Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Harry Reid reshaped the West. What is his climate legacy? – Los Angeles Times

This is the Jan. 6, 2021, edition of Boiling Point, a weekly newsletter about climate change and the environment in California and the American West. Sign up here to get it in your inbox.

When Harry Reid retired, New York Magazine ran this headline: Who Will Do What Harry Reid Did Now That Harry Reid Is Gone?

Ive been thinking about that question as Democrats struggle to advance President Bidens Build Back Better bill, which includes hundreds of billions of dollars in clean energy investments. As the Senates Democratic leader, Reid was legendary for brokering deals and holding his caucus together, most famously getting President Obamas Affordable Care Act across the finish line despite unified Republican opposition. Its hard not to wonder: If Reid were still in charge, would the climate bill have passed by now?

It was an impossible question to answer even before the Nevada senator died last week from pancreatic cancer.

But Reids legacy lives on across Western landscapes. And if you care about the region, youd do well to study that legacy.

For a primer, check out this documentary produced last year by KCET, The New West and the Politics of the Environment. It chronicles Reids impoverished origins in the gold-mining town of Searchlight and his many environmental efforts, including:

Those deals made Reid enemies, especially in rural Nevada. In the Truckee River Basin, for instance, farmers were furious to receive less water under the deal Reid facilitated. Critics also slammed the monument designations as federal land grabs.

Some environmentalists, too, were frustrated by Reids allegiance to the mining industry, and by his support for a plan to pump groundwater in rural Nevada and send it to Las Vegas via pipeline. After leaving office, he told the Las Vegas Review-Journal that water being used on farms in Lincoln County created hardly any jobs, and could instead be used to flush toilets on the Strip.

But Reids admirers say his talent for dealmaking and his ability and willingness to use political power for environmental goals offer a much-needed roadmap for progress, especially as climate change makes the West a more dangerous place to live.

Reid had this unique combination of optimism that something could be done, but also a pragmatism about the contours or the bounds that could make a deal possible, said Christian Filbrun, a doctoral student who is studying Reids legacy at the University of Nevada, Reno. Perhaps the old way of navigating the Senate isnt possible any longer as things become more divisive. But I think his career can still be viewed as a model to broker these deals and bring groups together.

Harry Reid tours the Copper Mountain solar plant while campaigning in Boulder City, Nev., in April 2010.

(Laura Rauch / Associated Press)

The West faces no shortage of climate challenges that demand collaboration. Long-term aridification is sapping the Colorado River. Wildfires have become a year-round threat. Mining for metals crucial to the clean energy transition is a burgeoning source of tension. Coal miners, ranchers and farmers are pushing back as urban growth and changing economics upend their way of life.

Harry Reid could not have solved those problems alone. But Jon Christensen thinks examining his legacy is a good starting point.

Christensen is an environmental historian and UCLA professor who spent more than a decade as a journalist in Nevada, where he followed Reids career closely. He produced the KCET documentary on the Nevada senator and was featured in it prominently.

Outside of the coastal states, the American West is a purple region, he told me. The path that Harry Reid forged for compromise with Republican colleagues, with conservative county commissions thats whats going to be needed.

When I asked Christensen which politicians might pick up Reids mantle, though, he had trouble naming any Republicans. He acknowledged that moderate Republicans have become an endangered species and said Democrats who want to solve the Wests environmental crises should build strong party infrastructure at the state level much as Republicans have done.

Reid was good at that too. His political machinery not only got him reelected during 2010 midterms otherwise dominated by the GOP but also helped deliver the Silver State for Hillary Clinton and Reids handpicked Senate successor, Catherine Cortez Masto.

The senator wasnt afraid to cajole and threaten. He helped the Moapa Band of Paiute Indians build the nations first large solar farm on tribal lands, for instance, by calling then-Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and suggesting the city buy the power. When NV Energy wanted to build new coal plants, Reid intervened with a hedge fund planning to finance construction.

I called a hedge fund and I told the guy, Look, you back away from that coal plant or I will get even with you. I dont know what Im going to do, but I will figure something out, Reid recalled in the KCET documentary.

That kind of story makes me wonder how Reid might have handled the conflicts between renewable energy development, habitat conservation and tribal rights that are becoming increasingly common on Western landscapes, including in his state.

Just this week, a federal judge temporarily blocked construction of a geothermal power plant on public lands in northern Nevada, agreeing with the Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe that the project could threaten a sacred spring, as Jeniffer Solis reported for the Nevada Current. Would Reid have agreed with the tribe and pressured the city of L.A. which is slated to buy the power to back out of the geothermal plant? Or would he have gotten Congress to pass a bill allowing the project to move forward?

What about a solar farm on Nevadas Mormon Mesa, which was scrapped by the developer after critics said it would disrupt the experience of viewing a remote piece of desert land art, Michael Heizers Double Negative? Reid pushed for Basin and Range National Monument in part to protect another Heizer sculpture, known as City, from a railroad line that would have brought nuclear waste to Yucca Mountain. Would Reid have seen the Mormon Mesa solar farm as a threat, or as a public good?

Double Negative by artist Michael Heizer, seen in January 2021 near Overton, Nev.

(Josh Brasted / Getty Images)

Heres what I struggle with, personally: In an era of environmental crisis, when is compromise acceptable?

Scientists say planet-warming emissions need to be cut roughly in half by the end of this decade, then flattened to net-zero by midcentury. Biodiversity loss continues at an alarming and accelerating rate, with many species being pushed toward extinction. Tribal nations and communities of color are rightfully demanding the clean water, air and soil they have long been denied.

Patrick Donnelly, Nevada director of the Center for Biological Diversity, sees Reids environmental legacy as a mixed bag. While Reid protected vast swaths of wilderness, killed coal plants and helped restore Pyramid Lake for which he should be commended, Donnelly told me he also blocked mining reform and supported the controversial Las Vegas water pipeline.

Donnelly is especially worried about Reids template of allowing sprawling suburban development in exchange for wilderness protections. The Senate leader pioneered that tradeoff in the Las Vegas Valley nearly a quarter of a century ago. Its legacy continues to this day, with Cortez Masto introducing a bill in the Senate that would conserve about 2 million acres in Clark County while allowing the Las Vegas metro area to expand outward toward the California border, gobbling up public lands along the way.

Its no secret that suburban sprawl can exacerbate the climate crisis, leading to more driving and more tailpipe emissions. Donnelly would much rather see Las Vegas and cities across the West focus on dense infill development and public transit.

The climate crisis is a screaming emergency that demands a new way of doing business, Donnelly said. I dont want to condemn the Reid model of making deals ... but were in a new time now, and at least on the environmental side of that equation, the climate crisis throws the whole dealmaking balance out of whack. Climate should be the lens.

The Nevada Harry Reid came up in was a very different place at a different time, he added. I dont doubt that you had to make some serious deals to get things done on the environment 30 years ago here. Im really more interested in the legacy moving forward. Are we going to learn from the consequences of all that? Or are we just going to say, Rah rah, this was great?

Its impossible to know how Reid would have navigated the Wests current and future challenges. But its possible to guess what political calculus might have informed his decisions. His deals often left farmers and ranchers feeling like they were on the losing end and he seemed to accept that, especially if it meant Native Americans or other marginalized groups benefited.

You can call it Reids pragmatism that he recognized that Nevada was shifting and he didnt need the rural vote anymore, Filbrun said. Whether it was pragmatism or bravery that he could weather the storm is up for interpretation.

Heres what else is happening around the West:

Todd Lovrien looks over the smoldering remains of his sisters home in Louisville, Colo., after the Marshall fire tore through the area.

(Jack Dempsey / Associated Press)

The Marshall fire tore through Colorado suburbs between Denver and Boulder over New Years weekend, destroying nearly 1,000 homes and other buildings. No deaths have been reported, but two people are still missing. The blaze is unfortunately teaching Coloradans a lesson that many Californians have learned: The wildland-urban interface is huge, and just because you dont live in the forest or the mountains doesnt mean youre safe, as Sam Brasch writes for CPR News. The Washington Post also has a lucid rundown of how climate change created the conditions for such an awful winter firestorm.

Although the Golden State has seen blazes like Colorados, that doesnt mean all Californians are coming to terms with the new reality we face. In a searing essay for ProPublica and the New York Times Magazine, Elizabeth Weil writes that the California we know and love is actually gone, and we need to confront the one weve got. That means fireproofing homes, pulling back from the wildland-urban interface and hurrying to reduce climate pollution. Blaming the problem on forces outside our control like the argument that arson is getting worse, which my colleague Hayley Smith largely debunked is not going to solve anything.

A Pacific Gas & Electric power line ignited the Dixie fire, which burned nearly 1 million acres last year. Heres the story from The Times Gregory Yee, who writes that investigators determined PG&E was responsible for the second-largest fire in Californias recorded history. In related news, federal judges rejected a challenge by attorney Michael Aguirre to the $13.5-billion wildfire liability fund approved by state lawmakers, which critics derided as a bailout of PG&E and other utilities. California utilities have also faced criticism for trying to prevent ignitions by shutting off power during fire weather but in Washington state, people are frustrated that utilities arent shutting off power more often as fire danger grows, Rebecca Moss reports for the Seattle Times.

California has instituted water-wasting rules similar to those from the last drought, with fines of up to $500 for violators. No more hosing down driveways, overwatering lawns or washing cars without a shutoff nozzle, if for some reason youre still doing that stuff, my colleague Ian James reports. Officials approved the new rules even after a series of storms that brought Sierra snowpack to 160% of average for this time of year and set rainfall records across the L.A. area. Even with all that water, the next few months will determine whether the drought continues or comes to an end, The Times Hayley Smith and Paul Duginski report.

Another positive from all the snow: California should have more hydropower this summer, and less likelihood of rolling blackouts. That said, a return to dry conditions over the next few months could limit the energy windfall, Rob Nikolewski notes for the San Diego Union-Tribune. Theres already enough water in Lake Oroville that hydroelectric generation has resumed after a five-month shutdown, but the plant is nowhere near full capacity, Kurtis Alexander reports for the San Francisco Chronicle.

Even with all the rain and snow, California is throttling back pumping from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta the heart of the states water delivery network to protect the Delta smelt. Yes, this is the endangered fish that Ted Cruz said goes well with cheese and crackers in an appeal to San Joaquin Valley farmers who dont want to see water deliveries reduced. The Sacramento Bees Ryan Sabalow and Dale Kasler explain whats going on. They also write that nearly all juvenile winter-run salmon died during the hot, dry summer on the Sacramento River last year, with just 2.6% of the endangered fish surviving.

On Dec. 1, this United Airlines 737 Max 8 became the first commercial airliner to use biofuel as the sole fuel for one of its engines.

(United Airlines)

On a United Airlines flight from Chicago to Washington last month, one of the engines exclusively used cooking oil a first. Its one of the options for airlines targeting net-zero emissions by 2050, my colleague Hugo Martn reports. But some clean energy advocates are skeptical that cooking oil is a sustainable fuel. New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham is facing similar criticism over her plan to make the state a hydrogen hub, Scott Wyland and Daniel Chacon report for the Santa Fe New Mexican.

Humboldt County was once the center of Californias lumber industry. Now it wants to be the offshore wind capital of the West Coast, Emma Foehringer Merchant writes for Inside Climate News. That would require major upgrades to the Port of Humboldt, to help it handle wind turbine blades longer than football fields and towers nearly the size of the Washington Monument. But funds from California and the Biden administration, which both want offshore wind, could help make it happen.

Idaho Power says it will phase out coal by 2028 and add huge amounts of solar, wind and battery storage in its quest for 100% clean energy by 2045. The utility company plans to exit from Wyomings Jim Bridger coal plant by 2028 and from Nevadas Valmy coal plant three years earlier, the APs Keith Ridler reports. In other potentially positive news for clean energy, Sen. Joe Manchin III voiced support for at least some of the Build Back Better legislation hes been blocking, telling reporters, The climate thing is one that we probably can come to agreement much easier than anything else, per Jeremy Dillon at E&E News.

The merger of two gold mining giants has had major consequences for the remote northern Nevada community of Elko. Employees say the consolidated company has made life worse for workers who have nowhere else to go, in part through anti-union tactics, and Native American tribes are concerned about the companys plan to expand gold mining on their ancestral lands, as Nick Bowlin and Daniel Rothberg report in a fascinating deep dive for High Country News and the Nevada Independent.

A plan to mine antimony in Idahos Salmon River Mountain has prompted objections from the Nez Perce tribe, who say the project would decimate salmon habitat and violate their treaty rights. A Bill Gates-backup startup would use the antimony to manufacture liquid-metal batteries that havent yet proved their effectiveness in the real world, Jack Healy and Mike Baker write for the New York Times. In neighboring Washington state, meanwhile, Gov. Jay Inslee vetoed a section of a landmark climate law that would have allowed tribes to block energy projects that would harm sacred sites, Sarah Sax writes for High Country News.

Southern California ended the year with yet another sewage spill. Beaches were closed on New Years Eve as a result, my colleague Anh Do reports; as much as 7 million gallons spilled, with officials citing the failure of an aging sewage line in Carson that was due to be replaced in less than a year, James Rainey reports. In other sewage news yes, theres more El Segundo residents have sued the city of L.A. over last summers spill from the Hyperion plant, saying they were exposed to hydrogen sulfide gas, Hayley Smith reports. In better news, Hayley also reports that the Orange County offshore oil spill is now fully cleaned up.

Dont Look Up features Leonardo DiCaprio and Jennifer Lawrence.

(Photo illustration by Nicole Vas / Los Angeles Times; Niko Tavernise / Netflix)

I spent New Years Eve watching the Adam McKay film Dont Look Up, starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Jennifer Lawrence, in which a meteor heading straight for Earth serves as a metaphor for societys failure to tackle the climate crisis. I wouldnt say I enjoyed it, exactly McKays criticism of our collective inability to pay attention to impending doom hits painfully close to home but its an excellent, thought-provoking film that Id recommend. Itll make you cringe, but it also offers some good laughs.

Id say the most important thing about Dont Look Up is that its gotten so many people talking about global warming. My colleague Ryan Faughnder who writes our Wide Shot newsletter, which you should definitely sign up for if you have any interest in the entertainment industry notes that Dont Look Up was the No. 1 movie worldwide on Netflix after its release.

Theres surely a preaching-to-the-choir aspect to Dont Look Up. But the response to the film shows that theres at least some appetite for entertainment that directly tackles an issue that, to many, feels intractable, Ryan writes. Hollywood has had all sorts of trouble telling compelling stories about climate change, he adds, and this film could break the ice, so to speak.

Well be back in your inbox next week. If you enjoyed this newsletter, please consider forwarding it to your friends and colleagues.

Go here to see the original:
Harry Reid reshaped the West. What is his climate legacy? - Los Angeles Times

U.S. House January 6 attack chairman Bennie Thompson lays out the investigation ahead – The Atlanta Voice

During two interviews on January 2, Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-MS) outlined steps moving forward after months of investigation of the violent January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol by Donald Trump supporters.

The Chair of the special committee to investigate the January 6, 2021 attack said in a January 2nd interview that the violent insurrection appeared to be a coordinated effort on the part of a number of people to undermine the election.

Thompson also indicated that the Department of Defense may have interfered with assistance to the Capitol from the National Guard.

There were significant inconsistencies in coordination, that the National Guard from the District of Columbia was slow to respond, not on its own, but it had to go to the Department of Defense. We have actually fixed that right now, where the mayor of the District of Columbia can access the Guard right now, Thompson said.

Thompson is planning televised hearings of the committees work in January. Thompson also mentioned a task force within the committee that will investigate the financial support of Trump supporters who attacked the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The committee is bi-partisan with two Republicans: Reps. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) and Liz Cheney (R-WY).

The attack on the legislative branch of the U.S. government happened on the same day that the election of President Joe Biden was to officially be certified as the victor of the 2020 presidential election by Congress. The certification process is typically a non-eventful procedure that involves officially receiving the certification papers of all the states during an hours-long ceremony and vote on the House floor.

There were 147 Republicans in the U.S. House who voted against the certification of Bidens election even after the violent attack on the Capitol.

On January 6, 2021, former President Trump, who lost to President Joe Biden on November 3, 2020 by over 7,052,770 votes, had only 14 days left to remain in The White House before Bidens inaugural. On the morning of January 6, 2021, Trump appeared at a gathering of his supporters and lied to them, as he had since November 2020 claiming the election was stolen. Trumps lie that his election loss was the result of fraud has been advanced on Facebook by his supporters and in right-wing media non-stop.

I think it is critically important, given everything we know about the lines that he was willing to cross he crossed lines no American president has ever crossed before. You know, we entrust the survival of our republic into the hands of the chief executive, and when a president refuses to tell the mob to stop, when he refuses to defend any of the coordinate branches of government, he cannot be trusted, Rep. Cheney said about Donald Trump on January 2.

Trump lost to Biden by double the amount of votes that he lost to Hillary Clinton in 2016. Clinton won the popular vote by 2,868,686 votes but lost the electoral college 304 to 227.

All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldened radical-left Democrats, which is what theyre doing. And stolen by the fake news media, Trump bellowed from a stage on the eclipse near The White House. We will never give up, we will never concede. It doesnt happen. You dont concede when theres theft involved, Trump continued citing no evidence.

Several Republican election officials in states such as Georgia, Arizona and New Mexico certified Biden as the winner of the election without controversy.

Trumps supporters violently attacked the Capitol shortly after Trumps speech, over-running entrances, assaulting police officers and breaking glass doors as Vice President Michael Pence during the violent insurrection at the Capitol. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser called Governors in surrounding states for assistance from their National Guard.

Trumps supporters set up a fake guillotine they said was for Pence on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol between the reflecting pool and a memorial of U.S. Grant. Trumps supporters chanted hang Mike Pence in the Capitol during the insurrection.

We have significant testimony that leads us to believe that the White House had been told to do something. We want to verify all of it, Thompson said on CNN.

The next committee meeting is expected soon.

View post:
U.S. House January 6 attack chairman Bennie Thompson lays out the investigation ahead - The Atlanta Voice

STEPHEN MOORE: Union bosses against union jobs – The Bakersfield Californian

Why don't the union bosses in America represent their union members anymore? Could it be because the union leadership has become more beholden to the Democratic politicians in Washington than the rank-and-file workers who pay the dues?

We saw an example of this betrayal of the workers not long ago when the United Association of Union Plumbers and Pipefitters brass endorsed Joe Biden for president even though Biden openly opposed all fossil fuels and wanted to end the building of pipelines.

Talk about selling the rope to the hangman. The union bosses acted surprised that Biden's first act as president was to kill several thousand union jobs by killing the Keystone XL pipeline. And in recent months, the Biden officials have been on a crusade to shutdown Midwest pipelines that carry natural gas to the midwestern states.

More recently, we witnessed one of the dumbest union leadership campaigns in American history. The United Mine Workers Association endorsed the Build Back Better bill, which is stuffed with $550 billion of subsidies for green energy projects and energy mandates explicitly designed to kill America's coal production. Wipe coal and coal miners right out of existence.

Then, UMWA President Cecil Roberts wrote an extraordinary letter to Sen. Joe Manchin, D-West Virginia, admonishing him for opposing the bill. "We are disappointed that the bill will not pass," Roberts said. "We urge Sen. Manchin to revisit his opposition to this legislation and work with his colleagues to pass something that will help keep coal miners working." Manchin was standing up for the coal miners in his state. Why wouldn't the union do the same?

I've been to Charleston, West Virginia, and talked to many of the coal miners. They hatethe Biden bill and know that their jobs are in jeopardy. They remember that Hillary Clinton came to West Virginia in 2016 and told the coal miners that under her plan, these workers could build wind panels instead. They laughed at her arrogance and fantasy.

The UMWA wants more funding for victims of black lung and other benefits for laid-off coal miners. That's fine. But if Build Back Better passes, there won't be any miners left working in states like West Virginia, and the UMWA will be defunct.

What's next, the Steelworkers union coming out against steel production?

Even the United Auto Workers union is putting at risk tens of thousands of union jobs by backing Biden's risky plan to divert production of gasoline-powered cars toward electric vehicles. More than 90 percent of the car sales in the U.S. are still traditional cars. If they are not made in the U.S., they will be made in Japan, Korea and Germany. How does that create union jobs?

The union bosses haven't caught on to the reality that the green movement they are partnering up with is essentially supporting an agenda that will deindustrialize America. There is no way that we can have a $22 trillion economy that makes everything from steel to cars to pipelines to buildings and airplanes and technology and corn and cotton without affordable energy. My question for the union bosses is: How do we create jobs in America if our energy comes from wind turbines and solar panels ... made in China?

Stephen Moore is a senior fellow at Freedom Works. He is also author of the new book: "Govzilla: How The Relentless Growth of Government Is Devouring Our Economy."

Excerpt from:
STEPHEN MOORE: Union bosses against union jobs - The Bakersfield Californian

Democrats are on the decline could Hillary Clinton save them? – The Pasadena Star-News

The 2022 midterm elections are still ten months away, but Democrats already have reason to be concerned about their presidential ticket in 2024 namely, over the fact that none of the potential candidates have the stature to win a general election, nor the experience to lead when in office.

President Joe Biden realistically will not seek a second term due to his age, and Kamala Harris is less popular than any other vice president in recent history. Even if Harris herself was slightly more viable, the Biden Administrations unpopularity has become a millstone around Democrats neck, and she would inevitably be tainted by the administrations political baggage.

Indeed, voters are turning on the Biden presidency: Republicans now lead in the 2022 generic vote for Congress; and in a hypothetical Trump-Biden rematch, 48 percent of voters say they would back Trump, compared with 45 percent for Biden.

Assuming Harris will not be the default nominee, we can expect that a drawn-out primary process will ensue in which progressives and moderates duke it out in a contest that further exposes the partys deep divisions. Other Democrats that could potentially win such a primarylike Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigiegmay be relatively stronger than Harris, though not much.

There is only one potential solution, which Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich recently suggested could happen: bring back Hillary Clinton.

Hillary Clinton would offer Democrats a new approach that is separate and apart from the Biden Administration. She would also likely sweep in a primary race, allowing the party to quickly coalesce around one candidate.

Admittedly, a Clinton candidacy is unlikely to occur. However, the fact that it is even being discussed reflects the degree to which the Democrats have moved away from their traditional positioning, and how extreme the partys positions have become in international and domestic affairs.

That being said, the Biden Administration has three major problems that a Clinton candidacy could remedy.

First: their foreign policy. The administration either does not have a coherent foreign policy strategy, or their approach has failed.

In August, the world watched the U.S. botch the withdrawal of our troops from Afghanistan, which led to Taliban militants with ties to transnational terrorist groups seizing control of the country. The Biden Administration still has not articulated a strategy to deal with the wide-ranging fallout from Afghanistannamely, how to confront the militaristic aggression exhibited by China and Russia, two autocratic nations emboldened by the U.S.s strategic failure.

Second: the administrations rudderless domestic policyespecially following the failed effort to pass Bidens Build Back Better plan before the end of the year. To that end, majorities of voters disapprove of Bidens handling of major domestic issuesincluding the economy (53 percent) and immigration (56 percent), per a recent Politico/Morning Consult poll.

The third problema biproduct of the first twois President Bidens deteriorating overall approval rating, which now stands at just 43 percent approve, 53 percent disapprove, per Politico/Morning Consult.

Bidens overall decline is largely attributable to a drop among Independent voters. Though Biden won Independents handily in 2020, just 33 percent of Independents now approve of the job Biden is doing, while 59 percent disapprove.

In light of these three major problems, only a pivot to Hillary Clintonas desperate a move as that may becan save the party from evisceration in the midterms and a potential wipe out in 2024.

This would begin with Biden forcing a resignation from Secretary of State Anthony Blinken and elevating Clinton to the position. If appointed, she would become the frontrunner for 2024 in the event that Biden does not seek a second term.

In terms of addressing the first problem Ive identified; Clinton represents a clear new direction in foreign policy.

If past is precedent, Clinton would be tougher on China for their undemocratic actions toward Taiwan and Hong Kong, and for their human rights abuses against religious minorities. As Secretary of State, Clinton spear-headed the Obama Administrations pivot to Asia, and made it known early on that the U.S. would not sit by as China took aggressive actions in the South China Sea.

With regard to the Middle East, though Clinton has voiced skepticism about the Iranians, she was more cautious in her approach to the Iran Nuclear Deal than the president she served under.

On domestic policy, Clinton has one primary advantage: she would be able to create distance between herself and the letdowns of the Biden-Harris Administration, while still offering experience.

And in light of the controversy surrounding the abortion bans in Texas and Mississippi, Clinton could be uniquely positioned to excite groups of Democratic and Independent female voters. She has throughout her career championed womens rights, and of course, was the first women to be the presidential nominee of a major political party.

To be sure, I am well-aware that Hillary Clinton lost an election she should not have.

In retrospect, that was most likely the result of the October Surprise of FBI Director James Comey reopening the investigation into her email server. Some will say it had more to do with Russias interference, others will point to her campaigns lack of an economic message.

Clinton remains ambitious, outspoken, and convinced that but for Comeys intervention that she would have won the 2016 electionand she may well be right.

Thus, with the correct messaging, one could argue that Clinton has the stature, the positions, and the record that Democrats need.

If we are to have a foreign policy that is respected around the world and Democratic leadership at home that is a clear break from the Biden Administration, at this point, there is no clear alternative.

Douglas Schoen is a longtime Democratic political consultant.

Read more:
Democrats are on the decline could Hillary Clinton save them? - The Pasadena Star-News

Hillary Clinton awards women leaders advancing peace and security – The Georgetown Voice

Human rights are womens rights and womens rights are human rights, Hillary Clinton said at the 1995 UN Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing.

Her words were reaffirmed at the Hillary Rodham Clinton Awards, an annual awards ceremony held on campus that recognizes and celebrates women who have advanced global peace and security. The event included remarks from Hillary Clinton and President John J. DeGioia, as well as Melanne Verveer, former U.S. ambassador-at-large for global womens issues and current executive director for the Georgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security (GIWPS).

The 2021 awardees hail from around the worldMexico, Russia, Afghanistan, Zimbabwe, and Chinaand focus their work on a wide range of issues affecting women, from climate change to ending child marriage. Despite facing resistance and threats from authorities, they continue to pioneer womens rights activism in their countries and fields of expertise.

Awardee Marina Pisklakova Parker from Russia created the first hotline for reporting domestic abuse in Russia, an issue often disregarded by Russian authorities. Palwasha Hassan from Afghanistan pioneered the first womens legal support organization in Afghanistan, Roazana, and continues to advocate for womens access to education while in exile in the U.S.

Following the awards ceremony, Verveer led a discussion with the recipients, during which they reminisced about the 1995 conference and the impact it had on their work and on the larger context of gender equality.

The conference itself was a turning point in both the definition and the fight for gender equality, Clinton said.

Awardee Patricia Espinosa of Mexico, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), added, Beijing was a change in my view, Beijing was a change in human history. I think we really need to see it in this bigger dimension.

Clinton and Verveer extended gratitude and recognition to womens rights activists in Afghanistan in particularincluding Hassan, director of The Afghan Womens Educational Center.

I especially want to recognize and celebrate an especially courageous group of women: women from Afghanistan, Verveer said. We and others have been working to help evacuate them and will continue to support them and their resettlement.

Georgetown and GIWPS have been active in responding to the crisis in Afghanistan by helping the evacuation efforts of women activists through the GIWPS-launched Protect Afghan Women project established last summer. The initiative supports Afghan women whose lives are in imminent danger through a donations-based emergency fund. Georgetown also co-founded the U.S.-Afghan Womens Council (USAWC), a non-partisan public-private partnership bringing different stakeholders together to support Afghan women and girls education, health care, economic empowerment, and leadership, in 2002.

Following the event, Clinton visited Lauinger Librarys fifth floor exhibition highlighting the U.N. Fourth World Conference on Women, which includes 85 artifacts gathered by Verveer from the conferences time. Students gathered around the library hoping to catch a glimpse of Clinton as she left the building.

For many Georgetown students, attending the event and seeing an influential political figure like Clinton was an incredible opportunity to engage with global issues they care deeply about.

I love being able to attend these events where I get to relate them with what Im learning in my classes, in the news, and with what Im doing outside of academics, Elisabeth Koch (SFS 24) said.

Koch also emphasized her appreciation of Clinton and the awardees acknowledgement of the long-term action still needed to improve gender equality worldwide. Among the long-term goals Clinton and the awardees emphasized were the inclusion of women in climate change negotiations and the creation of a global treaty that addresses domestic violence.

We have a lot at stake and we need women leaders from every corner of the globe to continue to speak up, to stand out, and yes, to seek power, Clinton said.

Here is the original post:
Hillary Clinton awards women leaders advancing peace and security - The Georgetown Voice