Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

Paying Illegal Aliens to Stay Is a Radical Position – Immigration Blog

Recent moves toward paying illegal aliens to stay in the U.S., at both the federal and state levels, are extreme and radical, as the mainstream media does not seem to realize.

There are, to condense the options available about enforcing the immigration law, five different levels:

In other words simply proposing to suspend most deportations, one of President Biden's policies, while drastic enough, is just one step along the way to open borders, while paying disaster grants or extra unemployment insurance to those in illegal statusis a fifth step in the same direction. The media simply does not understand this, or if it does, it ties itself in knots trying not to convey this reality.

For a good example of this kind of journalistic denial, one only has to read a February 20 Washington Post article about how some Maryland Democrats are trying to add illegal aliens to the list of families about to receive state-level disaster grants of $300 to $500 each.

Erin Cox, writing on tax credits for illegal aliens in Maryland, so shrank from that term that she used, inaccurately, the following terms: "noncitizen Marylanders" in the print version headline, "immigrants who are not citizens", and the value-loaded "taxpayers without Social Security numbers" in the text. "Noncitizen Marylanders" is inaccurate in this context because some of them are here legally and eligible for the payments, and some are not.

Maryland Governor Larry Hogan's posture on this issue do not pay illegal aliens to stay in the country is the correct one. Noncitizens should get these benefits if they are here permanently and legally as permanent resident aliens (those with green cards); aliens who are here legally on temporary visas, and those here without papers should receive nothing.

Maryland's position, more precisely, that benefits should not go to aliens without Social Security numbers, is the right one; these numbers are supposed to be handed out only to people here legally. There are ITINs (individual tax identification numbers) for aliens who are not here legally; no benefits should go to them.

While Maryland, so far, is doing the right thing on this issue, California and the feds are not. We reported earlier that the U.S. Senate, on a party-line vote, decided that illegal aliens could get the next round of $1,400 disaster payments. Similarly, the state legislature in California made the same decision about its last round of such payments, $500 for adult illegal aliens.

Read more:
Paying Illegal Aliens to Stay Is a Radical Position - Immigration Blog

Biden immigration plan raises hopes for those in Berks seeking path to citizenship – Reading Eagle

A lot of people had been anxiously awaiting the unveiling of President Joe Biden's plan to overhaul the nation's immigration system, a priority he made clear in his campaign and his first day in the Oval Office.

Fatima Mendez of Reading was one of those people. But for her it's not a matter of policy or politics. It's personal.

She is one of nearly 700,000 young men and women known as "Dreamers," recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, an administrative action from the Obama era that protects immigrants from deportation who were brought into the United States illegally as children.

They are commonly referred to as "Dreamers," based on never-passed proposals in Congress called the DREAM Act. Opponents say the law rewards people for breaking the law, encourages illegal immigration and hurts American workers.

In the case of Mendez, she came to Berks County from El Salvador as a 14-year-old in 2006. She was escorted by adults on the arduous journey to reunite with her parents, who received temporary protected status in 2001, following a devastating earthquake that hit their home country.

Mendez, who went on to earn a degree from Albright College, said being part of the program has enabled her to work at a local bank and contribute to her community. Without the program, she would face the possibility of being sent back to a country that she barely remembers.

So it should come as no surprise that the immigration system is something Mendez pays quite a lot of attention to. And the 30-year-old says that Biden's election, and his early attempt to address that system's flaws that was unveiled last week, have her cautiously optimistic.

"I think this proposal is great and pretty ambitious," she said. "It honestly feels like Biden is setting the bar high and that what we will actually get from lawmakers will be very different in the end."

Biden's plan looks to make sweeping changes to the immigration system like creating pathways to citizenship for the 11 million immigrants here illegally and for the more than 1 million here under protected status like the "Dreamers".

The proposal, known as the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021, would have a profound impact on her family.

"It's always good to be hopeful, but it's expected that since you're an immigrant we should be grateful for whatever we get," she said. "I feel like, in some ways, I can't really criticize a plan like this."

Although Mendez is excited about the possibilities of Biden's plan, she said she realizes it has a long way to go before becoming a reality. Parts of it will likely receive pushback, aspects of it may end up changing significantly.

"These proposals come and go all the time," she said. "I want to be excited but at the same time, I feel like this is an issue that gains momentum every few years and then nothing actually happens. We need lawmakers to take action."

Mendez, who recently bought a home in Reading with her boyfriend, said she is relieved just knowing the president isn't actively looking to deport all those living in the country illegally.

"I have been just enjoying ordinary life," she said. "I'm just like everyone else: I go to work. I pay taxes. I worry about all the same things and I live in this community."

Mendez said she considers herself privileged. She was able to get a college education, she can legally drive, she has a Social Security number, she can live without being in constant fear of being deported if someone discovers her immigration status.

"I pretty much have all the perks of being a citizen," she said. "But there is still a fight to be respected as an American."

Mendez said becoming a citizen would mean she could finally cast a ballot, travel outside the country and have the ability to apply for school loans. But the biggest change it would make would be how she views her place in the community.

"I think I would feel more empowered to speak out about the things I would like to see in my community," she said. "I think there is still a fear that I carry around about my status and what it could mean for me if someone has a problem with it.

"Not having to worry about being judged would be a huge relief."

Like Mendez, other local immigration advocates have applauded Biden's effort. But they also remain a bit wary, unsure if there's enough political will for the immigration system to be rewritten and of what it will look like in the end.

The administration and congressional Democrats haveunveiled an immigration reform billthat includes proposals Biden announced on his first day in office.

The centerpiece of the legislation is an eight-year path to citizenship for most of the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. as of January.

After passing background checks and paying taxes, they would be allowed to live and work in the U.S. for five years. After that, they could apply for a green card, giving them the opportunity to gain citizenship after three more years.

It would also remove restrictions on family-based immigration, expand worker visas, reduce immigration court backlogs and provide funding to reduce asylum application backlogs.

Attorney Abraham Cepeda, who practices immigration law at Cultura Law in Reading, said there are many proposals in the legislation that get to the heart of the problems plaguing the existing immigration system.

"I am glad to see that they are addressing some of the glaring mistakes of the past that have led to this crisis," he said. "The bill has a lot of meat in it if it would pass in this form. And Biden has a good chance because the Democrats control both chambers of Congress right now."

Abraham Cepeda practices immigration law in Berks County.

Cepeda said he was pleasantly surprised that the president stuck to his campaign promise by making it clear that immigration would be one of his first priorities.

"To tell you the truth, I didn't think he was going to come out with this plan on Day One," he said. "This makes me hopeful that he is really ready to get to work on this."

Cepeda said the pathway to citizenship for those in the country illegally is probably the most exciting piece of the legislation.

He said the provisional status would give them the opportunity to work legally, use the banking system, obtain a license to drive and travel outside the country to see family. It would also require that they pass a background check and pay taxes that are owed.

"This proposal makes sure we vet the people going into this system, and I believe what is being asked of them is appropriate," he said. "We want to make sure everyone feels confident that these people are going to contribute to our community."

Cepeda said most of the families that his firm serves have at least one undocumented family member who is worried they will be discovered and deported. So, he said, the proposal would eliminate the constant anxiety that comes from knowing a family member could just disappear one day.

Cepeda said there are also a number of what he called hidden gems in the legislation.

Those include eliminating a provision put in place by former President Bill Clinton that bars someone found to be in the country illegally who leaves voluntarily from returning for 10 years, and providing more funding to help speed up the immigration process.

"I deal with cases stemming from these issues all the time," he said. "Most people are unwilling to voluntarily leave behind the lives they have built here and it can take people more than a decade to get here through the proper channels.

"You hear a lot of people say that immigrants should get in line and do it the right way. But I don't think people know about the backlogs that exist. And if you're living in a dangerous situation in your home country waiting that long is not much of an option."

Michael Toledo, president and CEO of the Daniel Torres Hispanic Center, said Biden's supportso early into his term is a good sign.

"With all the challenges that the president is facing right now, that he put out a comprehensive plan on immigration gives me a great deal of hope," he said. "It is time for Congress to take action now. And, quite honestly, the majority of Americans want to see a fair and humane immigration policy that supports those in our country who are working and contributing to the communities they live in."

Michael Toledo, president and CEO of the Daniel Torres Hispanic Center.

Toledo is right about positive public opinion. It's growing.

A Morning Consult/Politico poll released in January found that 57% of voters believe those in the country illegally should be allowed to stay and become citizens if they meet certain requirements up 11 percentage points from an April 2017 survey. It is the most recent poll available on the issue.

While previous attempts at sweeping immigration reform have failed under both Republican and Democratic administrations, Biden has signaled a willingness to break the legislation into pieces.

As a potential secondary path, lawmakers would work to pass bills legalizing farmworkers and "Dreamers" right away, then move toward a more expansive overhaul. The main objective, officials said, is progress.

Carol Anne Donohoe, a Berks resident who is managing attorney for the immigration advocacy organization Al Otro Lado, said there certainly are actions that can be taken immediately to ease the burden on the millions of families at risk of deportation and those that have protections under temporary programs.

But, she warned, lawmakers should look at the legislation as a whole because people tend to look at these two groups quite differently. Some may feel more sympathetic for a child who was brought here by their parents, but the reality is that those children would still worry about their undocumented parents being deported.

Whether there is the political will to pass comprehensive legislation in the current political environment is the real question. So she acknowledged that working on individual pieces may be a better way to go.

Carol Anne Donohoe, a Berks County immigration lawyer, speaks about her work representing asylum-seeking families detained at the Berks County Residential Center at Albright College in this file photo.

"I'm normally of the opinion that you ask for everything," she said. "But if one piece gets done sooner than the other that's at least one piece that wasn't done before. And this is coming from someone who is so not a fan of incremental change."

Donohoe said that whatever path Congress takes, advocates will be ready for a fight.

"We have to be loud and we have to be demanding," she said. "We have to let them know that we are not going to accept any of the horrors that have taken hold in our immigration system. We learned a lot of tactics under Trump so we are prepared to fight."

She said that since Biden was sworn in, she no longer wakes up every morning with the existential dread that anything she does is useless. But she added that she has been following immigration issues long enough to know that a new president cannot magically make the system better.

"I don't look to a leader as being the answer," she said. "We have to keep watching, questioning and urging action because a lot of harm has been and continues to be done under our current system."

Toledo said members of the Hispanic Center will do everything they can to support the legislation.

"We see the true value that our immigrant and mixed family population brings to the community," he said. "We just have to continue to tell the story about the contributions that they are making. And, hopefully, our congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle can work with the administration on a bill that lifts up everyone.

"Given our current political climate, I have my doubts that this is possible. However, Biden spent so much time in Congress that he understands how important it can be to compromise."

Even if Biden gets most of what he wants on immigration, fully implementing the kind of sweeping changes he's promised will likely take years.

Donohoe said she worries that Biden may not do enough to reverse policies put in place by the Trump administration. And she already has a few examples of ways in which he has disappointed advocates.

Biden issued an executive order banning the detention of migrants from private prisons, but the order does not apply to facilities like the Berks County Residential Center.

Donohoe, who had previously represented those detained at the Bern Township center, said she was discouraged that both the executive order and the legislation supported by Biden does not specifically mention the detention of families at facilities like the one in Berks.

"There is absolutely no purpose for detention," she said.

She is also disappointed that deportations are still taking place.

Biden signed a moratorium on the second day of his term declaring a pause on certain deportations for 100 days. But that moratorium has been blocked by a judge in Texas.

Donohoe said there is more Biden could do. She said the president could have reversed a Trump policy that used an obscure public health rule to effectively close the southern border to asylum seekers due to concerns about the coronavirus pandemic.

"We need more immediate action and more clarity," she said. "We need them to actively stop ICE from deporting people and begin processing people so that they can remain in the country until they have had their day in court."

There has, however, been one bright spot.

Donohoe said she was happy to see Biden sign an executive order creating a task force to reunite hundreds of migrant families who were separated at the border by the Trump administration and remain apart years later.

But she still remains concerned about a lack of details or timeline for the plan.

"These families are told to be patient, but it's really hard to be patient when you haven't seen your child in three years," she said. "The issue is not finding these parents because we know how to find them. The problem is the hundreds of deported parents who have not been able to return."

Cepeda said he can still remember a time when immigration was a nonpartisan issue.

In fact, he pointed out that two of the most consequential changes to immigration law during the last three decades did not fall along our current political lines.

Cepeda noted President Ronald Reagan, who is often referred to as the father of modern conservatism, signed a sweeping immigration reform law in 1986. The law made immigrants who had entered the country before 1982 eligible for amnesty.

In the end, that law granted amnesty to nearly 3 million undocumented immigrants.

On the other hand, Cepeda cited how Clinton signed the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act that prevented undocumented immigrants who had overstayed their visas or crossed the border illegally from returning after an extended wait period.

"This should not be a political issue but, unfortunately, this is what it has become," he said. "And after four years of Donald Trump the rhetoric against immigration has been ratcheted up to a level we have never seen before."

However, Cepeda said, that might actually be helpful.

"I think the fact that Trump pushed these horrible policies may have caused some people to take a more humane look at this issue," he said.

Toledo said there may be some truth in that. He said he believes people want an immigration system that is fair, humane and keeps families together.

"There's a lot of fear out there in the country," he said. "Our foundation is based on immigrants but, unfortunately, there are people out there who spread fear and falsehoods that turn it into a political issue. But it should not be that way. It's going to be challenging, but I think if there was ever a time to start moving the needle forward it's now."

See the original post:
Biden immigration plan raises hopes for those in Berks seeking path to citizenship - Reading Eagle

Tom Cotton falsely claims Joe Biden halted the deportation of criminals – PolitiFact

Speaking at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., criticized Democrats immigration proposals and claimed that President Joe Biden was giving terrorists and other criminals a pass to stay in the country even if they were here illegally.

"They have halted deportations for all illegal aliens murderers, rapists, terrorists, MS-13 gang members are not being deported," Cotton told CPAC attendees Feb. 26 in Orlando.

Is Cotton right about criminals being allowed to stay? No. His claim ignores the policies of the Department of Homeland Security.

"Sen. Cotton misspoke," with respect to terrorists not being deported, James Arnold, a spokesperson for Cotton, told PolitiFact.

100-day deportation pause order did not apply to national security and public safety threats

On Jan. 20, David Pekoske, then-acting secretary of homeland security, ordered a review of immigration enforcement practices and an immediate 100-day pause on the deportation of people with final orders of removal.

"Due to limited resources, DHS cannot respond to all immigration violations or remove all persons unlawfully in the United States," Pekoske said. "Rather, DHS must implement civil immigration enforcement based on sensible priorities and changing circumstances."

The deportation pause did not apply to people who had engaged or were suspected of engaging in terrorism or espionage, or posed a danger to national security and public safety.

People were still eligible for deportation if they were in prison or jail and released on or after the date of Pekoskes memo, and if they were convicted of an aggravated felony. An aggravated felony includes murder, rape or sexual abuse of a minor.

Cotton also left out that a federal judge in Texas has since blocked the deportation moratorium indefinitely. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the Biden administration over the deportation pause.

DHS told PolitiFact that Cottons claim was incorrect, noting that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Feb. 18 issued interim operating guidance that said removal resources would focus on threats to national security, border security and public safety.

"Individuals are presumed to be a threat to public safety if, for example, they have been convicted of an aggravated felony or engaged in certain activity as part of a criminal gang or transnational criminal organization and there is reason to believe they currently pose a threat," ICE said.

We dont have data on how many murderers, rapists, gang members or terrorists have been deported during the Biden administration. But it is inaccurate to say that their deportations were halted.

Our ruling

Cotton said, "They have halted deportations for all illegal aliens, murderers, rapists, terrorists, MS-13 gang members are not being deported."

Bidens administration ordered a 100-day deportation pause, but it did not apply to criminals such as murderers, rapists, terrorists or gang members.

We rate Cottons claim False.

UPDATE,Feb. 26, 7:10 p.m.: We updated the story shortly after publication to clarify the response from Cotton's spokesman.It did not affect the rating.

The rest is here:
Tom Cotton falsely claims Joe Biden halted the deportation of criminals - PolitiFact

Assessing Claims in the Coronavirus Stimulus Debate – The New York Times

Ahead of the vote on President Bidens $1.9 trillion stimulus package, lawmakers have offered an array of misleading claims to promote their position on the bill. Heres a fact check of some common talking points.

WHAT WAS SAID

This is supposed to be a Covid bill. Only 9 percent of it goes to Covid. Representative Kevin McCarthy, Republican of California and the House minority leader, in an interview this week on Fox News.

This is misleading. A spokeswoman for Mr. McCarthy said that the 9 percent referred to the $160 billion for a national vaccination program, expanded testing and a public health jobs program, as outlined by the Biden administration. In other words, 8.4 percent, or $160 billion of the $1.9 trillion package, is allocated specifically to fighting the coronavirus.

But that is a rather narrow interpretation of pandemic-related funding. The bill also includes other health care spending like subsidizing insurance coverage for laid-off workers, extending paid sick leave and funding for veterans care.

And like the first two relief bills signed by President Donald J. Trump and an alternate measure proposed this year by 10 Republican lawmakers, much of the Biden plan is devoted to providing financial help to families and businesses harmed by the economic effects of the pandemic. The $1,400 stimulus checks and extension of unemployment benefits are the two biggest single expenditures, according to a breakdown by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

WHAT WAS SAID

Weve run the numbers and heres your receipt, @SpeakerPelosi @SenSchumer, Senator Marsha Blackburn this week on Twitter, breaking down the bill into categories like arts, museums and library services; Pelosis subway; services including Planned Parenthood; and climate justice.

This is misleading. Ms. Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, accused Democratic leadership of drafting a $1.9 trillion bill that amounted to a liberal wishlist. But the four specific areas of funding she highlighted add up to $547 million or about 0.03 percent of the total $1.9 trillion.

Pelosis subway refers to a project to extend the Bay Area Rapid Transit system into downtown San Jose which is an hour south of San Francisco and the district Speaker Nancy Pelosi represents. The project is actually in the district of another Democrat, Representative Zoe Lofgren.

A spokeswoman for the House transportation committee said that the BART extension was not receiving special funding, but rather simply being funded proportionately to other similar projects around the country.

Over all, the bill includes $30 billion to help public transit agencies, the bulk of which covers operational costs of transit systems across the nation. About $1 billion of that goes to a Transportation Department grant program to ensure that already approved transit projects like the BART extension as well as rail improvements in Republican-led states like Indiana and Arizona remain solvent.

Art, museums, and library services refer to the $135 million set aside for the National Endowment for the Arts and $200 million for the Institute of Museum and Library Services.

The bill also devotes $50 million to family planning projects, which Ms. Blackburn characterized as services including Planned Parenthood. The group is not explicitly mentioned in the bill, but it has previously received family planning grants. Other grantees include state and local health agencies (including Tennessees Department of Health family planning program) and other nonprofits.

Another $50 million is earmarked for environmental justice purposes, the bill reads, and is intended to address the health outcome disparities from pollution and the pandemic.

WHAT WAS SAID

There are bailouts to Planned Parenthood, stimulus grants to illegal immigrant families. Representative Jim Banks, Republican of Indiana, in an interview this week on Fox News.

This is misleading. Mr. Bankss claim about illegal immigrant families receiving stimulus grants refers to families with mixed immigration status, not families where all members are undocumented. Under the bill, couples who jointly file their taxes need to have only one valid Social Security number to receive a stimulus check. But the amount would be $1,400 for an individual, not $2,800 for a couple.

In other words, American citizens or legal residents married to undocumented immigrants would receive the $1,400, but their spouses would not.

The first two rounds of stimulus checks had the same conditions with virtually identical language.

WHAT WAS SAID

Theres over a trillion dollars of money unspent from previous relief bills that were bipartisan. The moneys still sitting in a bank account. Representative Steve Scalise, Republican of Louisiana, in an interview this week on ABC.

If you think about whats happened already, $4 trillion worth of stimulus has been passed. Theres still a trillion dollars worth, or close to a trillion dollars, that hasnt even been spent yet. Senator Bill Hagerty, Republican of Tennessee, in an interview this week on Fox Business.

This is misleading. In an op-ed published this month by The Washington Post, Mr. Scalise linked to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budgets coronavirus spending tracker as his source for this claim. According to the tracker, about $3 trillion has already been spent. But that does not necessarily mean that $1 trillion will remain unused.

The think tank explained in a blog post in January that much of it is already allocated or scheduled to be spent, and a small portion will never be spent. About $775 billion of the unspent funding came from the $900 billion stimulus package signed into law in late December, according to the blog post. Funding expected to be doled out over time (loans and Medicaid spending), as well as data lags, also explain some of the disparity.

WHAT WAS SAID

In fact, 95 percent of that money cant even be spent until 2022. Do you really want to wait until 2022 to start having your kid go back in school? This bill actually will delay school reopening. This is crazy. Mr. Scalise in an interview this week on Fox News.

We need to get and follow the science and get kids back to school. This bill does not do that. Mr. McCarthy, in an interview this week on Fox News.

This is misleading. The bill sets aside $128.5 billion for funding K-12 schools through the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that $6.4 billion of that would be spent in the 2021 fiscal year, which ends in September.

But the budget office also said that the spending rate it estimated was subject to considerable uncertainty.

In a letter to congressional leaders, education groups wrote that the notion that schools did not need more funding because of how much they would spend this year was inaccurate.

In conversations with our respective memberships, they report that while the spend rate may seem quite low to those unfamiliar with state and district school financial procedures and requirements, they have budgeted for every dollar they are scheduled to receive from the Covid relief bills and are still anticipating more significant costs they will be unable to meet without additional federal funds, the groups wrote.

A spokeswoman for Mr. McCarthy also noted that the bill provides no assurance to families that schools will reopen and that funding was not tied to reopening schools.

Nothing in the bill explicitly delays school reopening, nor does it condition funding on reopening. But a spokesman for the House Education and Labor Committee noted that it was never intended to.

Our position has always been that these decisions should be made by local school districts in consultation with public health officials, said Joshua Weisz, the communications director for the committee. Congress should not be coercing schools into reopening.

WHAT WAS SAID

If we dont pass the American Rescue Plan, 40 million Americans will lose nutritional assistance through a program we call SNAP, the old food stamp program. Do we not invest $3 million $3 billion to keep families from going hungry? Mr. Biden in remarks last week at a Pfizer plant.

This is exaggerated. As FactCheck.org noted, the White House transcript of Mr. Bidens remarks added some of in brackets before the words nutritional assistance. That is because failure to pass the bill would not lead to Americans who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program in losing all of their benefits. Rather, the stimulus package signed into law in December temporarily increased food stamp benefits by 15 percent from January to June. The current bill and Mr. Bidens plan would extend that increase to September.

WHAT WAS SAID

For example, if it went if we gradually increased it when we indexed it at $7.20, if we kept it indexed by to inflation, people would be making 20 bucks an hour right now. Mr. Biden last week at a CNN town hall event.

False. The federal minimum wage was last raised to $7.25 in July 2009, which if indexed for consumer inflation would be about $8.81 today. Mr. Biden most likely meant to say worker productivity instead of inflation. Dean Baker, an economist at left-leaning Center for Economic and Policy Research, has estimated that if the minimum wage had kept up with productivity, it would be about $24.

We welcome suggestions and tips from readers on what to fact-check on email and Twitter.

See original here:
Assessing Claims in the Coronavirus Stimulus Debate - The New York Times

Biden’s new plans propose progressive immigration reforms, but undocumented Wisconsin immigrants may have quicker ways to citizenship – UW Badger…

Last week, President Joe Biden attended a town hall in Milwaukee to discuss a range of issues and policies he hopes to tackle during the beginning of his term.

President Biden told CNN interviewer Anderson Cooper he hopes to provide roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants a path towards citizenship and dramatically expand the number of refugees the United States accepts each year.

The White House website statesthis bill is part of the presidents commitment to modernize our immigration system.

And he is right. If passed, Bidens bill would be the largest reform on U.S. immigration laws in decades.

Specifically, Bidens proposals would implement some long-desired liberal reforms, as well as peel back many Trump-era enactments.

Providing a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants is one of the hallmarks of the Democrats policy goals. Biden reaffirmedthis at his Milwaukee town hall.

Democratic congressmen have attempted to pass such a measure for years now two similar bills failed in Congress in 2007 and 2013. President Obama attempted to protect illegal migrants through an executive order in 2014 but his actions were quickly challenged and overturned in court.

Now, polls show increasing support among affiliates of both political parties for amnesty for undocumented immigrants. Many also believe Biden hopes to pass immigration reform now so he can provide tangible results for moderate Latino voters who supported his campaign.

Clocking back in as the worlds policeman: Biden adopts foreign policy strategies of his predecessorsLast week, President Biden delivered his first speech on U.S. foreign policy and described his main goals for the United Read

Director of the Milwaukee-based Voces de la Frontera advocacy group Christine Neumann-Ortizprojects 90,000 undocumented workers reside in Wisconsin, working primarily in health care and food service.

I would say for myself and other Latino and immigrant families that were deeply involved in the effort to not just drive out Trump, but to help President-Elect Biden and Vice President-Elect Kamala Harris, that was done on the basis of their commitment to champion immigration, both around pandemic relief and immediate protections, Neumann-Ortiz said.They had an impressive platform on immigration that reflected the demands of the movement over the last 20 years.

Other motivations for immigration reform include removing many controversial policies implemented by former President Trump. This week, Biden began by removing last years ban on green card workers, allowing thousands of migrants to come to the United States to work legally. Biden also already ended the controversial Muslim Ban on his first day in office.

Biden hopes to solve many other lasting issues with his legislation, such as the lingering effects of family separations and Trumps reduction of the number of refugees accepted annually.

Biden must address how fake news claims and media distrust continue to fuel Trump supportersIf you have ever wanted to see the totally unfiltered opinions of the American people, look no further than the Read

Other measures in Bidens immigration bill reflect his sympathy with some Trump-era policies. For example, Biden hopes to continue to strengthen border security by investing in more advanced screening technology and protective infrastructure at the border to combat drug trafficking.

Biden also advocates increasing U.S. agencies roles in Latin American countries by personally combating and collecting intelligence on drug cartels. He proposes establishing Designated Processing Centers across Latin America to distribute migrants to the United States. An overall ambitious plan, which would be incredibly invasive in the domestic affairs of other countries.

Bidens plan would be the most streamlined route for immigration in decades. Not since 1965 when the Immigration and Nationality Act ended racial barriers from entry have U.S. immigration laws changed this significantly. A reform of this magnitude will likely cause a similar ripple of effects previous reforms did.

Bidens immigration legislation hopes to address decades of neglect by Congress and turn the direction of Americas attitude towards immigration.

UW students react to 2020 election results with joy, hope amid pandemic anxietyMadison residents and students burst into celebration and rushed to the Wisconsin State Capitol Nov. 7 after multiple news outlets Read

Even if youre not involved in politics at all, you have probably heard me say this 1,000 times and matter that everyone is entitled to be treated with decency, with dignity, Biden saidin Milwaukee. Everyone is entitled to that.

The history of American immigration constantly battled with this principle. For decades, many people were banned from coming to the U.S. or unjustly deported because of their skin color.

This past year, Trump lowered the countrys overall refugee quota to just 15,000, (with only just over 5,000 actually accepted) starkly contrasting Obamas last year in office with a quota of 110,000.

Passing this bill is a positive step toward making American laws more just for aspiring immigrants. But some of his more troubling measures regarding increased surveillance and intervention in Latin American affairs should be reconsidered before they are forgotten amid the wave of progressive optimism for this bill.

While ambitious in its goals, any smaller version of this bill would enact ever-needed changes on the troubled American immigration system.

Hayden Kolowrat ([emailprotected]) is a graduate student studying Southeast Asian studies.

Read the original here:
Biden's new plans propose progressive immigration reforms, but undocumented Wisconsin immigrants may have quicker ways to citizenship - UW Badger...