Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

Illegal Immigration | Center for Immigration Studies

Content type

- Any -Blog entryPagePublication

Publication Type Op-edPress ReleaseReport-MemorandumBookFact SheetTranscriptTestimonyVideo-Immigration Policy Interview-Immigration Brief-Immigration NewsmakerWeb Program

Author A.J. IrwinA.J. LouderbackAdrian WooldridgeAlan McCunnAlan ReynoldsAlex NowrastehAlisia MinasianAmanda DownsAmanda K. BaumleAmitai EtzioniAmy WaxAndrew LightAndrew McCarthyAndrew R. ArthurAndrew SumAnuj ShelatArnold ShapiroAshley Monique WebsterAugust GribbinB. Lindsay LowellB. Meredith BurkeBarbara GonzalesBay BuchananBen WattenbergBen ZuckermanBenjamin DierkerBenjamin T. GalickBert MasonBill KingBill SheppitBob SegallBonnie ErbBrenda NeuerburgBryan GriffithByron YorkCarl F. HorowitzCarol IannoneCarol SwainCatoCharles BahmuellerCharles MurrayCindy HahamovitchCISClark BensenClark BensonCraig NelsonCynthia OwensDan AltenaDan CadmanDan SteinDaniel JesterDaniel N. Vara, Jr.Daniel PipesDaryl ScottDavid A. MartinDavid E. WeinsteinDavid FrumDavid KeeneDavid NorthDavid SchippersDavid SeminaraDavid ShirkDavid SimcoxDebra SaundersDimitri SimesDominique PeridansDon BarnettDon BragnawDon CrocettiDon WeedenDonald BarlettDonald R. DavisDoris MeissnerDouglas BesharovDouglas MasseyDudley L. Poston, Jr.Ed GrantF. Ray MarshallFather Brian JordanFrancis CissnaFrank GaffneyFrank Morris, Sr.Fred A. LazinFred SiegelFredo Arias-KingGalen K. BrownGary McLhinneyGeorge B. HighGeorge BorjasGeorge ElfordGeorge HawleyGeorge W. GraysonGerri RatliffGlynn CustredGodfrey Jin-Kai LiGreg BednarzGregory RodriguezGregory T. BergGrisel IbarraGuest BloggerGus AyashHans von SpakovskyHans-Herman HoppeHarry E. SoysterHeather Mac DonaldHerbert H. McMillanHerbert I. LondonHipolito AcostaHong DanIain MurrayIrie TurnerIshwar KhatiwadaJack MartinJames BissettJames F. ThompsonJames G. GimpelJames HuseJames K. HoffmeierJames McHenryJames PinkertonJames R. Edwards, Jr.Jamie GreedanJan TingJane GoodridgeJanice KephartJared BernsteinJason RichwineJaxon Van DerbekenJeff CollinsJeff HsuJeff JohnsonJeremy BeckJerry KammerJerry SeperJessica M. VaughanJoaquin F. OteroJoe GuzzardiJoel MowbrayJohn FonteJohn FundJohn HermannJohn IsbisterJohn KeeleyJohn L. MartinJohn MianoJohn MillerJohn O'SullivanJohn RhodesJohn WahalaJon FeereJose PertierriJoseph H. CarensJoseph J. KolbJoseph KingJoseph PerkinsJoseph PuderJudith Flanagan KennedyJulie AxelrodJulie Myers WoodJulie WilsonJune Marie NogleKaren KaufmannKaren ZeiglerKatherine TelfordKathleen NewlandKathleene ParkerKathy KraningerKausha LunaKelly DuBoisKellyanne ConwayKen BoehmKen SilversteinKent LundgrenKevin R. JohnsonKevin RothsteinKhalid DurnKris W. KobachKristina TanasichukLawrence FuchsLawrence MishelLawrence O. BurmanLenny TuckerLeo BanksLeo PerreroLeon F. BouvierLeon KolankiewiczLinda ChavezLou DobbsMalcolm PearlMalcolm R. LovellManuel Garcia y GriegoMarguerite TelfordMaria CruzMark J. MillerMark KrikorianMark MetcalfMark R. LevinMarti DinersteinMartin CollacottMatt GrahamMatthew SussisMicah KingMichael BaroneMichael C. NicleyMichael ChertoffMichael KnowlesMichael LindMichael MaxwellMichael TeitelbaumMichael W. CutlerMichelle MalkinMickey KausMike StopaMike VolpeMonica HeppelNanbin Benjamin ZhaiNancy Wemmerus RoseneNathan GlazerNayla RushNeil MunroNewt GingrichNicholas EberstadtNicolas SteinNikolai WenzelNoah M. J. PickusNora McArdleNorman MatloffOrlando PattersonOtis L. Graham Jr.Pat BuchanonPatrick McHughPaul DonnellyPaul HarringtonPaul J. SmithPeggy OrchowskiPeter A. SchulkinPeter A. SpiroPeter AndrewsPeter BrimelowPeter MortonPeter NunezPeter SkerryPhilip CafaroPhilip MartinPhilip ShabecoffPolling CompanyPreston HuennekensR. Keith StrieglerRamesh PonnuruReihan SalamRep. Dana RohrabacherRep. Jim KolbeRep. Jim SensenbrennerRep. John HostettlerRep. Lamar SmithRep. Lou BarlettaRep. Mo BrooksRep. Rob BishopRep. Steve KingRep. Ted PoeRep. Tom FeeneyRep. Tom TancredoRichard D. LammRichard H. BlackRichard ThompsonRick InzunzaRobert J. ScholesRobert LermanRobert MalloyRobert ManningRobert RectorRobert S. LeikenRoberto SuroRodney NorthRomano MazzoliRon HiraRonald W. MortensenRosemary JenksRoy BeckRuss DoubledayRuss KnockeS. Lynne WalkerSabine DurdenSam PageSamuel P. HuntingtonSandra AmendolaSanjay MongiaSara CarterSarah A. AdamsSarah Ann SmithSarah RyleyScott RasmussenSen. David PerdueSen. Jeff SessionsShawn ZellerSheriff Chuck JenkinsShuya OhnoStanley RenshonStephanie HoffmanStephen DinanStephen MillerStephen MooreStephen SteinlightStephen TordellaSteve HenrySteve ZawackiSteven A. CamarotaSteven BarnsSteven MalangaStewart BakerSusan F. MartinT. Alexander AleinikoffT. Willard FairT.J. BonnerTamar JacobyTed HessonTerence JeffreyTerry HartleThomas C.T. BrokawThomas L. BockThomas PalleyThomas ReddingTodd BensmanTom GodfreyTom HomanTom WolfsohnTony SmithVernon M. Briggs Jr.Victor Davis HansonVirgil GoodeW.D. ReasonerWallace HuffmanWilliam A.V. ClarkWilliam FreyWilliam LeonardWilliam McGowanWilliam RileyWilliam StockWilliam W. ChipWinthrop Staples IIIYoav Sarig

Apply

See the rest here:
Illegal Immigration | Center for Immigration Studies

Illegal Immigration is a Crime | Federation for American …

March 2013

Each year the Border Patrol apprehends hundreds of thousands of aliens who flagrantly violate our nation's laws by unlawfully crossing U.S. borders. Such illegal entry is a misdemeanor, and, if repeated after being deported, becomes punishable as a felony.

The illegal alien population is composed of those who illegally enter the country (referred to as "entry without inspection EWI") in violation of the immigration law, and others enter legally and then sty illegally (referred to as overstayers). The immigration authorities currently estimate that two-thirds to three-fifths of all illegal immigrants are EWIs and the remainder is overstayers. Both types of illegal immigrants are deportable under Immigration and Nationality Act Section 237 (a)(1)(B) which says: "Any alien who is present in the United States in violation of this Act or any other law of the United States is deportable."

Apologists for illegal immigration try to paint it as a victimless crime, but the fact is that illegal immigration causes substantial harm to American citizens and legal immigrants, particularly those in the most vulnerable sectors of our population the poor, minorities, and children.

Illegal immigration causes an enormous drain on public funds. The seminal study of the costs of immigration by the National Academy of Sciences found that the taxes paid by immigrants do not begin to cover the cost of services received by them.1The quality of education, health care and other services for Americans are undermined by the needs of endless numbers of poor, unskilled illegal entrants.

Additionally, job competition by waves of illegal immigrants desperate for any job unfairly depresses the wages and working conditions offered to American workers, hitting hardest at minority workers and those without high school degrees.

Illegal immigration also contributes to the dramatic population growth overwhelming communities across America crowding school classrooms, consuming already limited affordable housing, and increasing the strain on precious natural resources like water, energy, and forestland. Until the recent economic recession and high unemployment, the immigration authorities estimated that the population of illegal aliens was increasing by an estimated half million people annually.

While most illegal immigrants may come only to seek work and a better economic opportunity, their presence outside the law furnishes an opportunity for terrorists to blend into the same shadows while they target the American public for their terrorist crimes. Some people advocate giving illegal aliens legal status to bring them out of the shadows, but, if we accommodate illegal immigration by offering legal status, this will be seen abroad as a message that we condone illegal immigration, and we will forever be faced with the problem.

The Border Patrol plays a crucial role in combating illegal immigration, but illegal immigration cannot be controlled solely at the border. The overstayers as well as the EWIs who get past the Border Patrol must be identified and removed by the interior immigration inspectors of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Today, the policies of the Obama administration are working at cross purposes to this objective. ICE is constrained from detaining and deporting most illegal aliens they encounter with the exception of those with criminal convictions or threats to the national security.

There must be a comprehensive effort to end illegal immigration. That requires ensuring that illegal aliens will not be able to obtain employment, public assistance benefits, public education, public housing, or any other taxpayer-funded benefit without detection.

The three major components of immigration control deterrence, apprehension and removal need to be strengthened by Congress and the Executive Branch if effective control is ever to be reestablished. Controlling illegal immigration requires a balanced approach with a full range of enforcement improvements that go far beyond the border. These include many procedural reforms, beefed up investigation capacity, asylum reform, documents improvements, major improvements in detention and deportation procedures, limitations on judicial review, improved intelligence capacity, greatly improved state/federal cooperation, and added resources.

Effective control and management of the laws against illegal immigration require adequate resources. But those costs will be more than offset by savings to states, counties, communities, and school districts across the nation.

Read more here:
Illegal Immigration is a Crime | Federation for American ...

Illegal Immigration | Daily Wire

How many illegal immigrants are living in the country? According to a 2017 study by the Pew Research Center, an estimated 11.3 million illegal immigrants are living in the United States. That number constitutes 3.4 percent of the total population of the U.S. A majority of illegal immigrants have lived in the country for over a decade.

What countries are most illegal immigrants from? Roughly half of the immigrants illegally leaving in the country are Mexicans, though Pew notes their percentage of the total has been declining in recent years. There were 5.6 million Mexican unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S. in 2015 and 2016, down from 6.4 million in 2009, Pew reports. In 2015, around 5.7 million illegal immigrants came from countries other than Mexico, a large percentage from Central America.

Where do most illegal immigrants live? Pews 2017 study found that 59 percent of illegal immigrants live in the following six states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, New Jersey and Illinois.

What are DREAMers? DREAMers are those who entered the country illegally as children but qualify for temporary work authorization and protection from deportation under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) act, which was announced on June 15, 2012 by the Obama administration. The Department of Homeland Security explains that under DACA qualified immigrants are eligible for work authorization, but while they are protected from deportation under deferred action, that does not provide lawful status to them.

See original here:
Illegal Immigration | Daily Wire

FACT CHECK: Trump, Illegal Immigration And Crime : NPR

President Trump speaks about immigration alongside family members affected by crime committed by undocumented immigrants, at the White House Friday. Evan Vucci/AP hide caption

President Trump speaks about immigration alongside family members affected by crime committed by undocumented immigrants, at the White House Friday.

Updated at 8:30 p.m. ET

After days of damaging news stories about an administration policy that separated immigrant families at the Southern border, President Trump tried to change the narrative Friday. He spoke up for grieving family members who have lost loved ones at the hands of people in the country illegally.

Trump has frequently pointed to sympathetic crime victims to justify his get-tough policies at the Southern border. But experts say the president's rhetoric overstates the threat posed by immigrants, who tend to commit crime at lower rates than people who are born in the United States.

"These are the families the media ignores," Trump said of crime victims. "These are the stories that Democrats and people that are weak on immigration, they don't want to discuss, they don't want to hear, they don't want to see, they don't want to talk about."

The president was joined at the White House by more than a dozen parents whose children were killed in some cases in traffic accidents by immigrants in the country illegally. Their stories offered a counterpoint to those filling newspapers and television broadcasts this week of immigrant children forcibly separated from their parents after crossing the border illegally.

Trump reversed course and ended his family separation policy on Wednesday. But he vowed to continue a crackdown on illegal immigration, defying critics.

"They don't talk about the death and destruction caused by people who shouldn't be here," the president said. "People that will continuously get into trouble and do bad things."

During the 2016 campaign, Trump often highlighted the case of Kate Steinle, who was fatally shot in San Francisco by Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, a Mexican national who had repeatedly crossed the border illegally. Garcia Zarate was acquitted of second-degree murder last year. A California jury was apparently convinced by the defense argument that the shooting was accidental.

While any death is tragic, a February 2018 study by the Cato Institute using 2015 crime statistics from Texas found immigrants in the country illegally were 25 percent less likely to be convicted of homicide than native-born Americans. (Legal immigrants were 87 percent less likely.)

According to the study, immigrants in the country illegally were also 11.5 percent less likely than native-born Americans to be convicted of sexual assault and 79 percent less likely to be convicted of larceny.

The study found higher conviction rates among illegal immigrants for gambling, kidnapping, smuggling and vagrancy, but those offenses were rare and made up a tiny fraction of overall crime in Texas in 2015.

A separate March 2018 study in the journal Criminology looked at whether violent crime increases as the number of immigrants living illegally in a community goes up. Researchers found it does not. If anything, the opposite is true: Violent crime appears to fall when more immigrants are living in a community illegally.

Trump disputed those findings during his White House event Friday but he did not offer evidence to the contrary.

In the aggregate, Trump said, immigrants in the country illegally are responsible for tens of thousands of crimes. He pointed to a 2011 study by the Government Accountability Office which estimated undocumented immigrants had committed some 25,000 homicides, 42,000 robberies and nearly 70,000 sex offenses. That estimate was extrapolated from a survey of 1,000 undocumented immigrants held in state and federal prisons. It offered no time frame in which the crimes might have been committed and no basis for comparison with the native-born population.

In the past, the president has exaggerated threats facing the U.S. to justify his travel ban, tough-on-crime measures and a now-folded commission on voter fraud.

In an interview with NPR last month, White House chief of staff John Kelly acknowledged that most people crossing the border illegally do not pose a security threat.

"The vast majority of the people that move illegally into the United States are not bad people," Kelly said. "They're not criminals. They're not MS-13" gang members.

Kelly defended the administration's Southern border crackdown, however, arguing that immigrants coming from rural parts of Central America with little education might not easily assimilate into the United States.

"We must maintain a Strong Southern Border," Trump tweeted Friday. "We cannot allow our country to be overrun by illegal immigrants as the Democrats tell their phony stories of sadness and grief."

The president made similar comments in a meeting with lawmakers earlier this week.

"We have to be strong on the border," Trump said Wednesday. "Otherwise, you'll have millions of people coming up not thousands, like we have now; you'll have millions of people flowing up and just overtaking the country. And we're not letting that happen."

Illegal immigration at the Southern border dropped off sharply in the early months of the Trump administration. But in recent months, the number of apprehensions has rebounded, driven in part by a growing number of children and families. Overall, the number of illegal border crossers is still lower now than it was in 2014 and a fraction of what it was a decade earlier.

Originally posted here:
FACT CHECK: Trump, Illegal Immigration And Crime : NPR

Our Debate On Illegal Immigration Is A National Disaster

When emotionalism meets scaremongering, its difficult to have a useful debate about anything. Yet for immigration, those seem to be the two choices.

The Trump administration has adopted a zero tolerance policy requiring law enforcement to prosecute illegal immigrants. Yes, the policy comports with the law. Yes, the Obama administration engaged in a similar policy on a smaller scale and yes, the media covered it very differently.

But, no, President Trump doesnt have to temporarily break up families. He chooses to strictly implement the law, claiming, among other things, that it is a necessity in stopping gang violence. Trump officials inability to deal with the mess they created incompetently implementing their policy, and the public relations disaster resulting from that ineptitude, is on the administration, and no one else.

Trump has admitted, in fact, that zero tolerance is not only meant to cut down and discourage illegal immigration, but its a gambit to push Congress towards some form of a broader immigration deal that favors his priorities. Its difficult to believe that Democrats, whove eagerly embraced the ugly optics of separation policy, will be more inclined to agree to a deal now. You cant simultaneously argue, as Trump officials have, that youre being forced to do this, then admit its a negotiating tactic as well. At least, not convincingly.

Moreover, even if everything Trump is saying is true, theres got to be a more humane way to deal with families that are separated. Any policy, for instance, that fails to let parents know immediately, and continuously, exactly whats happening to their children, is immoral and it seems to me such things can be fixed administratively. It can certainly be fixed by Congress.

The idea, however, that this is something hatched completely in a vacuum is absurd. Even if separation policy is misguided, and I think it is, the administration doesnt kidnap or snatch little children from immigrant parents. Nor is the policy equivalent, in any conceivable way, to the Holocaust or human rights abuses of third world nations.

So when people like Joe Scarborough offer hysterical analogues, comparing Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents who are temporarily separating illegal immigrant parents from their children while cases are being heard with Auschwitz guards leading children to cyanide showers, they help create a moronically hyperbolic atmosphere that makes it increasingly impossible to fix anything.These children deserve better, yes, but there is no evidence that they are being willfully mistreated. In some cases, they are being protected.

Moreover, despite perceptions, often created by the president himself, the Trump policy isnt really zero tolerance. Those who claim asylum at ports of entry are not separated from their children. Only parents charged with entering the country illegally and who claim asylum after being apprehended are detained. Adults who choose not to be deported have to wait for adjudication of their case. While this happens, the law prohibits children from being held in the same detention centers as adults.

One of the underlying policy problems, largely ignored by those covering this story, is that in the past families who claimed asylum were often released with a bracelet (one that could be easily removed) if they promised to show up at a hearing at some later date. They often did not show up. Does anyone on the Left know how to fix this problem? Do they believe its a problem, at all? It sure doesnt seem like it.

The Trump administration, after all, didnt invent the cages that are being used to temporarily hold families who attempt to illegally enter the country. Our border policy was a mess long before Democrats were selectively citing scripture to shame conservatives. Actually, Trumps here in part because its a mess.

Instead of explaining the complicated dynamics of the problem, many in the media are stoking outrage by doing things like conflating unaccompanied minors with separated children, making no distinction by age or circumstance.

Trying to blame Trump for an influx of young foreign citizens is misguided. The majority of kids in care of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, most often teenagers, are apprehended because theyre here without any parents. Its a growing problem. In 2013, a little fewer than 40,000 unaccompanied minors were apprehended by the Border Patrol. That was a historic high. In 2016 there were nearly 60,000. This year there are likely to be more than 80,000.

As Doris Meissner, the director of the U.S. immigration policy program at the Migration Policy Institute, recently told CNN, its a phenomenon that dates from just the last few years, and was not one that the Bush or early Obama administrations confronted in any significant numbers.

Moreover, what should border enforcement do with unaccompanied children? Unless your position is that anyone who wants to walk over the border should be able to do so, including children, there will be detention centers, and a fraction of the people in those detention centers will be children.

Its true that some Republicans act as if everyone coming over the border is an MS-13 drug mule, while some liberals act as if there is no criminality associated with unregulated immigration, even from a nation experiencing an epidemic of lawlessness and violence. But perhaps the biggest tragedy of the immigration debate is that, despite the acrimony surrounding it, its probably the most easily fixed. The majority of Americans still arent ideologically rigid on the issue. Theyre open to immigration (and to Dreamers), but most also want secure borders. Falsely feeding the dueling perceptions that the United States is a budding fascist state or anarchy without a border create a political climate that makes immigration impossible to fix.

See the original post:
Our Debate On Illegal Immigration Is A National Disaster