Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

Letter: Illegal immigration ends up hurting us all – New Bern Sun Journal

Frank Bolen, New Bern

The media seems to be grouping all immigrants into one definition.

The vast majority of the people in the United States are immigrants. We cannot all claim to be descendants of American Indians.

Whether you are an immigrant or it was your parent, grandparent or great-grandparent, etc.,that is not important. The important part of being an immigrant is, did you or the family member get here legally?

Basically I am trying to say that we have to remember we have two types of immigrants legal and illegal. There is a difference. Legal immigrants have many and sincere rights in these United States. Many, if not most, have become citizens. Illegal immigrants should not have any of those rights. They are here illegally. They have broken our laws and we are supposed to be a nation of laws.

Legal immigration is and has been welcomed in this country and will continue to be. Yes, these immigrants should be fully vetted and then welcomed to become a true part of these great United States.

However, illegal immigration must be stopped. It does not help and actually injures all Americans, including immigrants who are legally here.

It is time to change. We must immediately get back to a country of laws.

See the original post:
Letter: Illegal immigration ends up hurting us all - New Bern Sun Journal

Keep illegal immigrants at bay by axing freebies – Wyoming Tribune

I have a solution to the illegal immigration problem. I have no illusions that any of this will ever take place, but this is what happens when an old man has time to just sit and cogitate. (I know that cogitating can be dangerous, but I still do it.)

My solution? Remove any and all incentives for anyone to come to America illegally. Make the E-Verify system mandatory. Make it next to impossible for an illegal to find work or earn any money. Then stop all the free stuff. No food stamps, no welfare and no subsidies of any kind. The only freebie would be a free ticket back to where they came from.

Of course, there would have to be exceptions, but on a case-by-case basis and based on humanitarian concerns.

For any illegal that commits a crime, a special prison, perhaps similar to the tent prison Sheriff Joe built in Arizona. No television, no radios and no recreational facilities. Also feed them a very bland and bare-subsistence diet. Then, make any crime a minimum 30 days, and after they complete the sentence, deport them with a warning that if they come back and are caught, they will go back to that prison for double the time of their original sentence.

I think this solution would solve the illegal immigration problem, and I guarantee it would cause widespread outrage, demonstrations and riots all across America by the bleeding-heart liberals. So be it!

More here:
Keep illegal immigrants at bay by axing freebies - Wyoming Tribune

Texas County Demands Fed Payback for Jailing Illegal Aliens – Breitbart News

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

The federal State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) requires that the county report criminal illegal aliens that have been housed in jail for four or more days.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

The demand comes after President Donald Trump signed executive orders to withhold federal monies from sanctuary cities, temporarily halt refugeesfrom any country for 120 days, and block travel from seven Muslim-majority nations.

We have decided to be compliant in working with immigration services, and so we turn over all that data to them. But the fact of the matter is they dont pick them up right away and we continue to incur that cost, Bexar County (San Antonio) Judge Nelson Wolff told the local ABC affiliate. Wolff is the county judge of the 17th most populated county in the United States.

A few days ago, Wolffwrote letters to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) requesting that the federal government completely reimburse the county for costs incurred over the last 12 years for housing criminal illegal aliens, reportedSan Antonio-Express News.

The letter begins:

Bexar County complies with federal laws associated with detainment of undocumented immigrants. The State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) requires Bexar County to report undocumented inmates that have been housed for four or more consecutive days in the Bexar County Adult Detention Center and have either one felony offense or two misdemeanor offenses within one fiscal year. Under the terms of the SCAAP agreement, Bexar County was to be reimbursed for holding federal immigration detainees.

TheExpress-Newsreported that Wolff said,The topic has come up about immigration and state funding I thought it was time to make it public of how much it costs local governments. Its not just a theoretical issue, its an expensive issue.

The county judge was reported to say that he will continue to comply with the law even if the county does not receive reimbursement.

Wolff wrote in his letter, Bexar County is willing to comply with federal immigration laws, but this has created a large burden on local property taxpayers that should be paid for by the federal government. He added, This burden on local government violates the principles of the SCAPP agreement.

The unfunded mandates by the federal government have become even more underfunded, reported the San Antonio area paper citing a report by the National Conference of State Legislatures. When the SCAAP first began in 1995, Congress put aside $130 million for the program, and between 2006 and 2009, that allocation was $400 million a year. The funding has decreased to $238 million, which covers roughly 18 percent of the costs to local jails.

SCAAP payments are not made where local and state entities cannot verify that those jailed are illegal aliens. Costs for unknown inmates are not reimbursed. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, this accounted for 58 percent of the program in 2010.

Lana Shadwickis a contributing writer and legal analyst for Breitbart Texas. She has served as a prosecutor and associate judge in Texas. Follow her on Twitter@LanaShadwick2.

See the original post here:
Texas County Demands Fed Payback for Jailing Illegal Aliens - Breitbart News

Bill Clinton opposed illegal immigration – Greensboro News & Record

Before Trump, there was President Obamas Iraqi refugee ban and seven nations of terror proclamation. But before Obama there was Bill Clinton, who received a standing ovation for demanding stronger border defenses and deporting criminal illegal immigrants.

Remember Clintons 1995 State of the Union speech?

We are a nation of immigrants ... but we are a nation of laws. ... Our nation is rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. ... Illegal immigrants take jobs from citizens or legal immigrants, they impose burdens on our taxpayers. ... That is why we are doubling the number of border guards, deporting more illegal immigrants than ever before, cracking down on illegal hiring, barring benefits to illegal aliens, and we will do more to speed the deportation of illegal immigrants arrest for crimes. ... It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws that has occurred in the last few years ... and we must do more to stop it.

Its starting to get a little awkward for the identity politics of the left to defend their own history while denigrating Trumps actions, according to the Zero Hedge website.

Editors note: Kathleen Parkers column will continue. She was on vacation that day.

View original post here:
Bill Clinton opposed illegal immigration - Greensboro News & Record

One Number Proves Trump’s Border Wall Won’t Stop Illegal Immigration – The Daily Dot

BY JAMES KING

President Donald Trump came to power by hanging his hat on the idea that a glorious wall along the US-Mexico border would be the be-all and end-all solution to illegal immigration in the United States. He was met by chants of build the wall at stops along the campaign trail where supporters worked themselves into a tizzy as the now-president crowed about deporting the roughly 11 million people in the country illegally (which is virtually impossible).

Everything else aside, however, there are numerous reasons critics say a border wall is not just bad politics it wont be very effective. First, there are still many other ways to cross a border,tunnels and ladders going under or over this great wall among them. Then theres the cost; an estimated $15 billion to construct this enormous wall that would need to span nearly 2,000 miles.

But even if the wall were free (its not; Mexico isnt paying)and tunnels and ladders didnt exist, a gargantuan wall on the border wouldnt have stopped nearly half of the people currently in the country illegally. Because nearly half of the undocumented immigrants currently in the country didnt get here by sneaking across the border. Rather, they came to the US on legal visas and didnt leave when they expired.

The most extensive research on people who overstay their visas (overstays as their called) was a study by theU.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service that found that 41 percent of those in the country illegally were overstays. The study was conducted in 1997, but that figure is widely accepted by most immigration experts as still being accurate today. In fact, some believe the number today is more in the ballpark of 50 percent.

In September of 2015, journalist Jorge Ramos used that figure to support his claim that 40 percent of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. get here by airplane as he argued against Trumps plan to build a border wall.Punditfact, a website that fact checks comments made by political pundits like Ramos, found that Ramos claim that 40 percent of undocumented immigrants get her on planes likely isnt accurate theres really no way to determine what mode of transportation immigrants use to get here. In disproving Ramos claim, the website circled back with immigration experts to see if the figure of 41 percent of undocumented immigrants being overstays rather than people who slipped across the border illegally.

It is likely that the 40 percent figure is still valid and, if anything, the share of unauthorized immigrants who are visa overstayers is probably higher than 40 percent, Jeffrey Passel, an immigration expert with the Pew Research Center, told the website.

Robert Warren, another immigration expert who worked at the INS at the time of the 1997 study, also told the site that he believes the percentage of undocumented immigrants who are overstays has likely increased, primarily because of the decline in Mexican nationals migrating to the U.S.

Since 2000, arrivals from Mexico, who are about 85-90 percent entries without inspection, have plummeted, while overstays have increased, or stayed at about their historical levels, Warren said.

Over the weekend, Trump signed a controversial executive order banning travel to the U.S. by people from seven primarily Muslim, Middle-eastern countries. Undocumented immigrants and refugees from those countries make up less than two percent of those in the country illegally (likely much less) according to data from theMigration Policy Institute, and nationals from these seven countries have been responsible for precisely zero American deaths. Like his $15 billion wall, Trumps order appears to be based more on campaign promises than any sort of rhyme or reason.

Read the original here:
One Number Proves Trump's Border Wall Won't Stop Illegal Immigration - The Daily Dot