Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Hillary Clinton Was Right to Warn Us – The New York Times

This is the thing, if you go back and review Hillarys speeches and tweets and debate performances from 2016: She was right about an awful lot. Not about everything. She had her share of lulus, like predicting that the election of Trump would set off a global financial panic and plunge the economy into a recession. (Oops. Took a pandemic to do that.)

But she did have some strikingly good insights. You see it in the she warned us memes on Twitter: Heres the snippet of her listing possible reasons Trump hadnt released his tax returns (hes a tax evader, hes in hock to mysterious creditors, hes not the bazilionaire we think), all of which turned out to be true; theres the snippet of Hillary telling Trump that he was a puppet, which is worth reading in fuller context:

TRUMP: from everything I see, [Putin] has no respect for this person.

CLINTON: Well, thats because hed rather have a puppet as president of the United States.

TRUMP: No puppet. No puppet.

CLINTON: And its pretty clear

TRUMP: Youre the puppet!

CLINTON: Its pretty clear you wont admit

TRUMP: No, youre the puppet.

CLINTON: that the Russians have engaged in cyberattacks against the United States of America, that you encouraged espionage against our people, that you are willing to spout the Putin line, sign up for his wish list, break up NATO, do whatever he wants to do, and that you continue to get help from him, because he has a very clear favorite in this race.

So I think that this is such an unprecedented situation. Weve never had a foreign government trying to interfere in our election. We have 17 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military, who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyberattacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin and they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing.

Two weeks ago, Hillary slyly said her own polite version of I-told-you-so. In my case, theres a whole speech for everything, she tweeted above a screenshot of this especially pungent quote from 2016:

Now, just imagine if you can. Donald Trump sitting in the Oval Office, the next time America faces a crisis. Imagine him being in charge when your jobs and savings are at stake. Is this who you want to lead us in an emergency? Someone thin skinned and quick to anger whod likely be on Twitter attacking reporters or bringing the whole regulatory system down on his critics when he should be focused on fixing whats wrong? Would he even know what to do?

Yet it never mattered. She couldnt get enough voters to listen.

Why was this?

Tiresome to say, but part of it can be chalked up to gender. Novelists and Hollywood writers may create delightful female know-it-alls, from Elizabeth Bennet to Hermione Granger to Olivia Pope. But they seldom get happy endings in real life. In real life, such women are often despised precisely because they are right.

And if you reread Hillarys speeches, you can see that her words were really unsparing and precise. She wasnt shyly hiding her erudition. To wit: Donald Trump doesnt know the first thing about Iran or its nuclear program. Ask him. Itll become very clear, very quickly. Or: There is a difference between getting tough on trade and recklessly starting trade wars. In What Happened, she compares Putin to a subway manspreader.

Talk about a guy who had a problem with powerful ladies. After Hillary criticized one his policies, Putin told the press, Its better not to argue with women.

But some of the reasons Hillarys warnings may have gone unheeded were more idiosyncratic. Early in her career, she tested good peoples patience not with her rightness, but with her self-righteousness. The former Senator Bill Bradley comes to mind: Decades ago, she batted away his request for a more realistic health care reform bill, adding that the Clinton administration would demonize anyone who stood in its way. That was it for me, Bradley told Carl Bernstein, in terms of Hillary Clinton.

Read more:
Hillary Clinton Was Right to Warn Us - The New York Times

Remember When Hillary Joked About Pokmon Go to the Polls? – The Cut

I Think About This a Lotis a series dedicated to private memes: images, videos, and other random trivia we are doomed to play forever on loop in our minds.

In a discussion about job creation spanning infrastructure to coding at a July 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign rally, the then-candidate introduced an idea for an app-based video game. I dont know who created Pokmon Go, she said. Oh no. But Im trying to figure out, dont do it, how we get them to have, oh God Pokmon Go to the polls.

Hearts stopped. The ground shook. Birds fell from the sky and began commuting by foot; aquatic life emerged from the sea with only one question on their fish lips: Why? The final words were delivered in the stilted speech pattern politicians generally use to implore crowds to take action like Go to the polls but with a palpable hesitation. If there was someone out there who knew why Hillary Clinton was saying the words Pokmon Go to the polls, it did not seem to be Hillary Clinton and it certainly wasnt the fish.

Pokmon Go to the polls has lived with me ever since. Of course, the horrifying goings-on of national politics give a person ample opportunity to think about going to the polls and then, naturally, Pokmon Go-ing to them. But my mindworm unfortunately does not stop there. I should Pokmon Go to the store, Ill think to myself. Do you need to Pokmon Go for a walk? Ill ask my dog. Ill text a friend, Pokmon Go to the polls. Hell text back, Pokmon Go to the polls.

The phrase was upsetting at first. Donald Trump was running for president president! and our best defense against him was standing onstage imploring us to Pokmon Go to the polls. A non-ideal situation. And let me be clear: I wanted Hillary to win. Not begrudgingly, not holding my nose. I was excited to vote for her, and I wanted her to win. I couldnt wait to Pokmon Go to the polls. But I suppose, at that moment, we should have seen what was coming. We should have seen that we were Pokmon Go-ing to hell.

Trump soon shared a video on Facebook of a game called Crookd Hillary NO, wherein an unseen player pitched a Pok Ball at, and subsequently caught, a Hillary Pokmon, bringing up a view of her Pokdex page. (The Pokdex is sort of like an in-game Pokmon encyclopedia, not to insult you with the clarification.) Career Politician, it said. 30,000 emails deleted. Often found lying to the American people, rigging the system, and sharing TOP SECRET emails. The video has over 13 million views. Produced and circulated during his campaign, its of an oddly higher quality than the hasty, pixilated, rarely coherent memes that have come out of his administration. It is clear his team has Pokmon Go-tten a little too comfortable.

Clinton was Pok-mocked and memed by non-supporters and supporters alike. Still, a pro-Hillary defense arose: The idea that if Bernie Sanders had said something like Pokmon Go to the polls, people would have cut him slack. They would have thought it was charming, maybe they would have even thought it was funny. And while its hard enough to imagine we live in a world where one presidential candidate said Pokmon Go to the polls, let alone two, I think theres a bit of truth to this. If a man says something funny, people tend to assume the humor was intentional; women arent always afforded this assumption. Do I think Hillary Clinton understood the potential humor to be found in Hillary Clinton saying something like Pokmon Go to the polls? Well. Lets just say that whether she did or she didnt doesnt make my point any less valid.

Regardless, it was indeed Hillary who said Pokmon Go to the polls, and it was, in fact, the American public who did not heed what was implicit in her command: that we Pokmon Go to the polls and vote for her, specifically in a way that would allow her to win the Electoral College.

Donald Trump was instead elected president. Our evolution as a nation ground to a halt, Pokmonically speaking. The phrase has morphed in my life from an unpleasant memory to a prescient warning. I beg you, listen to the dreaded whisper of the past. Take heart. On Tuesday, if you haventvoted early or by mail, please Pokmon Go to the polls.

Get the Cut newsletter delivered daily

Follow this link:
Remember When Hillary Joked About Pokmon Go to the Polls? - The Cut

Fact check: A birthday tweet from Hillary Clinton was edited to be about Amy Coney Barrett – USA TODAY

Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed to the Supreme Court by a deeply divided Senate, Republicans overpowering Democrats to install President Donald Trumps nominee days before the election and secure a likely conservative court majority for years. (Oct. 26) AP Domestic

A post on Instagram from Not the Bee ahumor-based news, opinionand entertainment site from the creators of The Babylon Bee depictsan edited tweet from Hillary Clinton.

"Happy birthday to this future president," the tweet appears to read, with a black-and-white photo of Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

In the post, the word "birthday" has been crossed out and replaced with the word "confirmation." The word "president" has been crossed out and replaced with the word "justice."

In its new form, it reads, "Happy confirmation to this future justice."

The post went up on Oct. 26, the day the Senate voted 52-48 to confirm Barrett to the high court, per USA TODAY.

Not the Bee has not responded to a request from USA TODAY for comment.

The post is based on a real tweet from Clinton in 2016.

On Oct. 26, 2016, she posted a photo of herself as a child on Twitter along with the caption"Happy birthday to this future president."

Two weeks later, onNov. 8, 2016, she lost the election to President Donald Trump.

In its post, Not the Bee simply subbed out the black-and-white photo of Clinton with a photo of Barrett and added itsstrikethroughs and substitutetext.

The photo is a real portrait Barrett then known as Amy V. Coney that hangs in a student hall of fame display in Southwestern Hall at Rhodes College, per the Commercial Appealin Memphis, Tennessee.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton laughs as she speaks with USA TODAY about the Hulu docuseries "Hillary" directed by Nanette Burstein.(Photo: Jasper Colt, USAT)

Not the Bee is not the first to poke fun at Clinton for her premature tweet.

In 2017, the DailyDot an outlet that reports on internet culture marked the tweet's first anniversary with a compilation of jokes about it.

"It's a tweet that will surely haunt us every year on Oct. 26," the story predicted.

So far, it's been right.

Fox News rounded up over a dozenjokes about the tweet this week.

Others also pointed out that thetweet (and birthday)coincided with the vote that confirmedBarrett to the Supreme Court solidifying a conservative majority on the court.

Even Senate Majority LeaderMitch McConnell gotin on the fun.

"It was a wonderful birthday present for Hillary Clinton to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court Monday night on her birthday," he said, per Newsweek. "I'm sure she was so grateful. So grateful."

Based on our research, the post from Not the Bee is SATIRE. In 2016, Hillary Clinton tweeted a photo of herself as a child on her birthday with the caption,"Happy birthday to this future president." After she lost the election, it became a meme. This year, her birthday coincided with the confirmation vote for Justice Amy Coney Barrett fueling further jokes and parodies, like the one created by Not the Bee.

Thank you for supporting our journalism. You can subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or electronic newspaper replica here.

Our fact check work is supported in part by a grant from Facebook.

This fact check is available at IFCNs 2020 US Elections FactChat #Chatbot on WhatsApp. Click here, for more.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/10/31/fact-check-hillary-clinton-tweet-edited-amy-coney-barrett/6087550002/

Read more here:
Fact check: A birthday tweet from Hillary Clinton was edited to be about Amy Coney Barrett - USA TODAY

What its like to lose a presidential election from Nixon, Carter and Hillary Clinton – ThePrint

Text Size:A- A+

The American public may not find out who wins the presidential election on Nov. 3 or Nov. 4 or even Nov. 5. But, at some point, we will learn whether Republican Donald Trump is elected to a second term or if Democrat Joe Biden will be the next president.

For the winner of the election, the moment of victory brings unbridled joy and acclamation, applause, laughter, hugs and champagne to celebrate the biggest prize in politics.

This isnt so for the loser, who must ultimately accept the responsibility for the defeat.

In my book, The Art of the Political Putdown, I tell the story of Thomas Dewey, the Republican presidential candidate in 1948, who was heavily favored to win the election only to lose to Harry S. Truman, the incumbent.

On election night, according to one story, Dewey, the governor of New York, asked his wife, How will it feel to sleep with the president of the United States?

A high honor, his wife replied, and quite frankly, darling, Im looking forward to it.

But Truman won the election. The next day at breakfast, as the story goes, Deweys wife said, Tell me, Tom, am I going to the White House or is Harry coming here tonight?

Losing the presidency is a crushing defeat. The incalculable hours of giving speeches, campaigning and fundraising came to naught. The candidate feels like they have disappointed the millions of people who believed in them, who contributed to the campaign, who voted for them and who thought they were going to win.

The pain associated with losing the presidential election remains for a long time. A dozen years after George McGovern lost the 1972 presidential election in a landslide to Richard Nixon, he was asked how long it had taken for him to recover. Ill let you know when I get there, McGovern said.

After losing the 2008 presidential election, John McCain said he slept like a baby: Sleep two hours, wake up and cry, he said, adding, sleep two hours, wake up and cry.

In 2016, Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton woke up on Election Day ahead in most of the polls and thought she would become the first woman president. By the time the day was over, those hopes had faded, and by early the next morning, when she called her opponent Donald Trump to concede, those hopes had disappeared entirely.

This is not the outcome we wanted or we worked so hard for, Clinton told her supporters. I know how disappointed you feel because I feel it, too This is painful, and it will be for a long time.

Also read: Three words that haunt Joe Biden Dewey Defeats Truman

When a person has committed so much to running for the president for so long, its not easy to let go. In the early morning hours of election night 2000, then-Vice President Al Gore conceded in a call to his Republican opponent, George W. Bush, then retracted the concession in another call when the results in the decisive state of Florida appeared uncertain. Thirty-six days passed before Bushs victory was confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court.

In her 2017 book, entitled What Happened, the title itself a statement of disbelief, Hillary Clinton remembered calling Donald Trump to concede the election. She said she offered to help him in any way she could. It was all perfectly nice and weirdly ordinary, like calling a neighbor to say you cant make it to his barbecue, she wrote. It was mercifully brief I was numb. It was all so shocking.

The 1960 presidential election between Democrat John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon, the Republican vice president, remains one of the closest in history. Nixon said that he was advised by President Dwight Eisenhower to challenge the results because of cheating by the Democrats but refused, he said, because it would cause a constitutional crisis and tear the country apart. This, he added, would result in him being called a sore loser and jeopardize any chance of him running for president again.

When Nixon ran for the presidency in 1968, he was elected and then reelected in 1972, before resigning in disgrace in 1974. Nixon was the last person who won his partys nomination after previously losing a presidential election.

But if theres little hope of a fresh attempt at the presidency, losing candidates have found second acts in American politics.

President Jimmy Carter, who was defeated by Ronald Reagan when he sought reelection in 1980, became an international human rights activist and won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002. Gore became an environmentalist and shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize and a 2007 Academy Award for best documentary for a pioneering examination of climate change.

John Kerry, who lost to George W. Bush in 2004, became secretary of state in the Barack Obama administration. John McCain, who lost to Obama in 2008, stayed in the U.S. Senate. Mitt Romney, who lost to Obama in 2012, now serves in the U.S. Senate.

Losing is hard, but losing as the incumbent, as Carter and George H.W. Bush did, is probably harder. But Carter and Bush understood the importance of the peaceful transition of power.

President Donald Trump repeatedly has cast doubt on whether he will accept the results of the election and peacefully hand over power if he loses to Biden. This could well result in the constitutional crisis to which Nixon referred.

In early 2020, when the Democratic primaries were still going on, Trump again expressed his unwillingness to vacate the White House which drew a retort from Pete Buttigieg, who ultimately lost the Democratic nomination to Biden. Buttigieg said he had an idea for handling Trump, joking If he wont leave, I guess if hes willing to do chores, we can work something out.

Chris Lamb, Professor of Journalism, IUPUI

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Also read: If Joe Biden wins US presidential election, prepare for an epic policy hangover

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

View original post here:
What its like to lose a presidential election from Nixon, Carter and Hillary Clinton - ThePrint

Hillary Clinton and 15 Other Celebrities Whose Family Members Nearly Cost Them Everything – Yahoo Finance

Hillary-Clinton

Once you?re rich and famous, there?s no guarantee that you?ll stay that way, and your worst enemy could be lurking in your own family tree. Numerous celebrities have been cheated, deceived or downright robbed by the people they might have thought they could trust the most. Not only does such betrayal rip families apart, it can lead to nasty court battles and all but decimate the career ? and finances ? of the star who has been conned.

It?s not always just about money, either; sometimes it?s about something far less replaceable, like image and integrity. Consider the case of Hillary Clinton. The infamous infidelity of her husband, Bill Clinton ? and her decision to stay with him ? dragged her through the mud in the public eye. Bill?s scandal, which led to impeachment, also left the family, in Hillary?s words, ?dead broke,? owing $5 million in legal fees. Hillary Clinton, a powerful name in her own right, is now worth $120 million ? so she?s clearly well out of bankruptcy?s way. But in some ways, she?s still paying for her husband?s womanizing ways. His scandal played a factor in the decision of some voters to not vote for her in the 2016 election. It would perhaps be a gross exaggeration to say that Bill cost Hillary her presidency, but his history of adultery didn?t do her any favors when she was campaigning.

Here?s a look at more celebrities and how their families have affected their lives.

Last updated: Oct. 26, 2020

Gary Coleman was worth $75,000 when he passed away at the age of 42 in 2010.

For four years, starting in 1989, actor Gary Coleman ? best known for his role as Arnold Jackson in ?Diff?rent Strokes? ? was embroiled in a legal battle with his parents and his ex-manager. Coleman filed suit against them for allegedly misappropriating money he made as a child star. In 1993, a judge ruled in Coleman?s favor and the defendants were ordered to pay their son and former client close to $1.3 million. When Coleman passed away in 2010, with a reported net worth of $75,000, his estranged parents dropped their plans to bury him upon seeing the will.

Story continues

Tori Spelling looked to have a future of infinite riches ahead of her, but when her father, TV industry titan Aaron Spelling, died in 2006, the reality star, actress and author was left nearly out of luck. She inherited $800,000 from her father?s fortune, which for most Americans, would be a life-changing windfall, but consider that Aaron was worth $600 million. To get less than 1% of that estate was probably a brutal disappointment. The reason Tori was shafted, according to her mother, Candy Spelling, who received the majority of her husband?s estate, is because Tori had a bit of a shopping problem. ?She would close a store and drop $50,000 to $60,000,? Candy said of her daughter?s spending habits.

Today, Tori has a net worth of $500,000, but her recent run-ins with credit card debt might alter that.

It?s been a notoriously bumpy road for former child star Lindsay Lohan, whose personal struggles, including addiction, have been tabloid fodder for well over a decade. The former child star, now 34, wasn?t dealt the best hand when it comes to parents. Michael and Dina Lohan have infamously struggled with their own problems (and arrests). Dina collected a decent share of Lindsay?s income during her prime childhood acting years, but according to 2012 reports of her $1.3 million debt, that money is long gone.

Today, Lindsay Lohan is worth $800,000.

In 2017, Mischa Barton, best known for her role as Marissa Cooper in ?The OC,? sued her mother and former manager for $25 million. The then-29-year-old actress alleged that her mother, Nuala Barton, withheld her earnings and ousted her out of her own $7.8 million Beverly Hills mansion. Mischa also claimed her mother exploited her celebrity for her own gain ? going so far as to launch a Mischa Barton handbag line without informing or paying Mischa.

Mischa Barton, who has publicly struggled with substance abuse, later dismissed the case against her mother. Today, she has a net worth today of $2.5 million.

Read More: Celebrities Who Have Lost Millions During COVID-19

In 2000, country singing star LeAnn Rimes sued her father, Wilbur Rimes, and her former manager, alleging that they stole at least $7 million from her. LeAnn?s mother, Belinda Rimes, filed the lawsuit on her daughter?s behalf as at the time LeAnn was only 17 years old. Wilbur filed a countersuit against LeAnn, accusing her of egregious overspending. After a bitter court battle, the two reconciled a few years later.

?I go by the saying ?Money?s the root of all evil,'? Rimes said, according to ABC News in 2005. ?And I definitely believe that the love for money is the root of all evil, because it changes people.?

Today, LeAnn Rimes has a net worth of $10 million.

Ariel Winter, best known for her work on ?Modern Family,? became legally emancipated from her parents in 2015 at the age of 17. Beginning at age 14, her sister, Shanelle Workman, was her legal guardian.

?It has been very sad for me, but at the same time it?s been much better for me emotionally and physically to be on my own and have a better, safer household and support system,? the actress told Seventeen, noting that her mother didn?t give her a choice when it came to acting, pushing her into the industry when she was just 4 years old.

Now 22 years old, Ariel Winter is worth $12 million.

He gave us all cheer as a child with his work in ?Home Alone,? but Macauly Culkin didn?t come from the happiest situation. He was one of seven siblings living in a one-bedroom apartment in Manhattan with his parents. Culkin has clarified that he didn?t legally emancipate himself from his parents, but when they separated when he was 16, a nasty custody battle ensued and his multimillion-dollar trust fund was at stake. ?I legally took my parents? names off of my trust fund and found an executor, someone who would look over my finances, just in case anyone wanted to stick their [expletive] pinkie in the pie,? Caulkin told Esquire in 2020.

Now 40 years old, Macaulay Culkin is worth $18 million.

Born in a prison while her mother, Constance, was serving a sentence for drug trafficking, Leighton Meester had what one might think of as the opposite of a Tori Spelling-esque childhood. Talented and perseverant, Meester?s career took off when she was a teenager, with her big break coming in 2007 as Blair Waldorf in ?Gossip Girl.? All seemed to be well until when Leighton and Constance filed lawsuits against one another over financial support Meester was providing for her younger brother. Leighton ended up victorious in June 2012, when the judge rejected the claims in her mother?s countersuit.

Today, Leighton Meester has a net worth of $16 million ? and she doesn?t have to give her mother a dime of it.

Read More: Popular TV Shows With the Highest-Paid Casts

Arguably the most iconic child actor of all time, Shirley Temple should have been a millionaire by age 18, but thanks to her father?s mismanagement of her earnings, as an adult, the famously ringleted star discovered she only had $44,000 of the $3.2 million she?d made. Allegedly, her father went against court orders to reserve Shirley?s earnings in a trust.

Temple, who went on to go by the name Shirley Temple Black after marriage, retired from acting at 22 but found a second career in politics. President Richard Nixon appointed her as an ambassador to the United Nations, and she also worked for the State Department ? among other impressive feats.

By the time she died, she was worth $30 million.

As Cinderella?s taunting stepsisters taught us, sometimes your family just really doesn?t want you to get your fairytale ending. Meghan Markle has lived this reality to an extent, with her both her dad, Thomas Markle, and her half-sister, Samantha Markle, thrusting themselves into the spotlight to hurl insults at her. And they do it for profit, to boot.

All these bad vibes have probably royally sucked for Meghan, but she seems to know how to take care of herself and transcend the toxicity with her husband, Harry. Together, the pair touts a $30 million net worth, according to Business Insider.

Comedian Dane Cook?s half-brother and ex-manager, Darryl McCauley, embezzled millions of dollars from Cook ? all while being handsomely paid by Cook for his work. In 2010, McCauley was ordered to pay Cook $12 million after pleading guilty to embezzling. At the time he was stealing, Cook was paying him $12,500 a month for management services. McCauley?s wife, Erica, was in on the act, too. Both she and McCauley were sentenced to time in prison for their crimes.

Today, Dane Cook has a net worth that stands at $35 million.

For a time during her career, Angelina Jolie and her father, actor Jon Voight, looked to be on great terms ? he even played her father in the 2001 ?Lara Croft? flick, but then turbulence ensued. In 2002, Jolie legally ditched her father?s name after her father did an ?Access Hollywood? interview and begged for her to get help for ?mental problems.? Jolie also declared that she did not want to be around her father now that she was a mother.

In recent years, Jolie and Voight appear to have patched things up, to an extent, but the crisis fed tabloids for years. Today, Voight has a net worth of $55 million and Jolie has more than twice that at $120 million.

Beyonc fired her dad/manager, Mathew Knowles, in 2011, but didn?t indicate that it was for any reason that would affect their relationship, noting that she still loved him as a father. A few months later the plot thickened when Mathew filed claims that Live Nation Entertainment lied to Beyonc about him stealing funds from her. Beyonc?s law firm conducted an audit that backed up the claim Mathew was disputing, but he continued to deny it.

If he did steal from her, it didn?t come anywhere close to bankrupting Beyonc, who has a net worth of $500 million.

Read More: 28 of the Highest-Grossing Concert Tours of All Time

In 2019, Rihanna filed a lawsuit against her father, Ronald Fenty, alleging that he misled the public and damaged her brand by using their name, Fenty, for his entertainment company, Fenty Entertainment. Rihanna also uses the name Fenty for her lines of cosmetics and fashion. She alleged that her father and another man ?egregiously and fraudulently misrepresented to third parties and the public that their company?is affiliated with Rihanna? and that they had never ?been authorized to use her name, intellectual property or publicity rights.? Additionally, the lawsuit alleged that Ronald?s entertainment company had arranged business commitments for Rihanna without her consent.

Rihanna has a net worth of $600 million.

In 2013, the late Kobe Bryant sued Goldin Auctions for selling personal belongings of his without his consent. The auction house countered that they?d been authorized to sell the belongings by his mother, who Kobe gave the memorabilia to fair and square. Soon after, Kobe reached a settlement with the auction house that enabled his mother to sell a small number of his memorabilia. He also received an apology from his parents.

At the time of his tragic passing in 2020, Kobe Bryant had a net worth of $600 million.

More From GOBankingRates

This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Hillary Clinton and 15 Other Celebrities Whose Family Members Nearly Cost Them Everything

Visit link:
Hillary Clinton and 15 Other Celebrities Whose Family Members Nearly Cost Them Everything - Yahoo Finance