Mediaboss Marketing

Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly announced on Wednesday the official launch of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcements office for victims of illegal immigrant crime, and a program to help track the custody status of violent, illegal perpetrators.

ICEs Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement Office (VOICE) was created in response to President Trumps executive order to enhance public safety, which directed the Department of Homeland Security to create an office to support victims of crimes committed by criminal aliens.

All crime is terrible, but these victims are unique and often too ignored, Kelly said on Wednesday. They are casualties of crimes that should never have taken place because the people who victimized them often times should not have been in the country in the first place.

Kelly outlined objectives of VOICE, including a victim-centered approach to support victims and their families, along with promoting awareness of available services to crime victims, such as the new automated service, DHS-Victim Information and Notification Exchange, which was created to help victims track the immigration custody status of those illegal alien perpetrators of crime.

According to DHS, ICE community relations officers will serve as local representatives to share information with victims regarding the enforcement and removal process of illegal aliens. According to DHS, ICE has 27 victim-assistance specialists across the country who possess a high degree of specialized victim-assistance expertise and training.

ICE is employing a measured approach to building the VOICE office meaning that it intends to expand the services VOICE offers in the future, DHS said in a statement on Wednesday. This approach allows the office to provide immediate services to victims, but will also allow the agency to collect metrics and information to determine additional resource needs and how the office can best serve victims and their families moving forward.

Fox News' Matthew Dean contributed to this report.

Brooke Singman is a Reporter for Fox News. Follow her on Twitter at @brookefoxnews.

See more here:
DHS announces office for victims of illegal immigrant crime - Fox News

As President Trump is discovering, there are a lot of very difficult, complicated issues he has to deal with. Healthcare, Syria, North Korea and the Russians are a few that come to mind. Controlling our borders and stanching the flow of illegal aliens into the United States, it turns out, is not one of them. In fact, in just the first three months of his administration, dealing with mass illegal immigration is proving to be one of the least complicated matters on the president's plate.

For decades, apologists for mass illegal immigration have been telling us that a) illegal immigration isn't really a problem, and b) that it an uncontrollable phenomenon in any event. Attempting to stop mass illegal immigration would be an expensive and futile effort.

It turns out that the so-called experts were wrong. In just the second full month of the Trump presidency, the number of people apprehended attempting to enter the United States illegally plummeted to 17-year lows. Moreover, the "surge" of illegal migration from Central America of unaccompanied minors (UAMs) and families with children suddenly stopped surging. As recently as December (not coincidentally, the last full month of the Obama presidency), more than 7,000 UAMs arrived at our southern border. By March, that number had dwindled to just 1,914. Likewise, the flood of 16,139 people arriving in family units in December was reduced to a trickle just 1,043 people in March a decline of 93 percent.

Even more remarkably, these dramatic declines in the number of people attempting to cross our border transpired before the first dime has been expended on construction of Trump's "big beautiful wall," and before the first of the administration's requested 5,000 new Border Patrol agents was hired, much less trained and deployed to the front lines.

Illegal immigration has always been a manageable problem. Illegal immigrants are rational people who respond rationally to the signals we send. When our policies convey the sense that we are not serious about enforcing our immigration laws (which has largely been the case for decades), they behave accordingly. Just the mere indication on the part of the Trump administration that they intend to enforce our laws has been sufficient to discourage many people from even attempting to come here illegally.

The president has also taken concrete actions to demonstrate that he is serious about deterring illegal immigration. Among other steps, he has ended the catch-and-release policy of the Obama administration, under which people arriving at the border were permitted to enter the country pending a hearing, often years in the future. The Trump administration, while continuing to prioritize the removal of criminal aliens, has made it clear that it will not exempt all other immigration lawbreakers from deportation.

Now it is up to Congress to reinforce these positive results with long overdue legislative reforms. In addition to funding the president's security barrier (which Congress authorized in 2007) and additional enforcement personnel, lawmakers must address the key pull factors of illegal immigration, most notably the availability of jobs to illegal aliens.

More than three decades after Congress outlawed the employment of illegal aliens, it is time to put teeth in that law. E-Verify, which allows employers to instantly check job applicants' information against Social Security and other government databases, must be made a mandatory part of the hiring process. As illegal aliens come to understand that they will no longer be able to use fraudulent or stolen documents to skirt the law, and employers understand that they will be held accountable if they are caught hiring illegal aliens, the lure of a job in this country will be greatly diminished.

Ironically, discouraging economic migrants from entering and remaining in the country illegally would vastly enhance our ability to target criminal aliens for removal. By eliminating the chaos that has long existed at our borders, fiscal and manpower resources can be devoted to identifying, apprehending and removing aliens who cannot be discouraged by diminished prospects of employment or access to public benefits.

The first few months of the Trump administration have shown that decades of mass illegal immigration were not a consequence of forces beyond our control, but rather the predictable result of politically driven policy choices we have been making. The biggest factor in managing illegal immigration is managing the perceptions of those who are weighing the pros and cons of breaking our laws which is actually not that complicated.

Ira Mehlman is the media director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).

If you would like to write an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, please read ourguidelines on submissions.

View post:
Who knew controlling illegal immigration was this un-complicated? - Washington Examiner

By Joe Guzzardi

Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said in a recent Meet the Press interview that a wider array of criminal behavior by illegal immigrants, including DUIs, could lead to their deportation. Kelly added that during the Obama administration a DUI was unlikely to result in deportation even though it would have put the alien in the DHS system.

The United States, Kelly stressed, has a legal justice process that allows it to deport aliens, and that practice is consistent with President Trumps new enforcement-first policy. The definition of criminal has not changed, but where on the spectrum of criminality we operate has changed, said Secretary Kelly.

But as clear as federal immigration laws are in their definition of who is deportable, Kellys frank statement that a DUI could expedite removal is certain to spark more protests that President Trumps commitment to enforcement is extreme. The American Civil Liberties Union condemned Kelly, even before he was confirmed, for his reasonable warning that unchecked immigration represents a national security threat.

The law on whats generally referred to as improper entry or entry without inspection is unambiguous: Whether by crossing the U.S. border alone, with a coyotes help or buying a fake U.S. passport, a foreign national who enters the U.S. illegally and not through a designated port of entry can be both convicted of a crime and fined. For the first improper entry, a civil violation, the alien can be fined or imprisoned for up to six months, or both. A subsequent offense, a felony, carries a fine or imprisonment for up to two years, or both.

Immigration laws also apply to visa overstays that make up as much as 40 percent of the 12 million illegal immigrants residing in the U.S. When an alien crosses into the U.S. illegally or enters on a valid, legal visa but fails to depart on the designated date, Immigration and Nationality Act Section 237 applies: Any alien who is present in the United States in violation of this Act or any other law of the United States is deportable.

Despite the laws crystal clarity, Congress legislative branch, which includes many lawyers, cant agree on who should remain. For some legislators, aliens who get past the border patrol or visitors on a temporary visa who overstay should be allowed to remain indefinitely. But illegal entry will never end unless laws are enforced. When immigration laws are enforced, living illegally in the U.S. becomes more challenging and less satisfying.

Attrition through enforcement is better for taxpayers and for foreign nationals unlawfully present. Taxpayers dont have to spend billions of dollars to subsidize DHS deportation efforts, and illegal immigrants can return home on their own terms when they realize that the option forced removal is less appealing. There is precedent for returning home voluntarily. According to a Pew Research study, between 2009 and 2014, the years that immediately followed the recession and the dried-up job market, more than 1 million Mexicans returned home; only 14 percent were deported.

The Trump administrations stepped-up enforcement helps American citizens and legal permanent residents get jobs, and discourages future illegal immigration, already down 40 percent from Mexico during January and February. The sharp drop in illegal immigration should encourage President Trump to continue his interior enforcement commitment. President Trump campaigned on an enforcement platform, and now hes delivering.

Joe Guzzardi is a senior writing fellow with Californians for Population Stabilization. Contact him at joeguzzardi@capsweb.org and find him on Twitter @joeguzzardi19.

Visit link:
DUIs could mean removal for illegal immigrants - Desert Dispatch

The anti-immigrant hysteria that became a mainstay of President Trumps agenda and the hymnal of the GOP rests on the assumption that we are awash with illegal immigrants. Its illegal immigrants who are responsible for a crime wave. (There isnt a wave, but stick with this for a moment.) Its illegal immigrants, they say, who are responsible for the economic suffering in the Rust Belt. (If we just got rid of them, jobs and wages would go up!) Hillary Clinton was going to continue the Obama administrations policy: open borders!

Well, its all fake. There was a dramatic downturn in illegal immigrants under President Barack Obama, who deported record number of people. As many of us argued, the economic recession reversed the flow of immigrants so on net more are now leaving for Mexico than coming from there. Alex Nowrasteh of the Cato Institute observes, President Trump cant take credit for the unprecedented collapse in illegal immigration since 2007 but the Great Recession, growing Mexican economy, and Mexican demographics can.

The Pew Research Center tells us:

There were 11 million unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S. in 2015, a small but statistically significant decline from the Centers estimate of 11.3 million for 2009, the last year of the Great Recession. The Centers preliminary estimate of the unauthorized immigrant population in 2016 is 11.3 million, which is statistically no different from the 2009 or 2015 estimates and comes from a different data source with a smaller sample size and a larger margin of error. This more recent preliminary data for 2016 are inconclusive as to whether the total unauthorized immigrant population continued to decrease, held steady or increased.

Oops. You mean getting rid of all those illegal immigrants didnt create job openings for unemployed factory workers in the heartland or boost wages or prevent Chicagos crime increase in the past two years? Nope. It seems the anti-immigration crowd will need to find new scapegoats to blame and new ideas for solving our systemic economic problems.

In particular, Trumps obsession with the Mexican border appears to be entirely misplaced:

Mexicans have long been the largest origin group among unauthorized immigrants and the majority for at least a decade but their numbers have been shrinking since peaking at 6.9 million, or 57% of the total, in 2007. In 2014, they numbered 5.8 million (52% of the total). In 2015, according to the Centers new estimate, they declined to 5.6 million, or 51% of the total. And in 2016, according to the Centers preliminary estimate, the number of unauthorized immigrants from Mexico was the same, but their share fell to 50% of the total, marking the first time since at least 2005 that Mexicans did not account for a majority of the unauthorized immigrant population.

Why, then, do you suppose the Trump team is so fixated on illegal immigrants and the southern border? Well, immigration exclusionists have been ignoring readily available facts for some time. There is no illegal immigrant crime wave. The border is much more secure.

Were hard-pressed to come up with any other explanation than the obvious one: As in France, fear and hatred of immigrants are a convenient excuse for voters and policymakers who cannot grapple with messy truths.Trump has no policy agenda to help the working and middle class, so he sells xenophobia. Get rid of illegals and youll all have $30-per-hour jobs! You cant make a middle-class living as a manual laborer? blame the immigrants! Scared of terrorism and dont want to think about the problem of radicalization of Westerners? Blame the refugees, the most thoroughly vetted immigrants there are.

Its time to put an end to the nonsense, stop turning our cities and communities upside-down, alienating our ally Mexico over an unneeded wall, wasting money on building a wall and vilifying outsiders. Right-wingers should stop pushing the comforting fantasy to displaced workers that nothing they have done (e.g., not gone to college, not developed computer skills, stayed in locales with no jobs) and nothing they have to do (e.g., go back to school, develop new skills, move to where the jobs are) matter so long as all those illegal immigrants are stealing their jobs. That sort of fatalism is wrongheaded and ultimately does a huge disservice to those who need to catch up to the globalized economy. And now we now have plenty of evidence that the immigration scaremongering is fraudulent.

Read the original here:
The jig is up: Hysteria over illegal immigration is baseless - Washington Post (blog)

The birthplace of the American Revolution joined the so-called sanctuary city movement last night as Concord Town Meeting approved a warrant making the town a welcoming community for illegal immigrants.

The overwhelming show of hands in favor by the crowd of more than 500 people followed a contentious debate by town residents pro and con.

The warrant states that no police officer can detain a person on suspicion of being an illegal immigrant, and calls on police to ignore ICE detainers without a judges order, or evidence of a violent felony conviction. It bars police officers and other town employees from responding to any ICE requests for information on peoples incarceration status, hearings, length of detention, home address or personal information.

The town where American militia faced British soldiers in the Revolutionary Wars first day of battle in 1775 now joins Boston, Somerville, Cambridge, Northampton and Amherst as towns that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency says limits cooperation with the federal government on immigration.

Resident Phil Villers said the measure has the support of the state attorney general and he claimed it is in line with the U.S. Constitution.

Weve all seen the pictures of babies gassed to death in Syria and the 500,000 dead there by bombings and killings from their own government, Villers said. At the same time the Trump administration has slammed closed the door on the 50,000 refugees from there. Undocumented immigrants are being expelled at record numbers. Theyre breaking up families. Some 42,000 immigrants are languishing in our prisons, euphemistically called detention centers. As you heard, many cities are resisting this outrageous turning of our traditional values. Concord needs to uphold its traditional values and say loudly and clearly against these abuses, Not in my name.

Nancy Barrett spoke out for legal immigration, opposing the measure, though she drew applause from the largely pro-sanctuary crowd when she told her story about coming here as a 4-year-old immigrant from the Middle East.

Both of my parents endured a lifetime of religious persecution and war. They dreamed of coming to America. It was a long process to get to America. We had to wait until we had an aunt and uncle who came before us who could sponsor us to come to this country, she said. Im personally offended by language in this article that equates my story with the story of people who have broken the laws of this country. No matter what my parents were fleeing from, they loved and respected this country too much to break the law to come here. They taught us to love and respect this country as well.

Dozens of angry residents stormed out of the meeting after the town moderator cut off comment and moved for a vote while several people were still queued up, awaiting their chance to speak.

This is an example of the corruption in Concord, fumed David Stevens, who had written remarks opposing the measure which he said he planned to deliver before Town Moderator Carmen C. Reiss ended comment after 30 minutes.

David Marsh called the actions to end debate on the issue embarrassing. He said the job of keeping the town and the nation safe is too big for police to do on their own, and they need citizens to support giving them the tools they need to do their job.

It was disgusting. It was embarrassing, Marsh said. Referring to Concords ban on plastic bottles, he added, I thought I was embarrassed over the plastic bottles, or the fact that they try to get cats on a leash, but this is really a serious, serious situation.

Read more:
Concord votes to be 'welcoming' to illegal immigrants - Boston Herald