yet, still, nothing changes.

Perhaps it is this fact that most reveals the possible criminal genius of her cartels strategy. By all appearances, she and her enlisted allies have placed the President in the grips of a seemingly paralyzing catch-22:

To avoid being impeached for obstruction of justice, the President must not use his authority to stop a rogue DOJ from continuing an unending, hostile and unlawful search, prior to its discovery of some presently unknown offense for which the President can be impeached.

The irony of this catch-22 is only exceeded by its absolute absurdity and must not be allowed by the President to continue to stand in defiance of reason if we hope to preserve our democracy.

Perhaps his unraveling of this Gordian Knot of corruption need not be as difficult as it might first appear, however.

More than two years ago, I first reported speaking with an FBI attorney who, when I asked about Hillary Clintons then emerging email debacle, told me the following:

I cant discuss an ongoing investigation But I can tell you this. We both know that, if you or I had ever been caught doing even a fraction of what we all already know that she did in mishandling state secrets, you or I would most certain be in federal custody by now.

Even back then, for me this only confirmed the obvious. Thus, now over two years later, perhaps the President would be well advised to regain control of his DOJ by doing the obvious remove the head of the snake that is attacking him:

Order his DOJ to indict, prosecute and, if appropriate, convict Hillary Rodham Clinton forthwith albeit belatedly for her violations of the Espionage Act, together with any other felonies she may have committed in the course of the cover-up that ensued.

Simultaneously, also give notice that any employees of the DOJ and FBI who refuse to comply with this order shall be immediately dismissed and replaced; particularly including, if necessary, Jeff Sessions and Rod Rosenstein.

These two orders alone will concurrently reaffirm the rule of law, restore the publics confidence in federal law enforcement, safeguard the legitimacy of our electoral process and put all the other corrupt below her on notice that their felonious behavior will no longer be either tolerated or ignored under this Presidents Administration not to mention its fulfillment of a campaign promise he made that, in the minds of many voters, is on par with his building of a wall.

Whether he does it now or after the midterms is a political decision only he can make. The important thing for him to come to grips with now is that a decision delayed can often end up being a decision to do nothing until its too late.

And that, of course, would sadly refer the President back to the dire forecast contained in my colleagues two-word memo.

Excerpt from:
Memo to President Trump: Prosecute Hillary Clinton or Perish