Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

Biden Admin’s Latest Plan To Deal With Immigration Surge Could Have Unintended Consequences – Tampa Free Press

The Biden administration announced a new plan to expedite asylum cases for migrants illegally entering the U.S., but some experts questioned the plans efficacy and argued it could pose national security risks.

In a joint statement, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ)announceda new plan to fast-track the asylum cases of some single adult migrants who unlawfully cross into the U.S., the latest effort to quell the incredible backlog of cases within the immigration court system. However, some experts who spoke with the Daily Caller News Foundation said the plan fails to solver the larger problem of increased migrant arrivals, and may open the door to national security threats.

Read :Texas Congressman Indicted For Bribery Spent Roughly Half Of Campaign Cash On Legal Fees

While this initiative could provide much-needed relief to the overwhelmed non-detained immigration docket, my primary concern is that it may represent an effort to expedite and approve claims without thorough adjudication, John Fabbricatore, a retired Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) field office director, said to the DCNF.

The effort is designed to shorten the time it takes for immigration judges to decide the asylum cases of some illegal migrants who entered the country through the U.S.-Mexico border. Those with legitimate claims will be granted asylum more quickly, while those who dont will be rejected.

Today, we are instituting with the Department of Justice a process to accelerate asylum proceedings so that individuals who do not qualify for relief can be removed more quickly and those who do qualify can achieve protection sooner, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in a statement introducing the Recent Arrivals Docket program.

Read: Illegal Immigrant Deported 3 Times Accused Of Smuggling People, Drugs, .50 Caliber Ammo Across Border

The Recent Arrivals Docket program, which will be limited to single adult migrants in select cities, will aim to adjudicate cases within 180 days.

However, the announcement hasnt come without criticism.

Speeding up the process without sufficient scrutiny could inadvertently create exploitable loopholes, potentially compromising national security, Fabbricatore said.

The backlog of immigration court cases has skyrocketed in recent years, a direct result of the ongoingborder crisis.

In 2022, the case backlog was around two million,according toSyracuses Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC). Currently, that number has ballooned to around3.5 millionpending cases, resulting in wait times that can take several years.

Read: Northern Border Sector Slammed With Record-Breaking Wave Of Illegal Migrant Arrests In One Month

Immigration experts have pointed to these enormously long wait times as an incentive for illegal immigration, which allow migrants to claim asylum at the border and then remain in the U.S. for years before their cases are adjudicated.

While the backlog of cases poses its own problems, Fabbricatore cautioned it is still crucial that we maintain rigorous security standards to ensure safety and integrity of the process. The retired ICE field office director, who isalso running for Congressin Colorado, warned that the Biden administration has consistently shown a tendency to move cases forward without adhering to proper vetting and background checks.

Lora Ries, border and immigration director for the Heritage Foundation, faulted the administration for not focusing on border security, the source behind the enormous immigration court backlog.

While the administration is planning to expedite decisions in five cities, the administration is doing nothing to secure the border to stop the flow of aliens entering the court pipeline, Ries stated to the DCNF. That is poor management of resources and our tax dollars.

Read: Bill Maher Mocks Biden For Trump Debate Proposal Proof Of Life

Ries encouraged the Biden administration to undertake initiatives that were implemented in the Trump administration and to adopt other measures to prevent asylum-seekers from taking advantage of the court system.

Instead, the administration should re-institute theRemain in Mexicoprogram and port courts along the southern border to prevent asylum fraud, catch-and-release, and aliens from gaming the court system, Ries stated.

The Biden administration has not detailed just how many migrants will be placed into the upcoming program, but the announcement did specify that single adult migrants living in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles and New York City will be among those eligible.

DHS did not respond to a request for comment from the Daily Caller News Foundation.

First published by theDaily Caller News Foundation.

HelpsupporttheTampa Free Pressby makingany small donation by clicking here.

Android Users,ClickToDownload The Tampa Free Press AppAnd Never Miss A Story. Follow Us OnFacebookandTwitter.Sign up for ourfree newsletter.

Continue reading here:
Biden Admin's Latest Plan To Deal With Immigration Surge Could Have Unintended Consequences - Tampa Free Press

Desperate migrants help prop up the U.S. economy; I went to meet some of them at the border Wisconsin Examiner – Wisconsin Examiner

I recently traveled to the U.S.-Mexico border from Wisconsin, a state that is heavily dependent on immigrant labor. A University of Wisconsin study estimates that 70% of the workers who milk cows in Americas Dairyland are undocumented immigrants. Other Wisconsin industries, including meatpacking, hospitality and construction, also lean heavily on migrant laborers. Yet a Marquette University law school poll recently found that two-thirds of Wisconsin voters agree with Republican politicians who say the Biden administrations border policies have created a crisis of uncontrolled illegal migration into the country. This was an opportunity to see for myself.

We met Terron in a refugee camp on the U.S. side of the border just south of Tucson, Arizona. A former college student, he had been traveling for three months by boat, bus, train and on foot after fleeing the violence in Sierra Leone after an attempted coup. Terron was patiently waiting for the border patrol with nine others, one from Cameroon, the others from Central America, in a tent city organized by immigrant support groups from the Tucson area.

We had driven to the border over the rough, desolate desert terrain with the Green Valley-Suhaurita Samaritans led by their dynamic Pastor Randy Mayer.

We provided the men with granola bars, water, winter caps, gloves, and blankets from the back of our 44. While it is illegal to help immigrants cross the border into the U.S., it is legal and humane to provide assistance that helps keep them alive and safe once they are in this country.

This was our second visit to the border with the Samaritans. Much has changed since our last visit 12 months ago. Last year there was little trash, no encampments, fewer people seeking refuge, and the cartels had little presence. But this year the numbers have increased, discarded clothes and shoes, empty bottles and food wrappers were scattered by the wall, and, Pastor Mayer said, the cartels dominate the border.

One thing that remained the same was the fear and desperation driving the people we met to leave their homes and loved ones.

During our first visit, as we descended into a valley, we had observed a solitary figure sitting alone by a stream next to the border wall. Reynaldos shoes were wet, his pants dirty from his week-long journey. Speaking softly through tears, he explained that he had survived by drinking water from the stream. A 42-year-old bus driver, he left Oaxaca, despite his wifes objections, after being assaulted and robbed twice. There was no other work for him in Oaxaca. He was desperate to help his two daughters pay for their education and to support his family, so desperate he had given a coyote (guide) a downpayment of $4,000 on a total payment of $8,000.

Reynaldo had been abandoned by the coyote after he fell and injured his knee. Nonetheless he had successfully crossed into the U.S. But after two cold days and nights, including an unusual March snowfall for which he was unprepared, he returned to the side of the stream to wait. He explained he had never seen snow and was terrified by the cold.

We gave him a packet of food, water and some clean, dry socks and offered to take him to the U.S. immigration authorities. They would facilitate his return home or at least return him to a border town in Mexico. He climbed in the front seat beside Mayer. He was ready to go home.

From a distance, the border wall in Arizona looks like a black snake crawling across the desert. It consists of 30-foot-tall steel bollards filled with concrete and is 232 miles long. The bollards are six inches wide and separated from each other by four inches of space. The spacing is designed to allow Border Patrol agents to see activity on the Mexico side of the border. Yet, during our entire 30-mile drive along the wall we never saw a single agent. The wall is topped with anti-climbing plates, and the foundation only extends about three to four feet underground to thwart tunneling.

A year ago, we observed more than 30 huge gaps in the wall, openings wide enough for large groups of people to easily walk through into the United States.

As we drove parallel to the wall, Mayer would bring the car to a stop, whistling and shouting, Necesitas Ayuda? Do you need help? in Spanish. If no one appeared we continued our journey.

At one gap, five young men dressed in camouflage clothing appeared. They were careful to stay on the Mexican side of the border. One, with a single crutch, limped forward. The groups youthful leader explained that Jos had broken his ankle traversing the deserts treacherous terrain. It was discolored and as large as a grapefruit. He asked if we could help. Mayer agreed and Jos hobbled across the border through the walls opening.

Jos had been an Uber driver in Guatemala, a corrupt and violent U.S. backed anti-democratic narco-kleptocracy. He left after he was robbed, beaten and his vehicle stolen for the second time. After the border patrol picked him up, his ankle was operated on, and he was sent home.

This year most of the gaps in the wall have been closed. But Paster Mayer pointed to several places where, he said, cartels had sawed through the wall creating new entryways. Neither the wall nor closing the gaps, has prevented people from immigrating. The numbers speak for themselves. Fear, and the violence they are fleeing, are powerful motivators. But filling the gaps has ironically empowered and enriched the cartels which now control the crossing, charging $8,000 per person.

We also encountered two children sitting on the U.S. side of the wall. They were 9 and 13 years old. Like thousands of young children, they were brought to the border in an effort to reunite with a parent living in the United States. They wore New York T-shirts and hats. The older boy held a crumpled piece of paper with his fathers name and Brooklyn address. The Samaritans took the children to the border patrol who helped reunite the family.

The people we met were not the animals, thugs and drug dealers of Donald Trumps imagination. They were people desperately fleeing violence, crime, and corruption, seeking economic opportunity and a better life for themselves and their families. Their circumstances and motivations were no different than the thousands of African Americans who left the violence and terror of the Jim Crow South during the Great Migration or many suburbanites who have relocated to safer communities seeking improved educational opportunities for their children.

They are no more poisoning the blood of our country than my own grandparents who fled czarist Russia and antisemitic pogroms at the beginning of the 20th century. Hardy parasites, my grandfathers became successful small business owners after first working in factories. Several of their children graduated from college and all contributed to the nations post World War II prosperity.

We met 84-year-old Jim Chilton, a fourth generation rancher whose property has five and a half miles bordering Mexico. He told us the encampments resembled a mini-United Nations in the middle of nowhere. He didnt rail against the people who crossed his property. He shook his head, explaining that the border was experiencing a humanitarian crisis.

Chilton was at the wall checking on the Mexican and American cowboys who were rounding up cows that had walked through the wall openings to return them to Mexico. This small example of international cooperation stood in sharp contrast to the hysterical anti-immigrant political rhetoric of Wisconsin politicians like U.S. Reps. Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Glen Grothman who have traveled to the border for sensational photo opps.

Scapegoating immigrants is as American as apple pie. From the early days of the Know Nothing movements demonization of Irish Catholic immigrants through the Chinese Exclusion Act to the xenophobic attacks on the southern and eastern European immigrants at the beginning of the 20th century to the Japanese internment camps, demagogues have routinely employed nativist rhetoric. Their goal was and remains to divide the multicultural working class by creating fear of the other, obscuring the central role immigrants play in the U.S. economy.

Attacks on 21st century immigrants and refugees are equally misguided. The recent surge in immigration is a major contributor to the U.S. economys ability to continue rapid job growth without runaway inflation. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, immigrants are largely responsible for the nations recent robust economic growth. The CBO projects that the increased immigration will add about 2% to real G.D.P. by 2034 because immigrants are overwhelmingly working-age adults.

Only a few years ago during the pandemic the very same immigrant workers Trump has accused of poisoning the blood of the country were praised as essential workers, as heroes! These men and women arent causing paper mills to close or relocate. They arent taking jobs from native born workers. A recent analysis by none other than Goldman Sachs shows no rise in native-born unemployment during the recent immigration surge.

Immigrant workers pay Social Security and Medicare taxes, helping keep these systems solvent. In 2019, for example, immigrants contributed $165.9 billion into Social Security and $45.1 billion in Medicare. A recent study found that immigrants contributions to Medicare helped prolong the solvency of the system and subsidized its care for 60 million seniors and disabled individuals. Yet many immigrants will never be eligible for these benefits.

It is a brutal world for the migrants at every turn, said Pastor Mayer. But it is huge money for everyone along the way, even in the U.S., somebody is making a dollar on them including the U.S. government. Three big beneficiaries of the flow of cheap labor across the border are private prisons, the Social Security system and U.S. employers, he added. Because of migrant labor the U.S. economy is strong. But the migrants get no credit, just demonized and used.

The men and women we met at the border simply want to live, work and take care of their families.

Traveling home, I thought about the six immigrant workers who fell to their deaths while working on Baltimores Francis Scott Key Bridge when it collapsed last month. They came from Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador and Mexico. They died engaged in backbreaking work in the middle of the night so that other people could drive safely to their offices and jobs and back home to their families.

Like Reynaldo, Jos, and Terron. They fled the violence of their homelands and migrated to this country to put their minds and muscles to work for their families and for all of us. We should recognize and embrace them for their courage and sacrifice. They represent what is best about the United States of America.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

SUBSCRIBE

See the original post here:
Desperate migrants help prop up the U.S. economy; I went to meet some of them at the border Wisconsin Examiner - Wisconsin Examiner

The Cost of the Border Crisis: $150.7 Billion and Counting | The U.S. House Committee on the Budget – House Budget Committee

WASHINGTON, D.C. Yesterday, the House Budget Committee held ahearingentitledThe Cost of the Border Crisisto highlightthe importance of border security and the fiscal implications of President Bidens failed border policies. Witnesses from the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), Texas Public Policy FoundationsSecure and Sovereign TexasInitiative, and Kinney County, Texas, testified before the committee to show the impacts of the border crisis, particularly the southern border, on a local, state, and federal level.

Some key moments from the hearing:

Chairman Arrington (R-TX):

ClickHEREto watch Chairman Arringtons opening remarks.

The greatest national security threat to the American people is posed by these open borders. The social cost has consistently been well in front of the American people. ButI don't think we've talked enough about the financial burden to taxpayers and the fiscal impact.

The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) has done a great job. Studies suggest this cost is upwards of$400 billion,but their cost estimate is$150 billion. The lion's share of that cost is borne by state and local governments. State and local governments can't borrow or print money like the federal government, so they have to balance their budgets by either absorbing this cost through raising taxes or they have to cut services to their citizens.

Budget Process Reform Chair Rep. Rudy Yakym (R-IN):

ClickHERE to watch Rep. Yakyms remarks.

President Biden created this crisis on day one when he signed his first actions that have undermined border security and encouraged illegal immigration. Despite the unprecedented surge in illegal immigration,the Biden administration chose to deny that there was any problem at all. As a matter of fact, just 11 months in they called it quote cyclical or seasonal. They continue to insist that the border is secure at about the 28-month mark.

Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-PA):

ClickHEREto watch Rep. Smuckers remarks.

We are allowing the flow of drugs, we are allowing the flow of criminals into the country. Im from Lancaster County, 2000 miles from the border. We have hundreds of fentanyl deaths in our region.Its a real problem that we have in every single city, every single area of the country really has been affected by the Biden Administrations policy on the border.

Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA):

ClickHEREto watch Rep. McClintocks remarks.

Opposition to illegal immigration is not opposition to legal immigration. In fact, the people I find who are the angriest about illegal immigration are the legal immigrants who have played by the rules, waited patiently in line, and are now watching millions of illegal migrants cut in line in front of them. And if we're going to encourage and reward illegal immigration, which is a clear and consistent policy of the Democrats today, then there's no point in legal immigration.

Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX):

ClickHERE to watch Rep. Roys remarks.

This notion that people flowing across the border, I heard one of my colleagues on either side of the aisle talk about the benefits of parole, that somehow that was fixing the system. Is that not in fact, a backdoor way to dump more people into the United States rather than having them visibly come across the border, enraging the American people rightfully, and rather fly them into the United Statesto the tune of 400,000 people last year, including the State of Texas and the state of Florida, and fly them into the country under parole when the law requires a case by case analysis.

Rep. Lisa McClain (R-MI):

ClickHEREto watch Rep. McClains remarks.

The federal government spent over$66 billion on illegal immigrants in 2023. According to FAIR, does anyone here want to guess how much we've spent on homeless veterans in 2023? Anybody want to guess?$66 billion on illegals and $3 billion on people who have laid down their lives for this country.

Oversight Task Force Chair Rep. Jack Bergman (R-MI):

ClickHEREto watch Rep. Bergmans remarks.

The cartels are operating as brokers and playing all sides against the middleto create the environment that, because of their use of drones because of their use of different submersibles, because of all the things they use, that there are probably things that we don't see that are tied together for the benefit of those against us.

The Bottom Line:

The House Budget Committees hearing on the Cost of the Border Crisisrevealed the uncomfortable truth about the cost of President Bidens border crisis.

We continue toSound the Alarmon the cost of the border crisis. American taxpayers are paying at least$150.7 billion in order to cover the costs of President Bidens open border policies. This cost burden on the American taxpayer is in addition to the failed economic policies of this Administration. All Americans are paying the price for Bidens radical policies, and we exposed their true cost.

More From the House Budget Committee on the Border Crisis:

Readmoreabout Bidens Border BlunderHERE.

Readmoreabout Bidens Border Crisis HERE.

ReadChairman Arringtons Amicus Brief in support of S.B. 4 in U.S. v. TexasHERE.

WatchChairman Arringtons Fox News interview on the Cost of the Border CrisisHERE.

Originally posted here:
The Cost of the Border Crisis: $150.7 Billion and Counting | The U.S. House Committee on the Budget - House Budget Committee

Hawley Introduces Bill to Prohibit Taxpayer Dollars from Funding New Biden Admin Illegal Immigrant ID Program – Josh Hawley

Today U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.)introducedtheNo Taxpayer Funds for Illegal Immigrant Identity Cards Act,barringPresident Biden's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from using taxpayers' dollars to issueidentity cards to illegal immigrants.

"Joe Biden opened the border and ushered in an era of unprecedented chaos in the U.S. And, now, rather than getting the crisis under control, he wants to use Americans money to fund ID cards for illegals,said Senator Hawley.Enough. Biden should be deporting illegal immigrants and securing our bordernot giving them IDs and making it easier for them to take advantage of taxpayer benefits."

Under a new DHS initiative set tolaunchthis summer, theICE Secure Docket Card Program is poised to provide thousands of illegal immigrants with Secure Docket Cards" featuring a photograph and biographical information. These identity cards risk enabling illegal immigrants to exploit certain privileges and government benefits, such ashousing, healthcare, or transportationall at American taxpayers' expensewhile incentivizing more illegal immigration into the country.

TheNo Taxpayer Funds for Illegal Immigrant Identity Cards Actwould:

Senator Hawley previouslyraisedconcerns over the Biden Administration's carelessness concerning illegal immigrants' use of identification forms ina 2022 letter to the Transportation Security Administration. He demanded answersabout illegal aliens using arrest warrants and notices of deportation as valid identification to pass checkpoints and board commercial airplanes.

See original here:
Hawley Introduces Bill to Prohibit Taxpayer Dollars from Funding New Biden Admin Illegal Immigrant ID Program - Josh Hawley

Trump promises to deport all undocumented immigrants, resurrecting a 1950s strategy but it didn’t work then and is … – Insight News

While campaigning in Iowa last September, former President Donald Trump made apromise to votersif he were elected again: Following the Eisenhower model, we will carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history, he said. Trump, who made asimilar pledgeduring his first presidential campaign, has recently repeated this promiseat rallies across the country.

Trump was referring toOperation Wetback, a military-style campaign launched by the Eisenhower administration in the summer of 1954 to end undocumented immigration by deporting hundreds of thousands of Mexicans. Wetback was a widely used ethnic slur for Mexicans who illegally crossed the Rio Grande, the river dividing Mexico and the U.S.

Trump says that he can replicate Operation Wetback on a much grander scale by setting up temporary immigration detention centers and relying on local, state and federal authorities, includingNational Guard troops, to remove the estimated11 million undocumented immigrantsnow living in the U.S.

As amigration scholar, I find Trumps proposal to be both disturbing and misleading. Besides playing to unfounded and dehumanizing fears of an immigrant invasion, it misrepresents the context and impact of Eisenhowers policy while ignoring the vastly changed landscape of U.S. immigration today.

Operation Wetback

In May 1954, U.S. Attorney General Harold Brownell appointed Joseph Swing, a retired general, to lead the Immigration and Naturalization Service, or INS, in a special program to apprehend and deport aliens illegally in this country fromareas along the southern border. Until 2003, the INS was responsible for immigration and border control, now handled by multiple federal agencies, including Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Swing ramped up adecade-long practiceof using special task forces composed of INS agents who could be rapidly deployed where needed in order to locate and deport undocumented workers. The operation began in California and then spread to Arizona and Texas. INS agents set up roadblocks and raided fields, factories, neighborhoods and saloons where immigrants were working or socializing. The INS also built a vastwire-fenced security camp, according to the Los Angeles Times, in order to detain apprehended immigrants in Los Angeles before sending them to the border.

Captured immigrants were put on hot, overcrowded buses or rickety boats and sent to designated border crossings in Arizona and Texas, where they were forced to cross back into Mexico. Some found themselves stranded in the Mexican desert just over the border. In one incident,88 migrantsdied of sunstroke before the Red Cross arrived with water and medical attention. Others were delivered to Mexican authorities, who loaded them onto trains headed deeper into Mexico.

By mid-August, INS agents had deportedmore than 100,000 immigrantsacross the U.S. Southwest. Fearing apprehension, thousands morereportedly fled back to Mexicoon their own. Most of these immigrants were young Mexican men, but the INS also targeted families, removingnearly 9,000 family members, including children, from the Rio Grande Valley in August. There is alsoevidence of U.S. citizensgetting caught up in the INS sweeps.

Operation Wetback wound down its operations a few months later, and Swing declared in January 1955 that the day of the wetback is over. The INSdisbanded its special mobile task forces, and the deportation of undocumented immigrantsplummetedover the next decade.

Not just about deportation

Operation Wetback made the headlines and disrupted countless lives, but it was more show than substance when it came to deportation.

Thegovernments claimto have deported more than 1 million Mexicans during the summer of 1954 does not stand up to scrutiny. The1.1 million figurewas for the entire fiscal year, which ended in June 1954, and a sizable share of these apprehensions wererepeat arrests, sometimes in a single day. Moreover, over 97% of these deportations occurredwithout a formal order of removal. Instead, migrants agreed, or were coerced, to leave the country after being apprehended.

Despite Trump-like rhetoric decrying a wetback invasion across the U.S.-Mexico border, Operation Wetbacks main objective was not to remove Mexican immigrants but ratherto frighten U.S. farmers, especially in Texas, into hiring them legally.

This tactic largely worked. A crucial but often overlooked detail about Operation Wetback is that it happened at the same time as theBracero Program, a massive guest-worker program between the U.S. and Mexico. Between 1942 and 1964, U.S. employers issued over4.6 million short-term contractsto more than 400,000 Mexican farm workers.Nearly three-quarters of these contractswere issued between 1955 and 1964 after the INS carried out Operation Wetback.

Operation Wetback is unlikely to have led to a dramatic decline in undocumented immigration had Mexican workers not had a legal option for entering the United States. As one immigrant caught up inOperation Wetback commented, I will come back legally, if possible. If not, Ill just walk across again.

The INS explicitly recognized the connection between the Bracero Program and the decline in undocumented immigrationin a 1958 report, stating that should a restriction be placed on the number of braceros allowed to enter the United States, we can look forward to a large increase in the number of illegal alien entrants into the United States.

It is no coincidence that the lull in migrants illegally crossing the U.S-Mexico border after Operation Wetback did not last once the Bracero Program ended in 1964. Mexicans still had strong incentives to migrate, but now they had to do so without visas or work contracts, contributing to a steady increase inborder arrestsafter 1965 that surpassed 1 million in 1976 and reached nearly 2 million in 2000.

Real lessons

If he were to win the presidency again, Trump would have the legal authority to deport undocumented immigrants, but the logistical, political and legal obstacles to doing so quickly and massively are even greater today than they were in the 1950s.

First, most undocumented immigrants now live in cities, where immigrant sweeps are more difficult to carry out. The INS learned this lesson when Operation Wetback shifted from the largely rural Southwest to urban areas in the Midwest and Pacific Northwest in September 1954. Despite transferring hundreds of agents to these locations and using similar tactics, INS agents producedfar fewer apprehensionsas they struggled to find and detain immigrants.

Second, the U.S. undocumented population is much more dispersed and diverse than in the 1950s.Today, Mexicans are no longer in the majority, and nearly half of undocumented immigrants live outside the six major hubs for immigrants California, Texas, Florida, New York, New Jersey and Illinois.

Third, most undocumented immigrants in the U.S. did not sneak across the border. Anestimated 42%entered the country legally but overstayed a visa illegally. Another 17% requested and received ashort-term legal statusthat protects them from immediate deportation.

Finally, mass deportations are likely to spark a more broad-based resistance today than happened in the 1950s. Once staunchly opposed to undocumented immigration, most labor unions andMexican-American organizationsare now in the pro-immigrant camp. Likewise, the Mexican government, which helped with Operation Wetback, isunlikely to allowmassive numbers of non-Mexicans to be deported to its territory without the proper documentation.

Trump has not supported a way to provide undocumented immigrants with a legal alternative, which means that migrants will keep finding ways to cross illegally.

Katrina Burgess does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Go here to see the original:
Trump promises to deport all undocumented immigrants, resurrecting a 1950s strategy but it didn't work then and is ... - Insight News