Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

Statutes of Liberty: Tax Law and the Undocumented — You Don’t Get What You Pay For – ARLnow

This sponsored column is by James Montana, Esq., Doran Shemin, Esq. and Laura Lorenzo, Esq., practicing attorneys atSteelyard LLC, an immigration-focused law firm located in Arlington, Virginia. The legal information given here is general in nature. If you want legal advice,contact Jamesfor an appointment.

Tax Law and the Undocumented was one of the less-popular choices on our glorious Readerpalooza poll, but its tax time, and we want to make sure this information is out there, because someone really needs it. (Our motto here at Statutes of Liberty is Decreasing Needless Suffering: Its Taking Longer Than We Thought.)

So, its time for a Q&A between our imaginary interviewer, Cosell, and our non-imaginary founding partner.

Cosell: Lets cut to the chase. Do illegal immigrants undocumented people, what-have-you do they have to pay taxes?

Montana: Yes. Paying taxes on U.S. income is required under federal law whether you are here legally or illegally.

Cosell: But they dont have Social Security numbers, do they?

Montana: Some of them do. Immigration is complicated. (Until 1974, you didnt have to submit any evidence at all to get an SSN you just asked for one. See here.)

Cosell: OK, wise guy, but how do you pay your taxes without a Social Security number?

Montana: The IRS will issue you something called an Individual Taxpayer ID Number (ITIN), which serves as a substitute for an SSN. An Individual Taxpayer ID Number allows the IRS to keep track of you from year to year.

Cosell: But come on. It would be stupid to tell the federal government your address and name if youre living illegally in this country. Why on earth would anyone do that?

Montana: Many of our clients genuinely want to pay taxes. They see it as part of being responsible residents in this country. Also again, immigration is complicated! there are lots of families with mixed status. For example, Dad has TPS, Mom is undocumented, one kid is undocumented and the two younger kids were born here. In that family, there are three legitimate Social Security numbers and two ITINs. Dads employer will withhold his income, and hell want to file a tax return.

Cosell: But wont the IRS report you to ICE?

Montana: There are plenty of people who fear that, but federal law generally forbids the disclosure of tax information for immigration purposes. This is a contested area of law, but our view is that people should pay their taxes. First of all, its the right thing to do. Second, paying your taxes is useful evidence of physical presence and compliance with U.S. law, which your immigration lawyer will love to see.

Cosell: So, lets say Im undocumented. Should I have my cousins friend prepare my taxes? I hear hes super good at it always gets the best refund!

Montana: God, we get this all the time. NO NO NO NO.

Cosell: Why not?

Montana: Because your cousins friend is an idiot. He will, without fail, (1) claim incorrect numbers of dependents, (2) write down that you are head of household when you arent, (3) put down his address rather than yours just to keep things simple and generally make a dogs breakfast of the whole thing.

Please go to a licensed tax preparer or a CPA. Free tax preparation is available right here in Arlington from Enterprise Development Group (EDG). If you live in D.C. or suburban Maryland, check out the Catholic Charities Financial Stability Network. If neither of those works for you, go to a physical H&R Block office. H&R Block takes more of your refund than a free preparer would, but theyre still better than the alternative.

Cosell: Whats your favorite unlicensed tax preparer story?

Montana: There are so many. My personal fave is Kenneth Mwase, whose unlicensed tax business not only fleeced clients out of their refunds but also (allegedly) drove them to ATMs to demand more money. After his conviction, he fled to South Africa using a bogus Zimbabwean passport. It took an international manhunt to find him. Why would you pay for that kind of service when you can get actual, sane tax advice for free from a kindly retired accountant?

The rest is here:
Statutes of Liberty: Tax Law and the Undocumented -- You Don't Get What You Pay For - ARLnow

Kamala Harris Is the New Border Czar Sort Of – Immigration Blog

Vice President Kamala Harris is apparently the new border czar sort of. As Politico explains: Harris exact role hasnt been fully laid out publicly. But she is ostensibly spearheading efforts to deal with what some experts describe as the root causes of migration usually described as poverty, high levels of violence, and corruption in Mexico El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. I wish her the best, but she will likely be no more successful than her predecessors.

It should be noted at the outset that migration actually exacerbates those root causes.

Corruption: My colleague Todd Bensman explained on March 29 how the recent migrant surge is enriching Mexican officials who are demanding bribes from and shaking down Central American migrants. Dont think for a minute that bribes and graft are not built into smugglers pricing structure elsewhere, at every step along the migrant journey.

High levels of violence: Violent drug cartels make money by demanding a tax or piso from smugglers who are moving migrants across what those cartels deem their territory. That money gets plowed back into their other criminal enterprises. And, of course, smugglers themselves are violent criminals, as a recent Wall Street Journal article makes vividly clear.

Then, there are the gangs, and in particular MS-13. Most Central American asylum claims are premised on some sort of harm by the gangs: extortion, recruitment, or threats to scare off witnesses and informants.

As the Obama-era Treasury Department made clear, however, MS-13 operates in the United States, too (with 8,000 members in 40 states and D.C.), and is involved in multiple crimes including murder, racketeering, drug trafficking, sex trafficking and human trafficking including prostitution. Profits from those enterprises get funneled back to the gangs leadership in El Salvador, enabling them to engage in more violent crime in Central America.

MS-13 recruits new members in the United States to commit those offenses, in part, by targeting recent immigrants, including unaccompanied alien minors, as Timothy D. Sini, the police commissioner of Suffolk County, N.Y., explained to a Senate committee in May 2017. Thus, the circle of crime and illegal immigration both in Central America and the United States is regrettably completed.

Poverty: As Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele told Fox News host Tucker Carlson in mid-March, mass immigration is not profitable for either country involved. Bukele explained:

If you send hardworking people and talented people and people who want to risk it just to go to work, you want to keep them here because those will be the drivers of your economy. You don't want them there so that they can send a remittance, which would be a small portion of what they would earn and produce; you want them to produce here.

Bukele would know: At least 20 percent of El Salvadors population lives abroad (most almost 1.3 million Salvadoran immigrants in the United States), and their remittances account for around 20 percent of the countrys GDP.

In any event, however, this is not the United States first foray into ending those root causes of illegal migration. Here is then-DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson, in a statement from 2016:

Border security alone cannot overcome the powerful push factors of poverty and violence that exist in Central America. ... Ultimately, the solution is long-term investment in Central America to address the underlying push factors in the region. We continue to work closely with our federal partners and the governments in the region, and are pleased with the $750 million Congress approved in FY 2016 for support and aid to Central America. We urge Congress to provide additional resources in FY 2017.

Given the fact that poverty, violence, and corruption are still cited as factors in Central American migration, that funding either wasnt enough, or simply made little or no difference in addressing these factors.

President Biden has, nonetheless, proposed a:

$4 billion four-year inter-agency plan to address the underlying causes of migration in the region, including by increasing assistance to El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, conditioned on their ability to reduce the endemic corruption, violence, and poverty that causes people to flee their home countries.

That is an increase of $250 million per year over the funding plan Johnson discussed in 2016, but will it do any good? Respectfully, there is no reason to suggest that it will.

The average annual income in El Salvador is $4,000, in Guatemala it is $4,610, in Honduras it is $2,310, and in Mexico it is $9,480. By comparison, it is $65,850 in the United States.

Of course, those are averages, not actual income. The minimum yearly wage in El Salvador is between $2,433.84 and $3,650.04, depending on the sector of the economy.

In Guatemala, the yearly minimum wage is $2,734.00, again, with some differentiation among sectors.

The approximate official yearly minimum wage in Honduras is $7,915.00, suggesting that a large portion of the economy is working off the books, and/or that taxes are really high.

By contrast, the federal minimum wage in the United States is $7.25 per hour, or about $15,080.00 per year. In California, however, it is $13.00 per hour ($27,040.00 per year); in Washington State it is $13.69 per hour ($28,475.20 per year); and in D.C. the minimum wage is $15.00 per hour (or $31,200 per year).

And the population of El Salvador is about 6.5 million; of Guatemala just over 18 million; and of Honduras, around 10 million, for a total of around 34.5 million. The $4 billion in aid that the president is proposing would total about $116 per person over four years, or about $29 per year. That is nowhere near enough to make up the difference in the wage gap between those countries and the United States.

And, while I have no doubt about the vice presidents negotiating skills, or her ability to combat crime (she is the former attorney general of California and San Francisco district attorney), I question whether she will be able to make any appreciable impact on the endemic crime and corruption in the Northern Triangle.

The United States does not have a great track record of addressing such structural issues abroad. We have been attempting to improve the lives of the Afghan people, for example, for the better part of two decades, and have little to show for the $500 million in civilian aid we provide there annually.

An evergreen hearing that we would regularly have when I was on the House Oversight Committee was with John Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction. In one instance, when he was asked whether he was familiar with $6 million that had been spent on a plan to import nine blond goats from Italy, Sopko responded:

Yes, unfortunately, I am. And it was a program by the Task Force for Business Stabilization. It was basically an attempt to rebuild or build a cashmere market, and as far as we know, it was a failure. They did import goats.

I will cut off the testimony there before it veers into animal husbandry, but you can read about that and other wasteful Afghanistan rebuilding efforts in a Washington Post article from August 2017 captioned Here are six costly failures from Americas longest war. No. 1: Cashmere goats.

Rather than traveling to address the so-called (and intractable, at least in the short run) root causes of illegal migration, the vice president would be better served by staying in Washington and cleaning up the pull factors, that is the loopholes in U.S. law that are drawing migrants to enter illegally. She can do that much more cheaply and likely exponentially more successfully from her office in the Capitol.

Originally posted here:
Kamala Harris Is the New Border Czar Sort Of - Immigration Blog

CoP worried: Illegal immigration could cause surge in COVID-19 cases – Loop News Trinidad and Tobago

Police Commissioner Gary Griffith believes T&T is at risk for a resurgence in COVID-19 cases due to the continued issue of illegal immigration.

He said harsher penalties and increased restrictions must be enacted to serve as a real deterrent to those entering the country illegally.

Griffith said the current $1,000 fine or three months imprisonment if in default are a get out of jail free pass.

He warned that urgent steps must be taken to stem the spread of the virus and allow the country to return to some semblance of normalcy.

If these numbers continue to increase, because it is perceived by people on the mainland that it is easy to enter the country and pay a thousand dollars we will be in serious trouble.

It will be difficult to contain the virus unless further restrictions are put in place and a vast majority of our citizens will be affected. This will prolong the time that it will take to revert to some degree of normalcy in the future.

The Police Commissioner noted that 26 people were arrested on Los Iros Beach by officers of the South Western Division last Saturday, and charged with failing to report to an immigration officer for examination on entry in Trinidad and Tobago.

The three drivers a Trinidadian, Nigerian and Venezuelan, pled not guilty and were granted bail. Orders of Supervision - not detention orders by the Immigration Division will be issued to the 23 illegal immigrants upon completion of their 14-day quarantine.

He said a recent court ruling ensures that these individuals will be free to stay in the country once their fine is paid.

Griffith said: although the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service (TTPS) has enforced the law by conducting operations based on intelligence gathering and due diligence, as a result of the actions of the judiciary, it seems that the perpetrators are being allowed "a get out of jail free pass".

Immigrants can come here illegally, hope that they dont get caught, and if they do, beat the system by walking with $1,000 cash, and they will be allowed to stay in the country. This is another glaring indication of the gap between law enforcement and the criminal justice system, he continued.

Griffith said the courts decision sends the message that there is virtually no deterrent and no consequences of entering the country illegally.

More:
CoP worried: Illegal immigration could cause surge in COVID-19 cases - Loop News Trinidad and Tobago

Senators tour Rio Grande, blame Biden administration for increase in undocumented immigrants – KGBT-TV

MISSION, Texas (KVEO) A delegation of 18 Republican Senators finished their tour of the border on Friday with a press conference in Anzalduas County Park to discuss the recent trend of undocumented immigrants.

Overnight, the delegation of Senators walked along the Rio Grande, seeing the areas they said illegal immigrants used to gain access to the country.

This afternoon, they took a tour of the Rio Grande itself aboard a DPS patrol boat. Back on the docks, the Senators spoke about the hardships Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is facing.

The smugglers, the drug runners, they understand our laws and they know how to expose them to their benefit. So ending catch and release, making sure people legitimate claims get to present them to an immigration judge, I think [those] should be a priority, said Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn.

He said the Biden administration was responsible for the increase in illegal immigrants.

Heres the bottom line- the border patrol and health and human services, and the non-government organizations that are struggling to deal with this flood of humanity, tell us they cannot get ahead of this flood of humanity without policy change in Washington DC, Cornyn continued.

Senator Ted Cruz spoke of the cramped conditions in the Donna facility, and of the kids in cages he saw there.

Little girls, of little boys, lying side by side, touching each other, covered with reflective emergency blankets, said Cruz. There was no six-foot space there was no three-foot space there wasnt a three-inch space between the children lined up one after the other after the other.

He continued and said the Biden administration needed to be doing a better job of caring for the kids in those facilities.

The Biden administration is taking kids who are testing positive for Covid-19 and locking them in cages side by side. This is inhumane, it is wrong, and it is the direct consequence of policy decisions by the Biden administration, he said.

During their speeches, several Senators called on President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to come to the border and experience the reality on the ground for themselves.

View post:
Senators tour Rio Grande, blame Biden administration for increase in undocumented immigrants - KGBT-TV

The Facts on the Increase in Illegal Immigration – FactCheck.org

Immigrants walk along the U.S.-Mexico border on March 17 after crossing the shallow Rio Grande between El Paso and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. Photo by John Moore/Getty Images.

The border facilities and the system of processing unaccompanied minors under law were designed for the time when the vast majority of encounters at the border were single adult Mexican males who were processed and returned across the border very quickly, often within a day, Brown said in an email. But Central Americans could not be sent back across to Mexico and if they applied for asylum, or were UACs would have to be taken into custody and provided an opportunity to make their case in immigration court.

Sarah Pierce, a policy analyst with the Migration Policy Institute, said the increases of families and unaccompanied children in 2014 and 2019 overwhelmed U.S. resources. In both of those years, the flow of immigrants were driven primarily by longstanding push and pull factors.

Those push and pull factors include poverty and violence in migrants home countries, and economic opportunity in the U.S., family ties and border policies on children and families, as the Migration Policy Institute outlined in a 2019 report.

In 2019, another factor was a chaotic implementation of restrictive southern border policies under Trump, Pierce told us.

The difference this year is that the increase overwhelming U.S. resources has been entirely driven by unaccompanied child migrants, Pierce said. The flow is also due to push and pull factors, as well as the coronavirus pandemic-caused economic crisis and recent hurricanes.

All three experts we spoke with told us there may be a perception that the Biden administration is more welcoming to migrants, but Biden has not significantly changed operations at the border since Trump as of yet, as Brown said.

In mid-February, the administration announced it would begin processing non-Mexican asylum seekers who have been waiting in Mexico for their U.S. court dates under a Trump-era program to keep those individuals on the other side of the border.But that policy doesnt concern new arrivals or those without pending asylum cases, the administration said.

One notable change for unaccompanied children, however, is that they are the only population that is officially exempt from the CDCs Title 42 order, Pierce said.

What is Title 42 and how has it affected immigration flows?

Title 42 is a public health law the Trump administration began invoking in March 2020 to immediately expel, due to the coronavirus pandemic, those apprehended on the southern border. In November, a federal judge ordered a halt to such deportations of minors. While the Biden administration has continued to use the law to expel adults and some families, it has stopped expelling children.

We are expelling most single adults and families, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in a March 16 statement. We are not expelling unaccompanied children.

While thats certainly the case for single adults, CBP data show, the administration expelled 41% of family units in February, down from 62% who were expelled in January. The Washington Post wrote aboutthe discrepancy.

Brown noted that migration started to increase in April 2020 and continued to rise through the Biden inauguration. So it is not true that the increase started under Biden. But the decision not to expel unaccompanied children sped up the increase.

A somewhat new phenomenon, being reported by attorneys for migrants in the region, is that it seems that some unaccompanied children actually arrived in Northern Mexico with family members who sent them into the US alone since the U.S. was letting them in, and then the adults would try to come in later, she said.

At the same time, Title 42 may have artificially inflated the problem of single adults being apprehended, because some are trying to cross repeatedly in short time frames.

We know that single adults have driven the majority of the total increase in encounters at the border, Brown said in an email. But we also have been told by CBP that as many as 1/3 of those are repeat encounters with the same person. We believe that because Title 42 results in rapid expulsion of migrants back to Mexico within a very short period of time, and no immigration process (and therefore no immigration bars being applied), the opportunity cost of migrants to repeatedly try to cross the border is low.

Brown said there are reports that smuggling operations are charging rates for up to 3 attempts.'

The increase in single adults also could be due to people sending children ahead of them and attempting to follow separately. But there are not detailed statistics on that, she told us.

Whats the process for these unaccompanied kids? How many unaccompanied children are being held in Customs and Border Protection custody?

Unaccompanied children are generally referred to the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement. Some from Mexico can be returned home, a Congressional Research Service report explains, but the vast majority of these kids in recent years are from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador. While that referral process is taking place, they are held in Customs and Border Protection custody.

A backlog, due to the increase in unaccompanied children arriving at the border and policies in place due to the coronavirus pandemic, has led to a crush of kids being held in border facilities. One lawmaker released images of kids sleeping on cots on the floor.

A CBP spokesperson wouldnt tell us how many children are now in custody, saying that it doesnt provide daily numbers as they are considered operationally sensitive because CBPs in-custody numbers fluctuate on a constant basis. The number it shares one morning may be different by the afternoon and the next day.

CNN reported on March 20 that more than 5,000 unaccompanied children were in CBP custody, according to documents obtained by CNN, up from 4,500 children days earlier.

The children are only supposed to be in CBP custody for up to 72 hours, before being transferred to the Office of Refugee Resettlement. CNN reported that the children were being held an average of five days and that more than 600 of them had been held in CBP custody for more than 10 days.

Unfortunately HHS waited until March 5 to start bringing beds back that were taken offline during the pandemic, Pierce told us of the problem. While HHS is making efforts to expand their capacity by bringing these beds back online and acquire new influx facilities, their lack of bed space has led to the current back up of children in CBP custody.

The CBP spokesperson told us the agencys ability to move children out of its care is directly tied to available space at HHS ORR and that everybodys focus is on moving UACs through as quickly as we can.

Past administrations have also struggled to get unaccompanied minors out of CBP custody.

In a November 2019 report, for instance, the Department of Homeland Security wrote: One of the most visible and troubling aspects of this humanitarian crisis, one that manifested itself in April, May and early June 2019, was young children (sometimes for a week or more) being held by CBPs Border Patrol, not because it wanted to hold them, but because HHS had run out of funds to house them.

A July 2019 DHS Office of Inspector General report warned of dangerous overcrowding of kids held in five border facilities. It said CBP data showed 2,669 children, some who arrived at the border alone and some with families, had been held for more than 72 hours, with some children younger than 7 years old held for more than two weeks.

Once with the Office of Refugee Resettlement, children stay in shelters while awaiting immigration proceedings, including asylum, before being placed with a sponsor, who could be a parent, another relative or a non-family member. In fiscal year 2019, 69,488 children were referred to the Office of Refugee Resettlement, which has cared for 409,550 children since 2003. The HHS press office told us there are currently about 11,350 children in ORR care.

Data from HHS from fiscal year 2012 through 2020 show that at least 66% of referred children each year have been male. They are primarily from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, and most are age 15 and older.

The Biden administration has tasked the Federal Emergency Management Agency with assisting HHS in housing the children.

Update, March 23: We updated this story with the number of children now in the care of the Office of Refugee Resettlement.

Editors note:FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made throughour Donate page. If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Read more:
The Facts on the Increase in Illegal Immigration - FactCheck.org