Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Here’s Just How Much Hillary Clinton’s Emails Dominated The Campaign – HuffPost

NEW ORLEANS The phrase But her emails! has become a sarcastic rallying cryamong many liberals who bemoan the attention dedicated last year to questions over Hillary Clintons use of a private email server.

Their perception that the focus on Clintons emails overshadowed the rest of her campaign is backed by data, according to an analysis recently released by researchers at Gallup, Georgetown University, and the University of Michigan. The results dont directly address the share of media coverage focused on Clintons emails, or the degree to which it hurt her standing, but they make it clear that much of what the public remembered hearing about her was focused on the controversy.

Email-related scandals clearly dominated recalled words about Clinton. This is true for almost every week of the campaign, the authors concluded in a presentation given Saturday during a panel on election surveys. There was no similarly common theme for Trump, whose multiple scandals produced a changing, and perhaps more easily overcome, narrative during the campaign.

During last years election, the polling firm Gallup regularly asked Americans if theyd read, heard, or seen anything about the presidential candidates in the last few days. Those who had usually two-thirds or more of the public in any given week were asked to elaborate.

The researchers then pulled out the words used by the public to describe what they were hearing about both candidates, as part of an effort to figure out what information was reaching voters and staying with them.

In a chart of the most common words used in relation to Clinton between last summer and Election Day, the word email quite literally crowds out the rest, with several of the other most prevalent words also alluding to perceptions that she was scandal-plagued. Health, another relatively common word, likely refers to the coverage of Clintons collapse at a 9/11 memorial event, which was caught on camera. Her campaign later released a statement saying she had pneumonia.

Frank Newport Lisa Singh Stuart Soroka Michael Traugott and Andrew Dugan

Clintons performance in the presidential debates also attracted attention, as did some of her speeches. But words that reflect her campaigns messaging or policy positions appear relatively scarce, suggesting her platform wasnt at the top of most Americans minds.

Because [what Americans recalled] was primarily about the emails, it didnt leave, relatively speaking, very much room for the issues,Michael Traugott, a political scientist at the University of Michigan, said Saturday.

That held true for virtually the length of the general election. With the exception of the presidential debates and her bout with pneumonia, email was among the most cited words for Clinton in every week leading up to the election.

Frank Newport Lisa Singh Stuart Soroka Michael Traugott and Andrew Dugan

Many of the words surrounding Donald Trump also related to unflattering stories women, for example, which likely encompasses everything from his litany of demeaning comments about womento the accusations he faced late in the campaign of sexual harassment and assault. But no one topic completely dominated the publics impressions of him or his campaign.

Frank Newport Lisa Singh Stuart Soroka Michael Traugott and Andrew Dugan

The predominant conversations about Trump fluctuated throughout the campaign, encompassing his choice of Mike Pence as a running mate and his comments on immigration. Toward the end of the campaign, attention seemed to shift largely to his treatment of women.

Frank Newport Lisa Singh Stuart Soroka Michael Traugott and Andrew Dugan

Most of the words used to describe Trump werent exactly policy-focused either. But more so than Clinton, Trump apparently managed to focus public attention on at least some of his campaign rhetoric, specifically on immigration. That squareswith a pre-election HuffPost/YouGov survey, which found that Americans perceived Trumps campaign as focused on immigration, and Clintons campaign as being largely about the personal qualities of both candidates.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Republicans and Democrats consumed and remembered starkly different information about the candidates, according to the Gallup data.

Frank Newport Lisa Singh Stuart Soroka Michael Traugott and Andrew Dugan

While Democrats were paying attention to Trumps comments about women and marginalized groups, Republicans focused more on his attitudes toward immigration and his pledges to make America great again.

If the prominence of the word speech is any indication, much of what they heard about Trump came directly from the candidate himself. Cable television networks like Fox, CNN and MSNBC regularly aired Trumps campaign speeches in their entirety during last years election in one case, as The New York Times Michael Grynbaum noted, skipping Clintons speech to a workers union in order to broadcast a live feed of an empty podium in North Dakota, on a stage where Mr. Trump was about to speak.

Most of the attention to Clintons emails came from Republicans, who perceived her more generally as dishonest and scandal-plagued. Democrats impressions of Clinton, while not centered around any particular topic, were far more neutral, and included interest in topics like her economic proposals.

See the original post here:
Here's Just How Much Hillary Clinton's Emails Dominated The Campaign - HuffPost

Report: Girl in Weiner sexting case lied to damage Clinton – The Hill

The teenage girl who had exchanged inappropriate text messages with former Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) lied about her age and political motivations to harm Hillary ClintonHillary Rodham ClintonReport: Girl in Weiner sexting case lied to damage Clinton Trump's triumph in Riyadh proves America is back on top of the world Juan Williams: Trump morphs into Nixon MORE, according to a report by the investigative news siteWhoWhatWhy.

In a report published Monday, the web site said the girl who exchanged the messages with Weiner was closer to 17 and not 15, as initial reports said. That also puts her above the age of consent in North Carolina.

In addition, she and her family were also not Clinton supporters, as the girl claimed in a letter published byBuzzFeed, according to social media posts unearthed by the website. The report also says the girl initiated the contact with Weiner, and then sought advice from a GOP figure behind "prior efforts to harm Weiner and other Democrats."

The website suggests this could mean that Weiner was the target of a politically motivated plot.

Seeing that Weiner is both a repeat offender his sexting addiction cost him his job in Congress as well as a shot at becoming mayor of New York and associated with one of the most important people in Clintons inner circle, it is conceivable that this was a set-up from the beginning, with the objective of embarrassing the Clinton campaign, the WhoWhatWhy report reads.

The investigation of Weiner and his accuser led the FBI to announce just weeks before Election Day that it was again looking at Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's emails. It did so because it had found a series of emails from Weiner to his then-estanged wife, Huma Abedin, an aide to Clinton.

Clinton lost the election and many in her camp have blamed the FBI and its then-director, James Comey.

Weiner last week pled guilty to a charge of distributing obscene material to a minor, which carries a sentence of up to 10 years in prison.

WhoWhatWhy is a non-profit investigative reporting site that describes itself as a "forensic journalism" that looks to "unearth the facts interested parties want hidden." Its editor-in-chief and CEO is Russ Baker, who has written for The New York Times, The New Yorker and The Washington Post.

The WhoWhatWhy report, citing a court record, says the girl was just shy of 17 when she approached Weiner, and not 15 as The Daily Mail cited when it initially broke the story.

It argues that this "lie" seems "clearly designed to to produce the maximum public outrage and put Weiner in greater legal jeopardy."

WhoWhatWhy cites a number of social media messages and photographs to argue that the victim was from a Republican-friendly family, and that this suggests a political trick may have been in play.

It says that the victim celebrated Trump's victory on social media, that her father is a registered Republican and that her mother tweeted derisively about the Black Lives Matter movement.

The report also added that Chuck Johnson, a conservative writer, was one of the individuals who connected the girl to The Daily Mail.

Its not yet clear whether the motive was primarily money, a plot to smear Clinton, or both, the report notes.

See more here:
Report: Girl in Weiner sexting case lied to damage Clinton - The Hill

‘There’s a $20!’: Watters Searches NY Woods For Hillary Clinton – Fox News Insider

This week, Jesse Watters headed to Whippoorwill Park in Westchester County, N.Y. in search of Hillary Clinton, who was previously pictured hiking around there after losing the election.

At a speech earlier this year, Clinton remarked that she was soon coming "out of the woods" and back into the public eye.

With a walking stick to navigate the hilly terrain, Watters hiked the trails in the park, outside the Clintons' adopted hometown of Chappaqua.

Watters: 'About Time' Law Enforcement Has Support From White House

Trump Calls For Unified Arab World, West Against Radical Islamic Terror

Soon, he spotted a possible sign of the former Democratic presidential nominee:

"There's a $20!" he said, picking up a bill from beside a tree.

Continuing along with no further luck, he tried calling out her campaign slogan to see if she would respond:

Giving up on his quest in the forest, Watters headed downtown to ask the folks there if she or President Clinton had been seen recently.

One woman said she saw the Clintons in the local bookstore:

Other folks said they hadn't seen the couple in a while, but added that they were still fans of the former secretary of state:

Watch the clip above.

WATCH: Students Walk Out of Pence's Graduation Speech at Notre Dame

'Classy & Conservative': Melania's Style Praised in Saudi Arabia

Ivanka in Riyadh: Young Generation Can 'Build Future of Tolerance, Hope and Peace'

LOOK: Trump, Obama Commemorate Armed Forces Day

See the article here:
'There's a $20!': Watters Searches NY Woods For Hillary Clinton - Fox News Insider

Roger Ailes, Hillary Clinton and Me – The New York Times – New York Times


New York Times
Roger Ailes, Hillary Clinton and Me - The New York Times
New York Times
The former head of Fox News liked journalists who looked like models and hated women who acted like Hillary Clinton. Which one was I going to be?
Friends, Family Gather to Mourn and Honor Roger AilesLifeZette
Roger Ailes, founder of Fox News, dead at 77Fox News

all 87 news articles »

View original post here:
Roger Ailes, Hillary Clinton and Me - The New York Times - New York Times

John Podesta Calls Comey Firing ‘Laughable,’ Continues to Blame Comey For Clinton Election Loss – Mediaite

Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta is still smarting from his candidates election loss.

In a lengthy interview with Politico, Podesta seemed to hold nothing back in ripping President Donald Trump who has, in Podestas view, made some absolutely crazy moves during his administration.

One of those moves, according to the Clinton campaign chairman whose hacked emails became public fodder last October was the firing of FBI Director James Comey. Podesta doesnt even remotely buy the idea that Comey was dismissed because of his handling of the Clinton email investigation.

Its laughable, really laughable that Donald Trump would fire Jim Comey because of his interference which damaged Hillary Clinton, Podesta told Politico. I mean, it was laughable from the very beginning.

Politicos Susan Glasser then asked Podesta, point blank: Do you think that [Comeys interference] did help to swing the election?

His response?

Oh, yes. Absolutely. I think that look, we bear responsibility, and its a great burden and I feel it every day. I mean, we lost this election; we won the popular vote by 3 million votes, but we lost the Electoral College and lost the election to Donald Trump. So, we have a burden of his having the keys to the White House, and you know, codes to the nuclear football. But I think this was a significant factor. We felt like we had a lead that we took away from the three debates, in which, you know, I believe that Hillary won all those debates. The race was tight; we werent overconfident, but we werewe had a lead, and that lead really substantially narrowed after Comeys letter, and the last week of coverage, which was all about if nothing else, is this thing going to ever end? Now, you know, hewhat he opened, he closed, as I said, just a week later. But he could have done that quietly, and consistently with long-standing precedent, of both Democratic and Republican Justice Departments.

Podestas response mirrors that of his candidates, who said at a forum last month that she takes personal responsibility for the loss, before going on to blame external factors such as Comey and not actually detailing any specific campaign failings.

I think, you know, if those 70,000 votes had gone differently in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, that we would have all been geniuses, Podesta told Politico.

[image via screengrab]

Follow Joe DePaolo (@joe_depaolo) on Twitter

Have a tip we should know? tips@mediaite.com

Excerpt from:
John Podesta Calls Comey Firing 'Laughable,' Continues to Blame Comey For Clinton Election Loss - Mediaite