Mediaboss Marketing

Hillary Clinton in a new interview praised the Republican Party for its relentless anti-abortion tactics, while blaming Democratic voters for dismissing her warnings on the matter as alarmist. She also denied that she personally bore any culpability for inaction on the issue during her time in the Senate. The former secretary of state and Democratic presidential candidate made the comments in an interview for an upcoming book by Elizabeth Dias and Lisa Lerer, called The Fall of Roe: The Rise of a New America, and represent her most comprehensive comments on the matter since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. One thing I give the right credit for is they never give up, she told The New York Times. They are relentless. You know, they take a loss, they get back up, they regroup, they raise more money Its tremendously impressive the way that they operate. And we have nothing like it on our side. She also issued a stark warning about the future of womens rights if Donald Trump is elected again this fallwhile predicting that Democratic voters would again dismiss her concerns. Oh, my God, there she goes again, she said, adopting the tone of a Times reader after hearing her warning. I mean, shes just so, you know, so out there. She added later: I know history will prove me right.

Editors note: This story has been updated to name the correct authors for the book The Fall of Roe: The Rise of a New America.

Go here to see the original:
Hillary Clinton Praises 'Relentless' GOP Tactics on Abortion - The Daily Beast

Former President Donald Trump walks out of court and toward the media following the guilty verdict in his hush money trial. (Mark Peterson / Associated Press)

They finally got him.

Not on Russia collusion. Ukraine phone calls. Jan. 6 riots. Classified documents. Or mean tweets.

They finally got Donald Trump, after everything, on filing the wrong financial sex-story coverup paperwork.

Read more:Guilty: Trump becomes first former U.S. president convicted of felony crimes

Who but Donald Trump could even be indicted for such a thing? As CNNs Fareed Zakaria said a few days ago: I doubt the New York indictment wouldve been brought against a defendant whose name was not Donald Trump.

It was jarring to hear my CNN colleague Jake Tapper say guilty 34 straight times, as the verdicts rolled in Thursday afternoon. A historic moment that further divided an already divided nation.

And it was equally jarring to see text after text pop up on my phone from decidedly non-MAGA Republicans, but also not Never Trumpers, all sounding the same note: I dont like this man, and now I think I have to vote for him.

Read more:Litman: Does it matter that Donald Trump just became a convicted criminal? Of course it does

Lest you think thats just anecdotal or a sign that Scott has weird friends, the Trump campaign reported a deluge of online contributions in the minutes following the verdict crashed their system.

The polling indicates the guilty verdict wont make much of a difference to how most Americans vote. But Republicans are madder than wet hens that the partys nominee for president and, according to the polls, likely the next president of the United States was indicted for 34 felonies that few can fully explain, in a very Democratic jurisdiction.

Basically, the prosecution argued that Hillary Clinton might have won if Trump hadnt paid Stormy Daniels for her silence, and so you must convict him for covering up what amounts to a campaign finance violation that he was never charged with or convicted of in the first place. The Department of Justice and Federal Election Commission declined to pursue this novel theory, but it found a home in the Manhattan district attorneys office.

Read more:What verdict will voters render after jury finds Trump guilty in hush money case?

It sounds crazy just typing it. Having never stuck the landing on Russia stole the election in 2016, Democrats have moved on to this rationalization of Hillary Clintons loss being caused by Trump paying for the silence of a porn star he allegedly had sex with in 2006. (Trump maintains it didnt happen; Daniels says it did.)

The consensus in my circle is that this will backfire massively, as Republicans get energized. Even Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, no Trump fan himself, tweeted: These charges never should have been brought in the first place. I expect the conviction to be overturned on appeal.

Read more:Editorial: Even before guilty verdict, Trump was unfit to serve

Im watching two groups of voters in the polling aftermath senior citizens and what we in the politics business call low info flow voters who consume very little news other than fleeting headlines. Seniors still remember the before times, when presidents werent spending all their time in courtrooms, and low info voters may never know much beyond that Trump is now a convicted felon.

Biden has strength with older white voters, while Trump does better with the disengaged types. If either group moves against Trump, it could cause a polling bump for Biden. Im not betting on it, but if I were in the Trump command center, those are the folks Id be tracking very closely for the next few weeks.

The guilty verdict kicks off a consequential June for what had become a sleepy campaign. Biden has been stuck in the mud for months, languishing at around a 38% approval rating (historically low), and trailing Trump in national and swing state polls. Voters remain angry with Biden over inflation and immigration. His job approval hasnt been above water since August of 2021, after the disastrous, chaotic and deadly pullout of U.S. troops from Afghanistan.

At the end of June, Biden and Trump will debate in Atlanta, with perhaps an unwanted party crasher on stage in the form of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Read more:Q&A: Yes, Trump could be elected president as a convicted felon

Step 1 to revive his flailing campaign was for Biden to see Trump convicted. Step 2 is for Biden to win the June 27 debate.

As of June 1, Trump is winning. What will the story be on July 1? What if, after a Trump conviction and a debate, Biden hasnt moved in the polls in a months time?

If you think the Democrats are in panic mode today (which Politico reported just this week), brace yourself for what comes next prominent members of the party wondering aloud about replacing Biden on the ticket if he cant move ahead of a convicted felon.

For Trump, the message is clear: The only verdict that matters will come from the American people on Nov. 5. And hell take the boost hes sure to get in the wake of the verdict, just as he has following his previous indictments and legal milestones.

Scott Jennings is a former special assistant to President George W. Bush and a senior CNN political commentator. @ScottJenningsKY

If its in the news right now, the L.A. Times Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

See the original post here:
Opinion: The guilty verdict only makes Donald Trump stronger - AOL

More than seven years after losing to former President Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton is attacking fellow women for not supporting her failed campaign.

Clinton shared her latest gripe about the 2016 contest during an interview with The New York Times as Trump runs another campaign for the White House this year.

Female voters were turned off because of how former FBI Director James Comey handled the investigation into her private email server, Clinton argued.

In the summer of 2016, Comey held a press conference in which he said showed Clintons handling of classified information as secretary of state was extremely careless.

Comey did not recommend any charges, but Clinton has begrudged him for re-opening the probe right before the election before closing it again.

Once he did that to me, the people, the voters who left me, were women, Clinton said.

They left me because they just couldnt take a risk on me, because as a woman, Im supposed to be perfect, she added.

Survey results showed that most women voted for Clinton, though a majority of white female voters backed Trump.

Clinton would have been the first woman to be president if she had won the 2016 election, a benchmark she claimed made it harder to win.

They were willing to take a risk on Trump who had a long list of, lets call them flaws, to illustrate his imperfection, Clinton said.

She said this was because he was a man, and they could envision a man as president and commander in chief.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

The interview also touched on abortion rights after the conservative-majority Supreme Court, molded under Trump, overturned Roe v. Wade.

Clinton bemoaned how people kind of rolled their eyes at me when she warned of a high court that could demolish pillars of the progressive movement.

Trump threw his lot in with the right on abortion and was richly rewarded, she said.

Clinton has a long history of blaming others for her 2016 defeat. The list also includes Russia, the news media, and white people.

In a podcast released last month, Clinton suggested Trump wants to kill his opposition because of his purported affinity for strongmen leaders.

Follow this link:
'I'm Supposed To Be Perfect': Hillary Clinton Whines About Women Abandoning Her - The Daily Wire

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently offered a candid reflection on her 2016 presidential campaign, attributing her loss in part to female voters who abandoned her in the campaign's final days. In an interview with The New Times, Clinton discussed the unique challenges she faced as a female candidate, suggesting that her gender played a significant role in her defeat.

"They left me because they just couldnt take a risk on me, because as a woman, Im supposed to be perfect," Clinton stated. "They were willing to take a risk on [former President Trump] who had a long list of, lets call them flaws, to illustrate his imperfection because he was a man, and they could envision a man as president and commander in chief."

This sentiment was echoed by several of Clinton's allies during the 2016 election, who highlighted the sexist double standards she encountered. Tracy Sefl, a Democratic consultant and Clinton surrogate, remarked at the time, "Is there a double standard? One hundred percent times 100 percent. And God forbid if she coughs."

Clinton's reflections come amid ongoing discussions about the barriers female politicians face. The challenges she described were not unique to her campaign. Former GOP presidential candidate Nikki Haley, for instance, encountered sexist attacks during her own run before suspending her campaign in March. During a Republican primary debate last year in Miami, fellow candidate Vivek Ramaswamy referred to her as Dick Cheney in three-inch heels, highlighting the persistent gender-based criticisms women in politics endure.

In addition to discussing her campaign, Clinton also critiqued her own party for its handling of abortion rights. She argued that Democrats failed to fully anticipate and counter the power of anti-abortion advocates, leading to the Supreme Courts 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, which ended the federal right to abortion access.

"We didnt take it seriously, and we didnt understand the threat," Clinton said. "Most Democrats, most Americans, did not realize we are in an existential struggle for the future of this country." She expressed regret, noting, "We could have done more to fight."

Clintons interview, conducted by The New Times in February and published on Saturday, delves into these issues with a critical eye. Her insights highlight not only the personal challenges she faced as a pioneering female candidate but also broader systemic issues within American politics that continue to affect female leaders today.

Clinton's reflections are a poignant reminder of the enduring challenges women face in politics, and her critique of her partys handling of key issues like abortion rights underscores the need for more proactive and strategic approaches to political advocacy and campaigning.

Credit: The Hill 2024-05-27

Get our Daily Newsletter - ClickHEREto subscribe

See original here:
Hillary Clinton Reflects on 2016 Campaign: Women Abandoned Me Because I Wasn't 'Perfect' - ASEAN NOW

Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN) did not disagree with 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton that their party could have been more proactive in protecting abortion access before the Supreme Court repealed Roe v. Wade.

Walz, who represented Minnesotas 1st Congressional Districtfrom 2007 to 2019, cited his first congressional campaign as an example when asked to respond to Clintons criticism.

I dont think shes totally wrong, Walz told CNNs State of the Union on Sunday. Look, I ran in a conservative district, second Democrat since 1892, when I won a seat in Congress, and I was fully supportive of abortion rights. And this is back in 2005-2006. That was considered risky by a lot of people in our party.

I think what the former secretary is getting at is that we maybe didnt understand the threat that was coming, that we thought that Roe was going to protect us, he said. I think there were a lot of us, myself included, didnt believe that.

But although Walz agreed Clinton is not wrong, he contended Democrats have not been flat-footed since Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization, with abortion credited for the partys strong performance in elections since 2022, despite poor polling data regarding the economy.

I think thats why states like Minnesota were firewalling things up, the governor said. Were an island of decency out here. Its Handmaids Tale out here of the states surrounding me, from the Dakotas to Iowa, forcing women into these terrible situations.

So, no, I dont totally disagree with her, he added. I think the difference is now, since the fall of Roe orchestrated by Donald Trump and his Supreme Court, that we are ready. And women are ready, men are ready. And those who think that this is just a distracting issue, this is a fundamental issue of personal freedoms and personal bodily autonomy.

In an interview with New York Times reporters Elizabeth Dias and Lisa Lerer previewing their new book, The Fall of Roe: The Rise of a New America, Clinton asserted our side was complacent and took Roe for granted and thinking it would never go away.

We didnt take it seriously, and we didnt understand the threat, Clinton said. Most Democrats, most Americans, did not realize we are in an existential struggle for the future of this country.

[The right is] relentless. You know, they take a loss, they get back up, they regroup, they raise more money, she continued. Its tremendously impressive the way that they operate. And we have nothing like it on our side.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Former President Donald Trump last week underscored that he would never advocateimposing restrictions on birth control after last month encouraging states to protect abortion access in the cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother, in addition to reiterating his support of in vitro fertilization.

My view is now that we haveabortionwhere everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint, the states will determine by vote or legislation or perhaps both, Trump said in April. Whatever they decide must be the law of the land in this case, the law of the state.

Correction: A previous version of this article incorrectly attributed Clinton as the author of The Fall of Roe: The Rise of a New America.

See the article here:
Gov. Tim Walz concurs with Hillary Clinton that Democrats were complacent on abortion - Washington Examiner