Mediaboss Marketing

The British government introduced legislation on Tuesday that would usher in a sweeping crackdown on illegal immigration with new penalties for those who enter the country illegally and permission for the government to keep migrants in offshore detention centers.

"If you illegally enter the U.K. via a safe country in which you could have claimed asylum, you are not seeking refuge from imminent peril as is the intended purpose of the system but are choosing the U.K. as a preferred destination over others," Home Secretary Priti Patel wrote in The Daily Mail.

UK HEALTH SECRETARY MATT HANCOCK RESIGNS AFTER IMAGES SHOW HIM KISSING AIDE

The Nationality and Borders Bill, which has a high chance of passage given the governing Conservative Partys dominant majority in the House of Commons, saw its first reading in the chamber on Tuesday. The bill will create a new criminal offense for "knowingly" entering the country illegally as part of a number of measures to prevent illegal immigration.

Illegal entry will also hurt a migrants asylum application, and such migrants will receive only a temporary protected status rather than a right to settle, and will be subjected to regular review of their status.

Patel also pledged to limit deportation appeals. "It is sickening that so many people who have no right to be here are able to play the system and stop us removing them," she said.

The bill also gives the countrys Border Patrol more powers of arrest and provides longer prison sentences for smugglers and gangs who help migrants enter the U.K. illegally.

"We will prevent these dangerous journeys to the U.K. by breaking the business model of the criminal gangs," Patel wrote. "Profiteering from illegal migration to Britain will no longer be worth the risk, with new maximum life sentences for people smugglers."

FILE - In this Thursday, Jan. 21, 2021 file photo Britain's Home Secretary Priti Patel speaks during a media briefing on the COVID-19 pandemic in Downing Street, London. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham, Pool, File)

The Home Office says it will also speed up removals of failed asylum seekers and better integrate refugees who are resettled.

The bill also includes provisions to build offshore migrant processing centers, similar to plans currently in place in countries like Denmark and Australia. The Times of London reported that U.K. officials have been in touch with their Danish counterparts, including about the "potential" to share facilities. The Danes are believed to be sending asylum seekers to Rwanda, the Times reported.

The bill represents one of the most aggressive moves by the Tory government to deliver on its promise to voters to crack down on illegal immigration and asylum fraud part of a package of promises that helped deliver the 2019 general election and other victories by appealing to traditionally Labour-held working-class areas on issues like Brexit, crime and immigration.

The government had engaged in a number of rounds of talks with France on the question of asylum cooperation. Migrants have regularly arrived in either small boats or hidden away in trucks and vehicles traveling over from the port of Calais into the U.K. via the tunnel or the ferry system.

UK, FRANCE AGREE TO PLAN TO STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT BOATS ACROSS ENGLISH CHANNEL

However, despite talks, migrants have kept coming. The Times reported that more than 300 migrants arrived in the U.K. in the last weekend of June, and approximately 6,000 have arrived this year overall.

The plan has seen strong criticism by those on both sides of the issue amid questions about whether it can survive legal scrutiny. Former U.K. Independence Party leader Nigel Farage, who led the fight for Brexit and has called for lower immigration levels, called Patels plans for tougher penalties "almost meaningless."

"Not only does Britain not have enough prison spaces for thousands of new offenders every month, but this countrys continued acceptance of the European Convention on Human Rights guarantees there would be endless legal challenges," Farage wrote in The Daily Telegraph. "Even if Patels plan did work, many hard-pressed taxpayers will wonder why they should pay for foreigners to occupy Britains notoriously expensive prison cells."

Meanwhile, the Labour Party slammed the plan as evidence of a lack of compassion and competence.

BORIS JOHNSON'S TORIES PICK UP SEAT IN HARTLEPOOL, PUNCHING HOLE IN LABOUR'S RED WALL

"These plans are unconscionable and an attempt to create a smokescreen to distract from the fact ministers have failed to reopen safe and legal routes, failed to reach an effective agreement with France to deal with criminal gangs, and failed to introduce effective border measures to stop the Delta Variant getting a foothold in this country," Shadow Home Secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds said in a statement.

Britain's crackdown on illegal migration and the moves to turn away or keep migrants in centers out of the country is a stark contrast to what is currently going on in the U.S.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

President Biden has unraveled a number of border protections established during the Trump administration, most notably the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), which kept migrants in Mexico while they awaited their hearings.

His administration also ended asylum cooperative agreements with Northern Triangle countries that made migrants claim asylum in countries they arrived in before traveling to the U.S.

Here is the original post:
UK government pushes bill to crack down on illegal immigration, hold migrants offshore - Fox News

The Biden administration has systematically abandoned the border security policies and immigration reforms that enabled the Trump administration to turn back the tide of illegal immigration. With the floodgates to illegal immigration wide open once again, drug cartels and human traffickers are cashing in and both American and immigrant lives are at greater risk.

It doesnt have to be this way.

In 2019, when faced with an acute, albeit less severe, border crisis than the one we face today, the Trump administration implored Congress to close loopholes in the immigration system. Then, as now, Congress refused to act.

Rather than let the situation at the border continue to deteriorate, Trump took executive action. He continued to build the border wall, as the Border Patrol requested. He started a never-before-used (but authorized by Congress in 1996) Remain in Mexico program requiring asylum seekers from Central America to stay in Mexico during their immigration proceedings. And he reached cooperative agreements with El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras requiring those countries to take back any migrants who had sought asylum with the U.S. without first seeking protection in a safe third country they had passed through on their way to the U.S.

>>>Congress Should Not Approve a Path to Citizenship for the Nations 11 Million Undocumented Immigrants

These changes quickly halted the caravans coming to the U.S. because migrants knew they would no longer be able to enter and disappear into the U.S. simply by claiming fear. By late 2019, our southern border was under control.

A new public health threat emerged in 2020. Moving early in the COVID pandemic to help contain that danger, the Trump administration authorized border officials to turn back migrants for public health safety (Title 42).

The Biden administration, however, has snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. It immediately stopped border wall construction, halted the Remain in Mexico program, tore up the asylum cooperative agreements, ended most deportations, requested congressional amnesty for the untold millions of illegal aliens in the U.S., decreased use of Title 42 health protections, and repeatedly messaged that no unaccompanied alien child would be turned away.

Predictably, historic numbers of immigrantsfrom all over the world, not just south of the borderflocked to enter the U.S. illegally. Human smugglers are pocketing $14 million a day, profiting royally from their services that often leave women raped in route and children abandoned at journeys end.

Border agents have intercepted known terrorists, gang members and sexual predators, but no doubt others have slipped through. Illegal aliens have been transported throughout the U.S. even after testing positive for COVID.

Knowing that the Border Patrol is being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of illegal entries, drug traffickers have picked up the pace, too. The amount of deadly fentanyl seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the first four months of this year exceeds what was seized in all of 2020. How many Americans have to die from these drugs before this administration will implement policies to secure the border?

Charged with addressing the border, Vice President Kamala Harris finally went there last week, stopping by an El Paso Border Patrol facility, miles from the actual border, on her way home to California. She has spent a bit more time in Guatemala and Mexico, where she unconvincingly told their citizens not to come to the U.S. and promised their governments $4 billion over four years to fix the problem. If history is a guide, that money will be absorbed by corrupt systems in those countries, leaving any root causes untouched.

Washington needs to return to an immigration and border security policy that prioritizes American interests. Our leaders should act now to promote legal immigration, prevent illegal immigration, and secure the border from drugs, human trafficking, and the cartels on both sides of the border.

>>>Bidens Border Polls Lower Than Bottom of Rio Grande

We know how to do it: continue building the border wall; reinstate the Remain in Mexico program and the safe third country requirements and agreements; consistently use Title 42 authority until COVID is no longer a global pandemic threat; stop welcoming and admitting unaccompanied alien children into the U.S.; end catch-and-release; enforce existing immigration laws, including deportations; and expand employment verification to ensure employers hire only work-authorized employees.

The president and vice president have sworn an oath to protect their fellow Americans. Yet their administrations immigration policies are undermining homeland security.

The prior administration showed how to turn this rapidly deteriorating situation around. This administration can and must do the same.

See more here:
Biden's Immigration Policies Have Turned a Win Into a Loss - Heritage.org

Austin, TX, 2 hours ago A number of Texas sheriffs, counties, and the nonprofit Federal Police Foundation, ICE Officers Division, have filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration over a February 18 directive that resulted in a reduction in the number of deportations by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The lawsuit alleges that the federal government is causing irreparable injury to the sheriffs and counties who initiated the suit.

Sheriffs deputies are not able to attend to their normal patrol and other public safety duties because the crime associated with the surge in illegal immigration has consumed their attention and time, the plaintiffs allege.

The plaintiffs include Sheriffs Brad Coe of Kinney County, J.W. Guthrie of Edwards County, Emmett Shelton of McMullen County, and Arvin West of Hudspeth County. The counties of Kinney, Edwards, McMullen, and Hudspeth are also plaintiffs in the suit, which was filed in the Galveston Division of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

The defendants in the suit include President Biden and U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, as well as a number of other officials and agencies responsible for enforcing immigration laws.

The lawsuit blasts a memorandum distributed to all ICE employees on February 18, 2021, by ICE Acting Director Tae Johnson that directs them to decline to place illegal aliens on a path to expulsion unless they fall into very narrow categories. According to the lawsuit, those cases consist principally of illegal aliens who pose a national security or terrorist threat to the United States, individuals who have arrived since November 1, 2020, or those who have committed other specified crimes.

This standdown in ICE enforcement has fueled a crisis at the border and in other Texas counties, encouraging a massive surge in illegal immigration, the lawsuits states.

In addition to the public safety risk of illegal immigration, the lawsuit also points to the fiscal impact that is befalling local governments.

Detaining illegal alien criminals imposes significant costs upon the Plaintiff sheriffs and counties. These costs include the financial cost of detention and the consumption of scarce county law enforcement resources, the lawsuit reads.

Those detention costs have already increased substantially since the implementation of the February 18 Memorandum and will continue to remain elevated as a result of Defendants failure to detain and/or remove illegal aliens, particularly those involved in criminal activity, because it increases the number of criminal illegal aliens that Plaintiff sheriffs and counties must detain.

The court documents say arrests and removals have dropped to one-third of what they were before Biden took office due to Johnsons memorandum. The plaintiffs cite a report from The Washington Post that indicated ICE performed fewer than 3,000 arrests, the lowest number on record in April, which means each of ICEs 6,000 officers is averaging one arrest every two months. This is contrasted with an average of 8,634 arrests monthly by ICE in Fiscal Year 2020.

The lawsuit claims the February 18 memo violates immigration statutes, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the U.S. Constitutions direction to the executive branch in Art. II, Sec. 3 faithfully to execute the law.

Vice President Kamala Harris, who is the White Houses policy lead on immigration, has said that the administration is focused on the root causes of migration, such as conditions in Central America. She recently took a trip to El Paso, where she expressed optimism about the administrations extreme progress.

Mayorkas, the DHS secretary, has also claimed that the Trump administration dismantled the asylum system and left DHS with a system that was plagued by chaos and cruelty.

A Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted from June 27-30 showed that 33 percent of American adults approved of Bidens handling of immigration, 51 percent disapproved, and 16 percent had no opinion. The polls margin of error was give or take 3.5 percent.

A copy of the lawsuit can be found below.

Read more:
Biden Causing 'Irreparable Injury' With Reduced Deportations, Texas Sheriffs Allege in Lawsuit - The Texan

By not enforcing federal immigration laws, the Biden administration is encouraging illegal immigration along our southern border. Mexican cartels dangerously are smuggling children, adults, lethal fentanyl and other drugs into the U.S, overwhelming the U.S. border patrol. U.S. taxpayers are paying to house and process.

Neither the president nor the vice president shows much interest. The vice president lied to NBC anchor Lester Holt on June 8, claiming we have been to the border when she clearly had not been to the border before her June 25 visit. Holts challenge to her lie made the Biden tactics even more shameful. This is a full-blown humanitarian and illegal drug crisis, yet the Trib gives it little coverage.

The Tribune-Review is right to focus its reporting on local news and to use news syndicates such as the Associated Press to report national and international stories. Because the Tribune-Review is reporting little news about this worsening crisis, can we assume that the syndicated news services also are giving little coverage to this major news story?

Voters strongly support legal immigration and strongly oppose illegal immigration. Those applying for citizenship the legal way deserve better. So does our country. What the print and broadcast media elect not to report is often more indicative of political bias than the news that it does report.

Scott Brown

Greensburg

Continue reading here:
Letter to the editor: Why so little coverage of border crisis? - TribLIVE

Ramsgate RNLI was called for assistance on Saturday

A rescue carried out by Ramsgates RNLI crew for 26 people stranded on a vessel after trying to make the Channel crossing to the UK last weekend has seen a swell of backing for the lifesaving charity.

The group were picked up by the RNLI crew on Saturday (July 3). Ramsgates all-weather lifeboat was tasked at 11.48am to a drifting vessel around 24 miles east of Ramsgate. The volunteer crew recovered the 26 casualties and returned to Ramsgate at 4pm that afternoon.

The incident was caught on film and then posted to social media by former Ukip and Brexit party leader Nigel Farage who claimed the RNLI had become a taxi service for illegal immigration.

The comments were reported in national papers including the Daily Mail.

But the RNLI has responded to say its lifesaving role is humanitarian rescuing vulnerable people in distress.

The statement says: The RNLI is an emergency service and will continue to launch to those in peril at sea when requested to by HM Coastguard, the government agency that initiates and co-ordinates our UK maritime search and rescue activity.

We are a lifesaving charity and, under maritime law and the Safety of Life at Sea Convention (SOLAS), our volunteer lifeboat crews will always go to the aid of those in danger at sea.

We want to be absolutely clear that we are incredibly proud of the humanitarian work our volunteer lifeboat crews do to rescue vulnerable people in distress.

HM Coastguard and the Irish Coast Guard can request any of our lifeboats to launch to an incident. Our lifeboats operate under international maritime law, which states we are permitted and indeed obligated to enter the waters of other territories for search and rescue purposes. Where we believe there is a risk to life at sea, we will always launch. We are not border control and, once a rescue is complete, we hand over responsibility for casualties to UK Border Force and/or the police.

Our charity exists to save lives at sea. Our mission is to save every one. Our lifesavers are compelled to go to those in need without judgement of how they came to be in the water. They have done so since the RNLI was founded in 1824 and this will always be our ethos.

We have been overwhelmed by the supportive messages weve received. We would like to thank you wholeheartedly your kindness means so much to us. It normally costs around 180m each year to run our charity all funded by our generous supporters. We have always been and remain focused on our core purpose: to save lives at sea.

If you would like to donate go to rnli.social/SaveEveryOne.

See the rest here:
RNLI hits out at Nigel Farage's 'taxi for illegal immigration' jibe after Ramsgate crew carries out rescue op - The Isle of Thanet News