Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Hillary Clinton’s alternative facts – Baltimore Sun

As fate would have it, Hillary Clinton spoke at last month's Hillary Rodham Clinton Awards for Advancing Women in Peace and Security, where she emphasized the importance of peace, of women and of women in peace.

"When women participate in peacekeeping peacemaking we are all safer and more secure," said Ms. Clinton, who boasted of "evidence-based" research that backs up this claim.

And she's right. Including women in the peacemaking process is often a valuable way of securing peace in war-torn countries.

But she also got in what was seen as a partisan shot at the Trump administration. At one point she began a sentence by saying, "Studies show ..." and then interrupted herself: "Here I go again talking about research, evidence and facts."

The crowd laughed, cheered and loudly applauded for a while, proving that there's nothing like working out your best material with a friendly audience. Ms. Clinton laughed at her supposedly very funny joke, too.

She also said, "Before anybody jumps to any conclusions, I will state clearly: Women are not inherently more peaceful than men. That is a stereotype. That belongs in the alternative reality."

Again, if you don't get the joke, the reference to "alternative reality" is apparently a jab at Kellyanne Conway, who once said something silly about "alternative facts."

But here's what I think is funny: Ms. Clinton's wrong. She's the one peddling an alternative reality.

Yeah, there's a stereotype that women are inherently more peaceful than men but, as a generalization (which is what stereotypes are) it's true.

This is an evidence-based conclusion backed by a great many studies.

In 2015, according to the FBI, 7,549 men were arrested for murder and non-negligent manslaughter. Only 984 women were. Men were four times more likely to be arrested for violent crimes and 10 times more likely to be arrested for illegal possession of a weapon.

It's not just in America. Disproportionate male aggression is a human universal, appearing all over the world and across thousands of years. "In almost every society men are the ones who are overwhelmingly involved in wars, in all kinds of intergroup aggressions and intragroup homicide," writes Dorian Fortuna at Psychology Today. Men "mobilize themselves in armies of violent fans, in criminal gangs, in bands of thugs, etc. These observations are as old as the world and have allowed us to create a clear distinction between male and female sexes regarding their predisposition to violence."

"Throughout history," reports The Economist magazine, "men have killed men roughly 97 times more often than women have killed women."

The male inclination for violence has a lot to do with testosterone, which is most plentiful in young men who, in their natural habitat, fought other males to impress women. (You can head down to Fort Lauderdale during Spring Break to document this phenomenon yourself.)

Steven Pinker writes in "The Better Angels of Our Nature," his sweeping history of violence, that "to the extent that the problem of violence is a problem of young, unmarried, lawless men competing for dominance, whether directly or on behalf of a leader, then violence really is a problem of there being too much testosterone in the world."

Interestingly, one of the things that is most likely to make men less violent is getting married, proving that Ms. Clinton is right when she says that women have a pacifying effect. What public policies should flow from all this is a topic for another day.

What's annoying about Ms. Clinton's cheap partisan preening isn't simply that she's wrong (and I suspect she knows it). It's that she is perpetuating an infuriating tendency of liberals today to claim science is always on their side.

There's a decidedly undemocratic flavor to this kind of argument. Patrick Moynihan famously said that everyone is entitled to their own opinions but not to their own facts. Liberals want to turn that on its head and claim that their opinions are facts and anyone who disagrees isn't merely voicing a bad opinion but it somehow living in alternative reality or "denying" science. It's the secular version of claiming that God is on your side.

Ms. Clinton is peddling stale, corporate feminism as settled science in part because she's pandering to a friendly audience, but also because she's too lazy to shed her own alternate reality.

Jonah Goldberg is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a senior editor of National Review. His email is goldbergcolumn@gmail.com. Twitter: @JonahNRO.

Continued here:
Hillary Clinton's alternative facts - Baltimore Sun

Hillary Clinton’s Loss – New York Times


New York Times
Hillary Clinton's Loss
New York Times
It's sad to read that Hillary Clinton is still blaming others for her loss five months after the presidential election. She cited misogyny, release of her campaign emails and the F.B.I. investigation into the use of her private email server as among ...
Hillary Clintons Back, and Shes Speaking for the MajorityDaily Beast
Powers: Hillary Clinton Blames Everybody But Herself For LossRealClearPolitics
Flashing Back to 2015 and Hillary Clinton's Presidential AnnouncementNewsweek
Washington Times -The Hill -POLITICO Magazine
all 137 news articles »

Read the original here:
Hillary Clinton's Loss - New York Times

Why Do Democrats Feel Sorry for Hillary Clinton? – New York Magazine

Hillary Clinton pauses during an interview with Nicholas Kristof at the Women in the World Summit on April 6 in New York. Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Every day, the incoherence deepens: Hes going to cover everyone, but hes going to push 24 million people off their health insurance. Hes going to wipe out the debt, but his tax cuts and spending spree will add trillions to it. Hes never going to intervene in Syria, but he just did. Hes going to get Mexico to pay for a big, beautiful wall, but he isnt. China is a currency manipulator, but it isnt. The media is the enemy of the people, but he is on the phone with them every five minutes and cant stop watching CNN and reading the New York Times. Hes going to be a tightwad with taxpayers money, unlike Obama, but his personal travel expenses are on track to be eight times more than his predecessors. Hes going to work relentlessly for the American people but he spends half his days watching cable news. Weve got to be very, very tough in foreign affairs, but when he sees dead babies on TV, he immediately calls General Mattis and lobs 59 Tomahawk missiles. He has a secret plan to defeat ISIS, but pursues Obamas strategy instead. He is for the forgotten men and women of America, but his tax plan which is itself changing all the time benefits the superrich and depends on removing health insurance for the working poor. He wants to be friends with Russia, but he doesnt. Hes going to challenge Chinas policy on Taiwan, but he isnt. He is against crony capitalism, but he is for it. Hes going to keep the focus on America, but just upped the ante in Yemen and Afghanistan. Hes a deal-maker, but he cannot make deals even with his own party. Hes a great manager, but his White House is consumed with in-fighting and he cannot staff his own administration. Hes a populist who stacks his cabinet with Goldman Sachs alums. Hes going to pressure China to take on North Korea, but after listening for ten minutes to Chinas dictator, he changes his mind.

I could go on. You can try to argue that Trump has simply pivoted to the center, like so many other presidents before him. But the statements he has made in just the last six months, and the policies he has pursued for the last three, have gyrated so wildly, have so little consistency, and make so little sense that there is no assurance that in another three months, he wont be back where he started, or somewhere even more clusterfucked.

What on earth is the point of trying to understand him when there is nothing to understand? Calling him a liar is true enough, but liars have some cognitive grip on reality, and he doesnt. Liars remember what they have said before. His brain is a neural Etch A Sketch. He doesnt speak, we realize; he emits random noises. He refuses to take responsibility for anything. He can accuse his predecessor and Obamas national security adviser of crimes, and provide no evidence for either. He has no strategy beyond the next 24 hours, no guiding philosophy, no politics, no consistency at all just whatever makes him feel good about himself this second. He therefore believes whatever bizarre nonfact he can instantly cook up in his addled head, or whatever the last person who spoke to him said. He makes Chauncey Gardiner look like Abraham Lincoln. Occams razor points us to the obvious: He has absolutely no idea what hes doing. Which is reassuring and still terrifying all at once.

Ive done what I could in this space to avoid the subject of Hillary Clinton. I dont want to be the perennial turd in the punchbowl. Id hoped wed finally seen the last of that name in public life its been a long quarter of a century and that we could all move on. Alas, no. Her daughter (angels and ministers of grace defend us) seems to be positioning herself for a political career. And Clinton herself duly emerged last week for a fawning, rapturous reception at the Women in the World conference in New York City. It simply amazes me the hold this family still has on the Democratic Party and on liberals in general. The most popular question that came from interviewer Nick Kristofs social-media outreach, for example, was: Are you doing okay? Heres Michelle Goldberg: I find myself wondering at odd times of the day and night: How is Hillary? Is she going to be all right? Seriously, can you imagine anyone wondering the same after Walter Mondale or Michael Dukakis or John Kerry blew elections?

And everywhere you see not an excoriation of one of the worst campaigns in recent history, leading to the Trump nightmare, but an attempt to blame anyone or anything but Clinton herself for the epic fail. It wasnt Clintons fault, were told. It never is. It was the voters those ungrateful, deplorable know-nothings! Their sexism defeated her (despite a majority of white women voting for Trump). A wave of misogyny defeated her (ditto). James Comey is to blame. Bernie Sanderss campaign because it highlighted her enmeshment with Wall Street, her brain-dead interventionism and her rapacious money-grubbing since she left the State Department was the problem. Millennial feminists were guilty as well, for not seeing what an amazing crusader for their cause this candidate was. And this, of course, is how Clinton sees it as well: She wasnt responsible for her own campaign her staffers were. As a new book on her campaign notes, after Clinton lost the Michigan primary to Sanders, The blame belonged to her campaign team, she believed, for failing to hone her message, energize important constituencies, and take care of business in getting voters to the polls. So by the time the general-election campaign came round, theyd fix that and win Michigan, right?

Let us review the facts: Clinton had the backing of the entire Democratic establishment, including the president (his biggest mistake in eight years by far), and was even married to the last, popular Democratic president. As in 2008, when she managed to lose to a neophyte whose middle name was Hussein, everything was stacked in her favor. In fact, the Clintons so intimidated other potential candidates and donors, she had the nomination all but wrapped up before she even started. And yet she was so bad a candidate, she still only managed to squeak through in the primaries against an elderly, stopped-clock socialist who wasnt even in her party, and who spent his honeymoon in the Soviet Union. She ran with a popular Democratic incumbent president in the White House in a growing economy. She had the extra allure of possibly breaking a glass ceiling that with any other female candidate would have been as inspiring as the election of the first black president. In the general election, she was running against a malevolent buffoon with no political experience, with a deeply divided party behind him, and whose negatives were stratospheric. She outspent him by almost two-to-one. Her convention was far more impressive than his. The demographics favored her. And yet she still managed to lose!

But but but her deluded fans insist, she won the popular vote! But thats precisely my point. Any candidate who can win the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes and still manage to lose the Electoral College by 304 to 227 is so profoundly incompetent, so miserably useless as a politician, she should be drummed out of the party under a welter of derision. Compare her electoral college result with Al Gores, who also won the popular vote but lost in the Electoral College: 271 to 266. For that matter, compare hers with John Kerrys, who lost the popular vote by 1.5 percent 286 to 241. She couldnt even find a halfway-decent speechwriter for her convention speech. The week before the election, she was campaigning in Arizona, for Petes sake. And she took off chunks of the summer, fundraising (at one point, in the swing states of Fire Island and Provincetown). Whenever she gave a speech, you could hear the air sucking out of the room minutes after she started. In the middle of an election campaign, she dismissed half of the Republican voters as deplorable. She lost Wisconsin, which she didnt visit once. I could go on.

And so I find myself wondering at odd times of the day and night: Why is Trump in the White House? And then I remember. Hillary Clinton put him there.

*

Do you know the real reason Dr. Dao was so brutally tackled and thrown off that United flight? It was all about white supremacy. I mean, what isnt these days? That idea is from the New Republic. Yes, the cops seemed to be African-American, as the author concedes, so the white-versus-minority paradigm is a little off. Yes, this has happened before to many people with no discernible racial or gender pattern. Yes, there is an obvious alternative explanation: The seats from which passengers were forcibly removed were randomly assigned. New York published a similar piece, which argued that the incident was just another example of Trumps border-and-immigration-enforcement policies toward suspected illegal immigrants of color. That no federal cops were involved and there is no actual evidence at all of police harassment of Asian-Americans is irrelevant its all racism, all the time, everywhere in everything.

Its easy to mock this reductionism, I know, but it reflects something a little deeper. Asian-Americans, like Jews, are indeed a problem for the social-justice brigade. I mean, how on earth have both ethnic groups done so well in such a profoundly racist society? How have bigoted white people allowed these minorities to do so well even to the point of earning more, on average, than whites? Asian-Americans, for example, have been subject to some of the most brutal oppression, racial hatred, and open discrimination over the years. In the late 19th century, as most worked in hard labor, they were subject to lynchings and violence across the American West and laws that prohibited their employment. They were banned from immigrating to the U.S. in 1924. Japanese-American citizens were forced into internment camps during the Second World War, and subjected to hideous, racist propaganda after Pearl Harbor. Yet, today, Asian-Americans are among the most prosperous, well-educated, and successful ethnic groups in America. What gives? It couldnt possibly be that they maintained solid two-parent family structures, had social networks that looked after one another, placed enormous emphasis on education and hard work, and thereby turned false, negative stereotypes into true, positive ones, could it? It couldnt be that all whites are not racists or that the American dream still lives?

What the San Bernardino Shooters Facebook Page Reveals About Domestic Violence

Trump Gleefully Recalls the Beautiful Chocolate Cake He Ate While Bombing Syria

Bill OReilly Is Going on Vacation. Will His Show Return?

Sheila Abdus-Salaam, First African-American Judge in New Yorks Top Court, Found Dead in Hudson River

Democrats turned the tables on Trump by making continuation of Obamacare insurer subsidies a must-pass item in must-pass spending legislation.

The developer, who calls himself the Turkish Trump, said hell work with a different hotel company.

[T]hose tweetstorms and Facebook posts causes millions of people to tune in.

How the party learned that the only thing it really disliked about Dubya was his inclusiveness.

Rather than blaming her for running an abysmal campaign and putting Trump in the White House.

While he once promoted hacked DNC emails, now he thinks WikiLeaks is a non-state hostile intelligence service abetted by the likes of Russia.

Officials pushed back on a report that said the U.S. is considering a preemptive strike, but its unclear how Trump might respond.

The Trump administration wants to know if there are any federal agencies Americans think are unnecessary and they mean any agency.

H.R. McMaster is reportedly pressing his colleagues to consider sending up to 50,000 ground troops to fight ISIS.

The proposal fulfills a Justin Trudeau campaign promise.

There hasnt ever been anything like it in Georgia politics, with $14 million spent so far $5 million by Jon Ossoff.

The 22,000-pound bomb was dropped on ISIS tunnels in Afghanistan.

Saudi Arabia is engineering a famine in Yemen with our governments help. We could stop them right now if we wanted to.

The bill barely passed in the Senate last month.

The most effective check on President Trumps worst instincts may be his familys desire to subordinate public policy to the needs of their brand.

The strike was supposed to be on ISIS forces, but it hit fighters from the Syrian Democratic Forces instead.

The United Airlines incident occurred within a disturbing context of increased hate directed at Asian-Americans.

The airline is doing everything it can to engender some good will.

I dont want people to get hurt, but he will kill Obamacare, threatens president.

The man who oversaw the bailout in 2008 is not optimistic about the banking industry under President Donald Trump.

Original post:
Why Do Democrats Feel Sorry for Hillary Clinton? - New York Magazine

Hillary Clintons Back, and Shes Speaking for the Majority – Daily Beast

Clinton spent some time walking in the woods, but shes not a wounded lonershes determined to figure out how she can use the platform she gained by winning almost 3 million votes more than Donald Trump.

Young women who werent excited about Hillary Clintons candidacy are energized by her loss in ways they probably never could have imagined. Theyre showing up at town halls, signing up for candidate training, and joining activist groups. And its not only millennial women waking up and fueling the resistance. Women across the spectrumschoolteachers, nurses, IT workersare turning up the political heat, and Clinton is taking notice.

Theres a realization that when she speaks, she speaks for the majority of the country, a former aide told The Daily Beast. Its a platform weve never had, the aide enthused, until reminded about Al Gores popular vote margin in the 2000 election.

Gore garnered 540,000 more votes than George W. Bush in an election that turned on faulty ballots in Florida and was settled by the Supreme Court in Bushs favor. Gore didnt hang around to see if anyone wanted to hear from him. He grew a beard and gave up on national politics.

Clinton spent some time walking in the woods, but shes not a dreamer and shes not a wounded loner. Shes a practical woman determined to figure out how she can use the platform that she gained by winning almost 3 million votes more than Donald Trump in the November election.

For activists and voters around the country, shes a reminder the country wanted something different, something better. Its a powerful juxtaposition, says the former aide, who did not want to be identified getting too far out front of where the ever-cautious Clinton is in her thinking.

Clinton is charting this next chapter in her life like any other campaign. There will be a book in the fall that draws on her favorite quotes over a lifetime for a series of essays that she said in a statement are the words I live by. One chapter will be about why she lost and could be titled, From Russia With Misogyny.

Her calendar is filling up with speeches before audiences sure to greet her like a conquering hero. Next week, shell be at an LGBT Community Center in New York City. Next month, shell keynote a Planned Parenthood gala and the Childrens Health Fund annual benefit in New York City. On May 26, shell give the commencement speech at her alma mater, Wellesley College.

For whatever other questions voters may have had about her, Americans generally viewed her as smart and right on the issues. And she has an important ability to focus peoples attention and shine a spotlight on the deficiencies in Donald Trumps approach to things, said Democratic pollster Geoff Garin.

Clintons popular vote margin lends her credibility that she wouldnt otherwise have, but losing candidates have to be careful when they weigh in that they dont sound like sour grapes, Garin continued. He gave her high marks for speaking out earlier this month at a Women in the World event in New York City, when she assured the audience, as a person, Im OK after her searing loss, but, as an American, Im pretty worried about the occupant in the White House.

She helps both raise alarm bells and put things in perspective for people, he said.

A lot of the country loves her, but there are parts that hate her with such visceral emotion that theres a danger she could over-interpret the positive reaction she gets from friendly audiences. Her numbers havent really recovered yet, said Garin. Its too soon, way too soon. It was a very polarized election.

The growing protest movement that has gotten Clintons attention isnt about her, and finding ways to be helpful is her challenge. Leaders will emerge organically, and Clintons role is more cheerleader than leader. Trump is the catalyst.

Thank You!

You are now subscribed to the Daily Digest and Cheat Sheet. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason

A first test of the resistance, and how well it can sustain the energy and enthusiasm that marked the Womens March on the day after the Inauguration, comes on Saturday, when 69 progressive groups from the newly launched Indivisible to Bernie Sanders Our Revolution and the venerable Common Cause are sponsoring 120 marches around the country calling on Congress to vote to release Trumps tax returns.

Saturday is eight years to the day since angry protests over Obamacare launched the Tea Party in 2009. Ezra Levin, a co-founder of Indivisible, A practical guide for resisting the Trump agenda, told The Daily Beast there are at least two and an average of 13-to-14 Indivisible groups in every congressional district, quite an achievement and a potential harbinger for change, since such a small percentage of the 435 House seats are even considered competitive.

The Indivisible guide borrows the strategy and tactics of the Tea Party, minus their racism and violence, said Levin. Republicans returning home to face their constituents are getting a taste of the publics anger. For lawmakers who duck these encounters, protesters are encouraged to think creatively and prop up a life-size cutout of the missing congressperson. A live chicken recently stood in for Michigan Republican Dave Trott.

Getting voters to understand the power they have over Congress is the goal. Trumpcare didnt get a vote because of the backlash from voters. Only 17 percent of those polled approved of the GOP plan. When Republicans proposed eliminating the Office of Ethics on Jan. 3, the first day of the new Congress, there was such furious pushback the GOP backed off immediately.

I view release of Trumps tax returns in the exact same way, said Levin. If people stand up and demand it, members of Congress will change their behavior.

With 74 percent of Americans saying Trump should release his returns, its not a partisan issue. Its about how our democracy works, says Levin, who worked on Capitol Hill in the belly of the beast where he learned firsthand what moves votes and attitudes. Hint: Its not Hillary Clinton.

Read more:
Hillary Clintons Back, and Shes Speaking for the Majority - Daily Beast

O’Reilly: Hillary Clinton should be doing ‘visible charitable work’ – The Hill


The Hill
O'Reilly: Hillary Clinton should be doing 'visible charitable work'
The Hill
"If I were advising Hillary Clinton, I would suggest that she redefine the Clinton Foundation and then travel the world doing visible charitable work," O'Reilly told The Hollywood Reporter in March for a profile that was published Thursday. "I would ...
Bill O'Reilly Is Going on Vacation. Will His Show Return?New York Magazine
Bill O'Reilly Thrives at Fox News, Even as Harassment Settlements Add UpNew York Times

all 292 news articles »

Read more here:
O'Reilly: Hillary Clinton should be doing 'visible charitable work' - The Hill