Mediaboss Marketing

The measure will last for six months and include the redistribution of migrants across the country and repatriations.

Italys cabinet has announced a state of emergency on immigration following a sharp rise of migrant arrivals along the countrys southern shores, a statement said, in a move aimed at better management of arrivals and repatriation facilities.

The state of emergency will last for six months and will be backed by initial funding of 5 million euros ($5.42m), according to the statement, which was issued on Tuesday.

Let it be clear, we are not solving the problem; the solution can only depend on responsible intervention by the European Union, Civil Protection Minister Nello Musumeci said.

The statement said that this measure was necessary to carry out with urgency extraordinary measures to reduce congestion at an overwhelmed migrant shelter on a tiny Italian island in the Mediterranean.

The government also said that the funds for this temporary emergency scheme will back new structures, suitable both for sheltering as well as the processing and repatriation of migrants who dont have the requisites to stay.

A government source told Reuters that this emergency measure will now allow Prime Minister Giorgia Melonis right-wing government to more quickly repatriate those not allowed to stay in Italy, boosting identification and expulsion orders.

According to the countrys Interior Ministry, some 31,300 migrants and refugees have arrived in Italy so far, up from around 7,900 in the same period last year.

Italys ANSA news agency reported that over the April 7-9 Easter holiday weekend, around 2,000 people arrived by boat on the Italian island of Lampedusa off the North African coast.

Over the past few months, NGOs and human rights groups have been questioning Italys stringent migration policies, over concerns that they could violate human rights.

Italian diplomat Ferdinando Nelli Feroci told Al Jazeera that this temporary emergency measure is mainly a scheme to transform illegal migration to legal migration.

I dont think this is a problem of violation of human rights. There is a distinction between people that arrive from countries like Afghanistan and Eritrea, where there is a very serious violation of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Those people have rights for protection and asylum, he said.

But the majority coming to Italys southern shores are economic migrants. So there is a problem of trying to manage the reception of these migrants, which the emergency scheme seeks to address, Feroci added.

Read the rest here:
Italy declares state of emergency over migration congestion - Al Jazeera English

As he moves toward a potential bid for president, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has highlighted his efforts to crack down on illegal immigration, including flying migrants to Marthas Vineyard in Massachusetts last year.

In an April 6 speech at Hillsdale College, a conservative Christian school in Michigan, DeSantis said Florida had banned sanctuary cities and caught thousands of Haitians and Cubans who had arrived illegally by sea.

DeSantis also said Democrats and legacy mediacare about people who are in the U.S. illegally only when they show up at beautiful Marthas Vineyard.

On Sept. 14, DeSantis flew around 50 immigrants to Marthas Vineyard in what was intended as an attack on the Biden administrations immigration record. It mirrored actions at the time by other Republican governors inTexas and Arizona. The migrants flown to the island off the southeastern coast of Massachusetts, mostly Venezuelans, had previously been in Texas.

Two days after arriving on Marthas Vineyard, the migrants were taken to nearby Joint Base Cape Cod, a military base withdormitory-style housing, for longer-term shelter.

Then they got really upset about that.,DeSantis saidin his speech, regarding the migrants arrival at Marthas Vineyard. They called out the National Guard and deported them within 24 hours. So these are people, these leftist elites, they want to impose their vision on society but they dont want to have to suffer the consequences of that vision, they want you to suffer the consequences.

DeSantis was parroting viral statements similar to ones wedebunkedin September.

We asked DeSantis for his evidence to support the claim and his spokesperson, Jeremy Redfern, replied via email, Massachusetts called in the National Guard to deport the migrants from Marthas Vineyard. In his reply, Redfern cited a Sept. 16New York Postarticle about the migrants, but the article referred to a relocation program, not deportation.

DeSantis is wrong on two counts. First, the migrants were not deported, which occurs when people are removed from the United States and sent back to their country of origin or, in some cases, to a third country. Second, deportations are generally carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or other federal immigration agencies not the National Guard.

The Massachusetts National Guard provided some assistance to the migrants on Cape Cod, including lodging and dining facilities. The agency did not transport the migrants from Marthas Vineyard, a spokesperson said.

DeSantis and the Florida Republican-led Legislature are moving toward passing additional immigration restrictions by the time the session ends in early May.

In February,DeSantis called formandating the use of E-Verify to vet the eligibility of workers, invalidating undocumented immigrants out-of-state licenses and requiring hospitals to collect data on the patients immigration status.

Marthas Vineyard is home to about 17,000 yearly residents, while about 200,000 people spend the summer there. About 63% of its homes are owned by people who live there seasonally, including former President Barack Obama.

The wealthy island is in themidst of an affordable housing crisisand not equipped to handle the sudden arrival of dozens of immigrants, said Lisa Belcastro, the islands homeless shelter coordinator, in September. There is no year-round homeless shelter on the island.

On Cape Cod, the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency led efforts to provide the immigrants with food, shelter and services, and coordinated with state and local agencies and nonprofit agencies. The migrants were provided access to health care, case management for housing and educational support for children and regular trips into the community for medical and other needs.

The Cape Cod shelter closed Oct. 7.

Monika Langarica, a staff attorney at the Center for Immigration Law and Policyat the UCLA School of Law, told us in September that movement between states or regions within the United States is not a deportation.

TheVineyard Gazettereported in March that of the 49 migrants, four of them ended up back on the island.

Over the winter they have quietly settled into island life, taking English classes at night and working odd jobs as they begin to navigate the labyrinthine American immigration system, a process that can take years, the Gazette wrote.

Rachel Self, an immigration lawyer representing five of the migrants, told us that she is not aware of any of the migrants being deported. She said that the migrants have applied for asylum andU visas, which are set aside for victims of certain crimes. Self said that most of the migrants have stayed in Massachusetts.

The Lawyers for Civil Rights, an organization headquartered in Boston that represents immigrants and people of color, filed a federal civil rights class action lawsuit in September against DeSantis and other Florida officials, challenging the transportation of the migrants to the island.

Ivn Espinoza-Madrigal, executive director of the group, told PolitiFact that none of the clients have been deported. The American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts also told PolitiFact that it is unaware of any deportations.

DeSantis said when migrants arrived on Marthas Vineyard, They called out the National Guard and deported them within 24 hours.

The migrants were relocated to a Cape Cod military base and were not removed from the United States. They remain in the U.S. today.

Deportations are carried out by federal immigration authorities, not the National Guard.

We rate this statement False.

This fact check was originallypublished by PolitiFact, which is part of the Poynter Institute. See the sources for this fact check here.

Read more:
Ron DeSantis falsely said migrants were deported from Marthas ... - Poynter

Forty-two foreign nationals and one South African are expected to appear in the Mecklenburg Magistrates Court tomorrow, Thursday April 13, on charges of illegal mining and contravention of the Immigration Act.

The suspects were apprehended during a joint intelligence operation conducted by members of the Provincial Illegal Mining Task Team, Provincial Organised Crime Unit and the RR Undercover Security Company at Ga-Phasha Village outside Mecklenburg at about 23:30.

The SAPS had received information about illegal mining activities taking place in the area and swiftly reacted.

Upon arrival, the police found the suspects busy mining chrome at Sefateng Mine without authorisation. When the suspects saw law enforcement, they ran into the nearby bush while others went into the self-made tunnels to avoid being nabbed. The scene was cordoned and 43 suspects were apprehended, said the Limpopo SAPS spokesperson, Colonel Malesela Ledwaba.

In addition, the SAPS confiscated 12 generators and 10 jackhammers valued at R170 000 and chrome estimated to be more than R1m.

The male suspects, aged between 18 and 43, are 41 undocumented Zimbabweans, an undocumented Mozambican and a South African.

The police will stop at nothing to ensure that the perpetrators of these crimes are arrested and ultimately incarcerated for justice to prevail, said the Limpopo SAPS commissioner, Lieutenant General Thembi Hadebe.The SAPS are continuing with operations to curb illegal mining across the province.

Read more:
42 illegal immigrants and a South African arrested for illegal mining in Mecklenburg - Lowvelder

Clarity counts, but obfuscation is better when trying to unload unpopular items. Seasoned home buyers can attest that any listing described as historic likely means the house is as drafty as an upper deck at Wrigley Field, mice have homesteading rights, and the wiring is a tinderbox on which local firemen have been waging bets. Similarly, car buyers know lightly driven means the clunker has more digits on the odometer than the U.S National Debt Clock.

Likewise, honesty is lacking in most thingsimmigration.

Case in point is Gary, Indiana, which in 2017 enacted a Welcoming City ordinance which sounds awfully nice on the surface given we all have a human instinct to be hospitable to new neighbors. The problem is that this measure doesnt delineate between legal immigrants and illegal aliens, it prohibits local officialsincluding policefrom requesting immigration status information, and thereby ignores the threat of criminal aliens and gangs. Most importantly, it runs afoul of Indianas anti-sanctuary laws passed in 2011. The ordinancewhich more accurately should be labeled, Garys Dinner Bell for Illegal Alienshas stubbornly survived several rounds of lawsuits, mostly due to lack of standing byplaintiffs.

Similar measures are popping up across the country. Despite squishy titles, theyre nothing other than efforts to reward and incentivize illegal immigration; never mind that doing so adversely impacts community safety, fiscal solvency, and overall quality of life for existing Americanresidents.

Other euphemisms abound. Fix a Broken System is one such gem. This is commonly used by leftists distressed that there are actually laws against illegal immigration and outraged that America is not quadrupling its annual number of legal immigrants (or whatever increase is mathematically proven to deliver the precise number of new immigrant voters that will ensure one party dominance in all perpetuity). But the fact is, illegal aliens arent supposed to be in the United States because by definition they do not have legal status. As regards to our level of legal immigration, America currently allows in more than one million people a year, more than any other industrialized country on the planet. The bottom line is that the only thing broken about our immigration system is an unwillingness to impose sensible limitations and enforce the laws. Accuracy might suggest that their version of fixing a broken system should be read as making the systemworse.

The granddaddy of linguist sleight-of-hand is undocumented workers. Given the huge sums of Soros-sourced money the special interests have, one might assume their high-paid consultants would have told them that this euphemism expired years ago. We all know it means illegal aliens, but open border advocates believe that using the adjective undocumented magically erases the illegality, while implying they are workers suggests all are gainfully employed, which theyre often not. The proper reference is illegal aliens. Illegal means prohibited by law. Yes, entry without inspection into the U.S is prohibited. And alien is a term defined in 8 U.S.C. Section 1101 and used by legal professionals across the board including the United States Supreme Court. Its okay to say illegal aliens! Youll be in goodcompany.

George Carlin once said that language is a tool for concealing the truth, so caveat emptor on all these examples and so many others. And as regards Gary, Indianas Welcoming ordinance violating state law that no one seems able to do much about, well there is something useful brewing. The Indiana Senate recently voted to add teeth into the existing state sanctuary-city ban by authorizing the attorney general to sue jurisdictions like Gary that openly violate it with so-called Welcoming ordinances. The House still has to vote on it before they adjourn April 27. Hoosiers need to tell the Indiana House and Governor Eric Holcomb to support it too, otherwise Indianas anti-sanctuary law will continue to be whittled down by one local initiative after theother.

And that, at least, is the plaintruth.

See original here:
Translating the Language of the Left in Gary, Indiana and Elsewhere - Federation for American Immigration Reform

OPINION:

Hospitals are buckling under the strain of Americas illegal immigration crisis.

Consider one hospital in the border city of Yuma, Arizona an area where the daily number of illegal crossings has skyrocketed from roughly 40 to more than 1,000 over the past two years.

Hospital administrators recently pleaded with a visiting congressional delegation for relief, explaining how their modest 406-bed facility has been forced to provide over $26 million in uncompensated care to illegal immigrants in just one year. So many pregnant illegal immigrants are flooding the hospital that doctors have had to delay planned deliveries for American mothers.

The Yuma hospital, just miles from the border, certainly has it worse than most. But hospitals nationwide are struggling to cope with the record influx of foreign nationals. At one point in December, more than 80% of U.S. hospital beds were occupied a level not seen since January 2022, the peak of the omicron wave. But this time, only about 6% of beds went to COVID-19 patients. This past winter, near-record numbers of patients including many recently arrived illegal immigrants needed care for a far wider variety of ailments.

The scale of border crossings is without precedent. From October through January, law enforcement agents recorded over 874,000 encounters with illegal immigrants at the border 30% more than the same four-month stretch the prior year, and almost double the number of encounters in the entirety of fiscal 2020, the last full fiscal year before President Biden took office.

Due to immigration both illegal and legal the nations population is growing far faster than hospital capacity. In 2021, immigration, rather than net reproduction (births outpacing deaths), accounted for a majority of U.S. population growth for the first time in history. The U.S. population is expected to increase by over 70 million in the next 40 years.

Our health care system cant keep up. As of 2017, we had only 2.9 hospital beds per 1,000 Americans down nearly 70% since 1960, even though the population has nearly doubled since then.

Given this rapid population growth, its hardly surprising that nearly 40% of emergency rooms across the country report that theyre overcrowded every day. Overcrowding leads to longer wait times to receive care. In fact, between 2017 and 2021, the percentage of patients who left before receiving any care whatsoever nearly doubled.

Not coincidentally, a majority of Americans think U.S. health care is poor or fair at best for the first time in decades.

Among the nonelderly population, illegal immigrants are more than five times as likely to be uninsured as U.S. citizens. Thanks to the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, uninsured illegal immigrants can receive emergency medical services via emergency Medicaid. Emergency rooms, as overcrowded and understaffed as they already are, are the only place many illegal immigrants turn to when they need medical services.

If were going to right the proverbial ship in our hospitals, we need to curb the immigration-driven population boom. That status quo is simply unsustainable.

Mike Hanauer is an environmental activist with more than 30 years experience. He is a speaker for the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy and has served on the National Board of Zero Population Growth and co-chaired the New England Coalition for Sustainable Population.

View original post here:
To keep hospitals open, we need to close our border - Washington Times