Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

Kim Jong-nam, Illegal Immigration, Mexico: Your Evening Briefing – New York Times


New York Times
Kim Jong-nam, Illegal Immigration, Mexico: Your Evening Briefing
New York Times
1. Undocumented immigrants fearful of President Trump's immigration crackdown are hiding out. Concerned even a minor run-in with the authorities could lead to deportation, some are bunkering down in their homes, forgoing trips to churches, stores ...
Mexico chides US immigration policies, admits route for illegal immigrantsWashington Times
Byko: A five-point plan to solve illegal immigrationPhilly.com
Illegal immigrants: the facts behind the US-Mexico fightYahoo News
Daily Caller -USA TODAY -Fox News -Department of Homeland Security
all 675 news articles »

Follow this link:
Kim Jong-nam, Illegal Immigration, Mexico: Your Evening Briefing - New York Times

Illegal immigrant gangbanger gets better deal than innocent American – New York Post

Its a Tale of Two Rikers. And this pair of true-life stories should frighten and outrage any law-abiding New York City-dweller.

Last week, 19-year-old El Salvadoran immigrant Estivan Rafael Marques Velasquez, an admitted gangbanger cooling his heels in the United States illegally, was quietly spit out onto the streets of Queens.

Hed served a light stretch in the citys notoriously ultraviolent Rikers Island jail after pleading guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct. His criminal rsum also includes convictions for second-degree reckless endangerment and fourth-degree criminal possession of a weapon. Solid guy.

Officials from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement unit ICE in New York requested they be informed when Velasquez was sprung so they might swoop in and deport the potentially dangerous character. It didnt happen.

Velasquez, instead, was set free, welcomed into the bosom of this city by the suicidal Sanctuary Cities Law signed into effect by Mayor de Blasio in 2014. Id be surprised if milk and cookies werent on his generous menu.

Fortunately, federal authorities quickly picked him up and put him in detention pending his booting from our shores. It was a close call.

Too close, in de Blasios above-the-law New York City.

Now, compare this gentle treatment of a possibly vicious foreigner with the Kafkaesque torture inflicted on an American citizen a young man convicted of no crime.

Kalief Browder was locked up on Rikers in 2010 when he was 16 years old, accused of stealing a backpack. Then the authorities threw away the proverbial key.

With his mother initially unable to come up with $3,000 bail, $900 bond, Browder spent about three years in hell, more than two of them in solitary confinement.

He was captured on video getting beaten by correction officers and fellow inmates. Several times, he attempted to kill himself.

Finally, in 2013, the Bronx District Attorneys Office dropped all charges against him. He was free but despondent, paranoid and suicidal. Then he was dead.

Browder hanged himself by the neck in 2015 with an electrical cord flung from a second-floor window of his Bronx house.

He was 22 years old.

The disparate treatment given one of our own versus a man of a protected class hangs heavily on critics of the criminal-justice system.

The mayor is going out of his way to protect this immigrant. Good for him, Paul Prestia, a lawyer representing the Browder family in a $20 million lawsuit against various city agencies, told me bitterly.

But he did not show the backbone in going after those responsible for the tragedy that was Kalief Browder. Juxtapose the sanctuary law with young men and women in the city. Why wasnt more done to protect them?

For a time, it seemed as if anyone with a microphone wanted a piece of Browder. On The View, Rosie ODonnell gushed to him, You really are a hero. Ex-Republican presidential contender Rand Paul evoked his name on the campaign trail. Former President Barack Obama mentioned him while enacting a ban on solitary confinement for youths and low-level offenders in federal prison. Mayor de Blasio even hailed him while instituting jail reforms, including ending solitary for juveniles.

Rap mogul Jay Z elevated Browder to the status of the holy in TIME: The Kalief Browder Story, a six-part documentary series on which he served as an executive producer. It debuts Wednesday on Spike TV.

Sometimes our prophets come in the form of young, undeveloped energy that will teach us grown-ups how to live better and have more compassion, and Kalief Browder was the prophet, he says on the show.

It wasnt enough.

Aggravatingly, city officials continue to defend their kid-glove treatment of an admitted member of the bloodthirsty M-13 gang, while all but ignoring the Kalief Browders of this city.

Velasquez was freed after serving time for an offense that does not qualify as a violent or serious felony under the citys local laws, and his gang affiliation was not supported by evidence that meets even minimal constitutional standards, a City Hall spokeswoman told The Post.

He posed a danger to the public and law-enforcement officers.

Kalief Browder threatened no one.

As long as officials get to choose whom to treasure at the expense of everyone else, were in for grief.

Eyes in New Jersey and beyond should fall on seventh-grader Sydney Phillips this weekend as the 13-year-old competes in a basketball playoff game with her Garden State Catholic school on the boys team. Her father sued St. Theresa School and the Archdiocese of Newark for her right to play, after the girls team was axed.

Instead, Sydney and her younger sister were expelled for two days, before an appeals court ordered them back to class.

On her return, she told me, a bunch of boys tried to block her from entering the school gym, and some parents bullied her online. But last week, a judge ruled that she can play. As she downed two baskets in her teams losing effort Sunday, spectators cheered wildly for her. Whatever happens next, Lady Courage is a winner.

Whod have thought The New York Times would publish a piece headlined Are Liberals Helping Trump?

But there it was Sunday, authored by Sabrina Tavernise, who interviewed moderate conservatives (we exist).

They felt pushed into President Trumps corner in the face of rampant liberal shaming of anyone even remotely to the right of center.

In the interest of diversity of opinion, Ill take whatever crumbs the Newspaper of Record dishes out.

How many more children must die or be permanently maimed? A pit bull being watched by a Brooklyn man mauled his 5-year-old son last weekend to the point where he needed 2,000 stitches. Depressingly, some people in New York City continue to champion this dangerous dog breed.

Too many pits are not safe around humans. Ban them!

More:
Illegal immigrant gangbanger gets better deal than innocent American - New York Post

‘We’re Not Standing in the Way’: CT Gov, Tucker Spar Over Illegal Immigration – Fox News Insider

On Thursday, Tucker Carlson debated Gov. Dannel Malloy (D-Conn.) on his response to President Trump's order that states comply with federal immigration laws when dealing with illegal immigrants.

This week, Malloy issued a memo to law enforcement and school officials, telling them they do not have to abide by federal immigration laws or fully cooperate with ICE.

CT Gov. Tells Officials Not to Follow Federal Immigration Law

CT Proposes Quadrupling Gun Permit Fees as Part of New Budget Plan

CT Budget Proposal Could Cut 21-Gun Salute from Military Funerals

"The president can't order [the state] to do federal work," Malloy said, "We're not standing in the way of that happening," he said on "Tucker Carlson Tonight."

Carlson pointed to the state's dire financial situation, adding that its capital city, Hartford, "is on the verge of bankruptcy" and asked Malloy whether responding to Trump's order in that manner helps Connecticut citizens facing the other issues.

"We should not be expending local dollars [or] state dollars," Malloy said, adding that a few years ago, the state legislature unanimously passed a referendum that mirrored Malloy's instructions in his response.

In response to Malloy's "federalist" argument, Carlson pointed to the governor's stern rebuke of President Trump's decision to reserve transgender restroom policies to the states, undoing a 2016 order by former President Barack Obama.

"I don't think discrimination and bigotry are state issues," Malloy said, "Why should someone be required to use a facility thy are no longer equipped [to utilize] because it was on their birth certificate?"

Watch the full debate above, and read more about Malloy's memo to his state authorities HERE.

'Angel Mom' Slams CT Gov. for Defying Immigration Law: 'It Will Hurt a Lot of People'

Huckabee on Indiana Law: 'This is a Manufactured Crisis By the Left'

See the original post here:
'We're Not Standing in the Way': CT Gov, Tucker Spar Over Illegal Immigration - Fox News Insider

Trump’s First 100 Days: Illegal immigrants, anti-Semitism and transgender students – Washington Post

Heres where things stand heading into day 34 of the Trump administration:

A new front has emerged in the battle over President Trumps immigration policy given his plan to ramp up enforcement against undocumented immigrants.

Over the weekend, news broke that Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly signed new guidelines empowering federal authorities to more aggressively detain and deport illegal immigrants inside the United States. Immigrant rights advocates reacted with fear and outrage.

The administration sought to allay their concernsTuesday during a conference call with reporters: Asenior official with the Department of Homeland Security said the measures are not intended to produce mass deportations and will take time to implement.

The Trump administration on Feb. 21 issued guidelines strengthening enforcement against illegal immigration but insisted that it isn't seeking "mass deportations." (Bastien Inzaurralde/The Washington Post)

But given Trumps harsh anti-immigrant rhetoric from the campaign trail, immigrant rights groups and Democratic lawmakers are still on alert.

The new guidelines called for the hiring of thousands of additional enforcement agents, expanding the pool of immigrants who are prioritized for removal, speeding up deportation hearings and enlisting local law enforcement to help make arrests, our colleague wrote.

TRUMP DENOUNCES RACISM AND ANTI-SEMITIC VIOLENCE

Trump has faced pressure for weeks to clearly decry the sharp increase in anti-Semitic incidents around the country.

On Tuesday, he finally did so during a visit to Washingtons National Museum of African American History and Culture.

This tour was a meaningful reminder of why we have to fight bigotry, intolerance and hatred in all of its very ugly forms, Trump said, reading off prepared remarks.

President Trump urged Americans to "fight bigotry, intolerance and hatred in all of its very ugly forms," including antisemitic threats targeted at Jewish community centers, speaking on Feb. 21 at the National Museum of African American History and Culture. (The Washington Post)

The anti-Semitic threats targeting our Jewish community and community centers are horrible and are painful and a very sad reminder of the work that still must be done to root out hate and prejudice and evil.

As our colleagues wrote, the statement was notably somber and disciplined a departure from the flashes of irritation he showed at a news conference last week at the White House, when he dismissed related questions from reporters.

Pressure had mounted after another wave of bomb threats hit Jewish community centers in multiple states on Monday and more than 170 Jewish gravestones were toppled at a cemetery near St. Louis over the weekend.

TRUMP PLANS TO ROLL BACK TRANSGENDER STUDENT PROTECTIONS

The bathroom debate looks like its about to start all over again.

Under a policy issued by the Obama administration, public school students were permitted to use bathrooms that match their gender identities rather than the sex listed on their birth certificates.

Now, it appears the Trump administration is preparing to change that. Aspokesman for Trump said the Education and Justice departments will provide new guidance on the issue, which he called a matter for states to decide.

As our colleagues wrote, Trumps decision would not have an immediate impact on the nations public school students because a federal judge had already put a hold on the Obama-era directive issued in May.

It would, however, affect several legal cases and indicate whether Trump will hew closer to the GOP party line on LGBT issues than he did on the campaign trail.

Follow the author @eliseviebeck.

Read more here:
Trump's First 100 Days: Illegal immigrants, anti-Semitism and transgender students - Washington Post

Treat Illegal Immigration Like What It Is: A Law Enforcement Problem – National Review

Victors excellent column on illegal immigration raises the tough questions presented by removable aliens who have committed serious but non-violent identity-fraud crimes. They are tough because they implicate the gray area between two extremes.

On one end, everyone knows that it is neither possible nor desirable to deport the entire illegal-immigrant population (estimated at 11 million-plus); on the other, there is strong consensus that serious criminals and those in defiance of deportation orders should be deported forthwith, though we know this is just a minority subset of that population. It is not an insignificant subset: As Victor notes, even before President Trump entered office, close to a million people were facing government removal orders.

This brings to the fore a subject on which I fear Im becoming a broken record, but Ill hit it again anyway. Since 9/11, weve lost the distinction between national-security challenges and crime problems. Illegal immigration is a crime problem. Yes, it has some important national-security aspects (as do other crime problems), but the percentage of illegal aliens who threaten national security (as opposed to who are recidivist criminals) is negligible.

The distinction is important. We must always have as a goal eradicating national-security challenges even if the goal is unrealistic, a single terrorist attack can be so catastrophic, we must take extra measures to prevent it. To the contrary, it is not our goal to eradicate crime problems it would neither be possible nor desirable (in terms of the costs to liberty) to do that.

Crime problems do not lend themselves to comprehensive solutions. Instead, they are managed by reasonable and hopefully efficient law enforcement.

Since enforcement resources are finite, priority will be given to removing serious criminals in the illegal-immigrant population. But what is a serious crime? The answer to this question, Victor points out, will depend on our view of identity-fraud crimes (and related varieties of document fraud). These are felonies. Because illegal aliens commit them massively, their apologists want us to think of such offenses as unserious. But they are even conceivable that way only when compared to heinous violent crimes; and we know they are not unserious because they are treated quite seriously by the government when committed by American citizens.

I dont think it is useful to make a rule about how we should regard identity-fraud offenders in the immigration population, because the offense behavior varies so widely. One person may have gotten a single fraudulent ID years ago in order to get a job, in connection with which he pays taxes, living an otherwise law-abiding life and being an asset to his community. Another may use fraudulent IDs to purloin benefits from social-welfare programs. Another may be in the fraudulent-ID business.

There is no one-size-fits-all approach to this. Better simply to let law enforcement do its job.

A sensible allocation of resources in immigration enforcement would focus on border security, apprehension and removal of known criminal aliens, and the magnets of illegal immigration employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens and the abuse of welfare programs. If you address those things, you eliminate or drastically reduce the incentive for immigrants to come to or stay in the U.S. illegally. The illegal-immigrant population would decrease, probably dramatically.

Beyond that, illegal immigrants who choose to stay here take their chances. The thing I have never understood about proposals for comprehensive immigration reform is the presumption that it is our obligation as Americans not only to address but to cure the illegal status of people who choose to violate our laws by entering our country illegally or overstaying their legal permission to remain here. If you are an illegal alien in this country, that is your choice and therefore your problem, not mine. (Caveat: I am not talking about DREAMers; they are a comparatively small category of people who were brought here as children, whose illegal status is not their fault, and who have never known any home other than the United States.)

I dont believe we need to or should hassle people, including illegal aliens, who are generally law-abiding. But if you are not here legally, and you encounter police when they are carrying out their normal duties, you run the risk of being arrested and deported. Maybe in an individual case, the equities will call for exercising discretion against triggering removal proceedings. But in most cases, illegal aliens who are encountered in the course of ordinary law enforcement operations should be detained and deported.

See original here:
Treat Illegal Immigration Like What It Is: A Law Enforcement Problem - National Review