Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

How America’s idea of illegal immigration doesn’t always match reality – Minnesota Public Radio News

When you think of illegal immigration in the U.S., do you picture a border crosser or a visa overstayer? A family or a single person? A farmworker or a waiter?

People living in the U.S. without legal status are frequently invoked in American politics especially in recent months. But the conversation is often short on facts about the millions of people who fall into this category.

There are, however, outdated beliefs: A Pew Research Center survey in 2015 found that very few Americans are aware of recent changes in immigration patterns.

And, of course, there are stereotypes, which often don't always match up with reality. Most people in the U.S. illegally have been here for years, for instance, and people working service jobs far outnumber migrant farm labor.

Here's a look at the actual statistics about people living in the U.S. illegally.

We should note that there are a few caveats about this data. Different research groups use different methodologies, and in some cases, they rely on estimates. We've included links to all our data sources so you can read about their methods in more detail.

There are far more naturalized citizens than unauthorized immigrants in the U.S., and slightly more green card holders, according to the Pew Research Center.

The total number of people living in the country illegally about 11 million has made headlines recently, because immigration advocates suggest that under the Trump administration's immigration enforcement policies, almost all of them could be targeted for deportation. (More than 700,000 "DREAMers" immigrants who were brought into the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visas as children are still temporarily protected from deportation through the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program.)

A large majority of those people currently living in the U.S. illegally have been here for a decade or longer, which is a major shift from the situation at the turn of the millennium.

About two-thirds of unauthorized immigrants have lived in the U.S. for 10 years or more, Pew says. Only 14 percent arrived within the past five years.

In the late 1990s, the number of new arrivals was far higher, and the share of longtime residents far lower.

Mexico is "the leading nation of origin for U.S. unauthorized immigrants," Pew writes, but the share of immigrants from Mexico is also declining.

That is to say, Mexican immigrants are a shrinking majority of the population living in the country through illegal immigration.

Of people living in the U.S. illegally, more than half are from Mexico. The population from that one country far outnumbers the population from entire continents. But there are fewer people of Mexican origin living in the U.S. now than there were a decade ago.

You can see the trend lines clearly if you look just at people arriving in the U.S. illegally, instead of the millions who live here. The percentage arriving from Mexico has dropped markedly, while more immigrants are coming from Africa, Central America and Asia.

The reasons for the shifting immigration patterns are complex. For Central American immigrants, conflicts in their home countries certainly play a role. The Migration Policy Institute suggests that there might be similar reasons for increased migration from Asia and Africa.

"As European countries have tightened migration restrictions after record inflows of asylum seekers and migrants in 2015, some Africans and Asians fleeing conflict and poverty appear to be flying to Latin American countries with relatively lenient visa policies, such as Ecuador, Brazil, and Cuba, then turning to established regional migration networks," the Migration Policy Institute writes.

The Department of Homeland Security has estimated that as of Jan. 4, 2016, about 416,500 people overstayed their visas in fiscal year 2015. That's less than 1 percent of visa holders who entered the U.S. during that period.

Still, it's unclear how many visa overstayers make up the total number of unauthorized immigrants. A Pew estimate from 2006 says it could be as high as 45 percent. A recent study by the Center for Migration Studies estimates that two-thirds of those who joined the unauthorized immigrant population in 2014 were visa overstayers.

Why's it so hard to nail down the details? In part, it's because the data released last year are the first numbers on visa overstays that the government has released in more than two decades.

Federal law requires the Department of Homeland Security to report how many people come into the U.S. and stay after their visas expire. But the government has been having trouble collecting that data for years, as a study by the U.S. Government Accountability Office found.

The way airports and other ports of entry are currently set up makes it difficult to keep track of when a traveler leaves the U.S. The department has been piloting new programs to identify airport travelers by scanning their faces and irises.

Without historical data, it's hard to measure trends. But the estimates for fiscal year 2015 do show that Canadians made up the majority of visa overstays.

If you're a person living in the U.S. illegally, odds are you can be found in one of a few big cities and their surrounding suburbs.

Sixty-one percent of this population lives in 20 metropolitan areas, such as New York, Los Angeles and Houston, Pew reports. That's very different from the stats for the U.S. as a whole just 36 percent of the overall population live in those areas.

But "metropolitan" doesn't mean "urban," and most people living there illegally reside in the suburbs instead of the city proper. (The only exception to that rule is Phoenix.)

That can pose a challenge for city governments that want to take a stand on immigration issues, as NPR's Richard Gonzalez reported last month:

"Many big city mayors have promised to resist President Trump's threat to cut off federal funds to sanctuary cities. But the fact that most of the unauthorized immigrants live outside of city limits might complicate a mayor's ability to protect them, according to William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution.

"He told the Chicago Tribune, 'This may raise questions of whether or not the sanctuary status is an umbrella one that covers the whole region.' "

You probably know that people living in the U.S. without legal status, as well as other immigrants, are a big part of the farm labor force.

That's why the farm industry and farmworkers have been keenly concerned about Trump's rhetoric and policies on immigration.

But there just aren't very many farming jobs in the U.S., overall. So farming is not a common industry for the 11 million -- only 4 percent of people living here illegally work in agriculture.

Far, far more work in service jobs or in construction.

According to the Migration Policy Institute, one-third of people who are age 15 or older and staying in the U.S. without authorization live with at least one child under the age of 18 who is a U.S. citizen. That's far more than the number who live only with noncitizen children that's just 6 percent of the population.

Jennifer Van Hook, a demographer at Penn State University who studies immigration, points out that this statistic shows that deportations affect more than just unauthorized immigrants.

"When these people leave the country, who's going to take care of their children? It's likely that some of those U.S.-born children will be accompanying their parents," she says.

Former President Barack Obama's attempt to temporarily shield these parents of U.S. citizens from deportation through Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents also known as DAPA has never been implemented, and the future of the effort is unclear.

Read more:
How America's idea of illegal immigration doesn't always match reality - Minnesota Public Radio News

Trump’s proposal to curb illegal immigration is justified – The San Luis Obispo Tribune


The San Luis Obispo Tribune
Trump's proposal to curb illegal immigration is justified
The San Luis Obispo Tribune
Regarding the recent Day Without Immigrants, marked with rallies locally and throughout the United States, I believe that all people are equal and should be treated equally. Nevertheless, all people must follow rules and laws created to promote ...

and more »

See the original post:
Trump's proposal to curb illegal immigration is justified - The San Luis Obispo Tribune

Nonprofits Helping Illegal Immigrants Took $291 Million From Taxpayers – Daily Caller

5522471

Taxpayers funded eight nonprofits that serve, protect or advocate for illegal immigrants with more than $291 million between 2012 to 2016, according to an analysis of federal spending data and tax documents by the Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group.

The eight groups including at least one that endorsed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016 provide a variety of support to illegal aliens, ranging from legal and social services to political advocacy.

Ninety-four percent of the public funds or, nearly $274 million came from the federal government, according to data obtained from USAspending.gov and 990 tax forms.

The $291 million total in publicfunding, however, is almost certainly an underestimate, since the respective 990s of each implicated nonprofit for all five years were not always available. Additionally, those groups only represent a small sample of publicly-funded pro-illegal immigrant nonprofits.

At least 684 nonprofits nationwide provide some form of legal aid to immigrants, a 2013 Urban Institute study said. More than half of these had budgets bigger than$1 million, but a more detailed breakdown is necessary to reveal how much support comes from government agencies.

The Urban Institute study also claimed there were too few charitiesat the time to serve the growing unauthorized population and that additional taxpayer-funded support was necessary. The study estimated that Californias 111 nonprofits then providing legal aid toimmigrants could serve as many as 22,973 illegal immigrants each.

The Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service (LIRS) received the most in government grants of the eight charities TheDCNF analyzed, raking in nearly $255 million or 87 percent of the total funding, data shows. A largeportion of that money was awarded to assist refugees.

And government grants accounted for 92 percent of the LIRS budget between 2013 and 2015.

LIRS wants to ensure all migrants and refugees are protected, embraced and empowered, and seeks to end detention centers, according to its website. Instead, the group advocates for community-based alternatives to immigration detention to house individuals as they await a final decision on their immigration status.

The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) was the second most publicly-funded charity among the eight analyzed nonprofits, receiving more than $17 million between 2013 and 2015, data shows. Government grants accounted for only a small portion of its revenue.

The groups 2012 and 2016 990s wereunavailable, but NCLR received an average of more than $5 million each year. La Razas political action committeeendorsedClinton for president during the 2016 campaign. It was the groups first-ever presidential candidate endorsement.

La Razas president and CEO Janet Murguia is an outspoken critic of President Donald Trumps immigration enforcement strategies, comparing his promise to deport illegal immigrants to both the Africanslave trade and the predominantly Japanese internment camps established in the U.S. following Japans surprise attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941.

Americans For Immigrant Justice received nearly$8 million in government grants between 2012 and 2014 (its 2015 and 2016 990s were unavailable) the third largest amount among the eight charities reviewed by TheDCNF. Public money accounted for nearly 91 percent of its total revenue, and it annually received $2.6 million on average.

The nonprofit legal defense fund has represented detained illegal immigrants, and cases often involve the conditions of the facilities.

I dont have our financials in front of me, but those numbers are not direct government funding, Americans for Immigrant Justice Deputy Director Michelle Ortiz told TheDCNF in an email. TheDCNF pulled the numbers from a line in the groups 990 labeled: government grants (contributions). Ortiz did not respond further after TheDCNF inquired about the 990 data.

Below are the five remaining publicly-funded nonprofits TheDCNF analyzed.

TheDCNF was highly selective when deciding which charities it would sample. Ultimately, only groups with a national scope and focus that overtly assisted illegal immigrants and dealt exclusively in immigration matters were included.

Nonprofits operating at local or state levels,thosemore covert about dealings with illegal immigrants, andgroups that handle a variety of issues in addition to immigration were excluded.

One group awarded significantpublic funding that TheDCNF excluded was the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Migration and Refugee Services, since its funding is lumped together with other services it provides.

The Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc. (CLINIC) was the only nonprofit analyzed that responded to requests for comment, besides Americans for Immigrant Justice.

CLINICinitiated its text4refugees project with a federal grant of $525,000. Anonymous subscribers receive up to two texts per month from CLINIC about the citizenship application process.

The group also used a $550,000 federal grant to provide training for its affiliates regarding legal protection for female immigrants who faceddomestic violence and sexual assault and are often fearful to access legal services or law enforcement because of their legal status, according to information provided by CLINIC spokeswoman Pat Zapor.

Our affiliates, the local nonprofit immigration service agencies, are the ones who deal directly with immigrants, Zapor told TheDCNF. So, indirectly, some subset of undocumented women who are victims of violence may benefit from the funding. But they do not get any direct benefit beyond a better-trained legal representative.

Follow Ethan on Twitter. Send tips to [emailprotected].

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [emailprotected].

Read more from the original source:
Nonprofits Helping Illegal Immigrants Took $291 Million From Taxpayers - Daily Caller

Illegal immigration from Mexico down 40 percent in Trump’s first month – New York Post


Fox News
Illegal immigration from Mexico down 40 percent in Trump's first month
New York Post
The number of illegal immigrants crossing into the United States from Mexico declined by 40 percent from January to February, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said on Wednesday. The downturn came after President Donald Trump took office on Jan.
How America's Idea Of Illegal Immigration Doesn't Always Match RealityNPR
Trump could make courthouse arrests of illegal immigrants the new normalFox News
Report: Illegal Immigration Important for Kentucky's EconomyWKU Public Radio
Newsmax
all 73 news articles »

Read the original here:
Illegal immigration from Mexico down 40 percent in Trump's first month - New York Post

Refugee ban could result in increased illegal immigration – The Hill

President Trumps temporary ban on refugees could create a new wave of illegal border crossings, experts warn.

The latest iteration of Trumps travel ban includes a provision that halts entry of all refugees into the United States for 120 days.

The Central American Minors program was created last year to reduce the number of unaccompanied minors and family units fleeing through Mexico and illegally trying to cross the southern border into the U.S.

Although the program remains in place, Trumps latest executive order sets out new rules for the number of refugees the United States will accept.

The problem is that we are maxed out, because, remember, [Trump] decreased the number of refugees that are allowed into the U.S., said Rep. Norma Torres (D-Calif.).

We could already be maxed out at 100 percent in 90 days. That means no one else could come in, she said.

With that avenue of escape closed, many may choose to make the dangerous crossing through Mexico instead.

Central American children and family units have become the main drivers of illegal immigration, as resettlement from Mexico has leveled off since 2009. Since 2014, Mexicans have accounted for less than half of all illegal border crossings.

Maureen Meyer, a migrant rights specialist at the Washington Office for Latin America, said the Trump administrations dissuasive efforts could change the plans of Central Americans seeking a better economic situation in the United States but are unlikely to deter those fleeing violence.

I would suspect that certain families will decide that the risk is so dangerous that theyll send their children [to the United States] either way, Meyer said.

Experts agree that its difficult to measure how many Central Americans migrate to the United States for economic reasons and how many do so because of a credible fear. But various studies point to violence as a major and growing concern for Central American migrants, particularly those from the Northern Triangle countries of Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.

Since 2008, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) reported a nearly fivefold increase in Northern Triangle asylum-seekers coming to the U.S., which its report calls a staggering indicator of the surging violence shaking the region.

That report found that homicide rates in those countries dwarf the global average of 6.2 homicides per 100,000 people.

In 2013, Honduras had a homicide rate of 90.4 per 100,000 people; El Salvadors rate was 82.2 per 100,000 people; and Guatemalas was 39.9 per 100,000 people. The UNHCR further found that 82 percent of women from those countries who claimed asylum in the United States in 2015 were found by American authorities to have a credible case.

Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly has proposed action designed to deter Central Americans from migrating to the United States via smuggling routes.

I would do almost anything to deter the people from Central America from getting on this very, very dangerous network that brings people through Mexico to the United States, Kelly told CNN this week.

One proposal Kelly put forth was to detain any adults illegally entering the country with children and putting those children in the care of the Department of Health and Human Services.

Democrats have panned that idea.

Its a terror tactic; its sheer terror, said Rep. Lou Correa (D-Calif.), who questioned Kelly last month at a House Homeland Security Committee meeting. During that hearing, the Homeland Security head said he would enforce existing law as long as it was on the books but admitted there was space for reform.

I beg you to change flawed immigration laws, Kelly told Correa at the time.

When he told me that, you know, please help him change the law, I think he was being sincere. I think hes following orders from the top down, Correa told The Hill.

The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request for comment.

Deterrence actions have had mixed results in the past.

The U.S. government for years has had many PR programs trying to tell people of the risks of the journey or that there has been no change in U.S. policy, Meyer said.

While more Central Americans are choosing to stay in Mexico than ever before, many are attracted to the United States because they have family members who are already in the country.

While Mexico, Costa Rica and other countries in the region have agreed to take in more refugees from the Northern Triangle, their programs are even more limited than that of the United States.

Costa Rica, for example, agreed to take 250 refugees a year.

Torres, who was born in Guatemala and sent by her parents to live with family in the United States at age 5, said the Trump administration should focus on programs already in place to improve conditions in the Northern Triangle, rather than implementing actions that could tear families apart.

The California lawmaker pointed out that Kelly, a former leader of U.S. Southern Command, knows the region well.

We already have a process to address the root causes of migration in the Northern Triangle, and he better than anyone else knows exactly what were doing in the Northern Triangle, she said.

Read the rest here:
Refugee ban could result in increased illegal immigration - The Hill