Mediaboss Marketing

But then she found herself face to face with veteran tech journalists Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg at the Recode conference in California. Anxiety about social media and the spread of "fake news" was in the air. When Mossberg lamented that Democrats had fallen "way behind" Republicans on the technology front, Clinton let loose.

"I get the nomination. So I'm now the nominee of the Democratic Party. I inherit nothing from the Democratic Party," Clinton said Wednesday. "I mean, it was bankrupt, it was on the verge of insolvency, its data was mediocre to poor, nonexistent, wrong. I had to inject money into it."

Since reemerging in public after her defeat in November, Clinton has leveled sharp criticism at a host of targets she blames for President Donald Trump's victory, including Russia, former FBI Director James Comey and major news organizations like the New York Times.

Clinton associates say that she is unlikely to make a habit of criticizing her own party's institutions, describing her comments at the Recode interview as a one-off event -- and a unique confluence of her frustrations and a digital-savvy audience eager to hear them.

But her allies also acknowledge that Clinton's grievances about the DNC are real and also note that she had lamented well before Election Day that the Democratic Party's infrastructure did not serve her well.

Clinton has been mulling over the reasons that led to her unexpected defeat on November 8. As she has acknowledged in public, Clinton has mentally separated out those reasons into two categories: those that could have been corrected and others that were simply out of her control.

Russia's meddling in the election, the Wikileaks hacks, the coverage of her private email server and even Comey's actions fall in the latter column.

But Clinton believed during the campaign and maintains to this day that her party's data operation was utterly inadequate, hurt her candidacy and was entirely fixable.

The DNC issue has "been on her mind since before Election Day," a Clinton associate told CNN.

"These were all things that affected the election and that we can solve going forward," the associate added. "This was newsy because it was talking about a specific political organization within her party, but it wasn't out of line with the other hard truths that she's been talking about."

But overwhelmingly, Clinton is focused on Russian interference in the election along with Comey's public statements about the investigation into her private email server as chief reasons for her defeat.

She has been increasingly explicit in alleging mischief on the part of the Russians and the Trump campaign, frequently pointing her finger directly at Trump himself. Amid an escalating federal investigation into individuals in the Trump orbit, Clinton has sharpened those allegations in public appearances, seeming to grow more confident that she will be vindicated by facts.

Clinton has said that if the election had been on October 27 -- the day before Comey sent a letter to members of Congress about her use of an email server -- she would have won the election. In her interview at the Recode conference Wednesday, she went as far as to say that she believes American supporters of Trump colluded with the Russians.

"She clearly feels and many of us feel that the election was stolen from her. It's undisputed how close the margin was in the three states that made the difference," said Terry Shumaker, a longtime Clinton friend and former U.S. ambassador to Trinidad. "Am I angry? Yes. Do I assume she is? Yes."

One former Clinton adviser who has been in touch with her since Election Day was blunt in their assessment of Clinton's recent venting about the circumstances surrounding her defeat.

"I think this time around, the confluence of the Russia hacking and that they tried to sway the election Trump's way... and the Comey thing gave her back-up to say, 'Hey, this wasn't my fault,'" the ex-adviser said. "She doesn't want to be the person that lost Donald Trump. It's one thing to lose to Barack Obama. It's entirely a different thing to lose to Donald Trump."

See more here:
What is Hillary Clinton thinking? - CNN

Hillary Clinton at the University of Pittsburgh.

President Donald Trumpinvoked the city of Pittsburghto justify his decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris climate agreement. "I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris," Trump said Thursday in the White House Rose Garden.

The reaction from Pittsburghs mayor, Bill Peduto, was swift. Hetweeted, "Fact: Hillary Clinton received 80% of the vote in Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh stands with the world & will follow Paris Agreement @HillaryClinton." At a press conference in Pittsburgh with local reporters Thursday, Peduto repeated this claim: "The people of Pittsburgh voted for Hillary Rodham Clinton, 80 percent."

Pedutos spokesperson Timothy McNulty said Friday the mayor got the number "off the top of his head" and noted the numbers werent that different.

During an appearance on CNN late Thursday, Peduto qualified his earlier statement: "The city of Pittsburgh voted for Hillary Clinton with nearly 80 percent of the vote. [Trump] may be talking about all of western Pennsylvania, but its a far cry from being Pittsburgh." And while on "Hardball with Chris Matthews" on MSNBC, Peduto again stuck with the same claim: "Actually in Pittsburgh, Hillary Clinton won with nearly 80 percent of the vote."

Did Clinton win the city by that majority?

Almost. Allegheny County election records show that Clinton won 75 percent of the vote in the city of Pittsburgh, while she won 56 percent of the vote county-wide.We calculated Clintons vote total using precinct-level data publishedby the county through the Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center.

Our ruling

Trump said he was elected to represent people from Pittsburgh, not Paris, when explaining why he decided to withdraw the U.S. from a global climate deal. Pittsburghs mayor, Bill Peduto, responded by tweeting that Hillary Clinton received 80 percent of the vote in Pittsburgh. Clinton received 75 percent of the vote. Thats pretty close; Clinton did win the city by an overwhelming number.

We rate this statement Mostly True.

Here is the original post:
"Fact: Hillary Clinton received 80% of the vote in Pittsburgh." - PolitiFact

Hillary Clinton may be the most tone-deaf politician in modern history. Repeatedly over the course of a 41-year career as a political wife, candidate and appointee, shes said and done things that have alienated voters.

Who can forget her acerbic comments during the 1992 presidential race? I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas, she told one reporter on the campaign trail in describing her decision to continue her legal career while first lady of Arkansas.

And then there was her response in defending her husband from allegations of extramarital affairs: You know, Im not sitting here, some little woman standing by my man like Tammy Wynette.

OPINION

More recently, there was her testimony in front of the committee investigating the attacks on a U.S. post in Libya that resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador: Was it because of a protest, or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided theyd go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make?

And of course, there was this infamous claim during the presidential campaign: You could put half of Trumps supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. She described these people as irredeemable, racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic you name it.

But Clintons tin ear hasnt improved with age or experience. This week, she told a California audience, I take responsibility for every decision I made but thats not why I lost (the presidential election).

She went on to blame the Democratic National Committee, saying that after she became the partys nominee, she inherited nothing from the Democratic Party: It was bankrupt. It was on the verge of insolvency. Its data was mediocre to poor, nonexistent, wrong. I had to inject money into it to keep it going.

She didnt bother to mention that DNC operatives were alleged to have helped her secure the nomination in the first place. She portrayed herself as a victim, even using the word to describe why the assumption she was going to win hurt her.

And of course, she blamed the Russians not without some justification, given their alleged role in hacking her emails and using WikiLeaks to dump them at the height of the election and former FBI Director James Comeys investigation of her private email servers.

Clintons lament, however, helps neither her nor the investigation into Russias meddling in the election. The best thing she could do right now is to stay silent.

Like it or not, Donald Trump won the election according to rules set up in our Constitution, securing enough electoral votes to win the presidency.

There has been no evidence that Russia hacked voting machines and altered the vote count. And even if Trumps operatives helped weaponize information gleaned from the meddling as Clinton claimed without citing evidence other than hearsay saying so publicly without proof may undermine the case against the Russians among those who will simply chalk up the charges to partisan whining.

The more Clinton blames others for her election loss the less sympathetic a figure she becomes. She has never been her own best advocate. Whether its the vast right-wing conspiracy, the Russians or Comey, someone else is always to blame when things dont go her way.

She wants to be perceived as a powerful woman in her own right one capable and deserving of leading the most powerful nation in the world on the one hand and a hapless victim of forces beyond her control on the other.

Shed be better off separating her defeat from the very real possibility that one of Americas strongest adversaries tried to interfere in our election.

Hillary Clinton and many Democrats seem to miss the forest for the trees in the Russia story. Russia may well have wanted to see Clinton defeated and Trump elected, but its ultimate purpose was to undermine confidence in American institutions and our electoral process.

It wanted to sow seeds of distrust among American voters and to undercut American influence in the world, regardless of who won. Turning the story of Russias involvement in the 2016 election into a partisan issue helps further Russian aims, and the real loser is American democracy.

Linda Chavez is the author of An Unlikely Conservative: The Transformation of an Ex-Liberal.

Send letters to: letters@suntimes.com

More here:
Hillary Clinton's gripes sow distrust, and Russia likes it - Chicago Sun-Times

Hillary Clinton asked a top aide in 2011 whether she could fly on a separate airplane from former first lady Michelle Obama to Betty Ford's funeral, according to a newly released email.

Judicial Watch released on Thursday more than 2,000 emails from Clinton's unauthorized private email server she used as secretary of state. One of the documents revealed a conversation between Clinton and then-Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin about how she would rather not ride the same plane as Obama en route Ford's funeral in Palm Desert, Calif.

"I'd be honored to speak," Clinton said in reference to Betty Ford's funeral. "Is it OK that we and Mrs. O take two separate planes?"

The recent email release allegedly shows Clinton receiving and sending more classified information via her private unsecured server. Many of the conversations revolve around the individuals involved with the Clinton Foundation receiving favors from Abedin.

Read more:
Newly released email: Clinton asked to fly on separate plane from Michelle Obama in 2011 - Washington Examiner

Hillary Clinton said Thursday that the act of writing her book is sometimes "exhausting" and requires her to either talk a walk, or take a nap.

"Sometimes I'll work on it for a couple of hours. I have a little writing area in the attic of our little farm house," she said at the Book Expo in New York.

"And you know, I'll work on it, and I've got, you know, great colleagues who are doing research and helping me think through how best to present things," she said.

"And it's so exhausting that I just literally have to get up," Clinton added. "Either go for a walk or go to bed. Those are my two choices."

Clinton said her book would be about her failed presidential election and how she felt about it as it unfolded in full public view last year.

She said she was writing about her experience as the first woman to ever be nominated as a major party candidate.

Clinton's memoir is expected to be published in September.

Originally posted here:
Hillary Clinton: Writing my book can be 'so exhausting' - Washington Examiner