Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

Risks of illegal migration to the UK – GOV.UK

This guidance is also available in the following languages:

Migrants are often told by smugglers that travelling to the UK will be safe and easy. In reality the journey puts people at serious risk of injury, abuse and exploitation. The journey is not only expensive, but dangerous. Men, women and children have died trying to get to the UK in small boats or hidden in lorries.

Migrants are often forced into situations that are extremely dangerous. Most people smugglers:

This puts migrants lives at serious risk during every journey.

Dont risk it. Choose a safe and legal alternative.

Many people have died or been seriously injured trying to travel to the UK in a small boat or by lorry - including children.

The dangers of travelling to the UK in a small boat include:

The dangers of travelling to the UK hidden in a lorry include:

The people who arrange your journey are often part of organised crime gangs and may force you into dangerous situations to pay off your debt to them.

Despite what smugglers may tell you, many illegal migrants struggle to find work and pay for life in the UK. You could end up sleeping in the streets, made to beg and give any money to the smugglers, or forced into slavery.

You may be given work by criminal employers who pay no or low wages and ask you to work in dangerous conditions. They can charge lots of money for travel and unsuitable accommodation.

Relying on smugglers could mean youll:

If you make it to the UK safely, you may not be able to stay. If you get to the UK through a safe country and you make an asylum claim, this may not be considered.

The UK asylum process gives no advantages over other European asylum processes and you should always claim asylum in the first safe country you reach.

If you make it to the UK, the realities may be different to what you expect, for example:

From 1 January 2022, you will be considered for relocation to Rwanda if you make an illegal journey to the UK and have travelled through or have a connection to a safe country.

People relocated to Rwanda will have their asylum claim processed there. Rwanda will have full responsibility for them.

People whose claims for protection are rejected will either be offered the chance to stay in Rwanda or return to their home country they will not return to the UK once their claims have been decided by Rwanda.

There is no limit to the number of people who can be relocated to Rwanda.

The UK is also toughening penalties and introducing new criminal offences for people coming to the UK illegally. It will be a criminal offence to knowingly arrive in the UK without a valid entry clearance when one is required. You could face up to 4 years in jail and be removed to a safe country if you arrive illegally.

If you are caught assisting people smugglers, for example by steering the boat or helping other people to pay smugglers, then the UK government can take criminal action against you. You could go to jail before being removed to a safe country.

The UK government has introduced tougher penalties for people smugglers with a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. Safely and anonymously report immigration crime, including people smugglers.

The UK is working closely with the French and Belgian governments to do everything possible to stop illegal migrants before they reach the UK. In 2021, French and UK authorities prevented more than 23,000 attempts to travel illegally to the UK. Over 6,000 crossings have been prevented so far in 2022, more than twice as many as at this point last year.

Some of the ways that governments are trying to stop illegal journeys to the UK are described below.

There are a variety of safe and legal routes to enter the UK. People smugglers cannot guarantee your safety or that you will be allowed to stay in the UK. Find out more about safer alternative options below.

You should always claim asylum in the first safe country you reach. You should contact authorities in the country you are in for information on how to do this.

Safe and legal routes to enter the UK include:

You can apply for a visa if you want to come to the UK to work, study or remain with family.

There are different visas you can apply for depending on your circumstances.

Under the UK Resettlement Scheme, the UK will continue to offer a safe and legal route to vulnerable refugees in need of protection. The Mandate Resettlement Scheme is a smaller global scheme that resettles refugees who have a close family member in the UK who is willing to house them.

You cannot apply to the UK government for resettlement to the UK. You will need to have been assessed for resettlement by UNHCR (the UN Refugee Agency).

Visit the UNHCR website for information for refugees, asylum-seekers and stateless people.

In addition to our refugee resettlement schemes, the UK has granted over 29,000 Refugee Family Reunion visas in the last 5 years.

If you were separated from your partner or parent when you were forced to leave your country, you may be able to apply to join them in the UK.

The Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy helps people formerly employed by the UK government (Locally Employed Staff) in Afghanistan.

Any current or former locally employed staff who are assessed to be under serious threat to life are offered priority relocation to the UK regardless of their employment status, rank or role, or length of time served.

If you believe you qualify, you should apply using the online application form.

The Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme began on 6 January, providing up to 20,000 women, children and others at risk with a safe and legal route to resettle in the UK.

The scheme prioritises:

members of Afghan civil society who supported the UK and international community effort in Afghanistan

vulnerable people, including women, girls and members of minority groups at risk

You cannot directly apply for the scheme, it is managed by a referral process. Further information is available on the Afghan citizens resettlement scheme.

The UK has launched one of the fastest and biggest visa schemes in UK history to support people fleeing the conflict in Ukraine. You will need to apply online for permission to enter the UK before you travel.

If you are a Ukrainian national and have settled family in the UK, you can apply for the Ukraine Family Scheme visa for free.

If you are a Ukrainian national but do not have settled family in the UK, apply for a visa under the Ukraine Sponsorship Scheme (also known as Homes for Ukraine) for free.

Read this article:
Risks of illegal migration to the UK - GOV.UK

House GOP bill would reimburse Texas for operation to crack down on illegal immigration – Fox News

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: A bill introduced by House Republicans on Friday would reimburse the state of Texas for the costs of its Operation Lone Star -- the states effort to crack down on illegal immigration amid a historic border crisis.

The Lone Star Reimbursement Act, introduced by Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas, would reimburse the state for the operation announced by Gov. Greg Abbott last year and which has surged law enforcement to the Texas-Mexico border to stop the flood of illegal immigration coming across.

TEXAS' OPERATION LONE STAR TO GET ANOTHER $500 MILLION TO SECURE BORDER, ABBOTT SAYS

The bill cites estimates that the Texas Military has so far apprehended and referred over 134,000 illegal immigrants to law enforcement, and has turned back or denied crossing to over 16,000 migrants.

"It is the sense of Congress that Operation Lone Star has been a tremendous help to stem the tide of illegal immigration and its members should be recognized for their efforts," the bill says.

May 5, 2022: A migrant family sits after being processed on May 05, 2022 in Roma, Texas. (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

The bill would make $1.4 billion available to Texas for its FY 2021 and FY 2022 costs. The lawmakers supporting the bill say that because the job of securing the border is that of the federal government, states that take that responsibility should be reimbursed by the federal government.

"To put it simply, border security is national security," Fallon said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "As a border state, Texas is disproportionally impacted by illegal immigration, but we shouldnt be forced to bear the entire financial burden when it comes to securing the entire country. Gov. Abbott launched Operation Lone Star because of a lack of action from this administration. Texas shouldnt be punished for Bidens mistake and my Lone Star Reimbursement Act recognizes this."

MIGRANT ENCOUNTERS AT SOUTHERN BORDER HIT NEW RECORD IN MAY, AS NUMBERS KEEP RISING

Co-sponsors on the bill are Texas Reps. Kay Granger, Roger Williams, Jake Ellzey, Ronny Jackson, Randy Weber, Michael Cloud, Brian Babin, Michael Burgess, Troy Nehls, and Louie Gohmert.

"Our southern border is no longer just about families coming to find a better life. The Biden administration has intentionally failed in its responsibility to protect the American people, and Texans have paid the price, both figuratively and literally." Ellzey said in a statement. "Over the two years, Texans have spent over $3 billion dollars to secure our border. Per the Constitution, that is a federal function, and we owe Texans every penny they have paid. I am proud to stand with my fellow colleagues in filling the Lone Star Reimbursement Act. If the President won't do his job, Congress will."

It is the latest move by Republicans in the delegation to reimburse the state for the operation. Burgess has previously offered amendments to various appropriations bills in the House to fund the program -- arguing that "Texas should not be bearing the sole cost to secure our southern border."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Meanwhile, numbers have been increasing at the southern border. There were more than 239,000 migrant apprehensions in May, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced this week. That is the highest number on record, and higher than the 180,597 encountered in May 2021 and the 23,237 encountered in May 2020. It is also higher than the 235,478 encountered in April 2022, which itself set a new record for encounters.

Adam Shaw is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital, with a focus on immigration. He can be reached at adam.shaw2@fox.com or on Twitter: @AdamShawNY

Read the original here:
House GOP bill would reimburse Texas for operation to crack down on illegal immigration - Fox News

Feds plan to dump immigrants in cities away from border: officials – New York Post

The Biden administration is working on plans to bus immigrants from overwhelmed border communities in Texas and dump them in cities and towns hours away, according to several Lone Star State pols.

San Angelo, Texas, about three hours from the US-Mexico border was scouted as a location to bus the immigrants, Republican US Rep. August Pfluger told The Post.

San Angelo is a welcoming community, but the locality has not volunteered for this mission, nor are they responsible for the burdens of the border crisis, said Pfluger, who represents the area in Congress. This situation is a direct result of [the Department of Homeland Securitys] shortsighted policies that encourage more illegal immigration and the agencys failure to establish operational control of the southern border.

Pfluger said he was alerted to the situation by San Angelo law enforcement, who were alarmed about their ability to absorb any amount of immigrants. San Angelo has a population of just over 100,000.

In a letter to DHS, Pfluger demanded to know what plans the department had to drop off immigrants in San Angelo or other Texas cities, whether chosen communities would receive any kind of notice that the people were heading their way and if DHS would provide local leaders background checks on the new arrivals.

Pfluger said that so far, he has only been contacted by officials from Customs and Border Protection and told San Angelo was merely being considering as a possible location but that no plans were set at this time.

You can only assume that theyre looking at other locations or that plans can change in the future, Pfluger told The Post.

Currently, immigrants who cross the border illegally and are seeking asylum are released after being processed by the Border Patrol and ICE. They are usually dropped off at bus stations in border communities such as Del Rio, Texas, where a Stripes gas station doubles as the bus depot. The immigrants then usually head to cities in the interior of the United States and do not plan on staying in border communities. While they wait to get a bus ticket or airfare to their final destination, they usually remain in small border towns, sometimes without a place to sleep.

Yes, it will relieve some of the pressure off of the border communities, but then its going to create a problem in other communities, said Robert Beau Nettleton, a county commissioner in Val Verde County, Texas, of the Biden administrations reported relocation plan. The county has been identified by Texas officials as being one of three hot spots for border crossings.

Were not solving problems. Were just moving people around to different locations to make it look like theres not as many people on the border as we normally see, the commissioner told The Post. Its a political ploy to say, Look, these communities no longer have this problem because we solved it. You solved it for that community, but you didnt solve the problem. You just moved the problem.

An internal DHS document obtained by NBC News shows DHSs plan to bus immigrants to Los Angeles, Albuquerque, Houston, Dallas, and other cities. San Angelo is the first small town without the resources to deal with immigrants that has been named as a possible location, critics say.

Theyre not set up to handle it. They dont have the resources to handle it, they dont have the [non-governmental organizations] to handle it, Nettleton said of San Angelo, adding that he predicts many immigrants will end up on the streets for a time after theyre released.

Its not the first time politicians have turned to bussing immigrants away from the border. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has used state funds and donations to send 65 busloads carrying more than 2,000 people to Washington, DC, since April.

Now, more new American cities and towns away from the border will have to share in the burden border communities have shouldered.

Theres still a lot of people in these bigger cities around the United States that dont really think that theres a border issue because theyre not dealing with it, but when they start dumping thousands of them in their backyard, then maybe they will understand that there is a problem, Nettleton said.

Go here to see the original:
Feds plan to dump immigrants in cities away from border: officials - New York Post

Border Dispatch, Part I: ‘Everyone Who Arrives Here Has Paid’ – The Federalist

Editors note: This is the first of a two-part series. Part two will be published next week.

REYNOSA, Mexico We met Osniel at Senda de Vida, a massive migrant shelter situated on the south bank of the Rio Grande across from McAllen, Texas. The slender 23-year-old Cuban didnt give us his last name, but did tell us hed paid a coyote, or smuggler, $11,000 to leave his home country, transit through Central America and Mexico, and cross the border into the United States twice.

Both times he crossed, though, hed been arrested by Border Patrol and quickly sent back to Mexico under Title 42, the pandemic health order that allows U.S. authorities to expel illegal immigrants quickly, with minimal processing. When Osniel left Cuba in early April, Title 42 didnt apply to Cubans. But that changed while he was en route.

On April 27, the Biden administrationcut a deal with Mexicoto begin expelling up to 100 Cubans and 20 Nicaraguans a day from three border facilities. For Osniel, it was just bad timing he crossed the river on April 29.

Title 42 was active under Donald Trump, and all this time, all this time Cubans were crossing over the river and entering with a humanitarian visa, Osniel told me and a pair of colleagues, Emily Jashinsky and David Agren, who accompanied me recently to migrant shelters in Reynosa and Matamoros. Now, Cubans keep trying to cross the river and they keep getting sent back.

He said he wasnt sure what he was going to do now. Having tried to cross the border twice, he couldnt try again without paying the local cartel, and he had no more money. (Nearly everyone who crosses the Rio Grande in the Mexican state of Tamaulipas, where Reynosa is situated, has to pay a tax to the cartels, which have been profiting handsomely from the arrangement.)

Early the next morning, around 2 a.m., Osniel called David in a panic. He had swam across the river, he said, but hadnt paid, and now feared he was being pursued by cartel gunmen. He said he was hiding on the north bank of the Rio Grande.

A GPS pin on WhatsApp showed he was just outside the town of Hidalgo, Texas, not far from the international bridge. He wanted David to call the police or Border Patrol to come pick him up before the cartel found him. David got ahold of the local police but they said it was Border Patrols responsibility, and no one picked up the phone at the McAllen Border Patrol station that night.

Osniels last communication, via WhatsApp, was at 5:52 a.m. The GPS pin showed he was on the U.S. side of the border, near the riverbank. We havent heard from him since.

Over the past year, illegal immigration along the southwest border has reached historic highs, with nearly 2.5 million arrestssince last April. U.S. border authorities apprehended on average more than 6,725 illegal immigrantsevery dayin April, the highest number ever recorded. (As of this writing, U.S. Customs and Border Protection has yet to release numbers for May, which will almost certainly be higher than Aprils.)

(UPDATE: CBP released May numbers on Wednesday, June 15, after press time. There were a record 239,416 encounters with illegal immigrants along the southwest border last month, the highest monthly total ever, surpassing Aprils record. So far in the 2022 fiscal year, about 1.5 million illegal immigrants have been arrested by Border Patrol. With four months remaining in FY2022, border arrests are almost certain to surpass 2 million.)

Why are so many coming now? We asked that question to every migrant we spoke to in Mexico and Texas, and nearly every one of them at some point said that they had heard it was a good time to come, that they would be able to get in. Theyre not wrong.

What they find upon arriving in northern Mexico, however, is not what many of them expected. For some, like Osniel, Title 42 still represents a real obstacle (although since Joe Biden took office, fewer and fewer illegal immigrants are being expelled under its authority). All of them, though, are drawn into a vast criminal enterprise run by cartels that have in recent years transformed illegal immigration into an industrialized black market. Elias Rodriguez, director of a migrant shelter run by the Catholic Diocese of Matamoros, told us bluntly that everyone who arrives here has paid.

Indeed, migrants transiting Mexico must not only make sure they have paid whichever cartel controls the area of the border they intend to cross, they often have to pay off Mexican officials en route to the border. More than one person told us how the bus they were on was stopped in Monterrey, or outside Reynosa, and boarded by federal or state officials who asked for everyones papers. Those without papers had to pay.

Setting aside the impossibility of confirming these accounts, the proof of such official corruption on a mass scale is the mere fact that hundreds of thousands of migrants arrive at northern Mexican border cities each month. They are here, and they could have gotten here only by paying their way.

About 1,500 migrants are housed at the Senda de Vida shelter, including many families and small children.

Signs of this illegal immigration black market lurk behind nearly every individual migrants story. We dont know, for example, why Osniel changed his mind about crossing the river. At the shelter, he told us he was going to wait there because it was too dangerous to leave. He said men had tried to assault him when he ventured out into Reynosa at one point, and that it wasnt safe anywhere outside the shelters walls.

Maybe he realized there was no other way into the United States. Maybe he was unwilling to wait any longer at the shelter. Hed told us that he follows the news about U.S. border policy closely, so maybe he saw that a U.S. judge recentlyordered the Biden administration to keep Title 42 in placeinstead of ending it on May 23 as planned.

Whatever changed Osniels mind, his plight is shared by tens of thousands of other migrants in Reynosa, Matamoros, and Mexican cities all along the border. They are caught between a black market smuggling industry run by ruthless cartels and a mercurial U.S. immigration bureaucracy that seems to adopt new policies and rules every week.

For a certain segment of the migrant population in Mexico, that means theyre stuck. For those who cant afford to pay the cartels, crossing the river without permission is dangerous. Its unlikely that Osniel was actually pursued across the river by armed men, but he was lucky to slip by them in Reynosa and make it over to the north bank. In Matamoros, we were told of several migrant groups that tried to cross without paying, and cartel members actually went out into the river and forcibly returned them to the Mexican side.

Others simply refuse to cross illegally, even with the aid of cartel-affiliated smugglers. These are mostly Haitian migrants, and they make up the vast majority of those staying at the shelters in Reynosa and Matamoros. Many of them say they will not cross illegally because they fear being arrested and deported to Haiti, a country most of them left many years ago.

The vast majority of Haitian migrants now in Mexico had until recently been living legally in Chile, Brazil, and other countries in South America. Indeed, of the dozens of Haitian migrants we interviewed, not one had recently lived in Haiti, and none wanted to return there.

For these people, being deported back to Haiti as thousands were last fall afterCBP cleared the encampmentnear Del Rio, Texas would be the worst possible outcome. So they wait in Mexican border towns for something to change.

One Haitian man we spoke to, Gerard Estinfils, was among a group of at least a hundred others waiting outside a migrant resource center near the international bridge in Matamoros, across from Brownsville, Texas, on a recent weekday morning, hoping to meet with a lawyer about applying for asylum in the United States.

Estinfils told us he has been in Mexico for ten months with his wife and three children, and they have no money left now. But even if they did, he said he would not pay a smuggler or a cartel to help him cross illegally. He says he and his wife have medical problems, and like some of the other Haitian migrants waiting outside the resource center that day, he hopes to get a medical exemption to enter the United States.

He might well end up getting such an exemption. We spoke to people who were recently discharged from CBP custody in Texas who had been admitted that way. But there is only so long people like Estinfils, who had been living for years in Chile before traveling north, can safely wait in these Mexican border towns. (The U.S. State Department issued a do not travel advisory for the entire state of Tamaulipas last June that isstill in effect. It forbids U.S. government employees from traveling between cities in Tamaulipas using interior Mexican highways, citing gun battles, murder, armed robbery, carjacking, kidnapping, forced disappearances, extortion, and sexual assault activity along the northern Mexican border.)

All of which to say: its not safe for Estanfils and his family to be living in these streets, but thats where they are for the simple reason that there are not enough shelters in these cities, and more people are arriving every day.

The day after we met in Matamoros, Estinfils messaged me on WhatsApp. He had seen me and my colleagues at the Sende de Vida shelter in Reynosa, where he had brought his family, hitching a ride from Matamoros from a servant of God. He said they left Matamoros because they had no food and nowhere to stay, and were hoping to get into the shelter.

What they found at Sende de Vida was chaos, confusion, and false hope. When we arrived that same day we saw hundreds of people lined up outside the shelter, waiting to get inside. A mood of confusion and frustration prevailed.

Every person we spoke to had been waiting for days in triple-digit heat. They were under the strong impression that there was a list inside the shelter, and that if you got on that list, you would eventually be bused to the international bridge downtown and be admitted to the United States. For that reason, most of them did not want to leave the immediate vicinity of the shelter, despite a lack of food and water and housing of any kind, for fear of losing their chance to get inside and get on the list.

But it wasnt true. Theres no such list inside the shelter. After we convinced the men guarding the heavy steel door to let us in so we could meet with Pastor Hector Silva, who runs the place, we learned that there is only a waiting list to get into the shelter, not to get into the United States.

Silva told us that the busloads of migrants who leave his shelter every day for the United States (on average, about 120 a day) are selected by CBP with the aid of immigration lawyers and nonprofits. He says CBP officials text him daily, sometimes multiple times a day, the names of migrants who qualify for admittance under Americas byzantine immigration laws. Silva finds these people in his shelter, tests them for Covid, and lines them up in the courtyard with their possessions before loading them onto a yellow school bus and, at least on the day we were there, drives them to the international bridge himself.

Migrants prepare to board a bus that will take them to an international bridge in Reynosa, where they will enter the United States.

The shelter is a ramshackle compound thats become in effect a walled village, housing about 1,500 people. Children are everywhere, running and playing. The adults loiter in tents and under shaded awnings. Hundreds of tents are packed wall-to-wall in two outdoor courtyards. In Silvas office, a small staff works ceaselessly to identify people who can be bussed out of the shelter and to the bridge, so more people outside can be admitted.

Haitians make up a majority of residents at the shelter, but many other nationalities are present too. In Silvas office, we met a couple from Volgograd (formerly Stalingrad), Russia. They said they were journalists and fled the country after they spoke out about the war in Ukraine and were threatened by the police. They spoke no English or Spanish (we communicated through Google translate) and appeared to have no plan to get into the United States. Silva said he has had many Russians and Ukrainians come through the shelter since the spring.

The Russians, though, had this in common with nearly everyone at the shelter: none of them knew how they were going to get into the United States. I spoke to a man from Honduras, Hector, who left his home six weeks ago. His wife is already in the United States, he said, in Texas.

Like many others here, he spent what he had to pay smuggler to get him this far, and now he has no money for a lawyer. He told me he plans to stay at the shelter for two more weeks. If nothing happens, hes going to swim across the river.

Everything depends on my luck, Hector says. Am I lucky? Okay. But I dont know. I ask him if hes going to pay anyone if he decides to swim across the river.

No, he says, shrugging. I dont have any money.

John Daniel Davidson is a senior editor at The Federalist. His writing has appeared in the Wall Street Journal, the Claremont Review of Books, The New York Post, and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter, @johnddavidson.

Here is the original post:
Border Dispatch, Part I: 'Everyone Who Arrives Here Has Paid' - The Federalist

DACA changed everything in immigration law and politics – Washington Times

President Obama knew it was a momentous occasion when he strode into the Rose Garden 10 years ago Wednesday to announce the DACA program, but he couldnt have predicted how much change it would bring.

After repeatedly saying he didnt have the power to carve entire categories of illegal immigrants out of danger of deportation, he reversed himself during his 2012 reelection campaign and decided that he did, in fact, have the power.

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, was the result. It granted a stay of deportation and extended work permits to young adult illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children, kept a relatively clean rap sheet and completed or were working toward an education.

At the time, it was supposed to be a bridge, granting hundreds of thousands of Dreamers, as they called themselves, a firmer foothold in the country that had become their home. The hope was that it was a forerunner of a broader immigration deal that would grant them, and others among the illegal immigrant population, a full pathway to citizenship while improving border security.

The Dreamers got the foothold and became a political force in their own right unable to vote, but incredibly powerful as a symbol.

A decade later, they are still in legal limbo, Congress remains gridlocked and the border faces unprecedented chaos. Meanwhile, DACA has rewritten the legal landscape and changed the face of politics.

SEE ALSO: Senators demand answers about the extent of work already done by DHS disinformation board

DACA probably got Donald Trump elected, said Andrew Art Arthur, who has been a part of immigration policy for nearly 30 years as a government lawyer, congressional staffer, immigration judge and now resident fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies.

He pointed to data from the political analysts at FiveThirtyEight.com who said anger over immigration policy propelled Mr. Trump to the Republican presidential nomination and traced it back to DACA, the first in a series of immigration enforcement shifts that really pissed off the American people.

DACA helped usher in the era of executive action the first of what Mr. Obama came to call his pen-and-phone approach to governing around, rather than with, Congress.

DACA also tracked with the court backlash. States looked to sue to derail administration actions, and judges were increasingly willing to side with the states.

I think in the past the court afforded administrations more leeway in exerting executive power on the immigration system both Democrat and Republican administrations. There was a lot of deference, and I think weve seen in recent years more skepticism, said Laurence Benenson, vice president of policy and advocacy at the National Immigration Forum.

DACA affected real people in real ways.

SEE ALSO: ICE chief adopts new free speech rules to limit investigations of journalists

On the day of Mr. Obamas announcement, Dreamers held watch parties to see what the president would say. Many were overjoyed. Some who just missed the age cutoff were devastated.

Many lucky enough to make Mr. Obamas cutoff date have treated it like a winning lottery ticket. They have secured jobs, bought cars and homes, and deepened roots in what they consider their home country.

At the start of the pandemic, the Center for American Progress figured that more than 200,000 DACA recipients were working in what could be deemed essential jobs such as health care and food-related services.

Dreamers have also worked on presidential campaigns and as interns on Capitol Hill. Hundreds have served in the U.S. military, and some have won admission to the bar as practicing lawyers.

DACA recipients are in our churches, theyre in our communities, they are at our workplace, they open businesses, theyre consumers. Their children, who are U.S. citizens, are in our schools, said Mr. Benenson. Theyve demonstrated the opportunity afforded by DACA is something Congress has made permanent.

But 10 years in, it hasnt happened.

DACA was never intended to be a 10-year policy. It was intended to be a short stopgap prior to Congress taking steps to pass meaningful immigration reform including protections for Dreamers, Mr. Benenson said.

Mr. Arthur said DACA sapped the impetus for that kind of deal.

For one thing, with the Dreamers no longer in danger of deportation, the most sympathetic cases had been addressed. Perhaps more important, Mr. Obamas move to use executive powers ones he disavowed months earlier to go around Congress soured the conversation on Capitol Hill.

It really broke faith between the Obama executive branch and Congress, Mr. Arthur said. One, you shouldnt be doing this because its not what we said, and two, we cant trust you if we do change the law. Where are you going to find your next magical power from after this?

Mr. Benenson countered that Congress has been close to a deal on Dreamers several times, including a 2013 bill that cleared the Senate and a 2018 proposal by Mr. Trump that would have traded a pathway to citizenship for border wall funding.

I dont think the existence of DACA has been a barrier to getting a Dreamer solution done, Mr. Benenson said.

Support for legalizing Dreamers is overwhelming. Polls show about 3 out of 4 Americans support the idea of giving them more permanent legal status. The trick has been figuring out how many people would qualify and what kinds of border security and enforcement add-ons would be attached.

More than 800,000 people have been through the program and, as of the end of 2021, there were still 611,470 active DACA recipients. Nearly 500,000 of them are from Mexico, with the No. 2 country, El Salvador, far behind at 23,620.

A DACA grant lasts two years but is renewable. That means some people are getting ready to file their sixth application.

One of those is Angie Rodriguez, whose husband, Mario Carrillo, is campaign director at Americas Voice.

As many other families can relate, its difficult living life two years at a time, knowing that the future of DACA has long been in question, Mr. Carrillo wrote in a piece for Americas Voice.

The article contained a note of caution: A federal judge in Texas last year ruled that DACA was created illegally.

Judge Andrew S. Hanen said Mr. Obama skipped too many procedural steps and that the program ran afoul of federal immigration law, though he essentially agreed with Mr. Obamas stance in the years before his 2012 reversal.

I am not a king, the president told Hispanic voters in 2010 as they pressed him for executive action to grant legal status.

Judge Hanen said Mr. Obama had it right the first time. The judge vacated the DACA program but issued a stay of his own ruling, allowing those already protected by DACA to remain under the protections. No new applications are being accepted.

An appeals court will hear oral arguments in the case next month.

The Supreme Court already had one shot at DACA. It ruled in 2020 that Mr. Trumps 2017 attempt to phase out the program cut too many procedural corners and was illegal.

Dissenting justices pointed out the irony that a program created illegally could not also be ended through the same procedural shortcuts.

That left Dreamers in the legal limbo that has characterized their past 10 years.

There should not be a 20th anniversary of DACA without a permanent solution, Mr. Benenson said. This is something that Congress needs to step in and provide a pathway to legalization.

See original here:
DACA changed everything in immigration law and politics - Washington Times