Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

White House rallies around Kamala Harris after reports of dysfunction in West Wing – USA TODAY

VP Kamala Harris tours US cemetery in Paris

Vice President Kamala Harris toured Suresnes American Cemetery in Paris on Wednesday, ahead of a meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron. (Nov. 10)

AP

WASHINGTON The White House rallied around Vice President Kamala Harris Monday after news media reports of discord between her office and that ofPresident Joe Biden.

"The president relies on the vice president for her advice, for her counsel," White House press secretary Jen Psaki said when asked if Biden has confidence in Harris' leadership, adding that Harris is tackling "challenging" issues and "not looking for a cushy role" as vice president.

Psaki's comments come afteraseries of reports airing concerns over Harris' leadership and political future. A Sunday CNN report quoted anonymous sources describing"exasperation and dysfunction" in the vice president's office. That report drew intensive pushback from the administration.

A Friday Washington Post reportcontrasted Harris with Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, noting that the two leaders face increased scrutiny as high-profile potential successors to Biden's legacy.

A Sunday Politico story highlighted early jockeying to replace Biden as the Democratic nominee for president in 2024 or 2028 and noted that Democrats outside the White House arestill gearing up for a potentially competitive primary despite Harris' status as Biden's second-in-command and presumed heir.

"They don't reflect his view or our experience with the vice president," Psaki said of the various reports detailing conflicts between Harris' staff,political allies and the broader administration.

Psaki added that Harris, as a confidant and top surrogate for the president, will also be "out in the country promoting the infrastructure bill," Biden's signature bipartisan achievement, alongside other senior administration officials in the coming weeks.

On Sunday, Psaki and other officials wrote tweets in support of Harris and her staff, disputing the notion that there are divides in the White House or that Biden is not confident in her leadership.

Since taking office, the White House has taken steps to highlight Harris' role as Biden's closest adviser, with aides often referring to the "Biden-Harris administration" in official documentation and public statements.

As vice president, Harris would become a clear frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination if Biden decides not to seek reelection in 2024. If he runs and is reelected, she'd be seen as the top contender for the nomination in 2028.

Harris is facing political headwinds lately. A November USA TODAY/Suffolk University poll found Harris had a 28% approval rating, a historically low rating that trails Biden's 38% in the same poll.

Recent news media reports have zeroed in on anxieties felt within the vice president's inner circle and public dissatisfaction with Harris. Activists involved insome issues in the vice president's portfolio have also expressed concern over a lack of progress while political allies worry she is not being set up for success.

Harris' political allies were quick to push back on the coverage as well, claiming some of the stories featured sexist or lazy stereotypes.

"I have a larger issue with the tone and tenor by which Kamala Harris is covered, and I think we saw that in this article," Bakari Sellers, a former South Carolina state representative and surrogate for Harris during her unsuccessful presidential bid, said Monday on CNN's "New Day."

"When you have these articles come out, it puts a lot of us in a defensive posture, because we see that a lot of people are treating Kamala Harris the same way they treated Hillary Clinton, which is attempting to end her political career in a death by a million cuts," Sellers said.

Follow Matthew Brown online @mrbrownsir.

See more here:
White House rallies around Kamala Harris after reports of dysfunction in West Wing - USA TODAY

Kash Patel: In Durham Investigation, All Roads Lead To FBI’s Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok – RealClearPolitics

Maria Bartiromo interviews former Trump administration Department of Defense Chief of Staff Kash Patel on FOX News Channels "Sunday Morning Futures."

Special counsel John Durham's investigation is "about 60-70% of the way there" to uncovering the origins of Russiagate, Patel said, out in the cold.

And, again, what happened with the Steele dossier, a grand jury is saying, was criminal in nature. And I expect that all of the folks that are involved with creating it and peddling it falsely would be in jeopardy.

BARTIROMO: And that was former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe with me last week on this program on what he declassified, which, of course, exposed that this dossier and whole Russia collusion lie was a fabrication from Hillary Clinton.

I am back with Kash Patel right now.

And, Kash. We mentioned Fiona Hill making all of these introductions to Christopher Steele, as well as Charles Dolan. Meanwhile, she says she has no idea what they were doing. Here is a quote from her from a closed-door testimony from October of 2019, saying: "I have no knowledge whatsoever of how he developed that dossier. None. I just want to state that."

What are your thoughts on this? And give us your sense of the three indictments we have seen so far and where this is going?

PATEL: Yes, real quick on Fiona Hill.

I think John Durham is on the case here, because Fiona Hill has a credibility problem. I believe she lied to Congress there under oath. She connected the main Clinton political operative, who Devin and I had never heard of because DOJ and FBI withheld those documents from us intentionally, I believe, so.

And now John Durham has exposed that. She connects the Steele operation to the Democratic Party. And she has the gall to go on national TV or in closed-door testimony and say, I don't know what's going on with Steele.

But John Durham's on that case, and I think we're going to get there.

As to the three indictments that John Durham has issued, I believe he's built a sort of triangle of indictments, as I call them. At the top of the pyramid, you have Sussmann, who represents an indictment of the Hillary Clinton campaign, the DNC, the law firm and Fusion GPS, funneling tens of millions of dollars to perpetuate the biggest fraud in American history into the FBI.

The bottom two pillars of the Durham triangle, I believe, are the FBI's -- John Durham's indictment of the FBI attorney, which is literally an indictment of the FBI, and now a criminal conviction for lying to a federal court to perpetuate a fraud and get a FISA warrant falsely.

The last leg of the Durham triangle comes in the form of his recent indictment of Danchenko. Who's Danchenko, and why does it matter? Danchenko is Steele's main source introduced to Steele by Fiona Hill who Steele relied on to write his dossier, in which he said he, Steele, received credible information from Danchenko.

We now know Danchenko is a liar. We also know, because of the Durham investigation, Danchenko provided no credible information to Christopher Steele. So he has now been -- his credibility has been destroyed. And these merchants of menace are finally coming to light, thanks to John Durham's great work. And he's got a long way to go.

And I'm glad he's getting the indictments -- excuse me -- the information that Rod Rosenstein and Chris Wray intentionally withheld from Chairman Nunes and our investigation during Russiagate probe.

BARTIROMO: So, on the Kevin Clinesmith indictment -- this is the FBI attorney -- does it end there? Or are we going to see a road to others in the FBI perhaps getting arrested for directing Kevin Clinesmith?

This is a young guy who obviously changed paperwork to say that Carter Page was not an asset of the CIA, when, in fact, he was.

PATEL: Yes, you're absolutely right.

Look, I think all roads lead to Andy McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI, who was caught lying three times by the inspector general during his tenure there. Kevin Clinesmith, a mid-level FBI attorney, cannot pull off the greatest political scandal in history alone.

He needs direction from his supervisors. He's a convicted felon. He doctored a piece of paper for the FISA court. And I, as a former national security prosecutor who did FISAs, know how horrendous and how egregious that type of conduct is. But, more importantly, I know that it cannot be done alone. It is virtually impossible to get that information to a federal judge for a secret surveillance warrant without the deputy director of the FBI knowing it.

And I think all roads lead to Andy McCabe. His credibility is in question, not to mention that of Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and Andy McCabe, who orchestrated the insurance policy to prevent Donald Trump from becoming president. That's their own text messages.

BARTIROMO: Real quick. Real quick, before you go, you took the deposition of Jake Sullivan.

As I keep saying on this program and have for some time, those who abused power are now in power. Jake Sullivan was the communications person for Hillary Clinton, a manager for her. Now he is working for Joe Biden at the NSA. He said -- he put out a tweet and a post back in October of 2016.

Listen to this: "This could be the most direct link yet between Donald Trump and Moscow. Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to the Russian-based bank."

Here is his post that Hillary Clinton then tweeted out. Jake Sullivan was peddling and spreading the dossier.

PATEL: He was. Then he has the gall to come into Congress -- and, as you mentioned, I took so many of those depositions -- and say he had no idea, like Fiona Hill, how the dossier was created or who the $10 million Jake Sullivan and the DNC were paying was being utilized to collect foreign intelligence fraudulent information.

So, I think John Durham's on his case. And, Maria, wouldn't it be the irony of all ironies for the current national security prosecutor to get charged with an actual felony based on real information and fact, and not have this Department of Justice withhold exculpatory evidence, like they did to the former national security adviser under Donald Trump?

I think that's the accountability that the American public so desperately need. And I think that's where this road is going and where John Durham's taking us.

So, stay tuned. I think we're only 60 to 70 percent of the way there.

Read more here:
Kash Patel: In Durham Investigation, All Roads Lead To FBI's Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok - RealClearPolitics

‘Impeachment: American Crime Story’: Hillary Clinton …

The following contains spoilers from Episode 8 of Impeachment: American Crime Story. Read our full coverage of the series here.

Impeachment has finally delved into the Hillary of it all.

Episode 8 of the FX series focuses on a woman who played a central role in the impeachment saga and Bill Clintons life but has until now been a spectral presence in the series: Hillary Clinton. Perhaps youve heard of her?

Using two of her best-known media appearances a 1992 sit-down on 60 Minutes that helped save Bill from political oblivion in the New Hampshire primary and a 1998 interview on Today that reframed the conversation around the Monica Lewinsky scandal Stand by Your Man explores Hillarys complicated role as the devoted wife and steadfast political ally of a man repeatedly unfaithful to her.

Written by Flora Birnbaum, the episode opens during the Democratic primaries in 1992, when Bill Clintons insurgent quest for the presidential nomination was nearly tanked by allegations hed had a 12-year affair with a former Arkansas state employee and singer named Gennifer Flowers. Clinton, who needed a first- or second-place finish in New Hampshire to keep his campaign afloat, was in trouble.

Newsletter

The complete guide to home viewing

Get Screen Gab for weekly recommendations, analysis, interviews and irreverent discussion of the TV and streaming movies everyones talking about.

Enter email address

Sign Me Up

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.

That is, until Hillary came to his rescue on 60 Minutes. In an interview that aired after the Super Bowl and was seen by an estimated 50 million viewers, Hillary came to her husbands defense, shooting down rumors of an affair and denying that their marriage was a politically convenient arrangement.

Im not sitting here like some little woman standing by my man like Tammy Wynette, she said. Im sitting here because I love him, and I respect him, and I honor what hes been through and what weve been through together. And you know, if thats not enough for people, then, heck, dont vote for him.

Clinton finished in a strong second place, earning him the nickname the Comeback Kid because of his seemingly superhuman political resilience. It was really Hillary that saved him, Clintons onetime rival, Bob Kerrey, later told the New York Times. (For his part, Bill would eventually admit in a 1998 deposition that he did have sex with Flowers, though he denied an ongoing affair.)

Hillary, meanwhile, had fallen into a role that would become familiar: culture war flashpoint. While her husband was surging in the polls, Hillary was caught up in a public feud with Wynette, portrayed as an elitist career woman who didnt understand more traditional wives a perception that was strengthened a few weeks later when Hillary committed another infamous gaffe, saying she could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas instead of working as a lawyer.

Mrs. Clinton, you have offended every woman and man who love that song several million in number, the singer wrote in an open letter demanding an apology. I would like you to appear with me on any forum, including networks, cable or talk shows and stand toe to toe with me. I can assure you, in spite of your education, you will find me to be just as bright as yourself.

Hillary apologized to Wynette repeatedly but the interview solidified her polarizing place in American life. Everyone had opinions on her, even Richard Nixon, who told the New York Times, If the wife comes through as being too strong and too intelligent, it makes the husband look like a wimp.

The 60 Minutes interview was typical of the impossible high-wire act Hillary would have to perform throughout her tenure as first lady: She needed to be supportive without seeming like a pushover, strong without being too assertive. The interview also established a pattern that would define much of her political life, salvaging her husbands image at the cost of her own reputation.

Its probably one of the great political missed opportunities of all time, Richard Mintz, Hillarys staff director during the campaign, told Politico in an excellent deep dive into the fateful 60 Minutes interview.

As Clinton recounted in her 2003 memoir, Living History, and the 2020 docuseries Hillary, the president woke her early Jan. 21, 1998, sat on the edge of the bed and warned her about the just-published stories that he had been having an affair with a former White House intern. He adamantly denied the reports and suggested that perhaps his attention to Lewinsky had been misinterpreted.

Clinton accepted her husbands explanation, which he also offered in private to friends and aides. For me the Lewinsky imbroglio seemed like just another vicious scandal manufactured by political opponents, she wrote in Living Memory.

In the days that followed the Lewinsky revelations, the presidents legal team and political aides fought about how to respond. The first lady was a a leading advocate of an aggressive strategy attacking Starr, reported the Washington Post, in reference to Kenneth W. Starr, whose four-year independent counsel investigation led to the House impeachment of President Clinton in 1998.

First, Bill Clinton used a routine White House event about education to deny the affair the infamous I did not have sexual relations with that woman moment depicted in Episode 7, The Assassination of Monica Lewinsky.

A few days later, the first lady sat for an interview with Matt Lauer oh, the irony on NBCs Today show, forcefully denying that her husband had an inappropriate affair and arguing that he was the victim of a politically motivated attack by his opponents.

The great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president, she told the host. (Clinton also conceded that if the allegations were proved true, that would be a very serious offense.)

I believed it was part of the whole Starr investigation. I was absolutely persuaded because of my own experience that this guy would make up stuff, Clinton said in Hillary. In the Hulu docuseries, Nancy Gertner, a classmate from Yale Law School, said she and most of their friends believed Bill Clinton had an affair with Lewinsky because it just didnt seem far from the person that we knew. But Hillary was in denial at the time: It would be like a mask would come over her in those days, Gertner said.

Though Hillary Clinton instantly made the phrase vast right-wing conspiracy famous, the concept originated in a comprehensive memo written by political consultants Chris Lehane and Mark Fabiani outlining the ways in which conservative media outlets had helped spread dubious theories about the death of Vince Foster and the Whitewater scandal. In her memoir, Clinton wrote, I might have phrased my point more artfully, but she stood by her characterization of Starrs investigation despite the truth about the affair with Lewinsky.

Back in 1998, Hillarys Today interview was seen as an effective counterattack that helped clearly establish talking points for his political allies.

Clive Owen as Bill Clinton and Beanie Feldstein as Monica Lewinsky in Impeachment: American Crime Story.

(Tina Thorpe / FX)

Eventually, Hillary learned the truth. On Aug. 15, 1998, two days before he was due to testify before a grand jury, Bill Clinton once again woke his wife up and shared some bad news, telling her for the first time that the situation was more serious than he had previously acknowledged.

I could hardly breathe, Hillary recalled in Living History. Gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him, What do you mean? What are you saying? Why did you lie to me?

The revelation left her dumbfounded, heartbroken and outraged that Id believed him at all, she wrote, admitting that she wanted to wring his neck. Hillary also told Bill that he would have to confess to their daughter, Chelsea, before the news became public.

Days later, the first family headed to Marthas Vineyard, Mass., for summer vacation. On their way to Marine One, Chelsea walked between her parents and grasped their hands in a show of support. But the weeks that followed were frosty, with Hillary rarely speaking to her husband. Their dog Buddy joined them on vacation and was the only member of our family who was still willing to spend time with the president, Clinton wrote in her memoir.

Clinton defended her husband throughout the impeachment process, ultimately deciding that his behavior did not warrant removal from office. When it came to their marriage, the answer was less clear.

I still had to decide whether I wanted to stay in the marriage, whether I thought it was worth saving. We saw a counselor, had painful, painful discussions, she said in Hillary.

Ironically, the public humiliation was good for Hillarys image. Opinion polls indicated that the American public approved of her conduct throughout the scandal. At a time when her husband was toxic, she served as a valuable surrogate in the 1998 midterms, which resulted in gains for the Democrats a rarity for the party in the White House.

The ordeal also seems to have inspired Hillary to run for office herself, something shed denied any interest in partly because she was more interested in policy than campaigning, according to Carl Bernsteins biography, A Woman in Charge.

On the day the Senate voted to acquit President Clinton in his impeachment trial, Hillary was in a study near her office looking at maps of New York state and plotting her campaign. There was something particularly defiant about choosing this moment to begin her decision-making in earnest, Bernstein wrote, but she was determined to redeem some of the promise of their journey to the White House.

She told me afterwards, that was the first time in 53 years that I spoke with my own voice as my own political person, said Gail Sheehy, author of Hillarys Choice, in a PBS Frontline special about the 2016 election.

As we all know now, that historic presidential campaign was dogged by her husbands decades-old indiscretions. Many have argued that it was Hillary Clinton, not Bill, who paid the price for these missteps, which have been weaponized against her never more vividly than when Donald Trump invited Bill Clintons accusers to an October 2016 debate to deflect attention from the Access Hollywood tape. Clintons decision to stay in her marriage haunts her in a way that she can never get out from under, said Jennifer Palmieri, communications director on the 2016 campaign, in Hillary.

In an interview with The Times last year, Clinton reflected on this chapter in her life. The whole impeachment saga and the terrible pain in our family and all of that was difficult, as it always is, even to think about, she said. Feeling very positive about the decisions that Ive made in my life, even the most difficult ones, doesnt make it any easier ... Im glad to be out on the other side of it all these years later.

Read the rest here:
'Impeachment: American Crime Story': Hillary Clinton ...

Longtime Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin describes sexual …

Huma Abedin, a longtime close aide to Hillary Clinton, has written in a new book that she was sexually assaulted by a US senator, an incident she buried until allegations against the supreme court justice Brett Kavanaugh triggered her memory years later.

Abedin makes the shocking claim in a memoir, Both/And: A Life in Many Worlds, which will be published next week. The Guardian obtained a copy. Abedin does not name the senator or his party or give any other clues as to his identity.

Abedin details her alleged assault while describing her work for Clinton when the former first lady and future secretary of state and presidential candidate was a US senator from New York, between 2001 and 2009.

The passage comes shortly after a description of how Abedin and the Clintons came to attend Donald Trumps wedding to his third wife, Melania Knauss, in Palm Beach, Florida, in January 2005.

Of that occasion, Abedin, who was born in Michigan but grew up in Saudi Arabia, writes: I felt I was at an Arab wedding back home.

Then, after describing a Washington dinner attended by a few senators and their aides but not Clinton, Abedin writes: I ended up walking out with one of the senators, and soon we stopped in front of his building and he invited me in for coffee. Once inside, he told me to make myself comfortable on the couch.

She says the senator took off his blazer, rolled up his sleeves and made coffee while they continued to talk.

Then, in an instant, it all changed. He plopped down to my right, put his left arm around my shoulder, and kissed me, pushing his tongue into my mouth, pressing me back on the sofa.

I was so utterly shocked, I pushed him away. All I wanted was for the last 10 seconds to be erased.

Abedin writes that the senator seemed surprised but apologized and said he had misread her all this time. As she considered how to leave without this ending badly, she writes, the senator asked if she wanted to stay.

Then I said something only the twentysomething version of me would have come up with I am so sorry and walked out, trying to appear as nonchalant as possible.

Abedin writes that she kept away from the senator for a few days but then ran into him on Capitol Hill, nodding when he asked if they were still friends. Clinton then joined them, Abedin writes, as if she knew I needed rescuing even though Id told her nothing about that night.

Abedin writes that she stayed friendly with the senator and soon buried the incident, which she wanted to forget, succeeding in erasing it from her mind entirely.

Then, in late 2018, Kavanaugh was nominated to the supreme court by Donald Trump. A professor, Christine Blasey Ford, accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault at a party years earlier, an allegation Kavanaugh denied.

Testifying in the Senate, Ford said the alleged assault drastically altered her life, before a therapy session in 2012 led her to do her best to suppress memories of the assault because recounting the details caused me to relive the experience, and caused panic attacks and anxiety.

Though Kavanaugh became a leading symbol of the #MeToo era, in which allegations of sexual misconduct and assault have brought down prominent men, Republicans did not waver in their support of his appointment and he was duly confirmed to the court.

Abedins memory of her experience on the unnamed senators couch, she writes, was triggered when she read about Christine Blasey Ford being accused of conveniently remembering her alleged assault.

Earlier this month, an excerpt from the book published by Vogue dealt with Abedins experiences when her husband, the former congressman and New York mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner, became embroiled in repeated scandal over sexually explicit behavior on social media.

Abedin and Weiner are now estranged.

Information and support for anyone affected by rape or sexual abuse issues is available from the following organisations. In the US, Rainn offers support on 800-656-4673. In the UK, Rape Crisis offers support on 0808 802 9999. In Australia, support is available at 1800Respect (1800 737 732). Other international helplines can be found at ibiblio.org/rcip/internl.html

Excerpt from:
Longtime Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin describes sexual ...

Why Is The Media Letting Hillary Clinton Sell Her Book …

I understand the argument that Hillary Clinton has suffered enough for her husbands sins. (Of course, shes hardly suffered enough for her own.) But shes a beneficiary of the power and money Bill Clinton enjoys in the wake of his presidency. Shes his wife and a window into his personal life. So why are any serious news outlets interviewing her without asking about Jeffrey Epstein? If the press wants to treat allegations against Epstein seriously, why should Clinton get a pass when shes trying to sell books?

The former secretary of state is on a book tour, hawking her new novel, making stops at The View and The Atlantic to sell copies and complain about conservatives. Yet, in the years since her failed presidential bid, the public learned a great deal about Bill Clintons deeply suspicious ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex criminal with a network of powerful allies. She should hardly be on the hook for all of Bills personal failings but these allegations are credible and enormous.

In May 2020, Netflix dropped Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich, a docuseries bizarrely executive produced in part by James Patterson, Epsteins former neighbor and Bill Clintons repeated co-author. (Their latest book dropped this summer.) That documentary features two witnesses who say, despite the Clintons denials, that Bill visited Little Saint James, Epsteins private island that was literally nicknamed Orgy Island. Steve Scully worked on the island for six years, from 1999 to 2005. I saw Bill Clinton sitting with Jeffrey on the living room porch, he says in the show.

Virginia Giuffre, one of Epsteins most vocal accusers, also told documentarians, I remember having a dinner with Clinton. He was there, and I never saw him do anything improper. I wish, you know, he would just come clean about [it].

Giuffre made that claim in court documents as well, telling investigators in 2011 that Epstein said Clinton was on the island because he owe[d] me a favor.

There is also a serious discrepancy between the number of flights Clinton admits to taking on Epsteins plane and the number in reports from flight logs. Fox News reported that Clinton took at least 26 flights on the jet. Flight logs from Gawker show at least a dozen. Clinton admits to only four.

Did the former first lady ask her husband why he was photographed getting a neck rub from Epsteins 22-year-old massage therapist on a post-presidential humanitarian trip to Africa? That massage therapist, whos since accused Epstein of rape, says she saw Clinton partake in no foul play on the trip, during which he traveled on Epsteins plane. Fine. But what does his wife think of the pictures, which were released in 2020? Did she ask him about that? Does she think they suggest Bill had way too casual of a relationship with a convicted abuser?

The media largely treats Giuffres many allegations against Epstein credibly. Outlets have reported on the flight logs. Why, then, should Hillary Clinton be allowed to continue enriching her family and advancing her message without answering difficult questions about her own husbands ties to Epstein? Does the news value of her insipid political commentary really outweigh the value of asking these questions?

Of course, any outlet that asks Clinton about Epstein will be punished by her team. Thats how this works. Thats almost certainly why ABC News quashed Amy Robachs story on Epstein back in 2019, despite the networks denials. Yet Clintons ties to Epstein have made enough headlines, and are plenty serious, that his wife has presumably brought it up and presumably knows something more than the public. Shell, of course, deny wrongdoing. But she should actually have to do that.

ABC News let The View give Clinton a nine-minute tongue bath earlier this month. The networks executives and journalists are normalizing something very abnormal.

Every journalist should make these questions a condition of sitting down with Hillary and Bill Clinton. If the pair wants access to the media, they should have to earn it by answering important questions the media exists to ask.

See the rest here:
Why Is The Media Letting Hillary Clinton Sell Her Book ...