Mediaboss Marketing

Hillary Clinton net worth and salary:Hillary Clinton is an Americanpoliticianwho hasa net worth of $45 million. Hillary Clinton most recently served as theSecretary of State under President Barack Obama. She is alsoserved asUnited States Senator for the state of New York, from 2001-2009. Hillary is married to the 42nd President of the United States,Bill Clinton. Hillary was one of the leading Democratic candidates for the presidential nomination in the 2008 election. She was born in Chicago, Illinois, on October 26th 1947. Hillary graduated from the Yale Law School in 1973. In 1974 she moved to Arkansas. She and Bill Clinton were married in 1975, and have one daughter, Chelsea.

Secretary of State Salary

In 1977, Hillary co-founded the Arkansas Advocates for children and Families. In 1978, she was the first female chairperson of the Legal Services Corporation. At Rose Law Firm she was named the first female partner in 1979. Her husband was the Governor for the State of Arkansas, from 1979 to 1981, and again,1983 to 1992. As the First Lady of Arkansas, she successfully led a task force to reform Arkansas's education system. She has also been a member of the board of directors of several corporations, including Wal-Mart.

After moving to the state of New York, Clinton was elected as a U. S. Senator, in 2000. This was the first time an American First Lady had run for public office. Clinton was also the first female senator to represent the state of New York. As a Senator, Hillary supported the Bush administration on some foreign policy issues, including a vote for the Iraq War Resolution. Clinton eventually changed her position and opposed the administration on its conduct of the war in Iraq, as well as most domestic issues. In 2006, Senator Clinton was reelected by a wide margin. Hillary Clinton won more primaries and delegates than any other female candidate in American history, for the 2008 presidential nomination, but lost the nomination toIllinois Senator Barack Obama by a narrow margin.

Read more:
Hillary Clinton Net Worth | Celebrity Net Worth

MIAMI Hillary Clinton entered this presidential campaign last April as an overwhelming frontrunner and inevitable Democratic nominee. Tonight, she regained that status.

There was a lot of cheering at Clintons primary night party as results from the 12 states and territories that voted on Tuesday began to flash on the screen. Polls had indicated Clinton would do well today, and there were no surprises.

Following her huge win in South Carolinas Democratic primary on Saturday, Clintons strong showing in the Super Tuesday races today has allowed her to pull substantially ahead of her rival, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont. As the night progressed, she was declared victor in the delegate-rich states of Georgia, Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas, Alabama, Texas and Massachusetts. Sanders won his home state of Vermont right off the bat and later Oklahoma, Colorado and Minnesota and gave an early evening speech before calling it a night. Though Clinton and her allies arent declaring victory just yet, it is clear they believe the writing is on the wall for Sanders.

Hillary Clinton speaks at her Super Tuesday election night rally at a film studio in Miami. (Photo: Joe Skipper/EPA)

Tuesdays balloting kicked off a streak of primaries this month, and Sanders campaign reportedly views March 15 as a decisive moment in the fight for the Democratic nomination. A Clinton campaign source who spoke to Yahoo News at her primary night party here on Tuesday indicated that the campaign also sees March 15as a turning point and that it expects the night will be a good one for them.

Slideshow: Super Tuesday winners >>>

By mid-March, our lead will be large enough that it will be effectively insurmountable [it] wont be mathematically impossible but it will be effectively insurmountable, the Clinton source said.

In her victory speech, Clinton congratulated Sanders on his strong showing and campaign. She then emphasized her own forward trajectory.

Now this campaign moves forward to the Crescent City, the Motor City and beyond, Clinton said.

Since her win in South Carolina, Clinton has increasingly shifted her focus to Republican frontrunner Donald Trump. Her Tuesday night speech included jabs at Trumps Make America Great Again slogan, which Clinton has been deploying on the campaign trail in recent days.

America never stopped being great, Clinton said. We have to make America whole.

It was easy to forget in the wake of Sanders surge in the early-voting states, but this is how the race was always supposed to be for Clinton.

Hillary Clinton arrives to speak at her Super Tuesday election night rally in Miami. (Photo: Gerald Herbert/AP)

Read More

With her years of experience as a former first lady, U.S. senator and secretary of state, Clinton began this race almost as more of an incumbent than a White House hopeful. This time last year, polls showed Clinton with a lead that was, on average, more than 40 points ahead of all her likely rivals. But then America and the Clinton campaign along with it began to Feel the Bern.

Sanders numbers climbed, and he started the primaries by nearly tying Clinton in Iowa and defeating her soundly in New Hampshire. Clinton was expected to have a firewall of support that would block Berniementum in the next two states on the calendar, Nevada and South Carolina. But as the Feb. 20 Nevada caucus approached, Sanders was closing the gap, and Clintons firewall seemed in danger of being breached.

Then Clinton ended up winning Nevada by five points, and South Carolina brought her an even stronger victory than she expected. She came into Super Tuesday with momentum on her side, and with her strong performance this evening, her allies dont expect the race to shift again.

Former Rep. Ron Klein, D-Fla., was in attendance at Clintons primary night party and, even before any results were in, predicted that the night would be the beginning of a surge that would propel Clinton past Sanders.

I think this is a continuing momentum is what it is The 12 states and territories that are going today, assuming she does well in many of the areas, I think it will just build a continued ball of steam, Klein said.

At one point, as the results were coming in, jubilant supporters waiting at the party to watch Clinton speak began chanting, I believe that she will win! I believe that she will win! Indeed, all the supporters who spoke with Yahoo News expressed confidence in Clintons chances. However, like the campaign, most of Clintons supporters arent ready to say the race is over just yet.

Michael Lefevre, a 26-year-old transportation planner from nearby Coral Gables, Fla., said he is eager for Clinton to take on Republican frontrunner Donald Trump.

Im tired of it. I cant believe its just a primary. Im ready for the real thing, Lefevre said.

Still, in spite of his eagerness, Lefevre doesnt think the primary is finished.

I think todays the day where you really start to see them separate, he said.

Cindy Lerner, the mayor of Pinecrest, Fla., similarly said that the Democratic race is winding down.

It will be close. I dont know that it will be over, Lerner said. It looks like everybodys doing their best to prolong their opportunities to be involved, and thats OK to me.

Though she was optimistic about Clintons chances, Lerner sounded one cautionary note. Lerner was a pledged delegate for Clinton in the 2008 presidential primary. After Clinton was defeated by Barack Obama in a hard-fought race, Lerner was somewhat reluctant to switch sides. The experience makes Lerner concerned that Sanders supporters might not all be able to unite behind Clinton in the general election.

I was one of those people that was so heartbroken that she stepped aside, Lerner said of Clinton in 2008. I was supposed to go to the national convention. I didnt want to go. A lot of us went through a lot of angst about it. I hope that doesnt happen this time.

April Hardemon, a Miami police officer who was at Clintons primary night party, said she has no such worries. She said theres no question in her mind that the fight for the Democratic nomination ended Tuesday night.

Im very confident in Hillary Clinton, Hardemon said, adding, Shes going to take it.

Visit link:
The night Hillary Clinton regained her inevitability

Michigan was supposed to be a clean victory for the former secretary of state, proving that she could win across the country and put her on a quick path to the Democratic nomination. But when polls closed and it became clear that the race against Bernie Sanders would be a nail-biter, the second-guessing among Clinton's allies kicked into full gear.

In the days ahead of the primary, Clinton repeatedly hammered Sanders over his 2009 vote against a bailout for the U.S. auto industry, calculating that the line of attack would resonate in a state that's home to the country's largest car manufacturers. But by Tuesday night, some Michigan Democrats aligned with Clinton's campaign said privately they think that strategy did not work as they intended.

CNN exit polls showed that Sanders outperformed Clinton among voters who are "very worried" about the U.S. economy, 56% to 40%. Among voters who believe international trade takes away American jobs, Sanders also led Clinton, 56% to 43% a sign that Sanders' populist economic message resonated in Michigan.

In another troubling sign for the Clinton campaign, among voters who said their most important priority in a presidential candidate is that they are honest and trustworthy, Sanders overwhelmingly outperformed Clinton, 80% to 19%.

Some supporters pointed to the fact that, in contrast to Sanders, Clinton had only campaigned in Detroit, Flint and Grand Rapids. After campaigning tirelessly in Nevada and South Carolina, Clinton's schedule in Michigan seemed less packed.

The hand-wringing inside the Clinton circle also included the concern that perhaps the campaign had lost sight of winning the Democratic nomination and started looking ahead at the general election too soon.

"They didn't take Sanders for granted as much as voters," said one top Democrat close to the campaign.

Clinton told supporters on Monday that "the sooner I could become your nominee, the more I could begin to turn my attention to the Republicans."

Clinton's aides seemed to anticipate the potential of a Michigan loss. A memo last week from Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook noted "even if Sen. Sanders were able to eke out a victory (in Michigan), we would still net more delegates in Mississippi, which holds its election on the same night."

Indeed, Clinton actually won more delegates than Sanders on Tuesday, according to a CNN estimate, picking up 84 to Sanders' 67. She now has 1,234 of the 2,383 delegates needed to win the nomination. That figure includes super delegates, party officials and office holders who have said they will back her.

Sanders has 567 delegates overall.

As it began to dawn on the Clinton campaign that the Michigan contest would be much tighter than it had anticipated, Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton's communication director, said that demographics were partly to blame.

"Michigan looks a lot like states that Sen. Sanders does well in. The Democratic vote is only about 75% white -- that is always coming in at a disadvantage to us," Palmieri told reporters Tuesday night in Ohio.

Palmieri added that at the end of the day, the campaign still felt "confident she is going to be the nominee."

Sanders' performance in Michigan gives the senator's campaign a fresh boost of optimism. Particularly after losing by big margins to Clinton in a state like South Carolina, where he had made aggressive outreach to the African-American community, one of his main challenges is to show that he can win over a more diverse electorate.

Clinton's struggles in Michigan will be particularly worrisome as the campaign aims to win neighboring Ohio on March 15.

But on Tuesday night, Palmieri denied that the tightness in Michigan indicates potential problems for Clinton in Ohio, arguing that Clinton's message on jobs, the auto bailout and the Republican Party can deliver them the Buckeye State.

"We think that she came into Michigan with a very strong economic agenda and message about how she would create jobs and put manufacturing sector around clean energy, also how she would help create small businesses, very future-oriented," Palmieri said. "We don't think Senator Sanders offered that and we think that that will be effective in Ohio."

Sanders acknowledged that the Michigan vote was close but thanked voters for "repudiating" polls that indicated Clinton had stronger support in the state.

"What tonight means is that the Bernie Sanders campaign, the people's revolution that we're talking about, the political revolution that we're talking about, is strong in every part of the country," Sanders said. "And, frankly, we believe our strongest areas are yet to happen."

Read the rest here:
What went wrong for Hillary Clinton? - CNNPolitics.com

Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders before the debate in Flint, Michigan, on Sunday.

Geoff Robins/Getty Images

Were at the point in the Democratic primary where theres little to learn from additional debates. This was true on Sunday, when Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders faced off in Flint, Michigan, ahead of the Michigan primary on Tuesday. Going into the event, we knew that Bernie Sanders would announce his stand against the millionaires and billionaires and call for a government that works for the people, rather than Wall Street or corporate America.

Jamelle Bouie isSlates chief political correspondent.

Likewise, we knew Hillary Clinton would hesitate on big questions, instinctively choosing the more cautious option when confronted with a tough challenge. When an audience member asked Clinton what she would do to keep jobs in the United States rather than being shipped overseas, she replied with small measures to nudge manufacturers in her direction. Were going to have a very clear set of proposals and incentives for manufacturing so that we change the way that companies think about making investments again in America, she said. Sanders, by contrast, took a broad swing. Look, I was on a picket line in [the] early 1990s against NAFTA because you didnt need a Ph.D. in economics to understand that American workers should not be forced to compete against people in Mexico making 25 cents an hour, he said in a broadside against trade agreements like the North American Free Trade Agreement that have been backed by Bill Clinton.

We even knew there would be occasional conflict between the two candidates, as they skirmished for command of the stage (compared, it should be said, to the outright battle royal of the latest Republican debate). Bernie refused to cede the stage to Hillary on multiple occasions, wrote my Slate colleague Josh Voorhees, and he went out of his way to press her on her refusal to release transcripts of her paid speeches to Wall Street institutions like Goldman Sachs.

But, as viewers, we can learn from debates even when they cover familiar ground. And the Flint debate, in particular, illustrates an important difference between Clinton and Sanders thats often overlooked in coverage of the two candidates but that goes a long way in explaining their campaigns and their positions. In short, Hillary Clinton is running to lead Democrats, and Bernie Sanders is running to lead liberals.

Primaries obscure this, but parties are far more than their voters. They are the volunteers that give time, the donors that give money, the local and state officials that build organizations, the recruiters that find candidates, etc. They are also loose coalitions of groups and interests that work in tandem for common goals and, equally, work against each other for particular gains. Some are more powerful than others, and that influences the broad direction and shape of the parties.

In addition to chief executive and commander in chief, the president of the United States is also the leader of his or her party. And as much as anything else, the president has to navigate these groups and interests, as well as communicate with other party members, from congressional leaders to local and state party officials. Its why, to that point, the vice president often takes the lead in campaigning and fundraising for down ballot racesit is a show of commitment from the White House to the broader Democratic Party. Ambitious lawmakers do the same, campaigning for candidates and colleagues around the country. Its why Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, for example, stumped for Kentucky Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes in 2014. Or why West Virginias Joe Manchin did the same for Louisianas Mary Landrieu.

Presidential candidates hold a unique role. As prospective leaders of the national party, they set the tone for everyone on the ballot. What the presidential candidate (or nominee) says affects how House, Senate, and gubernatorial candidates shape their campaigns.

Which brings us back to Hillary and Bernie. In the last hour of the Flint debate, a questioner pushed the candidates on fracking. Clinton equivocated. [B]y the time we get through all of my conditions, I do not think there will be many places in America where fracking will continue to take place, she said. And I think thats the best approach, because right now, there [are] places where fracking is going on that are not sufficiently regulated. Sanders, by contrast, was more direct: My answer is a lot shorter. No, I do not support fracking.

You can read this as political cowardice from Clinton and courage from Sanders; or as evidence of their ties to entrenched interests (or lack thereof); or of Clintons cautious moderation and Sanders ambitious liberalism. But I think you can also read it as a reflection of their different positions in the Democratic primary, and their different goals as candidates.

Hillary Clinton, a prominent leader from the ideological center of the Democratic Party, is running to lead the Democratic coalition as it exists. She wants to lead the party as much as she wants to be president. Which makes her more attentive to traditional party buildingshes pledged to devote resources to boosting state parties and candidatesand more cautious with her rhetoric. Liberals in the Democratic coalition are opposed to fracking, but many rural and purple state Democrats arent. Clinton doesnt want to alienate either, so she tries to satisfy both.

Bernie Sanders, by contrast, comes from the left wing of American politics with a nominal attachment to the Democratic Partyuntil his run for the presidency, he didnt identify as a Democrat. Hes not as concerned with the usual party building and coalition maintenance. He wants to change the terms of the institution that is the Democratic Party and put ideological liberals at the fulcrum of Democratic politics, in the same way that ideological conservatives sit at the center of Republican politics. And so, his appeals are broad and expansive. He doesnt worry about details as much as he focuses on energizing like-minded voters. Rather than trying to satisfy Democrats in conservative places, Sanders is trying to reduce their influence by attracting sympathetic voters (his political revolution).

The problem for Sanders is that ideological liberals are one faction among many, and they compete for influence with party stalwarts like union members and black Americans, who offer support based on transactionwhat can you do for the interests of our specific groupas much as belief. To win on his terms, Sanders has to grow the space for ideological politics in those groups and satisfy its more moderate and conservative members. This is hard (I call them stalwarts for a reason), and its why Sanders has had a hard time in states where they play an important part.

But the problem for Clinton is that the Democratic Party isnt just a loose coalition of interests. Its more liberal than it has ever been, with a much larger space for progressive politics and action. And as Sanders has shown among white Democrats in the Northeast, and among young Democrats nationwide, that space is growing. This makes Clintona transactional politician who sits at the ideological centeran uncomfortable fit, who appeals to stalwarts and interest groups (like banks and industry) far more than voters who choose on ideology and belief.

This isnt a clean division. On guns, for example, Sanders has had to play the transactional politician to win in Vermont while Clinton has taken an ideological tack as a way to damage Sanders with liberals and tarnish his appeal as a purer politician. And this isnt a conversation of pragmatism versus idealism. Ideological solutions can be pragmaticadvocates would say this for the public option in health care reformwhile Clintons Democratic centrism represents a particular ideology of market capitalism as much as it exists to bridge party divides.

But if youre looking for a way to describe the current state of the Democratic race, this is it: a presumptive coalition leader versus a prospective ideological one.

Follow this link:
The real difference between Hillary Clinton and Bernie.

Hillary Clinton shot her upcoming appearance on Broad City back in December but the show's stars are still feeling the buzz from the unlikely cameo.

"We've had some amazing guests stars, but this is a whole other level," Abbi Jacobson told me at Marie Claire's SXSW party for her and Ilana Glazer.

"She's like an A-list historical figure," Glazer said. "Meeting her? It was a trip. It was wild."

The presidential hopeful was on set for about 45 minutes. "We were like, 'Thank God,' because she shouldn't be on our show for too long," Jacobson said with a laugh. "There are probably more important things for her to be doing."

They did get to talk to Clinton in between takes.

READ: Hillary Clinton's Scandal Set Visit Delights Your Favorite Gladiators

"We were shooting and then we had to reset the camera for a different take and we were just chatting, just three girls chatting," Jacobson said.

What did they chat about?!

"We talked about Cynthia Nixon and Sex and the City," Glazer said.

What?!

"Cynthia is on the same episode," Glazer said. "[Clinton] was like, 'I like her.'"

Glazer doesn't think they'll be campaigning for Clinton anytime soonnot because they don't support her.

"I don't know if that's helpful," she said. "We're these pot smoking characters."

But Glazer is happy to to say, "Now she knows Broad City. I think maybe if someone mentions it, she may be like, 'I think I was on that show.'"

PHOTOS: Stars Meet the President

RELATED VIDEOS:

The rest is here:
Hillary Clinton Talked About What With Broad City Stars ...