Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Hillary Clinton: Clarence Thomas has always been a person of grievance – The Hill

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is slamming conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, whom she described as a person of grievance in an interview on Tuesday.

I went to law school with him. Hes been a person of grievance for as long as I have known him, Clinton said in an interview with Gayle King during an appearance on CBS This Morning. Resentment, grievance, anger women are going to die, Gayle. Women will die.

Thomas has been on the receiving end of sharp criticism from womens rights groups and Democrats following the courts blockbuster decision overturning Roe v. Wade, the landmark ruling granting abortion rights.

Thomas has long been an opponent of Roe, and in his abortion opinion said the court should reconsider other rights such as contraception and same-sex marriage.

He has signaled in the past to lower courts, to state legislatures to find cases, pass laws, get them up, Clinton said, adding Thomass message to conservative judicial activists has been I may not get them the first, the second, or the third time, but were going to keep at it.

Thomas has also been rebuked by Democrats over his refusal to recuse himself from cases related to the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol, despite his wife Ginni Thomas playing a prominent role in organizing around efforts to keep former President Trump in office.

Clinton ran for president in 2016 and lost to Trump. She has since written a best-selling book about her campaign and has engaged in dozens of television interviews, documentaries and speaking gigs offering her thoughts on politics, the media and pop culture.

Link:
Hillary Clinton: Clarence Thomas has always been a person of grievance - The Hill

Hillary Clinton says Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v Wade will …

Executive Producer Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks on stage during "Below The Belt" New York Premiere at Museum of Modern Art on May 24, 2022 in New York City.Cindy Ord/Getty Images

Hillary Clinton slammed the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

The opinion "will live in infamy as a step backward for women's rights and human rights," she said.

The Court overturned the landmark ruling that established the constitutional right to an abortion.

Hillary Clinton said the Supreme Court's decision on Friday to overturn the 1973 landmark Roe v. Wade ruling is a "step backward" for women's rights.

"Most Americans believe the decision to have a child is one of the most sacred decisions there is, and that such decisions should remain between patients and their doctors," she tweeted after the decision.

She continued: "Today's Supreme Court opinion will live in infamy as a step backward for women's rights and human rights."

The Supreme Court's decision to overrule Roe on Friday was part of an opinion in the case Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.

"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives,"the Friday ruling said.

The ruling now leaves the legality of abortion up to state legislatures.

Read the original article on Business Insider

See the rest here:
Hillary Clinton says Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v Wade will ...

Pundits Talking Up a Hillary Clinton Comeback – National Review

  1. Pundits Talking Up a Hillary Clinton Comeback  National Review
  2. Hillary Clinton post asserting an abortion shouldn't be harder to obtain than a gun declared dumbest tweet  Fox News
  3. Juan Williams: Hillary Clinton can rescue Democrats in the midterms  The Hill
  4. Notable & Quotable: Theres a New Kid in Town  The Wall Street Journal
  5. 'Hahaha!' Juan Williams truly believes Hillary can save Dems from midterms drubbing  BizPac Review
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read more:
Pundits Talking Up a Hillary Clinton Comeback - National Review

Champion of Justice Award to Hillary Clinton – CounterPunch

Public Justice, a non profit that litigates against purveyors of corporate corruption, sexual abusers and harassers, and polluters who ravage the environment,has decided to give its Champion of Justice Award to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

This did not sit well with reporters, academics and activists who have studied Secretary Clintons record.

Clinton has always been a war hawk, said Aisha Jumaan, President of the Yemen Relief and Reconstruction Project. During her tenure at the State Department, arms sales to Saudi Arabia increased by about 100%. These arms have been used against the Yemeni people since the Saudi started their aggression on Yemen in March 2015. In 2011, her aide congratulated her for pushing through arms sales to Saudi Arabia calling it a Christmas gift.

FormerNew York Timesreporter Chris Hedges, author of the best selling bookWar is a Force that Gives Us Meaning(Public Affairs, 2002) and the upcomingThe Greatest Evil is War(Seven Stories Press, 2022) toldCorporate Crime Reporter let the corporate interests Hillary Clinton serves give her encomiums and financial rewards, not those she betrayed.

We know who Hillary Clinton is from the 70,000 hacked emails belonging to the Democratic National Committee and senior Democratic officials released by WikiLeaks, Hedges said. The emails, copied from the accounts of John Podesta, Hillary Clintons campaign chairman, exposed the donation of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, two of the major funders of Islamic State. They exposed that Hillary Clinton in 2009 ordered US diplomats to spy on U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki Moon and other U.N. representatives from China, France, Russia, and the UK, spying that included obtaining DNA, iris scans, fingerprints, and personal passwords, part of the long pattern of illegal surveillance that included the eavesdropping on UN Secretary General Kofi Annan in the weeks before the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

They exposed that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and the CIA orchestrated the June 2009 military coup in Honduras that overthrew the democratically elected president Manuel Zelaya, replacing it with a murderous and corrupt military regime. They exposed the $657,000 that Goldman Sachs paid to Hillary Clinton to give talks.

They exposed Clintons repeated mendacity. She was caught in the emails, for example, telling the financial elites that she wanted open trade and open borders and believed Wall Street executives were best positioned to manage the economy, a statement that contradicted her campaign statements. They exposed the Clinton campaigns efforts to influence the Republican primaries to ensure that Donald Trump was the Republican nominee. They exposed Clintons advanced knowledge of questions in a primary debate. They exposed Clinton as the principal architect of the war in Libya, a war she believed would burnish her credentials as a presidential candidate.

Hedges said that Hillary Clinton is, and has always been, an abject servant of the billionaire class, a politician who cares little about justice for the victims of the wars she supported in the Middle East, the mothers and children who lost welfare benefits under the administration of Bill Clinton, or the workers who lost jobs and saw their communities destroyed under NAFTA and other trade deals.

She is an enemy of economic, social and political justice. She has already been amply rewarded for that. She and Bill Clinton left the White House with over $1 million in debt from legal bills. They are now worth over $120 million.

Public Justice executive director Paul Bland defended the decision to give Clinton the award. Clinton will accept the award via video link at the groups 40th anniversary gala on July 18 in Seattle, Washington.

Our current leadership was entirely supportive of honoring Secretary Clinton, Bland said. She was a very positive force for access to justice, opposing the Class Action Fairness Act, supporting the early versions of the Arbitration Fairness Act, supporting legal services.

As the organization is increasingly focused on advancing diversity, equity and inclusion, she was an important voice for womens rights, and focused a lot of her effort as Secretary of State on aspects of human rights that our country had largely ignored before her on the international stage, Bland said.

But Bruce Fein, a public interest lawyer and author ofAmerican Empire Before the Fall, called on Public Justice to reconsider its decision to give Clinton the award.

Public celebrities or public figures, for good or for ill or a blend, teach people by example, Fein said. Their lives cannot be fragmented on that score. The whole must be examined, and grievous faults outweigh less momentous benevolence or accomplishments.

Bill Cosbys serial predation of women disqualifies him from a race relations or indeed any other public interest award.

The case of President Lyndon Baines Johnson, more to the point, underscores Hillary Clintons unfitness for the Public Justice award. LBJ brought into being the Office of Economic Opportunity, the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1965 Voting Rights Act, the 1968 Fair Housing Act, Executive Order 11246 for federal government contractors, affirmative action, the appointment of Thurgood Marshall to the United States Supreme Court, and other measures to end and remediate a century of Jim Crow punctuated by thousands of black lynchings.

Yet his unforgivable Vietnam War crimes and dissembling and ethical obtuseness disqualified President Johnson for race-relations, human rights accolades or trophies, Fein said.

Martin Luther King turned against LBJ over the war, and likened his tactics in Vietnam to Nazi war crimes. The NAACP refrained from laureling LBJ with race relations trophies or medals.

Hillary Clinton is an a fortiori case. Her war crimes horrors continue to haunt the world to this very day, including the resistance of Iran and North Korea to nuclear deescalation upon witnessing Clintons gloating over Gaddafis overthrow and assassination after he had abandoned weapons of mass destruction.

Fein said that Public Justices effort to surgically remove Hillary Clintons good works from a torso of malignant injustice and disdain for the law doesnt cut muster.

How can it be denied that bestowing on Hillary Clinton a Public Justice award will be popularly perceived as valorizing and saluting her entire life? Awards do not lend themselves to footnotes or reservations.

Fein said that crowning Hillary Rodman Clinton with the Public Justice Award in 2022 ranks with laureling Henry Kissinger with a Nobel Peace Prize in 1973.

Secretary Clinton engineered the war crime of aggression against Libya in 2011 culminating with her Caesar-like triumphalist, We came, we saw, he [Muammar Gaddafi] died.

Ms. Clintons crime turned Libya into a Hobbesian wilderness earmarked by human trafficking, slavery, and thousands of drowning deaths in the Mediterranean Sea. She urged a reprise of her calamitous crime against Syria. She took Orwellian to a new level in effusing over her Libyan criminal debacle as smart power at its best.

Ms. Clinton exhibited her signature professional and moral obtuseness in declining to suspend the foreign-money-dominated Clinton Foundation during her service as Secretary of State and candidacy for the presidency. Among other things, the Foundation received tens of millions in donations from an all star roster of despotic states seeking to curry favor: Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Brunei.

That Ms. Clinton lost the 2016 presidential race to an open, notorious, misogynist, vulgar, unschooled, scofflaw speaks volumes about the publics distrust of her character.

If there are worse choices for the Public Justice award than Hillary Clinton, they do not readily come to mind.

In a March 2016 article titledHillary Clintons Support for the Iraq War Was No Fluke, Code Pinks Medea Benjamin wrote that when Clinton announced her second campaign for the presidency, she declared she was entering the race to be the champion for everyday Americans.

As a lawmaker and diplomat, however, Clinton has long championed military campaigns that have killed scores of everyday people abroad, Benjamin wrote. As commander-in-chief, theres no reason to believe shed be any less a war hawk than she was as the senator who backed George W. Bushs war in Iraq, or the secretary of state who encouraged Barack Obama to escalate the war in Afghanistan.

Clinton may well have been the administrations most vociferous advocate for military action. On at least three crucial issues Afghanistan, Libya, and the bin Laden raid she took a more aggressive line than Defense Secretary Gates, a Bush-appointed Republican.

Read more here:
Champion of Justice Award to Hillary Clinton - CounterPunch

What reversing Roe really means | | elkodaily.com – Elko Daily Free Press

Throughout the 2015-16 campaign for the Republican presidential nomination, I urged conservatives not to nominate Donald Trump. When November 2016 arrived, I did not vote for Donald Trump. Of course, I most certainly didnt vote for Hillary Clinton. I wrote in another Republican instead.

One of my chief concerns was that I could not imagine that Donald Trump, a lifelong pro-choice, playboy, billionaire, obnoxious New Yorker, truly had become pro-life and would nominate pro-life justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. I had additional issues with Trump, but that one really stood out. When Trump produced a list of pro-life judges he promised to appoint, I didnt trust him.

In turn, many pro-life conservatives urged me to nonetheless vote for the lesser of two evils when it came to abortion. The Supreme Courtplus countless other court appointments at other levelshung in the balance. If Hillary Clinton was elected, we would lose the courts for at least another entire generation. You would never reverse Roe v. Wade and its companion case of insanity, Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Pro-lifers insisted on voting to save the court.

People are also reading

In that respect, they stand vindicated. I still had much I didnt like about Trump, but the man proceeded to govern as the best pro-life president the country ever had. It was astonishing, and I was shocked every step of the way, but it is indisputably true. A pro-life colleague of mine who loathes Donald Trump insists that Trump did what he did for pro-lifers strictly for political expediency. Even if that were the case (for the sake of argument), it is undeniable that Trump became the most effective pro-life president ever, including more so than my buddy Ronald Reagan.

Most critical and most obvious, of course, were Trumps three Supreme Court picks: Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. They gave you this reversal of Roe and Casey. Had Hillary Clinton been president, you wouldve gotten three more like Harry Blackmun, William Brennan, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg (even as RBG knew and candidly admitted how flawed Roe was). (For the record, Reagan gave us Sandra Day OConnor, the hugely disappointing Anthony Kennedy, and just one outstanding pro-life pickAntonin Scalia.) Hillary Clinton quickly came forward after the Dobbs announcement to denounce a new day of infamy for America.

That said, what does this decision overturning Roe really mean?

First and foremost, it affirms what numerous constitutional scholarsincluding many liberal scholars and even the likes of Ruth Bader Ginsburgalways knew, namely: Roe v. Wade had no basis in the U.S. Constitution. Roe was a constitutional absurdity. It was never constitutional. I heard one news anchor on Fox News report that the Dobbs decision eliminated the constitutional right to abortion. No. There never was a constitutional right to abortion. Thats the whole point.

Roe was preposterously based on a right to an abortion invented and extended from a so-called penumbra or shadow of a right to privacy lurking somewhere in the arcane recesses of the Constitution. In fact, neither abortion nor even the word privacy are mentioned in the Constitutionno, not one timeeven as the rights and protection of life is mentioned three times (in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments).

One can certainly argue that when the framers mentioned life, they were not thinking of abortion. No doubt that is correct. But still, a pro-lifer looking for a right to life in the Constitution clearly has a little more to grab on to than a pro-choicer looking for a right to abortion or even privacy.

Roe v. Wade is a legal absurdity that any jurist not jaded by ideology would concede was utterly without foundation in the U.S. Constitution. The reality is that the Constitution is silent on abortion, which is why the federal government should never have enshrined it. It should have been left to the states. This was something that Judge Robert Bork tried to explain to Senators Joe Biden and Ted Kennedy and feminists and liberals everywhere over 30 years ago, and for which he was called everything from a misogynist to a gargoyle.

And so, abortion now goes to the states. What does that mean?

Despite the hyperbole and hysteria, this certainly does not mean an end to abortion. Not at all. You will now see the emergence of abortion statesthe abortion states of America. Already leading the charge at the state-level are the likes of New Yorks new pro-choice governor, Kathy Hochul, and Governor Gavin Newsom of California.

Vigorously supported by President Joe Biden, Hochul and Newsom are militantly committed to battling the efforts of states like Mississippi and Texas and others to limit abortions to the time of the unborn childs heartbeat. The Texas action outraged Joe Biden, who has promised to throw the whole of government against it. The bill infuriated Govs. Hochul and Newsom, who have responded by offering their states as destination centers for women nationwide to come for abortions.

Abortion access is safe in New York, Hochul ensures, To the women of Texas, I want to say I am with you. Lady Liberty is here to welcome you with open arms. She vows: We will help you find a way to New York.

As for Gavin Newsom, he vows to make California a reproductive freedom state. These are dark days, says a dire Newsom.

Whats happening with states like California and New York is something that many of us have long expected. Which states will be the dominant abortion states? Figuring that out isnt rocket science. The answer is simple and predictable: Go to political maps of presidential elections and look at the blue states vs. red states; that is, Democrat states vs. Republican states. The firmly Democrat states, especially on the West Coast and northeast, will become Americas abortion states. They will roll out the red carpet.

For states like New York and California, this process has already begun. The governors there are eager to fly the Roe flag as premier destination centers for abortion.

That sad reality ought to give some measure of comfort to pro-choice forces. They should be immensely satisfied with that they got from Roe. They got themselves nearly 50 years of legalized abortion. They threw open wide the doors to abortion clinics in every state. This long, insidious period was protracted enough to get them to a crucial hump they needed, namely: chemical abortions, abortions by pill, do-it-yourself-at-home abortions. This was symbolized by the group of young pro-abortion women who stood outside the Supreme Court a few months ago and en masse swallowed down abortion pills.

From here on, countless abortions will be done that wayas well as in the abortion states.

Pro-choicers: your choice will have plenty of options, including altogether new ones.

As for pro-lifers, they should nonetheless celebrate this achievement. Roe v. Wade was a monstrous injustice that produced over 60 million abortions of unborn children. It was a colossal sin and a dark stain on America.

Dr. Paul Kengor is professor of political science and chief academic fellow of the Institute for Faith and Freedom at Grove City College. One of his latest books (August 2020) is The Devil & Karl Marx: Communisms Long March of Death, Deception, and Infiltration. He is also the author of is A Pope and a President: John Paul II, Ronald Reagan, and the Extraordinary Untold Story of the 20th Century (April 2017) and 11 Principles of a Reagan Conservative. His other books include The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, The Untold Story of Barack Obamas Mentor and Dupes: How Americas Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century.

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

Excerpt from:
What reversing Roe really means | | elkodaily.com - Elko Daily Free Press