Dems advocate high immigration to gain political power and smear Republicans when called on it – New York Post
The horrific massacre in Buffalo has created a debate about great-replacement theory, the rancid idea that Jews are conspiring to destroy white America by importing non-white immigrants.
The Buffalo shooter was in thrall to the theory, as have been other racist and anti-Semitic killers.
The theory should be denounced by all people of good will, and indeed, it thrives only in the most sewerish precincts of the Internet.
Yet there is an attempt to tar Republicans more broadly with the theory and somehow attribute responsibility for the horror in Buffalo to them on this basis. The argument is that the likes of Elise Stefanik, a Republican congresswoman from New York, have warned that the Democratic Party views immigration as a way to change the electorate in its favor and so are mainstreaming the hateful replacement ideology.
This is a smear and especially perverse since Republicans sounding the alarm about this Democratic view have been unquestionably correct. There hasnt been any secretive cabal at work its all been out in the open, discussed by progressive political operatives and think-tank analysts and celebrated in the press.
The left-wing Center for American Progress issued a report in 2013 titled Immigration Is Changing the Political Landscape in Key States. It summarized its argument thus: Supporting real immigration reform that contains a pathway to citizenship for our nations 11 million undocumented immigrants is the only way to maintain electoral strength in the future.
Books were written about this idea. The widely cited (and over-interpreted) 2002 book The Emerging Democratic Majority by John Judis and Ruy Teixeira called the Democrats the party of transition as white America is supplanted by multiracial, multiethnic America. In 2016, Steve Phillips published Brown Is the New White: How the Demographic Revolution Has Created a New American Majority. His publishers website says the latest edition of the book contends hope for a more progressive political future lies not with increased advertising to middle-of-the-road white voters, but with cultivating Americas growing, diverse majority.
Donald Trumps 2016 victory suppressed some of this sentiment since it made it clear that white working-class voters didnt appreciate being spoken of as if they were a relic of the past, and the 2020 election and its aftermath made the assumption that Democrats will own Latino voters forevermore seem increasingly shaky.
But the left wants to create rules that define it as perfectly acceptable for Democrats to advocate high levels of immigration as a means of gaining political power and out of bounds for Republicans to call them on it.
Washington Post writer Greg Sargent slammed Stefanik for allegedly flirting with the great-replacement theory in Facebook advertisements last year. They warned that Democrats want a sweeping amnesty for illegal immigrants to overthrow our current electorate and create a permanent liberal majority in Washington.
Never mind that Stefanik could have drawn her warning directly from various left-wing writers and advocacy organizations. Or that Sargent himself wrote after Barack Obamas victory in 2012 that the election had been all about demographics and the outcome showed the electorate wasnt reverting to the older, whiter, more male version Republicans had hoped for.
What makes Sargents basic sentiment different from Stefaniks, other than the fact that he welcomes how immigration trends have changed our politics and she doesnt?
Immigration has been hotly contested throughout our history and is inherently a highly emotive issue, involving the composition of our polity and core questions of national identity. It can only inflame the issue further to explicitly weaponize demographic change, as the left has for decades now. We should have an immigration policy that serves the national interest, not the narrow interest of one political party.
Yes, by all means, further shun and marginalize great-replacement theory, but dont support high levels of immigration for partisan reasons and expect the other side not to notice.
Twitter: @RichLowry
See original here:
Dems advocate high immigration to gain political power and smear Republicans when called on it - New York Post