Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

To stop illegal immigration, Texas must pass mandatory E-Verify – Wilson County News

Audio articles on Wilson County News made possible by C Street Gift Shop in downtown Floresville!

When President Biden took office, he immediately rolled out the red carpet to illegal immigrants. He issued orders that stopped most illegal crossers from being detained until they could be deported. Potential migrants around the world got the message and have crossed the border illegally in historic and disastrous numbers.

Reports show that Texas has spent $4.4 billion over two years to combat and deal with illegal immigration as Gov. Abbott and Lt. Governor Dan Patrick denounce the waves of illegal immigration Texas has experienced under President Biden as an invasion.

Yet for all the effort and money spent, neither official has supported the one measure that would dramatically reduce illegal immigration in the Lone Star state mandatory E-Verify.

E-Verify is the federal online system that allows employers to instantly determine whether new hires are authorized to work in the United States. In order to get a job in this country, an individual needs a Social Security number or other identifier that confirms work authorization. E-Verify simply confirms whether the documentation given by a new employee information already required in the I-9 form every employee fills out when hired is genuine and belongs to the person using it.

If the information doesnt match existing records, E-Verify indicates usually in a matter of seconds that there is a problem. This may mean that a person legally allowed to work in the United States forgot to let Social Security know of a name change after marriage or another similar circumstance, easily corrected. Or it may indicate that a person illegally in the United States is trying to gain employment.

When Congress first passed legislation in 1996 under the Clinton administration creating E-Verify, it made the use of this scalable system voluntary for American businesses. In 2009, the Obama administration began requiring federal contractors and their subcontractors to use E-Verify, implementing an executive order issued at the end of George W. Bushs presidency.

Numerous states already mandate that employers use E-Verify. And many corporations, especially large ones like Apple, Exxon, and General Motors, use E-Verify to keep themselves from accidentally hiring illegal immigrants.

Today, E-Verify is used to check the legal status of more than half of all new hires in the country each year. The problem is that illegal immigrants apply to companies that do not use E-Verify. Unscrupulous businesses wont use E-Verify unless forced to by either state or federal governments.

Arizona was the first state that required all employers to use E-Verify, a law that was upheld by the Supreme Court. Other states have followed suit, including Alabama, South Carolina, Arizona, Georgia, and Mississippi. The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas found that these states saw substantial reductions in illegal immigrant employment.

Yet for all their frenetic activity to police their borders, Gov. Abbott and Lt. Gov. Patrick have never endorsed an E-Verify law for Texas. Unlike building walls and sending troops, mandating E-Verify would cost the state almost nothing and would turn off the jobs magnet that exists in Texas.

Raised in Texas, Jim Robb is Vice President for Strategies and Data at NumbersUSA, an immigration policy group, and author of Political Migrants: Hispanic Voters on the Move. This piece originally ran in Focus Daily News.

NOTE: Items posted to the WCN Blog Pages are the opinions of the writer, and do not necessarily the opinion of the Wilson County News, its management, or staff.

Read more:
To stop illegal immigration, Texas must pass mandatory E-Verify - Wilson County News

Chasing shadows from the sea? The electoral politics of illegal … – UK in a Changing Europe

John Curtice analyses UK in a Changing Europes latest Redfield and Wilton Strategies Brexit tracker poll, examining the relationship between public attitudes towards illegal immigration and voting intention.

The UK government has concerned itself with addressing what it terms illegal migration, in particular those who cross the English Channel with the aim of claiming asylum in the UK. Last year, it introduced a policy of transferring asylum seekers to Rwanda for their claim to be settled there, though as yet that policy is still the subject of litigation in the courts.

This week the Commons has passed legislation that would bar those who enter the UK via an unauthorized route from being able to seek asylum. Meanwhile, at the beginning of this year the Prime Minister made stop the boats one of his governments five key targets, whose achievement, he hopes, will improve his partys poor position in the opinion polls.

But is such a policy likely to be electorally effective? Even if the government does succeed in stopping the boats from crossing the English Channel, would that achievement be likely to help the Conservatives at the ballot box? We address this question using data collected as part the latest Brexit tracker poll by Redfield and Wilton Strategies for UK in a Changing Europe.

There is certainly little sign in the latest poll that the governments renewed emphasis on the issue has persuaded people that illegal immigration is being reduced. One question that Redfield & Wilton have asked regularly since February last year reads as follows:

In your opinion, has the level of illegal immigration into the United Kingdom gone up, gone down, or not changed much since the UKs departure from the European Union?

As the table below shows, during the last year consistently more than two in five voters took the view that illegal immigration has gone up since the UK left the EU. However, the figure edged closer towards a half in late 2022 and then rose by ten points to 56% shortly before Christmas an increase fuelled perhaps by media reports that the number of migrants crossing the Channel was heading for a record annual total.

The proportion who believe that illegal immigration has gone up did fall back to below a half in February, not long after Mr Sunak promised to stop the boats, but it has now moved above the 50% mark again. It may be early days, but so far, at least, the governments promises of action have not persuaded voters that anything has changed in practice.

Table: Perceptions of the level of illegal immigration since the UK left the EU, February 2022 April 2023

Source: Redfield & Wilton

Of course, voters may not necessarily blame Brexit itself for the perceived increase in illegal immigration. However, many do. In the two polls it has conducted this year, Redfield and Wilton have also asked:

In your opinion, with the United Kingdom outside of the European Union, is illegal immigration into the United Kingdom higher, lower, or similar to what it would be otherwise?

In the latest poll as many as 46% say that illegal immigration is higher than it would otherwise be because of Brexit, slightly up on the 42% who took that view in February. Only 10% believe it is lower.

These numbers suggest the government is being entirely rational in trying to reduce the flow of migrants across the Channel. Given the attention the issue has attracted, many voters have evidently noticed an increase in numbers. Moreover, this is particularly true of those who voted Conservative in 2019, 61% of whom believe that illegal immigration is higher than it was before the UK left the EU, compared with 53% among voters as a whole though only 44% of 2019 Conservative voters hold Brexit responsible.

However, if this issue has been costing the Conservatives votes, we would expect those 2019 Conservative voters who think that illegal immigration has increased to be less likely than those who do not share that view to say they would back the party again. But of such a pattern there is little sign.

True, only 54% of those 2019 Conservative voters who think that illegal immigration has increased since Brexit currently say that they would Conservative again at another election. But the figure is, if anything, even lower among those who say that illegal immigration has either fallen or that it has not changed much (49%). Meanwhile, at 49%, the level of continued loyalty among 2019 Conservatives who think that Brexit has resulted in higher illegal immigration is only marginally below that among those who think leaving the EU has either not made much difference or that it has occasioned a reduction in illegal immigration (56%).

If voters are not defecting from the Conservatives because of the level of illegal immigration, then it is doubtful they will be won back if the boats are indeed stopped. Meanwhile, the lack of any clear association between perceptions of what has happened to illegal immigration and willingness to vote Conservative again stands in marked contrast to the results of a similar analysis of voters perceptions of the overall impact of Brexit.

Only 43% of those 2019 Conservative voters who think that Brexit has had a negative impact on the UK (and one in four Conservatives feel that way) are currently minded to vote Conservative again compared with as many as 65% of those who believe leaving the EU has had a positive impact. Similarly, just 40% of those 2019 Conservative voters who say that the UK economy is weaker than it would be otherwise as a result of Brexit (one in three fall into that camp) are currently saying they will vote for the party again, well below the 68% figure among those who believe the economy is stronger.

Reducing the flow of migrants across the English Channel may be popular among the Conservative faithful. However, it is less clear that it will be effective at bringing less loyal supporters back into the Tory camp. To achieve that, Mr Sunak might find it more profitable to persuade more voters of the benefits of Brexit. After all, that is the prospect the party offered voters in 2019 when it promised to get Brexit done.

ByJohn Curtice, Senior Fellow, UK in a Changing Europe, Senior Research Fellow, National Centre for Social Research, and Professor of Politics, University of Strathclyde.

This blog is also posted on theWhat UK Thinkswebsite.

Excerpt from:
Chasing shadows from the sea? The electoral politics of illegal ... - UK in a Changing Europe

Dems Introduce Bill to Help LGBTQ Illegal Immigrants Avoid Detention – FOX News Radio

Democrats introduce a bill to prevent LGBTQ illegal immigrants from being held in custody and no- this is not a joke.

Im Tomi Lahren, more next.

Youve heard the expression where theres a will, theres a way, well for Democrats its more like, if theres any way they can speed up and exacerbate the crisis of illegals invading this country, theyll do it and theyll do it with a smile!

So heres a new one for ya, Democrats in the House and Senate introduced a new bill to give a free pass to..basically every Tom, Dick, Harry and Jose that comes across our border, illegally.

Its called the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act and yes, I too just threw up in my mouth a little bit.

This bill would make it harder to hold illegals in custody if they fall into what liberals deem a vulnerable category such as being gay, lesbian or transgender or those who dont speak English.

Theyve done it folks, Democrats have combined their two favorite things: illegal immigration and gay issues into one package thats sure to make the illegal immigration crisis even worse.

Im Tomi Lahren and you watch my show Tomi Lahren is Fearless at Outkick.com

Excerpt from:
Dems Introduce Bill to Help LGBTQ Illegal Immigrants Avoid Detention - FOX News Radio

Smugglers on the Border – Immigration Blog

A strange and destructive thing is happening at the border. The federal government is quietly abetting human smuggling, setting off an unprecedented wave of migration.

In just over two years, the Biden administration has released more than two million illegal aliens into the United States. Another 1.3 million have entered by evading the Border Patrol. Millions more are en route. Nearly all are exploited by the cartels, which control the smuggling routes and have grown large and powerful enough to challenge governments. Some of the migrants are trafficked, assaulted, abandoned, even tortured to death. It is a deepening crisis with serious social, economic, fiscal, and political implications. But first it is a humanitarian disaster, enabled by a federal government whose primary task is to prevent such things.

The Center has extensively covered this ongoing crisis, explaining in great detail the decisions made by the administration that triggered the record surge in migration and its subsequent reactions to the surge that have made the situation worse.

The explanation for these decisions is complex. Crudely simplified, those in charge are driven by an aversion to any policy enacted by the Trump administration. Undergirding this sentiment is a growing conviction that any restriction on immigration is immoral, an idea that has taken years to germinate and is far more entrenched than mere political disagreement. It is a disturbing and revolutionary idea that threatens the stability of the nation itself. And it is now embraced by a significant number of academics and politicians, particularly on the left, including many in the administration.

Given the radical nature and general unpopularity of such a position, the unquestioned right to come to the United States is being recognized under the guise of establishing a humane, orderly, and safe immigration system. By broadening the definition of asylum and the widespread use of parole, for example, the administration is maintaining the illusion of order while releasing millions of illegal migrants into the country.

The architects of these policies seem unfazed by the human suffering that has ensued. For example, the administration has lost contact with 85,000 children who recently crossed the border unaccompanied. Only about 37 percent of unaccompanied children are reunited with a parent and many end up working in dangerous jobs that violate child labor laws. Despite the scope and severity of this problem, the White House has ignored repeated warnings.

Just last week, my colleague Jessica Vaughan testified at a congressional hearing on the surge of unaccompanied children. At that hearing, Department of Health and Human Services whistleblower Tara Lee Rodas revealed how the federal government has become the middleman in a vile multibillion-dollar trafficking operation. She told the committee that migrant children are being sold for sex and into debt bondage. She said there are apartment buildings where 20, 30, or 40 children are released and people who are simultaneously sponsoring children from multiple refugee sites using different addresses. She talked of enslaved Guatemalan children who can only speak Mayan dialects, unable to cry for help in Spanish or English. She pleaded for Congress to intervene.

For the current administration, it seems that the alienation and exploitation of tens of thousands of children is an acceptable trade-off for unrestricted immigration.

We saw glimpses of this mentality in action on our recent border tour. During an early morning visit to where the border wall ends in Yuma, on the edge of the Cocopah Reservation, we witnessed migrants from all over the world enter from Mexico and line up along the wall. Roughly 90 percent of the migrants that cross there are coming from countries other than Mexico. Piles of trash, including discarded passports and personal items, filled a gully just across the border. Every night hundreds, sometimes even thousands, arrive at that spot, bused on the Mexican side by smugglers who instruct them to head straight to the Border Patrol. American buses then take the migrants to a CBP tent facility, where they are fed and cared for. Most are promptly released into the United States, few questions asked. The juxtaposition of the orderly procession around the wall, erected just a few years ago, into the waiting buses prompted one of our guests to exclaim, Our country is having a nervous breakdown!

Behind the veneer of order lies chaos. At capacity, the Yuma tent facility costs more than a million dollars a day to operate. The local hospital has provided $20 million in uncompensated care to migrants in just the last few months. The produce industry in Yuma, which provides nearly all of the lettuce consumed in the United States and Canada in the winter months, has been forced to implement time consuming and expensive measures to prevent E. coli contamination, which is at an elevated risk due to the steady stream of migrants that hike through the lettuce fields, sometimes relieving themselves. And then there is the drug trafficking, which has become easier to do since Border Patrol agents are now busy greeting migrants. Jonathan Lines, a Yuma county supervisor, told us that every family in the area knows someone who has been harmed by fentanyl. The tragedies of the opioid epidemic are mounting.

To the west, San Diego Sector Chief Aaron Heitke told us that his agents are now apprehending around 1,000 migrants a day, sometimes in groups of 200 or 300. Each migrant pays a smuggling fee of $8,000 to $10,000 to get through on land or $10,000 to $15,000 to enter by boat via the Pacific. Every inch of the border is controlled by the cartels, and crossers who do not pay are severely punished. Border Patrol agents often care for migrants in desperate situations and sometimes even deliver babies. This year they have already seen 157 nationalities. Heitke said that when they release a migrant from a given country into the United States, a lot more people from that country start arriving. He also told us that his agents have seized 1,000 pounds of fentanyl in the last two months.

Just south of the border, in the Mexican city of Mexicali, we visited three bustling migrant shelters filled with people from all over the world who have responded to Bidens La Invitacion. Unlike shelters we visited on previous trips, the three in Mexicali are not run by Christian churches and are at least loosely affiliated with the UNs International Office of Migration. One of the shelters lacked a roof and was in extreme disrepair. The man who was in charge, whom we had arranged to meet, was fired before our visit when it was discovered that he was profiting off of smuggling. In another shelter, which was crammed with people, dozens of children came out of their rooms to greet us. What will become of all these migrants is unknown.

The surge, however, is expected to get even bigger as Title 42 is set to expire this month. The public health order that allows expedited removal is still being used to deport a fraction of the migrants who are apprehended. The San Diego Sector, for example, sends back under Title 42 about 25 percent of the migrants they encounter. When that order expires, those deportations will no longer occur. There is a growing queue of migrants stretching deep into Central America, all waiting for the change in policy before they make their way to the United States.

One story from our trip stands out against the chaos and suffering of the surge. Our guide in Mexicali was a young man who migrated illegally to New Jersey as a teenager. After making the decision to leave his family, he was fortunate to find stable foster care and attend high school in the states. After high school, he worked at odd jobs and, for whatever reason, was one of the rare illegal aliens who got noticed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and was deported. Recalling the experience, he told us that he made the decision not to illegally reenter the United States. Instead, he has established himself in Mexicali, enterprising and successfully employed with a family of his own. He explained that so many migrants force their way into the United States in search of the American dream, but often their stories do not have a happy ending. The current policies of our federal government almost ensure that this is so.

Link:
Smugglers on the Border - Immigration Blog

St Albans: Pilot jailed for illegal immigration plot – The Herts Advertiser

Richard Styles, 53, joked "I normally get arrested for drugs, so it's a bit strange" when arrested at Deenethorpe Airfield near Corby, Northamptonshire, in March 2022.

He had just flown his twin-engine plane to the airfield from Belgium, carrying three men and a woman who were all attempting to evade immigration checks.

National Crime Agency investigators found that Styles had worked with Silvano Turchet, 68, a former pilot, to rent asix-seater Piper Seneca airplane for 1,500 from an airfield in Lincolnshire.

Styles flew it to Deenethorpe, where Turchetpaid for it to be stored before it was flown to Belgium on March 23.

Investigators believe the men were in contact with an Albanian known as Tim K who arranged for Styles passengers to meet him in Belgium.

When the plane returned to the UK the next day, an NCA surveillance team was waiting.

The Albanian people were then detained by Northants police officers while they were in a taxi driven by a third man, Vijayakumar Sivakumar. They were later handed to immigration authorities.

READ MORE: Harpenden council candidate made 'extremely offensive' comments about MP

Sivakumar, 43, was also arrested,and phone recordsshowed he had been in contact with 'Tim K' beforethe flight.

Styles has previous convictions for using a plane tosmuggle ecstasy tablets out of Belgium in 2003, and fordropping cannabis into Jersey in the same year whileon the run from the Belgian authorities.

He was sentenced to 12 years in prison in 2006, where he is believed to have met Turchet.

Styles and Turchet were both arrested by theDutch authorities in 2017 in connection with another people smuggling enterprise. Styles would later be convicted in his absence he was already in custody in the UK by the time the case came to trial.

Following their recent plot, Styles, Turchet and Sivakumarwere charged with facilitating a breach of immigration law.

Styles admitted the charge at a hearing on August 8, 2022 and Turchet pleaded guiltyon the first day of his trial, while Sivakumar was found guilty by a jury after a five-day trial at Leicester Crown Court in February 2023.

On April 28 at the same court, a judgesentenced Styles to seven years in prison, Turchet to seven-and-a-half years, and Sivakumar to four-and-a-half years.

Jacque Beer, regional head of investigations at the NCA,said: Styles was a career criminal who previously used his piloting skills to move consignments of drugs around Europe.

"On this occasion he was offering a luxury end to end service, bringing people into the UK using a private plane.

His comments to my officers show that he considered getting arrested nothing more than an occupational hazard.

People smugglers use a range of methods to try and breach UK border controls, and we are determined to do all we can to stop them. Tackling organised immigration crime is a priority for the NCA.

While this type of crime is rare, we would appeal to the aviation and local community to help us prevent it.

"Whether you work in the aviation industry, are a keen pilot, or live locally, you should report any unusual or suspicious activity at a UK airfield or airport immediately.

Read more:
St Albans: Pilot jailed for illegal immigration plot - The Herts Advertiser