Mediaboss Marketing

Hillary Clinton: Russia Got Help From Americans in Election Meddling Wall Street Journal (subscription) Hillary Clinton on Wednesday said she believes that Russians likely received help from inside the U.S. on how to effectively use the information that intelligence agencies say was gathered to meddle in last year's presidential election, which she lost ...

The rest is here:
Hillary Clinton: Russia Got Help From Americans in Election Meddling - Wall Street Journal (subscription)

Hillary Clinton did not set foot in Wisconsin for the whole of the 2016 general election.

Not once.

The former secretary of state defends the decision to this day, arguing that her campaign data showed she personally didn't need to bother with the Badger State. That's reasonable. After all, data is fallible.

What's embarrassing is that Clinton has expanded her list of excuses for why she lost Wisconsin to include "fake news," WikiLeaks emails and allegations that Gov. Scott Walker suppressed the vote.

Conspicuously absent from her list of excuses is any mention of the fact that she didn't campaign in Wisconsin.

Clinton was pressed for answers on her campaign blunder Wednesday afternoon by Verge editor-in-chief Nilay Patel, who is himself from the Badger State.

"I'm from Wisconsin. Why didn't you spend more time in Wisconsin?" he asked to audible gasps at the Recode conference in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif.

"We thought we were doing really well in Wisconsin. I spent a lot of time in Pennsylvania, a lot of time in Florida. We sent a lot of great surrogates, including [Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va.] and others to Wisconsin you make these scheduling decisions based on the best information that you have, and it turned out that, you know, our information was not as reliable as I wished it had been," Clinton said.

Clinton also blamed her loss on Scott Walker's support for voter ID laws, accusing the Republican governor of being part of a larger effort to disenfranchise voters.

"The other thing that's in hindsight, which is really troubling is the [Associated Press] did a really well-researched piece about voter suppression in Wisconsin, and they literally found people who showed up to vote and were turned away because Wisconsin, under the current governor, Scott Walker, has been one of the leaders in voter suppression. Making it difficult," the failed presidential candidate said.

The article to which Clinton referred Wednesday is titled "Voter ID law proved insurmountable for many in Wisconsin."

Clinton said, "The best estimate is that 200,000 people in Wisconsin were either denied or chilled in their efforts to vote. I don't think we believed at the time before the election that it would be anything like that. Anything as big as that."

Roughly 300,000 eligible voters in Wisconsin "lacked valid photo IDs" ahead of the 2016 election, the AP story reported.

However, the article, which was published on May 9, does not provide citation for its number. Further, the report also stated specifically that, "It is unknown how many people did not vote because they didn't have proper identification."

Well then.

Clinton wasn't done: She also blamed the WikiLeaks email scandal and a rash of "fake news" stories for distorting Wisconsin voters' perception of her as a presidential candidate.

"So some people stayed home. Some people voted for Trump. Some people stayed with me, and some people went third party," she said. "It was a confluence of all kinds of things."

Sure, it was a confluence of events, not least of all the fact that she never visited the damned state. You know who could've cleared up those supposed "fake news" misconceptions about Hillary Clinton? Hillary Clinton.

Trump won Wisconsin by more than 20,000 votes, a margin of victory that actually increased during a hotly contested recount effort.

Continue reading here:
Hillary Clinton blames voter suppression for losing a state she didn't visit once during the election - Washington Examiner

Hillary Clinton warned that the technological forces that conspired to sabotage her presidential bid in 2016 are still very much at play in an interview Wednesday at the Code Conference in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif.

"I think it's important to learn the real lessons from this last campaign," she said. "The forces aren't just interested in influencing elections and politics. They're going after the economy and our unity as a nation."

Clinton spoke in great detail about how a massive Russian-led misinformation campaign scuttled her chances with the help of social networks that weren't properly empowered to combat fake news.

"What we saw in this election particularly the first time we had the tech revolution really weaponized politically," Clinton told Code Conference interviewees Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher. "It was aimed at me but it's a much deeper more persistent effort to literally turn the clock back on so much of what we have achieved as a country."

Clinton also singled out Vladimir Putin for having big ambitions that go way beyond her in his pursuit of destablizing the country.

"It is important that Americans, that people in tech and business understand that Putin wants to bring us down," she warned. "He is an old KGB agent."

Clinton addressed the incident last week in which Montana congressional candidate Greg Gianforte div-slammed a reporter days before the election he ended up winning. Citing a report that an NBC affiliate in Montana declined to use the audio of the incident in its coverage as part of a broader mandate by stations owned by Sinclair Group to keep its programming conservative-friendly, she commented, "I find that terrifying. Because local TV is still incredibly powerful."

Just because Clinton lost the election shouldn't give anyone the impression she is about to exit the political scene. "I am not going anywhere," she said. "I am very unbowed and unbroken about what happened because I don't want it to happen to anyone else. I don't want it to happen to the values and institutions i care about in America."

2017 Variety Media, LLC, a subsidiary of Penske Business Media; Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC

Read the original:
Hillary Clinton warns: 'Putin wants to bring us down' - Boston Herald

There's a sucker born every minute, goes the old saying, and several hundred of them gathered at Wellesley College last Thursday to cheer Hillary Clinton as she rehashed, complained about and justified her electoral loss by saying in different ways over and over that she is simply too good for this world. Seriously, just how addled does one have to be to take this nepot and parasite as an inspiration for women, and as a model of how one should build her career?

To follow Clinton's career path, one has to first attack then-Sen. Edward Brooke, R-Mass., at your graduation from Wellesley. Second, proceed to Yale Law School to meet and marry a skilled politician. Third, follow him home to suppress bimbo eruptions and otherwise serve as first lady of Arkansas. And fourth, wait for the day he's elected as president, so that you are first lady for real.

Having done that, one can start at the top, being given control of his healthcare reform plan, which you run into the ground 18 months later, just in time for a staggering wipeout in Congress in which he loses the Senate and House. And how does one manage to get this much power? One lies on "60 Minutes" on the eve of the New Hampshire primary about a woman in Arkansas who claimed that she and one's husband had had an affair.

If you had any doubts as to how she got to run healthcare, Carl Bernstein explains it to you on page 218 of A Woman In Charge, the book that he wrote about Hillary. "He was president in no small measure because she stood by him in the Gennifer Flowers mess," he quotes Bill's aide as saying. "He had to pay her back. This is what she wanted, and he couldn't figure out how not to give it to her. And so he hoped for the best." What he got was the worst, while Hillary built her career on trying to discount what Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick had accused Bill of doing, while joining Anita Hill and others in running against Clarence Thomas, for what Hillary had claimed that he said.

Having gotten so much because Bill misbehaved with one woman, Hillary got even more five years later, when it turned out he misbehaved with three more: In the course of a suit brought by Paula Jones (who charged that Bill asked her to "kiss it" in a hotel room in Little Rock), it came out that he had an affair with a 24-year-old intern, and had also molested an aide in the White House on the day that her husband had died.

As this broke new ground on the Richter scale of spouse mortification, the public was happy enough to allow her to run for the Senate from New York, a state that she had never lived in in order to start life anew. Hillary, who got one big job by covering up for her husband's philandering, got another because he had strayed once again (and been impeached in the process), while the three jobs she held that required executive competence healthcare reform and her two runs for president could be studied in as examples of cosmic mismanagement.

So, of course, she is now the ideal of millions of women, who swear she's the soul of self-made girl power, who would in due course have made a great president if only men had given her a chance.

Noemie Emery, a Washington Examiner columnist, is a contributing editor to The Weekly Standard and author of "Great Expectations: The Troubled Lives of Political Families."

See the original post:
Hillary Clinton is making fools out of feminists - Washington Examiner

Mayor of Chicago Rahm Emanuel seemed a bit irked that CNNs Dana Bash was asking him about the possibility of Hillary Clinton mounting a third presidential run would be good for the party, noting that it wasnt a good question. Emanuel said that he loves Hillary, and that she has lost to offerbut the decision about a 2020 run is best left with her. Also, were not even close to the 2018 midterm elections (via The Hill):

"I know, but I asked the question. Do you think she should," CNN's Dana Bash responded.

"Well it's not I love you. It's not a good question, OK," he said.

"Why not?" Bash asked.

"It's not a good question," he reiterated.

When pressed further, Emanuel said he happens to "love" Clinton, adding that he thinks she's "full of energy."

"We have a lot of time between now and the presidential election of 2020," he said.

Emanuel said Clinton has a "lot to offer," but the main question is whether Clinton wants to launch a bid in 2020.

"The core question is not whether I think she would be a good candidate. It's whether she wants to run," he said.

Well, I agree that it is up to Clinton about whether she wants to run again. At the same time, shes a two-time presidential loser, a substantial proportion of the Democratic base is moving more towards the left and away from her positions on policy, and they werent thrilled that she won the nomination in 2016.

The emails from the Democratic National Committee showing staffers mulling ways to undercut Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) primary campaign only confirmed what many in that camp thought: the establishment was fixing the game. It caused the DNC a lot of heartburn going into their national convention in Philadelphia last year. There isnt much there to create a good give me anther shot pitch. Many in the vocal progressive wing of the Democratic Party feel that its imperative that Clinton goes away in order for the party to move forward. The left inability to truly have an introspective analysis of why they lost in 2016 also hamstrings them from that goaland it doesnt help that Clinton is part of this behavior as well.

She has yet to fully take responsibility for her 2016 loss, instead pivoting to blaming the Russians and former FBI Director James Comey. She will never get past her other handicaps as well that were cemented in the minds of the electorate long before the 2016 campaign, which are that she (along with Bill) are secretive, and that they play by a different set of rules. These two conceptions were incredibly damaging, with the ethical questions surrounding the Clinton Foundation and her private email system embodying those criticisms. It was a throwback to the 1990s; voters viewed Clinton as untrustworthy and dishonest.

Also, the talk of Clinton 2020 also seems to highlight another problem Democrats have for the next presidential election. They dont have a deep bench concerning candidates anymore.

Trump Communications Director Resigns

More:
Rahm Emanuel On Hillary Clinton 2020: 'It's Not A Good Question, Okay' - Townhall